Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame
10/10/2022 1:33 PM
During the first years of the Solich era, I saw a tie between him and Rod McDavis as to whom was bringing the most to the university.
I don't know enough about these things to say with any certainty, but this take definitely surprises me. How would we quantify what Solich brought to the University?
As you can see, I said at the beginning of that post that folks might disagree with my take. How to quantify what Solich brought? My first thought was a significant increase in visibility for the university. His first home game as coach: National TV coverage of an OT win over Pitt before a packed Peden. In the ensuing years more such coverage and more visibility. I tend to think that some alums who hadn't opened their wallets started doing so. And some who had been opening them opened wider or more often.
Agree or disagree?
I'm not sure I have enough info to agree or disagree. My inclination's towards disagreeing, but it's really hard to say. For me, the national TV coverage feels separate from Solich's influence. Most of our TV appearances are negotiated by the MAC, or are the result of a deal negotiated by out of conference opponents. I don't know where the Pitt game came from, but suspect it was likely on the schedule before Frank showed up.
That said, if there was data that showed that alumni giving increased post-Frank that would certainly change my thinking. I remember looking not long ago and seeing that OU was well behind a lot of our MAC peers in terms of alumni giving, but that was US News and World Report data and I'm not sure how much weight to give it.
My bias is towards the idea that alumni don't really care about Ohio Football. Student engagement was low when I was in school, we haven't won anything meaningful, and while friends from OU will always suggest meeting when OU in the NCAA Tourny, they've never suggested a trip to Detroit for the MAC Championship game, or a trip to Boise for the Potato Bowl. But again, that's just my bias. The data may show otherwise.