I've consistently stated BG has yet to prove they're a good team.
Ok....
I didn't say they weren't good.
Hmmm....
Now I'm confused.
Who's chasing their tail here?
Yet to prove they're good is open ended.
Thats what you're not comprehending.
No I haven't said they're good yet. I also haven't ruled out eventually concluding they're good at a later point this season when more data is available.
There is no contradiction here.
I would intellectually dismantle you in front of a jury.
Waiting to reach a conclusion is not a rejection of a possibility.
Go scribble on some sidewalk bro.
Your thought process is primitive.
3. The spread is mystifying when the historical context is removed.
You were arguing that the spread at 20' was wrong....that it was too lopsided based on your "statistical analysis"
I was arguing that the spread was an anomaly.
These last three season have been bizzare. There's more to it than what lies on the surface.
But I did not say the spread was wrong. Because after all I stated that if my life was on the line I would pick BG to cover. (Which at the end of the day nothing is more valuable to most individuals than they're life)
I will say you picked the winning score while simultaneously picking BG to win by 20.
Hedge your bets much?