Ohio Football Topic
Topic: What is a University but the People?
Page: 3 of 4
OhioCatFan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 15,697
mail
OhioCatFan
mail
Posted: 11/30/2014 1:30 PM
The Situation wrote:expand_more
I like to think I use FACTS in my arguments.
Is it not a fact that it took Bill Snyder 14 years to win his first Conference Championship at K-State?

Is it not a fact that Bill Snyder had back to back losing seasons before he retired at age 65?

Is it not a fact that Bill Snyder's replacement head coach had back to back losing seasons in years 2 through 3 of his tenure?

Is it not a fact that Bill Snyder is now 72 years old, coaching a top 12 team?

Is it not a fact that Frank Solich is a two (2) time Coach of the Year of Bill Snyder's conference, while Bill Snyder coached in the very same conference?

Is it not a fact that Frank Solich has won a Big 12 Conference Championship?

Is it not a fact Kansas State football went 69 years between conference championships?

Is it not a fact, that despite coaching 22 years at Kansas State, Bill Snyder has but two (2) conference championships?

Is it not a fact that some (most?) of our Bobcats under Solich to sign NFL contracts were not 3-star recruits?

Is there not a discussion to be had about negativity standing in the way of "good years"?
+1 All excellent points that seem to be ignored by a certain segment of this board. These fall into three distinct groups: 1. Those who truly want OHIO football to get better but don't really understand football, can't evaluate talent, and don't understand the difference between building a football team and building a football program (a subset of these has a tendency to trip over their own egos). 2. Those who truly love OHIO football, but are just very impatient and live in constant fear of returning to our Wilderness Years. 3. Those who want OHIO football to fail, usually so that we can pour extra resources into basketball. There's probably a fourth group, too, that's made up of folks who just get their kicks out of being negative.
Athens
General User
A
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Post Count: 5,454
person
mail
Athens
mail
Posted: 11/30/2014 2:19 PM
I would would keep in mind that the academic center donor reception capabilities are there for any sport. It very well may be basketball that attracts the high rollers. Who would have thought for example that San Diego State would become a basketball school? The same can be said of SMU another traditional football school. It could be a future sport for Ohio if the school returns to Division 1 Ice Hockey.
BillyTheCat
General User
BTC
Member Since: 10/6/2012
Post Count: 10,801
person
mail
BillyTheCat
mail
Posted: 11/30/2014 2:27 PM
SBH wrote:expand_more
We seem to hold our basketball coaches to a much higher standard than our football coaches. Perhaps that was appropriate 10 years ago, but given our significantly increased investment in football, why do we still believe mediocre or mediocre-plus is OK?

I would agree with this. I remember the Fire Larry Hunter web page with the bouncing Larry head, and the constant complaint to fire him for only winning 1 title in 11 seasons. Today the investment is significantly higher than in those days.
D.A.
General User
DA
Member Since: 8/6/2010
Location: Georgetown, ME
Post Count: 1,198
person
mail
D.A.
mail
Posted: 11/30/2014 5:34 PM
BillyTheCat wrote:expand_more
We seem to hold our basketball coaches to a much higher standard than our football coaches. Perhaps that was appropriate 10 years ago, but given our significantly increased investment in football, why do we still believe mediocre or mediocre-plus is OK?

I would agree with this. I remember the Fire Larry Hunter web page with the bouncing Larry head, and the constant complaint to fire him for only winning 1 title in 11 seasons. Today the investment is significantly higher than in those days.
I spent some time trying to find where OHIO ranks in FB budget against all FBS to determine where we rank against those programs, and then compare that against our rank in Hoops. Unfortunately, no dice on a FB expense database.

However, based on the database rank on the Hoops Board, we are top 100 in Hoops budget in D1 v 351 peers, which puts us in the top 25th percentile in hoops budget, and with one of the better facilities in that group as well. Additionally, we outspend every other MAC school by a sizable margin.

Conversely, while we have significantly increased our competitive spend in FB, my spidey sense tells me we are still in the bottom 25-30th percentile in FBS against 125ish peers, and with one of the most outdated stadiums, albeit with a brand new MPF. We are also only mid to top third in the MAC in FB budget.

