Ohio Football Topic
Topic: Official Game 12 Thread: Akron
Page: 7 of 10
mail
person
giacomo
11/23/2016 5:17 PM
8-4 and in the hunt for a championship. You can't ask for more. The rants in this thread would be amusing if they weren't so sad.
mail
person
L.C.
11/23/2016 6:33 PM
giacomo wrote:expand_more
8-4 and in the hunt for a championship. You can't ask for more. The rants in this thread would be amusing if they weren't so sad.

Who could have guessed twelve years ago that the day would come when a team that was 8-4, defeated every team in the East, was bowl bound, won the East Championship, and was preparing to play for the conference championship would be considered unacceptable. Yes, the team is imperfect, but they are a scrappy bunch that never quits. They have my full support, and here's hoping they come back from Detroit with the trophy.


Happy Thanksgiving, BAers.
Last Edited: 11/23/2016 6:34:45 PM by L.C.
mail
person
Recovering Journalist
11/23/2016 7:24 PM
L.C. wrote:expand_more
8-4 and in the hunt for a championship. You can't ask for more. The rants in this thread would be amusing if they weren't so sad.

Who could have guessed twelve years ago that the day would come when a team that was 8-4, defeated every team in the East, was bowl bound, won the East Championship, and was preparing to play for the conference championship would be considered unacceptable. Yes, the team is imperfect, but they are a scrappy bunch that never quits. They have my full support, and here's hoping they come back from Detroit with the trophy.


Happy Thanksgiving, BAers.
You sure as hell can ask for more, and doing so doesn't make you a bad fan.

I'm thrilled that we have 8-4 to complain about. I know that the team works hard. I have season tickets. I lived through the 1-10 years on campus. I know that it's been a feat to make this team perennially respectable. But I don't get this attitude of permanent gratitude for not just 8-4, but THIS 8-4.

We're 8-4 thanks to one of the softest schedules in FBS. We have exactly ONE win against a team with a winning record, and that win at Toledo remains the only impressive victory of the year. It's an anomaly. We tied with Fiami for the MAC East crown, and the MAC East is awful.

Nothing this team has done since the Toledo game suggests that the MACC will be competitive. I'll be doing cartwheels with everyone else if they prove me wrong, but if you're doing cartwheels now your expectations are really low.
mail
person
Monroe Slavin
11/23/2016 7:38 PM
L.C. wrote:expand_more
8-4 and in the hunt for a championship. You can't ask for more. The rants in this thread would be amusing if they weren't so sad.

Who could have guessed twelve years ago that the day would come when a team that was 8-4, defeated every team in the East, was bowl bound, won the East Championship, and was preparing to play for the conference championship would be considered unacceptable. Yes, the team is imperfect, but they are a scrappy bunch that never quits. They have my full support, and here's hoping they come back from Detroit with the trophy.


Happy Thanksgiving, BAers.

We know; your support no matter what because you refuse to consider the crashing losses of the last 4.5 years and the softness of this year.

Consider: Our two most important games and we lose to CMU which lost its three games before us (by 14 to Toledo, 3 to Kents, and 20 to Miami) and barely beat an Akron team that lost in its last three games (by 21 to Buffalo, 31 to Toledo, and 10 to BG).

Better than most of the last four years. Yes? In the same way that basically mediocre looks good next to way-is-that-bad.


