menu
Logo
Ohio Football Topic
Topic: OT: Tattoo Gate
Page: 13 of 17
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 5/31/2011 5:59 PM
cc cat wrote:expand_more
I personally see the USC and OSU things to be quite different, USC was turning a blind eye while their athletes were getting paid (now the car thing may turn something like that up), but currently the issue is still trading "University owned" merchandise for tatoo's.  The real transgression here lies with the Coach and his Maverick behavior.  As long as they do not point a smoking gun at anyone higher who was privilaged to this information we may not see anything too severe.  However once on campus the NCAA is highly effective at finding things.


This is not about tattoos.  This is about cheating.  Tressel cheated.  Period.  He played players he knew had jeopardized their eligibility.  He played players knowing had the NCAA known what he knew the players would not have been allowed to dress.  This is not about players selling merchandise.  This is about a coach playing players that should have been on the sidelines.  This is about a coach hiding information in order to give his team a better chance on winning.  This is about cheating.  Tressel cheated.  OSU Cheated.  They cheated and they got caught. 


I thought that the school in columbus was allowed to do this with no penalty.

Unless they start losing games.
SBH
General User
SBH
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 4,681
person
mail
SBH
mail
Posted: 5/31/2011 7:06 PM
It appears the equipment manager might be sucked into this investigation now that Pryor has been allegedly trading multiple sets of shoulder pads, helmets and other equipment for tattoos, cash and perhaps other items.  I wonder how carefully equipment is tracked when it leaves the shelves. 
BattleCat
General User
BC
Member Since: 11/21/2007
Post Count: 312
person
mail
BattleCat
mail
Posted: 5/31/2011 8:27 PM
Monroe Slavin wrote:expand_more
I personally see the USC and OSU things to be quite different, USC was turning a blind eye while their athletes were getting paid (now the car thing may turn something like that up), but currently the issue is still trading "University owned" merchandise for tatoo's. The real transgression here lies with the Coach and his Maverick behavior. As long as they do not point a smoking gun at anyone higher who was privilaged to this information we may not see anything too severe. However once on campus the NCAA is highly effective at finding things.


This is not about tattoos. This is about cheating. Tressel cheated. Period. He played players he knew had jeopardized their eligibility. He played players knowing had the NCAA known what he knew the players would not have been allowed to dress. This is not about players selling merchandise. This is about a coach playing players that should have been on the sidelines. This is about a coach hiding information in order to give his team a better chance on winning. This is about cheating. Tressel cheated. OSU Cheated. They cheated and they got caught.


I thought that the school in columbus was allowed to do this with no penalty.

Unless they start losing games.
USC knew there athletes were ineligible as well and played them. What made the kids ineligible is the difference. Both are violations, however, had Tressel shown better judgement and reported what he knew this would be a non-story, 5 games and done, Tressel would have never been suspended, much less fired.

Sorry SBH, no real knowledge on that subject. I know at my work we brass in and brass out with our tools.
JSF
General User
Member Since: 1/29/2005
Location: Houston, TX
Post Count: 6,581
mail
JSF
mail
Posted: 5/31/2011 8:35 PM
cc-cat
General User
C
Member Since: 4/5/2006
Location: matthews, NC
Post Count: 4,016
person
mail
cc-cat
mail
Posted: 5/31/2011 9:05 PM
BattleCat Wrote

"USC knew there athletes were ineligible as well and played them. What made the kids ineligible is the difference. Both are violations, however, had Tressel shown better judgement and reported what he knew this would be a non-story, 5 games and done, Tressel would have never been suspended, much less fired."