Not saying it is right or wrong either way, but is it disingenuous to have the same winning percentage expectation considering where our spend is v our peers in both sports? Not saying it is or isn't, just find it a curious comparative situation.
Last Edited: 11/30/2014 5:38:11 PM by D.A.
Casper71
General User
C71
Member Since: 12/1/2006
Post Count: 3,237
person
mail
Casper71
mail
Posted: 11/30/2014 9:17 PM
OCF, I'd say I am pretty much a #2 guy. Like you, I've loved OHIO FB for close to 50 years! And, at 65, I am impatient for another MACC! The one thing I do not do, however, is fret over that every minute of every day (it's more like only on Saturdays in the Fall thing).

As for Situation, I guess he is 24 and a youngster. So, once he is 65 and lived a full life I'll let him tell me all about it.

As for the Situation's "facts"...they would be great if we were talking about Kansas State and Bill Snyder. I will give him FS was in a National Championship game, a two time Champ in the Big 8, and a Coach of the year in the Big 8. Which is why when we hired him, I, like many thought better days were ahead. And they were...except for that MACC thing and the seeming decline in the project of building a program over the last three years.

I have stated FS has done some outstanding things for OHIO. He has taken us from the outhouse to indoor plumbing and respectability but not the Penthouse! When he was hired, I knew he could make us respectable. It just seems to me that the last three years have not been the trajectory I (and probably most) thought we would be on in year ten of this program. I am hopeful that next year we return to the Top two or three of the MAC and finally get the monkey of FS and all of our backs.

Stay tuned...
OhioCatFan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 15,697
mail
OhioCatFan
mail
Posted: 11/30/2014 9:57 PM
Casper71 wrote:expand_more
OCF, I'd say I am pretty much a #2 guy. Like you, I've loved OHIO FB for close to 50 years! And, at 65, I am impatient for another MACC! The one thing I do not do, however, is fret over that every minute of every day (it's more like only on Saturdays in the Fall thing).
Yes, we have a lot in common. I guess that the big difference is that I'm a tad more optimistic for the future and you are, perhaps, only "cautiously optimistic." But, I do know that we both want only the best for OHIO, and that we want another MACC before we shuffle off this mortal coil. I think, like TS, that Frank is the one to lead us to the promised land. I hope that you and I aren't like Moses and can only see it in the distance but can't enter it. Good Lord willing it'll be sooner rather than later.

Casper71 wrote:expand_more
I am hopeful that next year we return to the Top two or three of the MAC and finally get the monkey of[f] FS and all of our backs.

Stay tuned...
Agreed . . . stay tuned is right. Go OHIO!
Last Edited: 11/30/2014 11:43:44 PM by OhioCatFan
The Situation
General User
Member Since: 7/13/2010
Location: Columbus, OH
Post Count: 957
mail
The Situation
mail
Posted: 11/30/2014 10:29 PM
Casper71 wrote:expand_more
As for Situation, I guess he is 24 and a youngster. So, once he is 65 and lived a full life I'll let him tell me all about it.
I don't know what must be more frustrating for you...

- Waiting to for a MAC Championship
- or having every conversation with someone your own age end in a stalemate.

Some people like to think of themselves as a fine wine that gets better with time.

Maybe others are actually a more like rock, which gets weaker fighting the wind and the rain as the years go by.
Last Edited: 11/30/2014 10:34:05 PM by The Situation
Athens
General User
A
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Post Count: 5,454
person
mail
Athens
mail
Posted: 11/30/2014 11:52 PM
D.A. wrote:expand_more
We seem to hold our basketball coaches to a much higher standard than our football coaches. Perhaps that was appropriate 10 years ago, but given our significantly increased investment in football, why do we still believe mediocre or mediocre-plus is OK?

I would agree with this. I remember the Fire Larry Hunter web page with the bouncing Larry head, and the constant complaint to fire him for only winning 1 title in 11 seasons. Today the investment is significantly higher than in those days.
I spent some time trying to find where OHIO ranks in FB budget against all FBS to determine where we rank against those programs, and then compare that against our rank in Hoops. Unfortunately, no dice on a FB expense database.

However, based on the database rank on the Hoops Board, we are top 100 in Hoops budget in D1 v 351 peers, which puts us in the top 25th percentile in hoops budget, and with one of the better facilities in that group as well. Additionally, we outspend every other MAC school by a sizable margin.