How's it over there on the dwindling everyonegetsatrophy bandwagon?
mail
person
CafTud
11/23/2016 8:24 PM
I don't understand the "soft" argument. Perhaps your standard is an elite P5 program like OSU and Alabama, with 100,000 seat stadia and $100M in annual revenue? Is this a realistic comparison? How about the Patriot League, are we then "hard"? OHIO has done quite well in its conference and among peer programs. OHIO has won its division and is advancing to the league championship, for the fourth time in 12 years. The schedule two P5 programs, including a competitive game against a top 25 program, and the likelihood of another. The current staff has amassed a lifetime 59-37 conference record, including a 10-2 record against Miami, and a 4-2 record against Marshall. There have been several other wins over P5 programs (Pitt, Illinois, Penn State and Kansas), and several more competitive road losses (Northwestern, OSU, Minnesota and Tennessee). The record indicates that OHIO typically resides in the top 1/3 of the MAC and maintains a program comparable to say, the bottom half of the Big 10, despite some disparity in resources. So please explain the "soft" argument.
mail
person
doubledribble
11/23/2016 8:24 PM
Giacamo, L.C., we have to consider the sources of the sour grapes and move past it. Luckily for Ohio University, this negative, mouthy minority is so far off base that they cannot be taken seriously by any people who control our programs. Bobcat fans will be backing the Bobcat players and our staff next week in Detroit. See you there!
mail
person
Scott Woods
11/23/2016 8:36 PM
Recovering Journalist wrote:expand_more
Nothing this team has done since the Toledo game suggests that the MACC will be competitive.
Hard to argue with this when looking at each game individually. However, I still think they've played to the level of their competition all year. So looking at the year as a whole gives me hope the Bobcats can indeed be competitive.
mail
The Situation
11/23/2016 8:49 PM
Monroe Slavin wrote:expand_more
We know; your support no matter what because you refuse to consider the crashing losses of the last 4.5 years and the softness of this year.
Do you consider a team with no double digit losses this season an improvement over the crashing losses of the last 4.5 years?
mail
Diamond Cat
11/23/2016 9:12 PM
Look man...we all know something is missing. There were years when I would ignore the obvious given we were a door mat in the MAC for 30 years.

When I see WMU play, we aren't in the same league (this year). WMU Fans will soon realize they will not sustain the success they have today. Good for them in 2016. I hope they represent the MAC well. We need it.

They have the "Tony Robbins" of head coaches. He creates an atmosphere that is hard to argue. Most of us have been or run into corporate leaders with the same MOJO. PJ has the "it" factor. Almost 40 years separate him and Solich. The Millenials respond more to a guy like PJ today than Solich. I'm not banging on Frank. There is a reason you don't just dismiss a hard hit to the head in this era like we did in the 80's. It's a different game and mentality.

Frank has the ability to prepare a 1-game plan. We've also laid some serious eggs like Troy and our mid-season tank jobs. Let's see what happens.

I'm off to drink some green Kool-Aid (with Tito's).

Got my hotel....see you in The Motor City.
mail
person
L.C.
11/23/2016 9:14 PM
Monroe Slavin wrote:expand_more
We know; your support no matter what because you refuse to consider the crashing losses of the last 4.5 years and the softness of this year. ...

First of all, I wasn't very happy with the crushing losses, but I attribute them largely to the switch to the new defense. I have tried to keep an open mind about it, but have been somewhat skeptical all along. This year, post-Texas State, they do seem to finally be getting it under control, so I'm back in the "maybe it will be OK after all" camp, despite the ugly losses it caused.

Regarding, of the 4.5 years you mention, that goes back to 2012. Here's my take on those years, year by year (in addition to the problems caused by the new defense):
2012 - a great year cut short by an incredible number of season ending injuries. For that that think they always keep the best players on the bench, apparently the second team wasn't as good as the first team, and after 19 season or career ending injuries, the team just wasn't as good.
2013 - blame this one on the coaches, blame it on the players. Internal issues made this team significantly under perform
2014 - There were heavy graduations, and a changing of the guard to younger players, so the team wasn't as good.
2015 - I expected the beginning of the next wave up, and we saw that.
2016 - I predicted a good team, with an excellent front 7 on defense. We have that.

So...while 2013 bothered me a lot, late 2012 didn't, nor did 2014-15. 2016 hasn't been quite as good as I expected, and I attribute that to the skill players on offense, where there have been a lot of injuries. They have played around those, and found ways to win, and here we are at the championship game.

Go Bobcats!
mail
person
CafTud
11/23/2016 9:24 PM
Diamond Cat wrote:expand_more
PJ has the "it" factor. Almost 40 years separate him and Solich. The Millenials respond more to a guy like PJ today than Solich.
Fleck's 4-year conference record: 20-11 (with one left to play)
Solich's (same) 4-year conference record: 19-13
mail
The Situation
11/23/2016 9:40 PM
CatFud wrote:expand_more
PJ has the "it" factor. Almost 40 years separate him and Solich. The Millenials respond more to a guy like PJ today than Solich.
Fleck's 4-year conference record: 20-11 (with one left to play)
Solich's (same) 4-year conference record: 19-13
Fleck was 4-14 against teams with winning records over that period. Ohio was 6-13.