Yes, the only difference in the two stories is what the players were ineligible for - which is irrelevant.  Ineligible is ineligible.  USC and Tressel both knew their athletes were ineligible and played them. What made the kids ineligible is the difference. - but irrelevnt.   Both schools violated the rules and played players that should not have been eligible.  They cheated to better their team.  Had Tressel or USC shown better judgement and reported what they knew neither would be a story, 5 games and done in Tressel's case., Tressel would have never been suspended, much less fired.But instead he and Ohio State cheated and now he is gone and OSU is going to be hit with penalties that at least equal those at USC.
Last Edited: 5/31/2011 9:06:48 PM by cc-cat
BattleCat
General User
BC
Member Since: 11/21/2007
Post Count: 312
person
mail
BattleCat
mail
Posted: 5/31/2011 9:29 PM
CC: you are changing the context of my original post. Which is that I see paying players and their families is more erroneous than selling your NCAA swag. This was my point, that the initial acts were more severe at SC. This is evidenced by the penalties brought forth in the initial punishment. Five game suspensions and playing in a Bowl game is a minor penalty The only real thing that has surfaced to this point that is of any seriousness is Tressel's action (or inactions), which in themself is a serious action.
Last Edited: 5/31/2011 9:31:08 PM by BattleCat
OhioCatFan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 15,714
mail
OhioCatFan
mail
Posted: 5/31/2011 10:13 PM
How can anyone read the SI article and not see "loss of institutional control" as a major possibility here?  IF the "facts" as presented in that article are true or even a majority of them, it'll be crystal clear to the NCAA that O$U had a program filled with players who had virtually no guidance and very limited concern for following any rules of any kind.  As I read the article it reminded me of stories I've heard about the shenanigans that went on in the 1890-1920 era when there were hardly and rules to break.  This has the potential of being the biggest college football scandal of the modern era.  I agree with whoever it was that said earlier in this thread that Gene Smith is probably implicated.  It seems to me that he was either knowledgeable about what was going on and was part of the cover up, and should therefore be fired.  Or, he was not knowledgeable about what has happening all around him, and therefore should be fired on the basis of incompetence.  Perhaps, the same should be said for Gordon Gee, but I won't go that far at this juncture.  I will say that the word of the day at Ohio A&M is "CYA"! 

Edit: I just found this story.  It looks like others are thinking along the same lines, too.  Yes, I know BC that this story rehashes a lot of old stuff, but it does have some new information -- or at least new speculation -- in it.   Prez and AD may be on hot seat.  
Last Edited: 5/31/2011 10:29:40 PM by OhioCatFan
BattleCat
General User
BC
Member Since: 11/21/2007
Post Count: 312
person
mail
BattleCat
mail
Posted: 5/31/2011 10:52 PM
OhioCatFan wrote:expand_more
How can anyone read the SI article and not see "loss of institutional control" as a major possibility here? IF the "facts" as presented in that article are true or even a majority of them, it'll be crystal clear to the NCAA that O$U had a program filled with players who had virtually no guidance and very limited concern for following any rules of any kind. As I read the article it reminded me of stories I've heard about the shenanigans that went on in the 1890-1920 era when there were hardly and rules to break. This has the potential of being the biggest college football scandal of the modern era. I agree with whoever it was that said earlier in this thread that Gene Smith is probably implicated. It seems to me that he was either knowledgeable about what was going on and was part of the cover up, and should therefore be fired. Or, he was not knowledgeable about what has happening all around him, and therefore should be fired on the basis of incompetence. Perhaps, the same should be said for Gordon Gee, but I won't go that far at this juncture. I will say that the word of the day at Ohio A&M is "CYA"!

Edit: I just found this story. It looks like others are thinking along the same lines, too. Yes, I know BC that this story rehashes a lot of old stuff, but it does have some new information -- or at least new speculation -- in it. Prez and AD may be on hot seat.
I agree the great perception is lack of control. However, if Tressel had reported this, it would have been handled and done with, and we would be talking about how hot the Indians are, and how Cleveland was finally going to have a champion.
Mike Coleman
Administrator
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Near the Pristine Sandy Shores of Lake Erie, OH
Post Count: 1,999
mail
Mike Coleman
mail
Posted: 5/31/2011 10:55 PM
Pryor making news for the car he's driving and the fact he's driving.

http://www.10tv.com/live/content/local/stories/2011/05/31...
Doc Bobcat
General User
DB
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 4,421
person
mail
Doc Bobcat
mail
Posted: 5/31/2011 11:46 PM
Mike Coleman wrote:expand_more
Pryor making news for the car he's driving and the fact he's driving.

http://www.10tv.com/live/content/local/stories/2011/05/31...


Ooopsey poopsey.
C Money
General User
Member Since: 8/28/2010
Post Count: 3,420
mail
C Money
mail
Posted: 6/1/2011 7:51 AM
Pryor must be deathly allergic to the BMV.
cc-cat
General User
C
Member Since: 4/5/2006
Location: matthews, NC
Post Count: 4,016
person
mail
cc-cat
mail
Posted: 6/1/2011 7:56 AM
BattleCat wrote:expand_more
CC: you are changing the context of my original post. Which is that I see paying players and their families is more erroneous than selling your NCAA swag. This was my point, that the initial acts were more severe at SC. This is evidenced by the penalties brought forth in the initial punishment. Five game suspensions and playing in a Bowl game is a minor penalty The only real thing that has surfaced to this point that is of any seriousness is Tressel's action (or inactions), which in themself is a serious action.


