General Ohio University Discussion/Alumni Events Topic
Topic: Governor Kasich Faux Pas
Page: 5 of 6
mail
person
Kevin Finnegan
4/12/2016 5:09 PM
http://www.newsnet5.com/news/state/john-kasich-on-refusin...

Maybe condemned is strong language, but he mentioned that he wouldn't have signed it and thinks that the Mississippi law is out of line.
mail
person
Ohio69
4/13/2016 2:12 PM
finnOhio wrote:expand_more
http://www.newsnet5.com/news/state/john-kasich-on-refusin...

Maybe condemned is strong language, but he mentioned that he wouldn't have signed it and thinks that the Mississippi law is out of line.
Well, I'd consider a "what the hell are we doing in this country" a condemnation. Good for him.

Kasich is starting to get well positioned for 2020.
mail
person
rpbobcat
4/14/2016 9:34 AM
Saw this on another board this morning.

One of the people who pushed for Bruce to cancel his NC concert (Mr.Burgard), and started a petition for it, was quoted as saying:
(I'm paraphrasing)
Mr. Springsteen,like every business person, has the right to deny services where and when it violates their beliefs.

Wonder how that foot tastes ?
mail
person
Alan Swank
4/14/2016 1:10 PM
rpbobcat wrote:expand_more
Saw this on another board this morning.

One of the people who pushed for Bruce to cancel his NC concert (Mr.Burgard), and started a petition for it, was quoted as saying:
(I'm paraphrasing)
Mr. Springsteen,like every business person, has the right to deny services where and when it violates their beliefs.

Wonder how that foot tastes ?
https://www.change.org/p/the-people-support-bruce-springs...
mail
person
rpbobcat
4/14/2016 2:03 PM
Alan Swank wrote:expand_more
Saw this on another board this morning.

One of the people who pushed for Bruce to cancel his NC concert (Mr.Burgard), and started a petition for it, was quoted as saying:
(I'm paraphrasing)
Mr. Springsteen,like every business person, has the right to deny services where and when it violates their beliefs.

Wonder how that foot tastes ?
https://www.change.org/p/the-people-support-bruce-springs...

According to the petition,Bruce has the right not to do business with people he disagrees with.
I wonder if he thinks that same "right" should apply to every businessman ?
Last Edited: 4/14/2016 3:08:09 PM by rpbobcat
mail
person
Alan Swank
4/14/2016 3:33 PM
rpbobcat wrote:expand_more
Saw this on another board this morning.

One of the people who pushed for Bruce to cancel his NC concert (Mr.Burgard), and started a petition for it, was quoted as saying:
(I'm paraphrasing)
Mr. Springsteen,like every business person, has the right to deny services where and when it violates their beliefs.

Wonder how that foot tastes ?
https://www.change.org/p/the-people-support-bruce-springs...

According to the petition,Bruce has the right not to do business with people he disagrees with.
I wonder if he thinks that same "right" should apply to every businessman ?
First of all, Bruce did not start this petition and based on what I can find, has not endorsed it. He is providing refunds for those who bought tickets. As for promoter costs, I can't find that anywhere. If we can close the case on this concert, let's look at the bigger picture going forward.

As an artist, I can choose to work/play wherever I want. Choosing not to work/play in a particular state is very different than having a business and refusing to serve customers in a store based on some criteria that one finds offensive. As an artist, I have no obligation to schedule a show in a particular place. A store already exists and by law cannot discriminate based on certain criteria. There is a difference in the two cases - a show that might happen and a store that exists.
mail
person
Robert Fox
4/14/2016 4:48 PM
Alan Swank wrote:expand_more
First of all, Bruce did not start this petition and based on what I can find, has not endorsed it. He is providing refunds for those who bought tickets. As for promoter costs, I can't find that anywhere. If we can close the case on this concert, let's look at the bigger picture going forward.