But Fleck will finish 6-15 in that stat line if WMU wins the remaining games they're favored in. And Ohio will finish 6-15 if they lose the remaining games they're not favored in.

With that kind of turn around at WMU Fleck will probably shape up to be more of an Al Golden than a Turner Gill or Brady Hoke.

Al Golden though is now a tight ends coach on the Detroit Lions after leaving Temple for the U in 2011.
mail
person
colobobcat66
11/23/2016 11:03 PM
The Situation wrote:expand_more
PJ has the "it" factor. Almost 40 years separate him and Solich. The Millenials respond more to a guy like PJ today than Solich.
Fleck's 4-year conference record: 20-11 (with one left to play)
Solich's (same) 4-year conference record: 19-13
Fleck was 4-14 against teams with winning records over that period. Ohio was 6-13.

But Fleck will finish 6-15 in that stat line if WMU wins the remaining games they're favored in. And Ohio will finish 6-15 if they lose the remaining games they're not favored in.

With that kind of turn around at WMU Fleck will probably shape up to be more of an Al Golden than a Turner Gill or Brady Hoke.

Al Golden though is now a tight ends coach on the Detroit Lions after leaving Temple for the U in 2011.

I don't know how good a coach that Fleck is, but he is one heck of a recruiter and that is a big deal. I think he's had the top MAC recruiting results for 3 years and with all his 3 star guys, he should be doing quite well and he is. Will be interesting to see how that translates to a P-5 job where he may have trouble maintaining a big recruiting edge over his other conference coaches.
mail
person
Monroe Slavin
11/24/2016 1:41 AM
Goodness sake.

I don't know. But in the modern era...let's call that the last 40 or so years..has there been a coach who's helmed a MAC team for 11 years at any MAC school who did not win a MAC title?

Aren't we looking at a MAC record for futility? In football at any rate. I wonder if that holds in any sport?

It's absurd how indulgent you all are with Solich and staff.

This is the freaking MAC, loaded with weakass teams and rarely seeing a really top team (recent excepts NIU and this year's WMU). It's not like a lightning bolt has to strike to win a title in the MAC.

But keep finding any reason you want for no MAC in 11 years.


Stay tuned for 10 more days.
mail
person
CA Bobcat
11/24/2016 2:20 AM
Monroe Slavin wrote:expand_more
Goodness sake.

I don't know. But in the modern era...let's call that the last 40 or so years..has there been a coach who's helmed a MAC team for 11 years at any MAC school who did not win a MAC title?

Aren't we looking at a MAC record for futility? In football at any rate. I wonder if that holds in any sport?

It's absurd how indulgent you all are with Solich and staff.

This is the freaking MAC, loaded with weakass teams and rarely seeing a really top team (recent excepts NIU and this year's WMU). It's not like a lightning bolt has to strike to win a title in the MAC.

But keep finding any reason you want for no MAC in 11 years.


Stay tuned for 10 more days.
You're a dope. Ohio was a weakass team for decades prior to Frank's arrival. I thought old people like you remembered the past like it was yesterday.

By the way, did you attend a game this year? What is your OBC donation level? As you know, Californians have no problem talking about money.
mail
perimeterpost
11/24/2016 2:51 AM
12 teams in a league... 6 teams in a division... in Solich's 12th year he should have, on average, 1 conference title and 2 divisions titles. We'll see how the numbers work out on Friday.
mail
person
Lande71
11/24/2016 9:03 AM
[QUOTE=CA Bobcat] [QUOTE=Monroe Slavin] Goodness sake.

I don't know. But in the modern era...let's call that the last 40 or so years..has there been a coach who's helmed a MAC team for 11 years at any MAC school who did not win a MAC title?

Aren't we looking at a MAC record for futility? In football at any rate. I wonder if that holds in any sport?