I agree the initial offense at SC is more severe (though as you point out, the car deals will trump the SC situation - more players gaining huge financial benefits).  My point was that SC's penalties are not only because Bush took cash, but because SC (asst coach) knew about it - SC knew about infractions, but let it go to allow an ineligible player to play (cheating).  OSU's ultimate NCAA penalty (of which they have received nothing yet as a result of the the cover-up - lying) will be just as severe - especially if any of the car things are true. AND because the head coach (at the least) was in on it  And to someone's post - this is classic lack of institutional control.  The NCAA penalty is stiff for lying to keep players eligible aka cheating. 
Last Edited: 6/1/2011 7:59:52 AM by cc-cat
Jeff Johnson
General User
JJ
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Post Count: 186
person
mail
Jeff Johnson
mail
Posted: 6/1/2011 9:20 AM
The sad thing about this whole mess (at least for fans and supporters of Ohio State) is that it could have been largely prevented.  If OSU had demanded strict compliance with NCAA rules, and if they had come down harshly on any player, coach, etc., who dared violate such rules, they would still have gotten the best players available simple because they are Ohio State.
rpbobcat
General User
R
Member Since: 4/28/2006
Location: Rochelle Park, NJ
Post Count: 3,664
person
mail
rpbobcat
mail
Posted: 6/1/2011 11:36 AM
Just wondering if there are any rumblings out there in Ohio that the NCAA investigation may also turn up problems with any of O.S.U.'s  other sports programs,especially basketball ?
Bobcat36
General User
Member Since: 1/5/2005
Location: Delaware, OH
Post Count: 1,167
mail
Bobcat36
mail
Posted: 6/1/2011 11:56 AM
There have been mentions in the media of some car deals involving basketball players as well...
Bobcat36
General User
Member Since: 1/5/2005
Location: Delaware, OH
Post Count: 1,167
mail
Bobcat36
mail
Posted: 6/1/2011 12:18 PM
BattleCat wrote:expand_more
How can anyone read the SI article and not see "loss of institutional control" as a major possibility here? IF the "facts" as presented in that article are true or even a majority of them, it'll be crystal clear to the NCAA that O$U had a program filled with players who had virtually no guidance and very limited concern for following any rules of any kind. As I read the article it reminded me of stories I've heard about the shenanigans that went on in the 1890-1920 era when there were hardly and rules to break. This has the potential of being the biggest college football scandal of the modern era. I agree with whoever it was that said earlier in this thread that Gene Smith is probably implicated. It seems to me that he was either knowledgeable about what was going on and was part of the cover up, and should therefore be fired. Or, he was not knowledgeable about what has happening all around him, and therefore should be fired on the basis of incompetence. Perhaps, the same should be said for Gordon Gee, but I won't go that far at this juncture. I will say that the word of the day at Ohio A&M is "CYA"!

Edit: I just found this story. It looks like others are thinking along the same lines, too. Yes, I know BC that this story rehashes a lot of old stuff, but it does have some new information -- or at least new speculation -- in it. Prez and AD may be on hot seat.


I agree the great perception is lack of control. However, if Tressel had reported this, it would have been handled and done with, and we would be talking about how hot the Indians are, and how Cleveland was finally going to have a champion.


To quote Lee Corso..."Not so fast my friend"...

http://aol.sportingnews.com/ncaa-football/feed/2010-12/osu-suspensions/story/car-dealer-osu-compliance-director-called-me-over-50-times

The lies and contradictions continue to pile up...
 
This is way bigger than the Tattoo's...

Gene Smith himself stood in front of the world and said there's no systemic issue...They "self reported" the 5 and apparently just overlooked the other 20 or so that were hanging out in the Tattoo parlor...

Doug Archie can't seem to keep his "facts" straight when discussing his dealings with Kniffin (car salesman)...

Shelly Po (the Tressel hand picked Media Relations person that was brought in from WVU and who is highly regarded with her profession) was replaced so they could further seal off any honesty coming out of their camp...