As an artist, I can choose to work/play wherever I want. Choosing not to work/play in a particular state is very different than having a business and refusing to serve customers in a store based on some criteria that one finds offensive. As an artist, I have no obligation to schedule a show in a particular place. A store already exists and by law cannot discriminate based on certain criteria. There is a difference in the two cases - a show that might happen and a store that exists.
RP's analogy illustrates the danger of manipulating societal norms by way of fiat. The way I see it, it's often better to expose people to new norms, let them grow into those norms, and eventually accept those norms at their own pace. This is especially true when dealing with questions of morality. Societal acceptance of new ideas happens at a varied rate, from early adopters to laggards. Let the laggards catch on without so quickly resorting to lawsuits and violence. I don't know why guys like Springsteen and Bryan Adams make this so polarizing. They're in perfect position to advocate if they choose to do so. And if they're interested, they can advocate and be respectful of differing opinions at the same time.
mail
person
Alan Swank
4/14/2016 5:43 PM
Robert Fox wrote:expand_more
First of all, Bruce did not start this petition and based on what I can find, has not endorsed it. He is providing refunds for those who bought tickets. As for promoter costs, I can't find that anywhere. If we can close the case on this concert, let's look at the bigger picture going forward.

As an artist, I can choose to work/play wherever I want. Choosing not to work/play in a particular state is very different than having a business and refusing to serve customers in a store based on some criteria that one finds offensive. As an artist, I have no obligation to schedule a show in a particular place. A store already exists and by law cannot discriminate based on certain criteria. There is a difference in the two cases - a show that might happen and a store that exists.
RP's analogy illustrates the danger of manipulating societal norms by way of fiat. The way I see it, it's often better to expose people to new norms, let them grow into those norms, and eventually accept those norms at their own pace. This is especially true when dealing with questions of morality. Societal acceptance of new ideas happens at a varied rate, from early adopters to laggards. Let the laggards catch on without so quickly resorting to lawsuits and violence. I don't know why guys like Springsteen and Bryan Adams make this so polarizing. They're in perfect position to advocate if they choose to do so. And if they're interested, they can advocate and be respectful of differing opinions at the same time.
Since the late 50's and perhaps before (I haven't studied much on it before that), musicians such as Joan Baez, Peter, Paul and Mary, Harry Belefonte and Harry Chapin have pushed the envelope on everything from civil rights to world hunger. Not only were they early adopters but they were movement makers. Sports figures have been reluctant to do that. LeBron James is an exception. I remember going to a CSN&Y show at Polaris not too many years ago and some people walked out when Neil played a few of his songs. My wife and I looked at each other and said, "what did they expect, it's CSN&Y." Personally I'm glad that Bruce acted on something I've quoted him as saying before, "do something."
mail
person
rpbobcat
4/14/2016 5:51 PM
Alan Swank wrote:expand_more
Saw this on another board this morning.

One of the people who pushed for Bruce to cancel his NC concert (Mr.Burgard), and started a petition for it, was quoted as saying:
(I'm paraphrasing)
Mr. Springsteen,like every business person, has the right to deny services where and when it violates their beliefs.

Wonder how that foot tastes ?
https://www.change.org/p/the-people-support-bruce-springs...

According to the petition,Bruce has the right not to do business with people he disagrees with.
I wonder if he thinks that same "right" should apply to every businessman ?
First of all, Bruce did not start this petition and based on what I can find, has not endorsed it. He is providing refunds for those who bought tickets. As for promoter costs, I can't find that anywhere. If we can close the case on this concert, let's look at the bigger picture going forward.

As an artist, I can choose to work/play wherever I want. Choosing not to work/play in a particular state is very different than having a business and refusing to serve customers in a store based on some criteria that one finds offensive. As an artist, I have no obligation to schedule a show in a particular place. A store already exists and by law cannot discriminate based on certain criteria. There is a difference in the two cases - a show that might happen and a store that exists.
Guess I wasn't clear.
My comments dealt strictly with the language used in the petition.
I showed it to several of my friends who support Bruce 100% on canceling the show.
They couldn't believe how hypocritical the petition comes across.
Last Edited: 4/14/2016 5:56:19 PM by rpbobcat
mail
person
bobcatsquared
4/14/2016 7:27 PM
Alan Swank wrote:expand_more
Personally I'm glad that Bruce acted on something I've quoted him as saying before, "do something."