It's absurd how indulgent you all are with Solich and staff.

This is the freaking MAC, loaded with weakass teams and rarely seeing a really top team (recent excepts NIU and this year's WMU). It's not like a lightning bolt has to strike to win a title in the MAC.

But keep finding any reason you want for no MAC in 11 years.


Stay tuned for 10 more days.


Ca Bobcat, I take it you are not letting Monroe accompany you to the MACC in Detroit!? I'm sure he has no time to come as his fingers are cramping daily from typing what appears to be the same things over and over and over. My fingers hurt just reading them, especially the middle finger!
Last Edited: 11/24/2016 9:06:00 AM by Lande71
mail
bshot44
11/24/2016 9:50 AM
Recovering Journalist wrote:expand_more
8-4 and in the hunt for a championship. You can't ask for more. The rants in this thread would be amusing if they weren't so sad.

Who could have guessed twelve years ago that the day would come when a team that was 8-4, defeated every team in the East, was bowl bound, won the East Championship, and was preparing to play for the conference championship would be considered unacceptable. Yes, the team is imperfect, but they are a scrappy bunch that never quits. They have my full support, and here's hoping they come back from Detroit with the trophy.


Happy Thanksgiving, BAers.
You sure as hell can ask for more, and doing so doesn't make you a bad fan.

I'm thrilled that we have 8-4 to complain about. I know that the team works hard. I have season tickets. I lived through the 1-10 years on campus. I know that it's been a feat to make this team perennially respectable. But I don't get this attitude of permanent gratitude for not just 8-4, but THIS 8-4.

We're 8-4 thanks to one of the softest schedules in FBS. We have exactly ONE win against a team with a winning record, and that win at Toledo remains the only impressive victory of the year. It's an anomaly. We tied with Fiami for the MAC East crown, and the MAC East is awful.

Nothing this team has done since the Toledo game suggests that the MACC will be competitive. I'll be doing cartwheels with everyone else if they prove me wrong, but if you're doing cartwheels now your expectations are really low. [/QUOTE]Solid post. A ton of truth to a lot of what you said. I too a thrilled to be 8-4... but utterly underwhelmed with how they got there. If it ends with a title, I'll be super excited (stunned) but won't erase what I've watched, especially offensively, against some bad defenses.

I say we're 8-4, but with a legit offense that could be 12-0.

Do you consider a team with no double digit losses this season an improvement over the crashing losses of the last 4.5 years?
I totally think it's an improvement. There's been some pride reinstated. I felt that was lacking in recent years based on drubbings in the MAC where it appeared they just laid down.

But what hasn't improved is the offensive gameplan they keep trotting out. It's stale and predictable.

How else do you explain Akron shutting Ohio down? They had 120th ranked defense and they held us to 9 points.

It's not the 8-4 that sucks. It's the way they get there. It could and should be better. And just cause folks "complain" doesn't make them any less of a Bobcat fan. This is a message board. You're going to get a variety of viewpoints.

Giacamo, L.C., we have to consider the sources of the sour grapes and move past it. Luckily for Ohio University, this negative, mouthy minority is so far off base that they cannot be taken seriously by any people who control our programs. Bobcat fans will be backing the Bobcat players and our staff next week in Detroit. See you there!
Go to the chat room during a game. Not a mouthy minority who are tired of the staleness. You just get more of a vocal majority on here patting everyone on the back for jobs we'll done. I have a ton of friends not on this board and many more I meet at tailgates and games that feel same way...

Thanks Frank for building this program, but it's time to take it to next level. Tired of watching unexciting 7-5, 8-4 seasons while others in our league (Toledo, NIU, BG, WMU) in recent years excel and gain national attention. It's happened once in 12 years under Frank and we proceeded to fall on our face immediately after and fall back to obscurity.

[QUOTE=CatFud] I don't understand the "soft" argument. OHIO has done quite well in its conference and among peer programs. OHIO has won its division and is advancing to the league championship, for the fourth time in 12 years. The current staff has amassed a lifetime 59-37 conference record, The record indicates that OHIO typically resides in the top 1/3 of the MAC and maintains a program comparable to say, the bottom half of the Big 10, despite some disparity in resources. So please explain the "soft" argument.
This is almost laughable. I'd hope that after 12 years, we're residing in the top third of the MAC. My goodness. That's not a huge accomplishment for a staff that has been together more than a decade in this pretty mediocre league.

