Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame
11/11/2021 8:33 PM
The MAC is the worst conference in FCS. That schools -- even those that are facing uncertainty in Conference USA -- aren't beating down the doors to join isn't a surprise.
I know you love to be Negative Nancy, but we are FBS not FCS, and C-USA 2.0 is by far the worst FBS Conference. And, WKU was literally beating down the doors to get into the MAC. They are a very solid program in both football and basketball, and actually have a Final Four appearance back in the 1970s.
Oops, sorry -- typo on the FCS vs. FBS.
As to your response, you're basically saying that the worst conference in the country is one that doesn't currently exist. Which means that the only argument you can make in which we are not currently in the worst conference in the country is to fast forward to a time in which that's no longer true. So, you know, I guess "Negative Nancy" happens to correspond with "very obviously right" in this case.
I'm actually not even convinced that it's a foregone conclusion that the new Conference USA is worse than the MAC. I think it's a worse situation for certain members, because of the travel, but it's far from certain that it's worse conference in terms of team quality. Either way, we're debating degrees and the fundamental truth here is that we're in one of the worst conferences in our subdivision. That's not a position of strength.
We're not good at Football and we participate at the lowest level in our subdivision. I know you don't like acknowledging that. But it's the reality and as the landscape of college sports shifts -- which it's doing rapidly -- we should be willing and able to call a spade a spade and have a rational conversation about where we stand as a program.
But, you know, WKU went to the final four in the 70s. So that's exciting.
Even C-USA this year, before all the sh** hit the fan, was not as good as the MAC. Compare any win a C-USA team had with MAC wins over B1G West-contender Minnesota, Georgia Tech and ACC-contender Pittsburg. We are not as bad at football as you would have us believe. And, the MAC in the last decade has played in to two New Year's Day bowls as the highest ranked G5 school. I may be wrong, as I haven't look it up, but I don't think C-USA has even one representative in a NYD bowl. I do remember that Marshall almost made it, save for a trouncing by WKU late in the season. I was bummed about that because my wife was going to buy plane and game tickets for me as a present.
According to RPI, the MAC is indeed worse than Conference USA:
http://realtimerpi.com/college_football/ncaaf_conf_Men.html That's not the be all end all, of course. But given that this conversation is about how attractive the MAC is as a landing spot for football, the fact that my assertion that we're the worst conference is being met with "no, actually I think we are second worse" doesn't actually change the over-arching point I'm making in any way.
We compete at a low level in our subdivision. It might be the lowest level. It might be the second latest level. Either way, it's not a very attractive offering.
Further, that there have been like 18 rounds of conference realignment, and the MAC remains untouched while Conference USA gets raided again and again says something about how the two conferences are perceived. Maybe, after three rounds of other conferences stealing their top programs, Conference USA will end up worse than the MAC. Is that a victory? Does it put us any closer to being, you know, actually eligible for a national championship?
We dump stupid amounts of money into a race we lost decades ago. The only championship we're eligible for is a conference championship, which exists at any level. Our TV deal doesn't cover the cost of our coaching staff.
I just truly fail to see the point of trying to maintain a level of football that has no interest in reciprocating any of the investment we put into it. And the divide that already exists is deepening. And we're scrambling to split up our small pie amongst more mouths. Why?