Conversely, while we have significantly increased our competitive spend in FB, my spidey sense tells me we are still in the bottom 25-30th percentile in FBS against 125ish peers, and with one of the most outdated stadiums, albeit with a brand new MPF. We are also only mid to top third in the MAC in FB budget.

Not saying it is right or wrong either way, but is it disingenuous to have the same winning percentage expectation considering where our spend is v our peers in both sports? Not saying it is or isn't, just find it a curious comparative situation.
Ohio is 87th out of 128 in football budget. That is in the top 67th percentile or the bottom 33rd percentile and second in the MAC to NIU who is 86th. Most of the stadium was built in the last 20-25 years. The tower, weight room, lowered field, endzone seats are all newer. IPF, Tower, Weight Room are all at the top or within the Top 3 of the MAC. Overall Ohio has the best football facilities and the academic center will only add to that. We don't though have a dominant budget for the MAC in football like there is in basketball. We should be competitive in the MAC in football and not necessarily own it as some demand. Pre Solich there was no IPF, Team Meeting rooms or Hydro Pools but other MAC schools had less to work with then. Facility wise the bottom was probably the 80's relative to the MAC peers.
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 12/1/2014 2:45 AM
The Situation wrote:expand_more
As for Situation, I guess he is 24 and a youngster. So, once he is 65 and lived a full life I'll let him tell me all about it.
I don't know what must be more frustrating for you...

- Waiting to for a MAC Championship
- or having every conversation with someone your own age end in a stalemate.

Some people like to think of themselves as a fine wine that gets better with time.

Maybe others are actually a more like rock, which gets weaker fighting the wind and the rain as the years go by.
Could you be more of an arrogant, inconsiderate, know-it-all arse? (hint: it'd be difficult)

It's truly awesome how smart you think you are versus everyone else and all their years of experience.
The Situation
General User
Member Since: 7/13/2010
Location: Columbus, OH
Post Count: 957
mail
The Situation
mail
Posted: 12/1/2014 7:45 AM
Sport, unlike message board arguments, literally give both sides a defined opportunity to win the contest.

Some of you guys like to think I won't allow a "loss", even in defeat. But I actually interpret you Monroe, et al, as not willing to concede a loss even in defeat.

The age related "experience" escape hatch has surfaced multiple times, never truly defined, just a catch-all statement.

Maybe I'll understand when I'm older. Or maybe you'll understand when you're more intelligent. Or maybe I'll never understand. Aw shucks. I guess no one's in charge to make sure we're all equal.

P.S.

Monroe, you never answered my question.

Does your lack of experience coaching college football at the FBS level put you at an advantage or disadvantage compared to Frank Solich?

Maybe you'll understand the irony when you're older.
Last Edited: 12/1/2014 8:04:04 AM by The Situation
bobcat2nc
General User
B2
Member Since: 12/28/2004
Post Count: 584
person
mail
bobcat2nc
mail
Posted: 12/1/2014 9:14 AM
The Situation wrote:expand_more
Sport, unlike message board arguments, literally give both sides a defined opportunity to win the contest.

Some of you guys like to think I won't allow a "loss", even in defeat. But I actually interpret you Monroe, et al, as not willing to concede a loss even in defeat.

The age related "experience" escape hatch has surfaced multiple times, never truly defined, just a catch-all statement.

Maybe I'll understand when I'm older. Or maybe you'll understand when you're more intelligent. Or maybe I'll never understand. Aw shucks. I guess no one's in charge to make sure we're all equal.

P.S.

Monroe, you never answered my question.

Does your lack of experience coaching college football at the FBS level put you at an advantage or disadvantage compared to Frank Solich?

Maybe you'll understand the irony when you're older.
I hear the pot talking to the kettle, over and over and over and over again.
The Situation
General User
Member Since: 7/13/2010
Location: Columbus, OH
Post Count: 957
mail
The Situation
mail
Posted: 12/1/2014 9:49 AM
bobcat2nc wrote:expand_more
I hear the pot talking to the kettle, over and over and over and over again.
Matthew 7:3

"Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother's eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye?"

I'll tell you why Jesus..

Hypocrisy is irrelevant when assessing the validity of an argument.

If we are attempting to determine if there is something in Monroe's eye. The plank in my eye is not relevant.

