Just go away. Please.

What exactly are you upset about?

Are you upset that my original post stated that OHIO potentially had a glimmer of hope against Bowling Green?

Or are you upset that I defended myself against false interpretations of my posts in this thread?

OR did I just hurt your feelings simply by the way I responded.

Since you chimed in again I'll address a contradiction you made in this thread that I let slide.

On 11/4 (the morning before the game) you stated in this thread "Vegas got it right" with respect to the spread.

On 11/6 you stated "I said 63-14 as my final score....obviously I didn't think Vegas was right with the 21 pt spread. "

Unfortunately for some reading at home, your conclusion was far from obvious.

I like Situation because of his use of the transitive property.

By showing team A beat team B which beat team C, etc, he can prove 1) that we are the national champions and 2) that we beat ourselves.

This is the death spiral of circular logic I referenced. It's a fruitless task.

Was Jacksonville State's OT loss to 4-4 Auburn more or less impressive than their 3 point win over Tennessee Chattanooga?

This game is about winning. Only winning. Not moral victories.

Don't lecture me on pessimism.

These types of transitive arguments are as fluid as water.

Alternate Universe A: How close was BG to beating Memphis? I don't really know.

Alternate Universe B: How close was Minnesota to beating TCU AND Michigan? I don't really know.

Is the hypothetical distance between these alternate universes really significantly different? No. But you've written your alternate to provide BG with all the benefit and Ohio with none.

I'm not saying Ohio's good. I'm saying keep the circular logic to yourself.

I apologize. I guess I just can't keep the rules straight on this message board. I'm just trying to keep my definition of "good" up to the standards of Bobcat Attack.

Throttling Kent, Akron, and UMass, (with 4 wins between the lot of them) beating Buffalo by 6 points, and then beating a couple recognizable teams with two (2) FBS wins between the pair of them IS PROOF that a team is good. (Didn't OHIO win a bowl game against an 8-win team by the score of 45-14 "IN THE LAST 35 GAMES?!" I digress). Then going home empty handed against an undefeated non-P5 team (with three wins by a TD or less) and losing to Tennessee by 29 points is just icing on the cake.

If that's good, so be it. Write it in stone. I'll be back in a couple years to measure the Bobcats against this standard.

I apologize for wanting to see just a little bit more from the team I described above before passing judgement. I didn't mark them as bad. I didn't say they weren't good.

The irony in all this is my threshold for "good" is just a little bit higher than the very people who falsely accuse me of living in some apathetic green tinted delusion.

P.S.

You're F'N' kidding me right?

If only this message board could catch it's F'N' tail.