He's the one comparing Tim Albin to Texas' OC saying Albin is better. But I'm the one that needs to get a grip.
Ok.
Got it.
Actually, no. It was Allen that started the comparison, saying that Ohio should hire the Texas OC. Bcat2 gave a legitimate observation that the Texas fans are not very happy with their OC, and that against a common opponent, Kansas, Ohio put more points on the board, and did it with presumably less talent. I can't argue with that.
Let's put the regular bickering aside for a few hours. Go Bobcats. Beat the ovetshoes. [/QUOTE]I agree. The bickering is getting old when we rehash the same argument. But I'm going to defend myself here.
This is what bcat2 fired away with, unprovoked in a different thread.
The accomplishment yesterday was inspiring a 1 win Kansas roster which even lost to Monroe's & B44's "mediocre" Ohio to beat the state of Texas's lead program.
Bcat2 did try to compare the two, going to the degree of saying Texas would rather have Albin
Likely Texas fans would swap for Albin right now.
And then proceeded to back it up with, of all things the Texas State game where Ohio scored 3 points in the first half under Albin's leadership
[Quote=bcat2]
B44. Hold your focus please. We are discussing the OCs here. Vs Texas State Albin's play calling scored 54, racked up 630 yards averaging 6.3 per play over 97 plays. Texas State was not on Albin