I knew you'd be all over it Mo Jo, hopefully your other OSU boys will chime in too. I consider the media outlet very credible in this instance. This isn't some blog with a college kid behind the keyboard. I'm confident in saying Yahoo Sports isn't publishing a story with months of research behind it unless they have proof it's true. Perhaps they do not wish to reveal their sources. I wasn't a journalism major but I think that's nothing new.
The penalties levied aginst the guilty players and the Cam Newton saga are not related to the new story about Tressel. I don't enitirely agree with the NCAA's decision in either of those cases but that's not what I was discussing in the original post.
Tressel is not the squeaky clean coach that he's made out to be by the faithful.
Here are my thoughts:
I want to see how detailed the report to Tressel was and in what form it came.
I want to see how Tressel responded to the tip, and depending on the above, the response necessary changes according to the tip.
If the tip was vague and through email, then I have no problem with Tressel ignoring it.
Otherwise, it depends on the details of his response.
Did he investigate but not follow proper procedure? If yes, then he should be sanctioned but slapped on the wrist.
Did he hand it over to compliance and forget it? If yes, then I have no problem with his response.
Did he totally ignore it? If yes, then it depends on the reasonableness of that decision, which depends on the details of the tip.
Did he find out about it and cover it all up with hopes it would go away? If yes, he should resign or be fired.
I just think a wait-and-see approach is prudent in this case. Yes, anonymous sources are fairly common. Yet, accusations proven to be untrue, followed by a retraction on the back page, are fairly common also.
Edit: OSU has a press conference at 7pm. Let's see what happens.
Last Edited: 3/8/2011 1:51:33 PM by Mr. Mo Jo Risin