-----

b2nc,

Who between Monroe and myself do you believe to be the kettle? I'll assume your stake is in Monroe the kettle.

After all, the kettle is supposed to have the metallic finish and the pot is the cooking utility living in denial.

"Pot, kettle, black" is not a break even allegation.
OUBobcat13
General User
OUB13
Member Since: 12/8/2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Post Count: 285
person
mail
OUBobcat13
mail
Posted: 12/1/2014 1:12 PM
Situation...I am curious as to whether or not you are looking for a job. If so, I'd like to offer you one...as my boss. I would expect that after increasing sales and productivity from the bottom of the barrel to respectable levels, it would be acceptable to then settle for a mediocre status quo year in and year out without fear of losing my job.

Unfortunately, in the real world many of us are measured in growth in some way or another. Whether it is productivity, sales, efficiency, employee retention, etc. most businesses like to see increases and growth amongst their departments, teams, employees, etc.

So, with that said, I'm not on the Fire Frank bandwagon yet. I can see the frustration amongst the alumni growing and understand it. I also believe that this last recruiting class, coupled with the next one, are Frank's last chance. Without marked improvement on the field, frustration with continue to mount and Schaus will have a decision to make.
bornacatfan
General User
Member Since: 8/3/2006
Post Count: 5,752
mail
bornacatfan
mail
Posted: 12/1/2014 6:26 PM
Uncle Wes wrote:expand_more
[. Overall Ohio has the best football facilities and the academic center will only add to that.\
Wes.

Have you been to NIU, CMU, and Western to start with? I am not sure if you have not seen the Dick Enberg Center and the indoor portion at CMU or the stadium guts and indoor facility at NIU how you can make that claim.
Ohio69
General User
O69
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 3,124
person
mail
Ohio69
mail
Posted: 12/1/2014 6:31 PM
Baylor and TCU are in the Power 5. Ohio is not. We are never going to be on par with Baylor or TCU. The comparison doesn't fit. There are no deep pocket alums sitting on the sideline. We are always going to be a mid-major. And mid-majors have up and down seasons/spells. That's who we are. And, the Power 5 is made sure schools like Ohio get no better with all their recent moves. They won. It is over. No need to dream about any sort of sustained top 10 greatness.

Solich's contributions to Ohio football are far deeper than just the wins and losses of the last 3 years. Unless we see some 2-10 records, he leaves when he wants.
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 12/1/2014 8:28 PM
The Situation wrote:expand_more
I hear the pot talking to the kettle, over and over and over and over again.
Matthew 7:3

"Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother's eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye?"

I'll tell you why Jesus..

Hypocrisy is irrelevant when assessing the validity of an argument.

If we are attempting to determine if there is something in Monroe's eye. The plank in my eye is not relevant.

-----

b2nc,

Who between Monroe and myself do you believe to be the kettle? I'll assume your stake is in Monroe the kettle.

After all, the kettle is supposed to have the metallic finish and the pot is the cooking utility living in denial.

"Pot, kettle, black" is not a break even allegation.
Whatever you're ingesting, you oughta cut it down.

Quoting the bible--please don't tell me that you're one of the Religious Right who allow no viewpoint other than their own.

I can't even figure out what you're trying to say above. When I get fringe, it's intentional and with whimsy. When you do it....it's frightening.
Last Edited: 12/1/2014 8:31:12 PM by Monroe Slavin
Mark Lembright '85
General User
ML85
Member Since: 8/22/2010
Location: Highland Heights, OH
Post Count: 2,460
person
mail
Mark Lembright '85
mail
Posted: 12/1/2014 9:19 PM
bornacatfan wrote:expand_more
[. Overall Ohio has the best football facilities and the academic center will only add to that.\
Wes.

Have you been to NIU, CMU, and Western to start with? I am not sure if you have not seen the Dick Enberg Center and the indoor portion at CMU or the stadium guts and indoor facility at NIU how you can make that claim.
Touché! Akron's $61 million (or thereabouts) football stadium isn't too shabby either. Or BG's Sebo Athletic Center.

