Ohio Football Topic
Topic: Early line Marshall -20.5
Page: 3 of 5
herdfan07
General User
H07
Member Since: 9/14/2011
Post Count: 55
person
mail
herdfan07
mail
Posted: 9/10/2014 5:05 PM
Thats fine but the poster came right at me on that like I was preaching it. I have great respect for ohio have been here before the 44-7 slaying that happened to marshall. I've been very realistic and i never predict games. I've worked too long in college football to know not to predict anything.
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 9/10/2014 5:47 PM
Your posts have been fine, and respectful, and raise the impression that others have of Marshall. I think he just confused you with someone else. Thanks for participating in the discussion.
goherd25
General User
G25
Member Since: 5/18/2012
Post Count: 143
person
mail
goherd25
mail
Posted: 9/10/2014 8:02 PM
L.C. wrote:expand_more
...I've never said we were better then UK..so please point where I said that... I also never said miami was good... again point that out.....

Other herd fans have said those things, however. Unfortunately on message boards, it's easy to confuse which fan said what, and I'm sure it was unintentional. Here are some quotes from another Marshall fan:

The point with regard to UK was from this thread:
Are you serious? Yes Marshall is better than Kentucky. Kentucky isnt in any polls that i am aware of. Has never had a bit of attention. There is a reason for that.
...And to the guy who said no evidence about marshall being better than UK.... handicappers are pretty damn good at their predictions. A 16 point dog at UK and 20.5 at marshall says they think we are 4.5 points better than UK.
As for Miami being good, there was a whole other thread, "Maimi is now the MAC East favorite according to Marshall fans":
http://www.bobcatattack.com/messageboard/topic.asp?FromPa...

I stand by the fact that we are better than kentucky. We would wipe the turf with them.
penn2moss
General User
P2
Member Since: 9/10/2012
Post Count: 37
person
mail
penn2moss
mail
Posted: 9/10/2014 8:52 PM
our average margin of victory over the last 9 games at home is like 40. -20 is pretty low.
Brian Smith (No, not that one)
General User
BSNNTO
Member Since: 2/4/2005
Post Count: 3,057
person
mail
Brian Smith (No, not that one)
mail
Posted: 9/10/2014 9:13 PM
Marshall's last nine wins at home have been by an average of 32.4 points per game. Just so we have the actual number at our disposal.
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 9/10/2014 10:42 PM
Delete Pending wrote:expand_more
Marshall's last nine wins at home have been by an average of 32.4 points per game. Just so we have the actual number at our disposal.

Considering that Ohio is likely to be bowl-eligible this year, that isn't very useful data because it includes things like wins over bad teams, and FCS teams. What is their record at home against bowl-eligible teams or FBS teams with a winning record?

Over the last three years, Marshall is 3-4 at home against such teams:
2013 ECU 59-28 win
2013 UTSA 34-10 win (winning record, but not eligible for bowl)
2012 UCF 17-54 loss
2012 Tulsa 38-45 loss
2012 Ohio 24-27 loss
2011 S.Miss 26-20 win
2011 V. Tech 10-30 loss
Average score 29.7 to 30.6
penn2moss
General User
P2
Member Since: 9/10/2012
Post Count: 37
person
mail
penn2moss
mail
Posted: 9/10/2014 11:02 PM
You are going back to 2011? That is real helpful.

We were scary good at home last year. As bad as we beat ECU, we had a punt return TD and other huge plays called back. Was the best game a Herd team has played in a decade.

UTSA has one heck of a FB team and that game was over after the first quarter when we jumped out to a 17-0 lead.

The Herd may lose this year. However, it will not be at home.

This isn't Kent state, we will have 35k there Saturday. It is going to be one heck of an atmosphere.
perimeterpost
General User
Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 3,165
mail
perimeterpost
mail
Posted: 9/10/2014 11:41 PM
Here's a look at Marshall's scoring vs Ohio as compared to other teams on their schedule. Notice that Ohio's defense has held Marshall's offense to significantly less points than their season's average for the last 3 years, and even in the years when Marshall won their point totals were next to lowest of any of their other wins. I'm confident Ohio's defense will continue this trend on Saturday, it will be up to Ohio's offense to score enough to get the W.

2013
61 W
59 W
56 W
55 W
52 W
49 L
48 W
45 W
34 W
31 W
31 L OHIO
24 W
24 L
21 L

2012
59 L
59 W
54 W
52 W
44 W
41 L
38 W
38 L
34 L
31 L
24 L OHIO
17 L

2011
59 W
34 W
28 L
26 W
24 W
23 W
20 W
17 W
17 L
13 L
10 L
07 L OHIO
06 L

2010
38 W
31 W
28 W
28 L
24 W OHIO
21 L
17 L
16 W
16 L
14 L
10 L
07 L

2009
34 W
31 W
31 W
27 W
27 W
21 W OHIO
21 L
20 L
20 L
17 W
17 L
10 L
07 L
goherd25
General User
G25
Member Since: 5/18/2012
Post Count: 143
person
mail
goherd25
mail
Posted: 9/10/2014 11:41 PM
L.C. wrote:expand_more
Marshall's last nine wins at home have been by an average of 32.4 points per game. Just so we have the actual number at our disposal.