Not bad, Mr. Swank. How about this one: "Nobody wins unless everybody wins."
mail
person
bobcatsquared
4/14/2016 7:33 PM
Speaking of Springsteen and knowing there are more than one sportswriter among BA posters (former sportswriter, myself) makes me wonder if those sports hacks/Bobcat fans are also fans of the Boss like others in this link:

http://www.kansascity.com/entertainment/article70089727.html

Interestingly, Todd Jones' of the Columbus Dispatch mentioned in this article that his first Bruce concert was in 1981 in Cincy, which happens to be my first Bruce concert as well. I remember driving from Athens to Cincy, then back that night, before classes the next day. It was the second show of the River Tour. The E St. Band is touring this year behind the re-release of the River album and my daughter and I saw him Tuesday night in Columbus (wonder if Todd Jones was there). She couldn't believe a 66-year-old man can put on a 3.5 hour show with so much energy, comparing it to a 1.5 hour Taylor Swift show she recently attended.
Last Edited: 4/14/2016 7:40:56 PM by bobcatsquared
mail
DelBobcat
4/21/2016 4:14 PM
rpbobcat wrote:expand_more
Saw this on another board this morning.

One of the people who pushed for Bruce to cancel his NC concert (Mr.Burgard), and started a petition for it, was quoted as saying:
(I'm paraphrasing)
Mr. Springsteen,like every business person, has the right to deny services where and when it violates their beliefs.

Wonder how that foot tastes ?
https://www.change.org/p/the-people-support-bruce-springs...

According to the petition,Bruce has the right not to do business with people he disagrees with.
I wonder if he thinks that same "right" should apply to every businessman ?
First of all, Bruce did not start this petition and based on what I can find, has not endorsed it. He is providing refunds for those who bought tickets. As for promoter costs, I can't find that anywhere. If we can close the case on this concert, let's look at the bigger picture going forward.

As an artist, I can choose to work/play wherever I want. Choosing not to work/play in a particular state is very different than having a business and refusing to serve customers in a store based on some criteria that one finds offensive. As an artist, I have no obligation to schedule a show in a particular place. A store already exists and by law cannot discriminate based on certain criteria. There is a difference in the two cases - a show that might happen and a store that exists.
Guess I wasn't clear.
My comments dealt strictly with the language used in the petition.
I showed it to several of my friends who support Bruce 100% on canceling the show.
They couldn't believe how hypocritical the petition comes across.
The guy that started that position did not push for Bruce to cancel his show. He is upset about Bruce cancelling the show and the petition is SATIRE. He is trying to paint Bruce as a hypocrite, and lacks the mental complexity to distinguish between Bruce's actions and discriminatory actions of others.

That is so blatantly obvious that I'm shocked that you wouldn't realize it. If you need proof, here is an article the guy wrote:

http://constitution.com/support-bruce-springsteens-right-... /
Last Edited: 4/21/2016 4:15:38 PM by DelBobcat
mail
person
Robert Fox
4/21/2016 4:54 PM
DelBobcat wrote:expand_more
...and lacks the mental complexity to distinguish between Bruce's actions and discriminatory actions of others.

That is so blatantly obvious that I'm shocked that you wouldn't realize it.
Oh please. Get over yourself.
mail
person
rpbobcat
4/22/2016 7:18 AM
DelBobcat wrote:expand_more
Saw this on another board this morning.

One of the people who pushed for Bruce to cancel his NC concert (Mr.Burgard), and started a petition for it, was quoted as saying:
(I'm paraphrasing)
Mr. Springsteen,like every business person, has the right to deny services where and when it violates their beliefs.

Wonder how that foot tastes ?
https://www.change.org/p/the-people-support-bruce-springs...

According to the petition,Bruce has the right not to do business with people he disagrees with.
I wonder if he thinks that same "right" should apply to every businessman ?
First of all, Bruce did not start this petition and based on what I can find, has not endorsed it. He is providing refunds for those who bought tickets. As for promoter costs, I can't find that anywhere. If we can close the case on this concert, let's look at the bigger picture going forward.

As an artist, I can choose to work/play wherever I want. Choosing not to work/play in a particular state is very different than having a business and refusing to serve customers in a store based on some criteria that one finds offensive. As an artist, I have no obligation to schedule a show in a particular place. A store already exists and by law cannot discriminate based on certain criteria. There is a difference in the two cases - a show that might happen and a store that exists.
Guess I wasn't clear.
My comments dealt strictly with the language used in the petition.
I showed it to several of my friends who support Bruce 100% on canceling the show.
They couldn't believe how hypocritical the petition comes across.
The guy that started that position did not push for Bruce to cancel his show. He is upset about Bruce cancelling the show and the petition is SATIRE. He is trying to paint Bruce as a hypocrite, and lacks the mental complexity to distinguish between Bruce's actions and discriminatory actions of others.