Ohio has definitely upgraded their football facilities over the years but they have been significantly outspent by some other MAC schools.
Last Edited: 12/1/2014 9:25:54 PM by Mark Lembright '85
JSF
General User
Member Since: 1/29/2005
Location: Houston, TX
Post Count: 6,580
mail
JSF
mail
Posted: 12/1/2014 11:52 PM
Ohio69 wrote:expand_more
Baylor and TCU are in the Power 5. Ohio is not. We are never going to be on par with Baylor or TCU. The comparison doesn't fit. There are no deep pocket alums sitting on the sideline.
You know, it's interesting. I'm just a few hours from Fort Worth, but nobody around here cares about TCU. At all. I could probably count on one hand the number of shirts and hats I've seen around the city.
The Situation
General User
Member Since: 7/13/2010
Location: Columbus, OH
Post Count: 957
mail
The Situation
mail
Posted: 12/2/2014 9:09 AM
Monroe Slavin wrote:expand_more
I hear the pot talking to the kettle, over and over and over and over again.
Matthew 7:3

"Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother's eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye?"

I'll tell you why Jesus..

Hypocrisy is irrelevant when assessing the validity of an argument.

If we are attempting to determine if there is something in Monroe's eye. The plank in my eye is not relevant.

-----

b2nc,

Who between Monroe and myself do you believe to be the kettle? I'll assume your stake is in Monroe the kettle.

After all, the kettle is supposed to have the metallic finish and the pot is the cooking utility living in denial.

"Pot, kettle, black" is not a break even allegation.
Whatever you're ingesting, you oughta cut it down.

Quoting the bible--please don't tell me that you're one of the Religious Right who allow no viewpoint other than their own.

I can't even figure out what you're trying to say above. When I get fringe, it's intentional and with whimsy. When you do it....it's frightening.
Allow me to elaborate then.

I currently have a working hypothesis that a reasonable person on this board may conclude we both are delusional (That's not my personable belief; but I can see how reasonable people who take a glance sporadically at our posts with no real intention of reading to comprehend may conclude that). I don't believe a reasonable person can conclude that you are not delusional and I am delusional.

Therefore, I addressed b2nc's comment, which can be taken 1 of 2 ways.

Way #1:

b2nc was calling me a hypocrite.

"Pot, Kettle, Black" labels the pot a hypocrite. The pot does not realize or does not acknowledge that he himself is black.

Religion aside, that quote is from the best selling book in human history. And it addresses hypocrisy in the way I feel most people, including b2nc would address hypocrisy.

b2nc may have been calling me out for crimes I'm alleging you of committing. But as I respond to Jesus' quote from the Bible, hypocrisy is irrelevant. If we are to determine if you, Monroe, are making yet another logically invalid statement. My allegedly logically invalid statements are irrelevant. It's irrelevant that I may potentially be a hypocrite.

Way #2:

b2nc was calling me delusional, but not calling you delusional.

A common mis-conception nowadays with "Pot, Kettle, Black" is that the pot and kettle are both black.

The kettle is not black. The kettle has a shiny reflection (copper or steel) and therefore when pot looks at the kettle, the pot sees their own reflection and concludes the kettle is also black. This is a delusion.

So I addressed Way #2 as well.

In conclusion:

b2nc, do you think Monroe is the kettle? Am I the kettle? Or were you just operating under the common misconception of "Pot, Kettle, Black"?
Last Edited: 12/2/2014 9:10:39 AM by The Situation
OUBobcat13
General User
OUB13
Member Since: 12/8/2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Post Count: 285
person
mail
OUBobcat13
mail
Posted: 12/2/2014 9:37 AM
The Situation wrote:expand_more
I hear the pot talking to the kettle, over and over and over and over again.
Matthew 7:3

"Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother's eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye?"

I'll tell you why Jesus..

Hypocrisy is irrelevant when assessing the validity of an argument.

If we are attempting to determine if there is something in Monroe's eye. The plank in my eye is not relevant.

-----

b2nc,

Who between Monroe and myself do you believe to be the kettle? I'll assume your stake is in Monroe the kettle.

After all, the kettle is supposed to have the metallic finish and the pot is the cooking utility living in denial.

"Pot, kettle, black" is not a break even allegation.
Whatever you're ingesting, you oughta cut it down.

Quoting the bible--please don't tell me that you're one of the Religious Right who allow no viewpoint other than their own.