Considering that Ohio is likely to be bowl-eligible this year, that isn't very useful data because it includes things like wins over bad teams, and FCS teams. What is their record at home against bowl-eligible teams or FBS teams with a winning record?

Over the last three years, Marshall is 3-4 at home against such teams:
2013 ECU 59-28 win
2013 UTSA 34-10 win (winning record, but not eligible for bowl)
2012 UCF 17-54 loss
2012 Tulsa 38-45 loss
2012 Ohio 24-27 loss
2011 S.Miss 26-20 win
2011 V. Tech 10-30 loss
Average score 29.7 to 30.6
Lol. Everyone has bad teams etc they play at home. It all evens out and is a level playing field. Skew the numbers if you wish but Marshall has a .86 winning pct at home and thats the best in college football.
Sony7
General User
Member Since: 6/25/2005
Location: Greenfield, WI
Post Count: 299
mail
Sony7
mail
Posted: 9/10/2014 11:41 PM
Terd fans getting testy and it's only Wednesday. Must be getting nervous. Tic Toc. LOL
C Money
General User
Member Since: 8/28/2010
Post Count: 3,420
mail
C Money
mail
Posted: 9/11/2014 7:28 AM
goherd25 wrote:expand_more
Lol. Everyone has bad teams etc they play at home. It all evens out and is a level playing field. Skew the numbers if you wish but Marshall has a .86 winning pct at home and thats the best in college football.

Ummmm, no? That's only since Joan C. Edwards stadium opened in 1991, and includes a decade of I-AA competition.

Since joining I-A, Marshall is 80-21 at home, a .792 winning percentage. Pretty good, but still behind Boise State, Oklahoma, Ohio State, Oregon, VaTech, Florida, Nebraska, Georgia, LSU, FSU, Wisconsin, Texas, Michigan, Troy, and Kansas State.

Since 2005, the time frame we're actually talking about in the thread, Marshall is 34-18 at home, a .654 winning percentage. Boise is tops, at 54-3, a .947 percentage. (Ohio is 37-15 at home, a .712 winning percentage).

But go on, keep living in 1999.
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 9/11/2014 8:40 AM
penn2moss wrote:expand_more
You are going back to 2011? That is real helpful.
....

I just gave the raw data. It's up to you (and others) to interpret it. I think it is certainly more relevant than the data you gave. The data you gave was "our average margin of victory over the last 9 games at home is like 40". As Delete Pending pointed out, your data was wrong, and the actual number for the last 9 games is 32. What he didn't mention is that if you go back to 10 games, 11 games, or 12 games, the "average margin of victory" keeps going down, because 10, 11, and 12 were all losses. Thus, starting at "9 games" is a pretty arbitrary point, isn't it?

Even then, if you accept your arbitrary point in the middle of 2102 as the starting point, and move to the actual data, you find that your 9 game dataset includes wins against FCS Rhode Island, FCS Gardner-Webb, a Miami team that ended up 0-12, a Southern Miss team that finished 1-11, and a UAB team that finished 2-10, so more than half of your 9 games were against horrible teams. By specifically including these in your comparison example from which you are projecting the score for Ohio-Marshall, you are implicitly saying that you think Ohio is no better than these teams. I think you are wrong, but everyone is entitled to their own opinion.

goherd25 wrote:expand_more
Lol. Everyone has bad teams etc they play at home. It all evens out and is a level playing field. Skew the numbers if you wish but Marshall has a .86 winning pct at home and thats the best in college football.

Of course everyone has bad teams they play at home. What does that have to do with the point we are talking about? The question is, if you want to project how Marshall might do against Ohio from past games, which is more "skewed", using as a comparison point games against Rhode Island and Gardner-Webb, or using as a comparison point only games against other bowl eligible teams?