That is so blatantly obvious that I'm shocked that you wouldn't realize it. If you need proof, here is an article the guy wrote:

http://constitution.com/support-bruce-springsteens-right-... /
As I said previously,I found out about the petition on another site.

The person who posted the comment about the petition was against the NC Law and 100% in favor of Bruce canceling the show.

I had no reason to think that the petition wasn't "on the level" given the fact that it was brought up by a supporter of canceling the show and mirrors the posts from a number of Bruce's fans.
mail
person
cc-cat
4/22/2016 4:48 PM
finnOhio wrote:expand_more
Since this thread started off about Governor Kasich and delved into the NC law, of course he had to bring it full-circle. His condemnation of these laws is very interesting.

I know earlier in the thread, the discussion was on his sincerity. It feels like he's speaking straight from the heart and is avoiding bombastic claims. I disagree with him on many social and fiscal issues, but I genuinely get the feeling that what he feels is because he thinks it's in the best interest of our country. I get the impression he could be a good leader. He doesn't seem to be looking to put on a show or grab headlines, he just wants to jumpstart many national discussions.

Similarly, on the topic of level-headedness and conversation-building, thank you CC Cat for your posts. I can honestly say that I learned a lot from your posts and felt that you did it without truly planting a stake in the ground. Are you the same one who once posted at length about branding? If so, I think I could read your writing everyday. You're quite thoughtful in your words and stop and make me think. Thanks for that.
Just a quick update - though this issue has now exploded nationally. The Governor's executive order was a token gesture - and called out upon by most. Shame the "bathroom" issue has become the distraction to the overall discrimination issue.

Yes, I was the brand guy - I get long winded sometimes. Only Finn I know from Ohio was Chris - class of 83 - relative?
mail
person
Monroe Slavin
4/28/2016 1:28 AM
Agree with OCF that the governments should not pay for the party (Repub, Democrat, etc.) elections.

My understanding is that Kasich balanced the Ohio state budget by taking money from cities, to the cities significant detriment. Lousy.

C'mon anyone who thinks Repub/extreme conservative efforts such as in NC are anything but assertion of the right of a business offering services to the public to discriminatorily choose who it does business with is either willfully blind/ignorant or not very perceptive. It's the same way that Southerners asserted "states rights" as a way to keep discriminating against blacks. You can put a coat on it but you can't hide the smell.

RFox, over-the-edge conservative, wants society to proceed at a pace that gently changes social norms. Yeah, keep on denying the vote to blacks and women and separate but equal etc until the time is right centuries from now. No heed to doing what is right and moral by treating people equally irrespective of race, religion, sex, etc. I'm sure you'd feel the same way if you were on the minority end of that.

RFox--there are differing opinions...and there is blatant moral failure to allow equal rights. And they are in no way equivalent.

OCF weird argument about how suppressing vote by requiring ID now is not tantamount to tactics suppressing black voting over the years. Huh?

Springsteen choosing not to perform in NC is about equal to a merchant of a public business being able to choose who he serves/doesn't serve--seriously?



The Dem candidates are reasonably moderate. The Repub candidates are extreme. Still waiting for 1) the huge Repub/conservative wave that is going to easily sweep out the Dems and 2) the obvious coming indictment of Hillary for illegalities.

These things may yet come. But I think that a reasonably objective person would have rolled his or her eyes at these expectation at all points in time.

Dems don't do a good job of framing their msgs. Repubs do a much better job of that. But Repubs get so lost in their own echo chamber that they can't see a reasonable representation of the truth.

Now, we're havin' some fun.
mail
person
rpbobcat
4/28/2016 7:02 AM
Monroe Slavin wrote:expand_more
Agree with OCF that the governments should not pay for the party (Repub, Democrat, etc.) elections.

My understanding is that Kasich balanced the Ohio state budget by taking money from cities, to the cities significant detriment. Lousy.

C'mon anyone who thinks Repub/extreme conservative efforts such as in NC are anything but assertion of the right of a business offering services to the public to discriminatorily choose who it does business with is either willfully blind/ignorant or not very perceptive. It's the same way that Southerners asserted "states rights" as a way to keep discriminating against blacks. You can put a coat on it but you can't hide the smell.