I can't even figure out what you're trying to say above. When I get fringe, it's intentional and with whimsy. When you do it....it's frightening.
Allow me to elaborate then.

I currently have a working hypothesis that a reasonable person on this board may conclude we both are delusional (That's not my personable belief; but I can see how reasonable people who take a glance sporadically at our posts with no real intention of reading to comprehend may conclude that). I don't believe a reasonable person can conclude that you are not delusional and I am delusional.

Therefore, I addressed b2nc's comment, which can be taken 1 of 2 ways.

Way #1:

b2nc was calling me a hypocrite.

"Pot, Kettle, Black" labels the pot a hypocrite. The pot does not realize or does not acknowledge that he himself is black.

Religion aside, that quote is from the best selling book in human history. And it addresses hypocrisy in the way I feel most people, including b2nc would address hypocrisy.

b2nc may have been calling me out for crimes I'm alleging you of committing. But as I respond to Jesus' quote from the Bible, hypocrisy is irrelevant. If we are to determine if you, Monroe, are making yet another logically invalid statement. My allegedly logically invalid statements are irrelevant. It's irrelevant that I may potentially be a hypocrite.

Way #2:

b2nc was calling me delusional, but not calling you delusional.

A common mis-conception nowadays with "Pot, Kettle, Black" is that the pot and kettle are both black.

The kettle is not black. The kettle has a shiny reflection (copper or steel) and therefore when pot looks at the kettle, the pot sees their own reflection and concludes the kettle is also black. This is a delusion.

So I addressed Way #2 as well.

In conclusion:

b2nc, do you think Monroe is the kettle? Am I the kettle? Or were you just operating under the common misconception of "Pot, Kettle, Black"?
Is this really where this thread has gone? Can't we come back to the basic premise of the argument here, which I read as "Despite what Franky has done for our program, do alumni have a right to ask "What have you done for me lately?"
Bcat2
General User
B2
Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 4,295
person
mail
Bcat2
mail
Posted: 12/2/2014 10:18 AM
OUBobcat13 wrote:expand_more
Is this really where this thread has gone? Can't we come back to the basic premise of the argument here, which I read as "Despite what Franky has done for our program, do alumni have a right to ask "What have you done for me lately?"
Now we have to discuss what do we each mean by "lately." Then, do we have to be all-inclusive during the term or can we cherry pick?
OUBobcat13
General User
OUB13
Member Since: 12/8/2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Post Count: 285
person
mail
OUBobcat13
mail
Posted: 12/2/2014 10:29 AM
Bcat2 wrote:expand_more
Is this really where this thread has gone? Can't we come back to the basic premise of the argument here, which I read as "Despite what Franky has done for our program, do alumni have a right to ask "What have you done for me lately?"
Now we have to discuss what do we each mean by "lately." Then, do we have to be all-inclusive during the term or can we cherry pick?
So...How 'bout them Bengals.
bobcat2nc
General User
B2
Member Since: 12/28/2004
Post Count: 584
person
mail
bobcat2nc
mail
Posted: 12/2/2014 10:58 AM
OUBobcat13 wrote:expand_more
I hear the pot talking to the kettle, over and over and over and over again.
Matthew 7:3

"Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother's eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye?"

I'll tell you why Jesus..

Hypocrisy is irrelevant when assessing the validity of an argument.

If we are attempting to determine if there is something in Monroe's eye. The plank in my eye is not relevant.

-----

b2nc,

Who between Monroe and myself do you believe to be the kettle? I'll assume your stake is in Monroe the kettle.

After all, the kettle is supposed to have the metallic finish and the pot is the cooking utility living in denial.

"Pot, kettle, black" is not a break even allegation.
Whatever you're ingesting, you oughta cut it down.

Quoting the bible--please don't tell me that you're one of the Religious Right who allow no viewpoint other than their own.

I can't even figure out what you're trying to say above. When I get fringe, it's intentional and with whimsy. When you do it....it's frightening.
Allow me to elaborate then.

I currently have a working hypothesis that a reasonable person on this board may conclude we both are delusional (That's not my personable belief; but I can see how reasonable people who take a glance sporadically at our posts with no real intention of reading to comprehend may conclude that). I don't believe a reasonable person can conclude that you are not delusional and I am delusional.