By the way, if you asked the same question about Ohio, here are the home games Ohio has had against bowl-eligible teams in the same time period:
2013 CMU 23-26 loss
2013 Marshall 34-31 win
2013 NTSU 27-21 win
2012 Bowling Green 14-26 loss
2011 Marshall 44-7 win
2011 Ball State 20-23 loss
2011 Temple 35-31 win
Ohio is 4-7, not significantly different from Marshall. I think that's pretty normal. The idea is that at home you want to win a little better than half of the games against good competition, and all the games against bad competition.
colobobcat66
General User
C66
Member Since: 9/1/2006
Location: Watching the bobcats run outside my window., CO
Post Count: 4,744
person
mail
colobobcat66
mail
Posted: 9/11/2014 9:02 AM
herdfan07 wrote:expand_more
Yes, Marshall has a secret playbook they only bring out for OHIO. How did that work out for you the last three times we played and beat you? Hmmmm?
Please god tell me you didnt recieve your degree from ohio.
You must have a degree in English from Marshall. Great command of the English language for sure.
Brian Smith (No, not that one)
General User
BSNNTO
Member Since: 2/4/2005
Post Count: 3,057
person
mail
Brian Smith (No, not that one)
mail
Posted: 9/11/2014 10:12 AM
L.C. wrote:expand_more
Marshall's last nine wins at home have been by an average of 32.4 points per game. Just so we have the actual number at our disposal.

Considering that Ohio is likely to be bowl-eligible this year, that isn't very useful data because it includes things like wins over bad teams, and FCS teams. What is their record at home against bowl-eligible teams or FBS teams with a winning record?
I was just trying to show the disparity between "like 40" and the actual number. Eight points a game is a lot. Especially to Las Vegas.

But they have been quite impressive at home since Ohio went in to the Joan and beat them two years ago.
herdfan07
General User
H07
Member Since: 9/14/2011
Post Count: 55
person
mail
herdfan07
mail
Posted: 9/11/2014 10:23 AM
colobobcat66 wrote:expand_more
Yes, Marshall has a secret playbook they only bring out for OHIO. How did that work out for you the last three times we played and beat you? Hmmmm?
Please god tell me you didnt recieve your degree from ohio.
You must have a degree in English from Marshall. Great command of the English language for sure.
Sorry, Im typing this on a mobile phone. Also, I received a degree in accounting at Marshall. I will be the first to say I was very lucky to get a passing grade in both of my english classes. I expected grammar smack since ohio is a liberal arts school.
OhioCatFan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 15,698
mail
OhioCatFan
mail
Posted: 9/11/2014 10:33 AM
herdfan07 wrote:expand_more
. . . I expected grammar smack since ohio has one of the ten best journalism schools in the nation.
Corrected that for you! :-)
herdfan07
General User
H07
Member Since: 9/14/2011
Post Count: 55
person
mail
herdfan07
mail
Posted: 9/11/2014 10:55 AM
OhioCatFan wrote:expand_more
. . . I expected grammar smack since ohio has one of the ten best journalism schools in the nation.
Corrected that for you! :-)

Thats way 2 long 2 type out
Last Edited: 9/11/2014 10:59:43 AM by herdfan07
penn2moss
General User
P2
Member Since: 9/10/2012
Post Count: 37
person
mail
penn2moss
mail
Posted: 9/11/2014 11:33 AM
L.C. wrote:expand_more
You are going back to 2011? That is real helpful.
....

Even then, if you accept your arbitrary point in the middle of 2102 as the starting point, and move to the actual data, you find that your 9 game dataset includes wins against FCS Rhode Island, FCS Gardner-Webb, a Miami team that ended up 0-12, a Southern Miss team that finished 1-11, and a UAB team that finished 2-10, so more than half of your 9 games were against horrible teams. By specifically including these in your comparison example from which you are projecting the score for Ohio-Marshall, you are implicitly saying that you think Ohio is no better than these teams. I think you are wrong, but everyone is entitled to their own opinion.
I pointed out the bowl eligible teams from a year ago like you wanted to do so quit with your hand waving.

Our average margin of victory over bowl eligible teams a year ago was 27.5, nearly 4 TDs.

Good luck this weekend, your going to need it.
Recovering Journalist
General User
RJ
Member Since: 8/17/2010
Location: Cleveland, OH
Post Count: 1,864
person
mail
Recovering Journalist
mail
Posted: 9/11/2014 12:02 PM
penn2moss wrote:expand_more
You are going back to 2011? That is real helpful.
....

Even then, if you accept your arbitrary point in the middle of 2102 as the starting point, and move to the actual data, you find that your 9 game dataset includes wins against FCS Rhode Island, FCS Gardner-Webb, a Miami team that ended up 0-12, a Southern Miss team that finished 1-11, and a UAB team that finished 2-10, so more than half of your 9 games were against horrible teams. By specifically including these in your comparison example from which you are projecting the score for Ohio-Marshall, you are implicitly saying that you think Ohio is no better than these teams. I think you are wrong, but everyone is entitled to their own opinion.
I pointed out the bowl eligible teams from a year ago like you wanted to do so quit with your hand waving.

Our average margin of victory over bowl eligible teams a year ago was 27.5, nearly 4 TDs.