RFox, over-the-edge conservative, wants society to proceed at a pace that gently changes social norms. Yeah, keep on denying the vote to blacks and women and separate but equal etc until the time is right centuries from now. No heed to doing what is right and moral by treating people equally irrespective of race, religion, sex, etc. I'm sure you'd feel the same way if you were on the minority end of that.

RFox--there are differing opinions...and there is blatant moral failure to allow equal rights. And they are in no way equivalent.

OCF weird argument about how suppressing vote by requiring ID now is not tantamount to tactics suppressing black voting over the years. Huh?

Springsteen choosing not to perform in NC is about equal to a merchant of a public business being able to choose who he serves/doesn't serve--seriously?



The Dem candidates are reasonably moderate. The Repub candidates are extreme. Still waiting for 1) the huge Repub/conservative wave that is going to easily sweep out the Dems and 2) the obvious coming indictment of Hillary for illegalities.

These things may yet come. But I think that a reasonably objective person would have rolled his or her eyes at these expectation at all points in time.

Dems don't do a good job of framing their msgs. Repubs do a much better job of that. But Repubs get so lost in their own echo chamber that they can't see a reasonable representation of the truth.

Now, we're havin' some fun.
Lets see.
When I go to a bank branch that doesn't know me and want to cash a check,I need to show a photo I.D.
I want to order tickets to a braodway show on line.I'm told to pick up the tickets I need to show the credit card I used and a photo I.D.
When I fly I need to show a photo I.D.

But requiring an I.D. to vote,even when its offered for free, is surpessing someone's right to vote.
Come on.

The Democratic candidates are "reasonably moderate".
That's like saying Antartica is "chilly".
Last Edited: 4/28/2016 7:03:15 AM by rpbobcat
mail
person
Taiwan BC
4/28/2016 8:36 AM
On a lighter note, anyone catch Cruz's basketball boo-boo while speaking in Indiana? Called a basketball hoop a "ring". NY pizza vs Indiana hoops misstep... Which one will/cost more votes?
mail
person
Kevin Finnegan
4/28/2016 10:13 AM
Taiwan BC wrote:expand_more
On a lighter note, anyone catch Cruz's basketball boo-boo while speaking in Indiana? Called a basketball hoop a "ring". NY pizza vs Indiana hoops misstep... Which one will/cost more votes?
Reminds me of when Ted Kennedy talked about Sammy Sooser and Mike McGwire during the big home run race of 1998. It often seems awkward when politicians try to relate with us common folks with sports references. I'd give GW Bush and Obama passes though, they truly seem to know and love sports.

I'm going to guess that Cruz has never played rings...
mail
person
rpbobcat
4/28/2016 12:24 PM
And during his presidential run,John Kerry praised "Buckeye football" when he was giving a speech in Michigan.
mail
person
Monroe Slavin
5/1/2016 11:45 AM
Repub = angry.

We should football recruit them.
mail
Andrew Ruck
5/10/2016 8:31 AM
BillyTheCat wrote:expand_more
The FBI primary is a joke, just like the Cubs for the past 108 years.
Cheap shot.
mail
person
bobcatsquared
7/22/2016 7:50 AM
Springsteen and the NBA, the most progressive of the four major sports leagues in our country, will come out on the right side of history concerning this issue.
mail
person
rpbobcat
7/22/2016 10:57 AM
bobcatsquared wrote:expand_more
Springsteen and the NBA, the most progressive of the four major sports leagues in our country, will come out on the right side of history concerning this issue.
Let me preface this by saying I'm a big fan of Bruce's music.I've seen him in concert well over 70 times and will be seeing him again this summer.

When it came to his cancelling his North Carolina concert I believe he was wrong and hypocritical.

1.He cancelled 2 days before the show.Some fans were already in route when they found out.
Other fans lost the money for the flights and hotels they booked.

2.Besides his fans,the people he impacted most were the "little people" like the arena staff,vendors etc. The ones he touts in his Public Service Announcements (PSA's) during his shows.

3.Bruce has/does play places like Australia,Germany and Italy that are much less LGBT friendly then North Carolina.

I feel Bruce should have done the concert and made a PSA about the law.
Last Edited: 7/22/2016 10:57:48 AM by rpbobcat
mail
person
Monroe Slavin
7/22/2016 8:56 PM
Do not blame Bruce for reacting to quickly arising politics.

Blame the wondrously open-minded NC legislature.
Showing Messages: 101 - 125 of 128
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)