Therefore, I addressed b2nc's comment, which can be taken 1 of 2 ways.

Way #1:

b2nc was calling me a hypocrite.

"Pot, Kettle, Black" labels the pot a hypocrite. The pot does not realize or does not acknowledge that he himself is black.

Religion aside, that quote is from the best selling book in human history. And it addresses hypocrisy in the way I feel most people, including b2nc would address hypocrisy.

b2nc may have been calling me out for crimes I'm alleging you of committing. But as I respond to Jesus' quote from the Bible, hypocrisy is irrelevant. If we are to determine if you, Monroe, are making yet another logically invalid statement. My allegedly logically invalid statements are irrelevant. It's irrelevant that I may potentially be a hypocrite.

Way #2:

b2nc was calling me delusional, but not calling you delusional.

A common mis-conception nowadays with "Pot, Kettle, Black" is that the pot and kettle are both black.

The kettle is not black. The kettle has a shiny reflection (copper or steel) and therefore when pot looks at the kettle, the pot sees their own reflection and concludes the kettle is also black. This is a delusion.

So I addressed Way #2 as well.

In conclusion:

b2nc, do you think Monroe is the kettle? Am I the kettle? Or were you just operating under the common misconception of "Pot, Kettle, Black"?
Is this really where this thread has gone? Can't we come back to the basic premise of the argument here, which I read as "Despite what Franky has done for our program, do alumni have a right to ask "What have you done for me lately?"
My final message on this topic...Situation, you accuse Monroe of not listening to reason and relentless hammering the same nail. All I was saying is that you appear to be doing the same thing. Maybe I used the wrong phrase but that is a commonly accepted use of the pot and kettle phrase.



I am not "taking sides" in this topic but I do have my own opinion. That opinion is that the past 3 seasons have looked to me to be a regression or at least a standstill of what was steady progression. The end of the season was an improvement and may point to better things again. However, if improving from lousy to mediocre is our goal then that is not good enough from my perspective. I am not comparing Frank to anyone else and I don't have any idea who might make a difference. My only point has been that sometimes it takes more than one change to get to the end goal. Maybe Frank was only the first step of bringing us closer. If there is more to come from Frank then I will be very happy to see it. If, on the the other hand, Frank has put Ohio in a better place for better things to come then I do not see that as a failure.


That is all.
The Situation
General User
Member Since: 7/13/2010
Location: Columbus, OH
Post Count: 957
mail
The Situation
mail
Posted: 12/2/2014 11:06 AM
I would love to get back to the original post.

OUB13, the premise of the argument is not time dependent and the premise has nothing to do with rights.

The premise of the original post was about choices.

As LC put it, "..I think people have a right to say what they want, where they want it. I just think they should think about the impact they might have when they do choose to say it."

The premise of my argument was that people who publicly disparage this coaching staff and these players can have a negative impact on this program. These people are choosing to make a negative contribution to OHIO. And they are standing in their own way.

And as I said in the second sentence, "Ohio University, like all universities, derives quality of life from the contributions of alumni, students, staff, and fans alike."

If you want OHIO to be the next program to make it big, make a positive contribution to OHIO.

You don't have to have a spare million to make a positive contribution to OHIO. You can write a letter of encouragement to Solich, or Schaus, or McDavis. You can donate a T-shirt to that alumni in LA that was asking for support for the students in her classroom. You can stand up and sing the next time you hear "Stand Up and Cheer".

Not all positive contributions are equal. Not all positive contributing are significant. But people that want to see this OHIO football program succeed are standing in their own way when they make negative contribtuions to OHIO.
james hall united
General User
JHU
Member Since: 4/9/2012
Location: c-bus, OH
Post Count: 40
person
mail
james hall united
mail
Posted: 12/2/2014 12:38 PM
I usually stay out of this but couldn't resist....
Situation -
So you are you are implying that you will put the 'team' on your back like Bassett did in that great tourney run? You do realize he left Indiana because it was too difficult after a coaching change? And then left us early to play in the developmental league. He had his universities' best interest in mind.
I live in Columbus and like many of you have to butt heads with osu fans all the time, defending our university. If I can't question what's happening in Athens here with like minded fans, where would you like me to go to do that?
I find you exhausting on these type of threads.
Showing Messages: 51 - 75 of 84
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)