I'd expect Ohio to be the class of the league. Not constantly looking up at others playing catch-up to the league's best.

That 59-37 has been well documented on here in the past. It's built mainly on wins against the bottom feeders in the league. Not many of those come against the better teams, especially in the last 5 years. The Toledo and NIU games the last couple years are both nice but those 37 losses have come a lot to the better teams in this league.

We've feasted on the poor in and out of our conference for years. It's led to bowl games. That's the "soft" comment.

But as I've said before... If that's all our program is going to strive for is bowl games & occasionally a MAC East division title... Just let me know and I'll sit back and enjoy the show.

But I like to raise expectations to being a perennial MAC powerhouse, nationally ranked more often. Play for a shot at a NY6 bowl game.

We were on that track in 2012 when the wheels came off. It's been mildly underwhelming since. Maybe Friday changes that. I'll be there to see first hand.

I'm just a fan who'd like to see a little bit more from his football program and says so. Doesn't make me the devil or unappreciative of where Frank has taken us from.

Happy Gobble Gobble Day
mail
person
allen
11/24/2016 10:40 AM
bshot44 wrote:expand_more
8-4 and in the hunt for a championship. You can't ask for more. The rants in this thread would be amusing if they weren't so sad.

Who could have guessed twelve years ago that the day would come when a team that was 8-4, defeated every team in the East, was bowl bound, won the East Championship, and was preparing to play for the conference championship would be considered unacceptable. Yes, the team is imperfect, but they are a scrappy bunch that never quits. They have my full support, and here's hoping they come back from Detroit with the trophy.


Happy Thanksgiving, BAers.
You sure as hell can ask for more, and doing so doesn't make you a bad fan.

I'm thrilled that we have 8-4 to complain about. I know that the team works hard. I have season tickets. I lived through the 1-10 years on campus. I know that it's been a feat to make this team perennially respectable. But I don't get this attitude of permanent gratitude for not just 8-4, but THIS 8-4.

We're 8-4 thanks to one of the softest schedules in FBS. We have exactly ONE win against a team with a winning record, and that win at Toledo remains the only impressive victory of the year. It's an anomaly. We tied with Fiami for the MAC East crown, and the MAC East is awful.

Nothing this team has done since the Toledo game suggests that the MACC will be competitive. I'll be doing cartwheels with everyone else if they prove me wrong, but if you're doing cartwheels now your expectations are really low.
Solid post. A ton of truth to a lot of what you said. I too a thrilled to be 8-4... but utterly underwhelmed with how they got there. If it ends with a title, I'll be super excited (stunned) but won't erase what I've watched, especially offensively, against some bad defenses.

I say we're 8-4, but with a legit offense that could be 12-0.

Do you consider a team with no double digit losses this season an improvement over the crashing losses of the last 4.5 years?
I totally think it's an improvement. There's been some pride reinstated. I felt that was lacking in recent years based on drubbings in the MAC where it appeared they just laid down.

But what hasn't improved is the offensive gameplan they keep trotting out. It's stale and predictable.

How else do you explain Akron shutting Ohio down? They had 120th ranked defense and they held us to 9 points.

It's not the 8-4 that sucks. It's the way they get there. It could and should be better. And just cause folks "complain" doesn't make them any less of a Bobcat fan. This is a message board. You're going to get a variety of viewpoints.

Giacamo, L.C., we have to consider the sources of the sour grapes and move past it. Luckily for Ohio University, this negative, mouthy minority is so far off base that they cannot be taken seriously by any people who control our programs. Bobcat fans will be backing the Bobcat players and our staff next week in Detroit. See you there!
Go to the chat room during a game. Not a mouthy minority who are tired of the staleness. You just get more of a vocal majority on here patting everyone on the back for jobs we'll done. I have a ton of friends not on this board and many more I meet at tailgates and games that feel same way...

