If Pryor had not been involved, you could bet the farm that none of the rest of the players involved would be goin to Nawlins. Pryor IS that team, and without him the Cowtowners have NO chance. Tressell knows it, and that's why they pushed the suspensions to the fall.
No, I have a friend who is a head student manager there and he said that the NCAA stepped in because of the money involved in this game. Ohio State was originally going to sit them out but NCAA wanted people to go to this game so they stepped in and let them play. It wasn't Tressel's call here. Most Columbusers and OSU alum are not pissed about the punishments, they're pissed that the players did this. Many of them actually would have rather seen them sit out the game so it wouldn't be considered tarnished if there was a win.
+1
I agree totally, most OSU fans are more pissed about the players and how the NCAA is letting them play in the bowls versus the actual punishment of sitting 5 games. Now if they win in the Sugar Bowl it will be tainted.
If it was soley up to Tressel all 6 of them aren't playing in the Sugar Bowl. BUT the NCAA wouldn't let them.
And yes, Tressel could sit them for the Bowl game, but then the NCAA will not consider it time served since they said they are eligible for the Bowl game. It's a double edged sword there, sit them for the Bowl game and still serve 5 games the next season? What good comes of sitting them from the bowl game then?
But it has been settled, they are playing in the Bowl game. Tressel allowed the seniors on the team to vote whether they would play or not, and not surprisingly, the seniors voted to let them play.
Greg Doyle had an interesting article on CBSSports website. Really... why not let them play in a meaningless bowl game? It protects the people that paid for tickets and paid for the trip already. The BCS people are going to make money regardless if they played or not. But the people that are going to the game are the ones losing out on the deal.