It's not a "perceived" lack of control...
OhioCatFan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 15,714
mail
OhioCatFan
mail
Posted: 6/1/2011 4:05 PM
What's at least as interesting as the article are the comments after the article from A&M fans.  I'll just say, da Nile is not just a river in Egypt. 
Bobcat36
General User
Member Since: 1/5/2005
Location: Delaware, OH
Post Count: 1,167
mail
Bobcat36
mail
Posted: 6/1/2011 4:10 PM
I know it OCF...

If you think that's good reading though, you should drop in on the Columbus Dispatch some time...I've literally seen threats to columnists...Good times...
BattleCat
General User
BC
Member Since: 11/21/2007
Post Count: 312
person
mail
BattleCat
mail
Posted: 6/3/2011 6:29 AM
Doc Bobcat wrote:expand_more
Pryor making news for the car he's driving and the fact he's driving.

http://www.10tv.com/live/content/local/stories/2011/05/31...


Ooopsey poopsey.
AP report, Pryor's license was reinstated. Looks like channel 10 was in a hurry to break that story, without fact checking.

http://www.rr.com/local/topic/article/rr/4473267/42787381...


Also according to channel 10, one of the players mentioned in the SI Article is suing the magazine for naming him as trading memorabilia for tattoos. Ought to be a fairly simply case, kid has no tattoos, and claims to have all his swag.
Last Edited: 6/3/2011 6:59:46 AM by BattleCat
cc-cat
General User
C
Member Since: 4/5/2006
Location: matthews, NC
Post Count: 4,016
person
mail
cc-cat
mail
Posted: 6/3/2011 9:17 AM
Keep the focus on the athletic department and the administration.  It is their guilt that is going to bring the harsh penalties, not whether every player has tats or not.  e,g, there appears to be agreement  the compliance department referred players to the dealership.  That alone raises ethical questions - why only one dealership?  As FoxSportsNews says you get referred to a dealership for one of two reasons:  great customer service or a great deal.  Not sure the players were swayed by customer service. 
Doc Bobcat
General User
DB
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 4,421
person
mail
Doc Bobcat
mail
Posted: 6/3/2011 9:56 AM
http://www.portclintonnewsherald.com/article/BF/20110602/...

Reserve OSU lber Storm Kleins dad goin after SI....also DT John Simon's family showing their displeasure.
Ohio69
General User
O69
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 3,124
person
mail
Ohio69
mail
Posted: 6/3/2011 12:25 PM
Doc Bobcat wrote:expand_more
http://www.portclintonnewsherald.com/article/BF/20110602/...

Reserve OSU lber Storm Kleins dad goin after SI....also DT John Simon's family showing their displeasure.


I kind of like this.
cc-cat
General User
C
Member Since: 4/5/2006
Location: matthews, NC
Post Count: 4,016
person
mail
cc-cat
mail
Posted: 6/3/2011 1:06 PM
I think Ca's dad said something like that as well - lol.

Old Stormy's innocence will be good for him, but not lessen the guilt of Tressel and OSU.

gotta thank borna for this (sorry - don't know how to load an image)

http://www.bobcatattack.com/messageboard/topic.asp?FromPa...
Last Edited: 6/3/2011 1:08:34 PM by cc-cat
giacomo
General User
G
Member Since: 11/20/2007
Post Count: 2,764
person
mail
giacomo
mail
Posted: 6/3/2011 1:09 PM
As coaches salaries go up, this kind of thing will continue and look like small potatoes. Can you imagine what the players will do when some coach makes 10M a year? How many people watch TV or go to the game to see the coach?
BattleCat
General User
BC
Member Since: 11/21/2007
Post Count: 312
person
mail
BattleCat
mail
Posted: 6/3/2011 1:58 PM
cc cat wrote:expand_more
Keep the focus on the athletic department and the administration. It is their guilt that is going to bring the harsh penalties, not whether every player has tats or not. e,g, there appears to be agreement the compliance department referred players to the dealership. That alone raises ethical questions - why only one dealership? As FoxSportsNews says you get referred to a dealership for one of two reasons: great customer service or a great deal. Not sure the players were swayed by customer service.
Very true, the issue at hand is bad enough without the hack reporting that's tying some names to this that seem to have stayed out of the fray.
Showing Messages: 301 - 325 of 420



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)