Thanks Frank for building this program, but it's time to take it to next level. Tired of watching unexciting 7-5, 8-4 seasons while others in our league (Toledo, NIU, BG, WMU) in recent years excel and gain national attention. It's happened once in 12 years under Frank and we proceeded to fall on our face immediately after and fall back to obscurity.

I don't understand the "soft" argument. OHIO has done quite well in its conference and among peer programs. OHIO has won its division and is advancing to the league championship, for the fourth time in 12 years. The current staff has amassed a lifetime 59-37 conference record, The record indicates that OHIO typically resides in the top 1/3 of the MAC and maintains a program comparable to say, the bottom half of the Big 10, despite some disparity in resources. So please explain the "soft" argument.
This is almost laughable. I'd hope that after 12 years, we're residing in the top third of the MAC. My goodness. That's not a huge accomplishment for a staff that has been together more than a decade in this pretty mediocre league.

I'd expect Ohio to be the class of the league. Not constantly looking up at others playing catch-up to the league's best.

That 59-37 has been well documented on here in the past. It's built mainly on wins against the bottom feeders in the league. Not many of those come against the better teams, especially in the last 5 years. The Toledo and NIU games the last couple years are both nice but those 37 losses have come a lot to the better teams in this league.

We've feasted on the poor in and out of our conference for years. It's led to bowl games. That's the "soft" comment.

But as I've said before... If that's all our program is going to strive for is bowl games & occasionally a MAC East division title... Just let me know and I'll sit back and enjoy the show.

But I like to raise expectations to being a perennial MAC powerhouse, nationally ranked more often. Play for a shot at a NY6 bowl game.

We were on that track in 2012 when the wheels came off. It's been mildly underwhelming since. Maybe Friday changes that. I'll be there to see first hand.

I'm just a fan who'd like to see a little bit more from his football program and says so. Doesn't make me the devil or unappreciative of where Frank has taken us from.

Happy Gobble Gobble Day
What a clap back!
mail
person
Monroe Slavin
11/24/2016 12:06 PM
CA Bobcat wrote:expand_more
Goodness sake.

I don't know. But in the modern era...let's call that the last 40 or so years..has there been a coach who's helmed a MAC team for 11 years at any MAC school who did not win a MAC title?

Aren't we looking at a MAC record for futility? In football at any rate. I wonder if that holds in any sport?

It's absurd how indulgent you all are with Solich and staff.

This is the freaking MAC, loaded with weakass teams and rarely seeing a really top team (recent excepts NIU and this year's WMU). It's not like a lightning bolt has to strike to win a title in the MAC.

But keep finding any reason you want for no MAC in 11 years.


Stay tuned for 10 more days.
You're a dope. Ohio was a weakass team for decades prior to Frank's arrival. I thought old people like you remembered the past like it was yesterday.

By the way, did you attend a game this year? What is your OBC donation level? As you know, Californians have no problem talking about money.


You remind me of someone who just says whatever comes to mind without any regard for the actual facts.


Why don't you have the grace to post under your real name?


The argument that, well, we are no longer the worst--that's mighty impressive.


Namaste.
mail
person
CA Bobcat
11/24/2016 1:47 PM
Lande71 wrote:expand_more
[QUOTE=CA Bobcat] [QUOTE=Monroe Slavin] Goodness sake.

I don't know. But in the modern era...let's call that the last 40 or so years..has there been a coach who's helmed a MAC team for 11 years at any MAC school who did not win a MAC title?

Aren't we looking at a MAC record for futility? In football at any rate. I wonder if that holds in any sport?

It's absurd how indulgent you all are with Solich and staff.

This is the freaking MAC, loaded with weakass teams and rarely seeing a really top team (recent excepts NIU and this year's WMU). It's not like a lightning bolt has to strike to win a title in the MAC.

But keep finding any reason you want for no MAC in 11 years.


Stay tuned for 10 more days.


Ca Bobcat, I take it you are not letting Monroe accompany you to the MACC in Detroit!? I'm sure he has no time to come as his fingers are cramping daily from typing what appears to be the same things over and over and over. My fingers hurt just reading them, especially the middle finger!