Good luck this weekend, your going to need it.
*you're

Pointless trash talk is more palatable with good grammar.
penn2moss
General User
P2
Member Since: 9/10/2012
Post Count: 37
person
mail
penn2moss
mail
Posted: 9/11/2014 4:47 PM
Recovering Journalist wrote:expand_more
You are going back to 2011? That is real helpful.
....

Even then, if you accept your arbitrary point in the middle of 2102 as the starting point, and move to the actual data, you find that your 9 game dataset includes wins against FCS Rhode Island, FCS Gardner-Webb, a Miami team that ended up 0-12, a Southern Miss team that finished 1-11, and a UAB team that finished 2-10, so more than half of your 9 games were against horrible teams. By specifically including these in your comparison example from which you are projecting the score for Ohio-Marshall, you are implicitly saying that you think Ohio is no better than these teams. I think you are wrong, but everyone is entitled to their own opinion.
I pointed out the bowl eligible teams from a year ago like you wanted to do so quit with your hand waving.

Our average margin of victory over bowl eligible teams a year ago was 27.5, nearly 4 TDs.

Good luck this weekend, your going to need it.
*you're

Pointless trash talk is more palatable with good grammar.
Thank-you professor, The Herd are ready for it's best game of the year. We win 0-45 so your in trouble. There ready to play.
JSF
General User
Member Since: 1/29/2005
Location: Houston, TX
Post Count: 6,580
mail
JSF
mail
Posted: 9/11/2014 4:51 PM
OhioCatFan wrote:expand_more
. . . I expected grammar smack because Ohio has one of the 10 best journalism schools in the nation.
Corrected that for you! :-)
AP style'd for you.
OhioCatFan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 15,698
mail
OhioCatFan
mail
Posted: 9/11/2014 5:45 PM
JSF wrote:expand_more
. . . I expected grammar smack because Ohio has one of the 10 best journalism schools in the nation.
Corrected that for you! :-)
AP style'd for you.
Thanks. I was trying to keep as much of the original as possible, so I only corrected factual information. Team editing. It's a BA varsity sport! :-)
goherd25
General User
G25
Member Since: 5/18/2012
Post Count: 143
person
mail
goherd25
mail
Posted: 9/11/2014 7:18 PM
C Money wrote:expand_more
Lol. Everyone has bad teams etc they play at home. It all evens out and is a level playing field. Skew the numbers if you wish but Marshall has a .86 winning pct at home and thats the best in college football.

Ummmm, no? That's only since Joan C. Edwards stadium opened in 1991, and includes a decade of I-AA competition.

Since joining I-A, Marshall is 80-21 at home, a .792 winning percentage. Pretty good, but still behind Boise State, Oklahoma, Ohio State, Oregon, VaTech, Florida, Nebraska, Georgia, LSU, FSU, Wisconsin, Texas, Michigan, Troy, and Kansas State.

Since 2005, the time frame we're actually talking about in the thread, Marshall is 34-18 at home, a .654 winning percentage. Boise is tops, at 54-3, a .947 percentage. (Ohio is 37-15 at home, a .712 winning percentage).

But go on, keep living in 1999.
Exactly. Since the stadium opened. Encompasses all home games played there. And my numbers are correct. You cant partition it up or just take a certain sample size. Youll get a taste of it in a couple days.
C Money
General User
Member Since: 8/28/2010
Post Count: 3,420
mail
C Money
mail
Posted: 9/11/2014 7:45 PM
goherd25 wrote:expand_more
Skew the numbers if you wish but Marshall has a .86 winning pct at home and thats the best in college football.
goherd25 wrote:expand_more
Exactly. Since the stadium opened.
goherd25 wrote:expand_more
You cant partition it up or just take a certain sample size.


http://youtu.be/5hfYJsQAhl0
PhiTau74
General User
PT74
Member Since: 8/6/2010
Location: Columbia, SC
Post Count: 458
person
mail
PhiTau74
mail
Posted: 9/11/2014 7:56 PM
goherd25 wrote:expand_more
...And to the guy who said no evidence about marshall being better than UK.... handicappers are pretty damn good at their predictions. A 16 point dog at UK and 20.5 at marshall says they think we are 4.5 points better than UK.
This must be from a Logic course taught at Marshall. Sagarin says KY 72.9 and Marshall 71.2 so no it's not Marshall plus 4.5. Handicappers are great, South Carolina 10.5 better than Texas A&M and Texas A&M won by 24. Kent 3.0 better than Ohio and Ohio wins by 3 with 4 second half turnovers. How can you possibly ascertain Marshall is 4.5 better than KY. Spreads are not static and remain the same to judge yourself against another team. Just throw out all the bad handicaps and go with the ones that fit your scenario I guess.
Showing Messages: 51 - 75 of 110
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)