Well, this chump Monroe never leaves his house and doesn't donate liberally to the program, yet continues to whine about the program not reaching his expectations. So, I can't accompany him to the MACC because he never actually attends OHIO football games.
mail
person
CA Bobcat
11/24/2016 1:56 PM
Monroe Slavin wrote:expand_more
Goodness sake.

I don't know. But in the modern era...let's call that the last 40 or so years..has there been a coach who's helmed a MAC team for 11 years at any MAC school who did not win a MAC title?

Aren't we looking at a MAC record for futility? In football at any rate. I wonder if that holds in any sport?

It's absurd how indulgent you all are with Solich and staff.

This is the freaking MAC, loaded with weakass teams and rarely seeing a really top team (recent excepts NIU and this year's WMU). It's not like a lightning bolt has to strike to win a title in the MAC.

But keep finding any reason you want for no MAC in 11 years.


Stay tuned for 10 more days.
You're a dope. Ohio was a weakass team for decades prior to Frank's arrival. I thought old people like you remembered the past like it was yesterday.

By the way, did you attend a game this year? What is your OBC donation level? As you know, Californians have no problem talking about money.


You remind me of someone who just says whatever comes to mind without any regard for the actual facts.


Why don't you have the grace to post under your real name?


The argument that, well, we are no longer the worst--that's mighty impressive.


Namaste.
The fact is, OHIO is playing in the MACC. It is a very real thing and you can't deny it as hard as you may try.

Dude, I couldn't give two f's what your name actually is and I don't see why you care what mine is unless you're trying to track me down so you can TP my house. I am an OBC Legend donor and since there are so few of us, that should really narrow things down for your little brain.

Try actually attending an OHIO football game in person sometime and giving to the program you expect to be consistent world beaters. It takes money to make shit happen. Pounding your keyboard on autopilot doesn't cut it.
mail
person
CafTud
11/24/2016 2:14 PM
bshot44 wrote:expand_more
I say we're 8-4, but with a legit offense that could be 12-0....

...not a huge accomplishment for a staff that has been together more than a decade in this pretty mediocre league.

But I like to raise expectations to being a perennial MAC powerhouse, nationally ranked more often. Play for a shot at a NY6 bowl game.
OK, now I understand...anything less than 12-0 is unacceptable, because the MAC is "mediocre" and none of the other teams are trying to win a zero-sum game. And this will always be the case, because recruiting is similarly uncompetitive and anyway, there is never any turnover of the roster. And champions of the non-mediocre leagues should step aside on New Year's Day.

Follow-up questions: are these realistic expectations; and, "mediocre" compared to what?

The MAC is a solid mid-major league; the quality of the top 1/3 of teams is comparable to the bottom tier of any P5 league despite obvious disparities in financial and physical resources, and contending for its championship every third or fourth year is a significant achievement.

Consider the hoards of well-endowed P5 teams who will not be playing for a league championship or even a bowl game...Notre Dame, Cincinnati, Duke, Syracuse, Iowa State, Rutgers, Purdue, Illinois, Missouri, Arizona....By comparison, the view from the top of the MAC is not so bad.
mail
person
Recovering Journalist
11/24/2016 2:49 PM
CA Bobcat wrote:expand_more
Try actually attending an OHIO football game in person sometime and giving to the program you expect to be consistent world beaters. It takes money to make shit happen. Pounding your keyboard on autopilot doesn't cut it.
You can say a lot of things about Monroe, but if you think he doesn't financially support this program more than almost anyone on this board, you're woefully uninformed.
mail
person
Recovering Journalist
11/24/2016 2:55 PM
CatFud wrote:expand_more
OK, now I understand...anything less than 12-0 is unacceptable, because the MAC is "mediocre" and none of the other teams are trying to win a zero-sum game.
This is a straw man. No one is saying anything about regular undefeated seasons. This is about wanting more than being Texas State's only FBS win, wanting more than a single win against a winning team, and wanting a MACC every 10 years or so.

Spin it how you like, but this is a program stuck in neutral. I'm just shocked at the number of fans who castigate those of us who want it to move forward.
Showing Messages: 151 - 175 of 238
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)