Ohio Football Topic
Topic: Why NFL Ratings Are Sagging
Page: 8 of 11
mail
person
Monroe Slavin
12/17/2016 2:25 PM
L.C. wrote:expand_more
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/yes-colin-kaepernick-is-hur...

A timely article. Headline: Yes, Colin Kaepernick is hurting NFL ratings

The comments are interesting, too. It seems there is a broad overlap between Trump supporters and those that have stopped or reduced their watching of the NFL over this issue. I would think that Trump supporters are/were a prime demographic for NFL supporters.

Logically the sequence of events you'd expect to see would be falling viewership/support leading to falling revenue, leading to falling player salaries. Since existing players may be under long term contract, the differential should be more visible for players signing new contracts. It will be interesting to see how this develops.

Agree that there's likely a broad overlap between Trump supporters and those foregoing the NFL. Also between those supporters and people who will forego the truth if it doesn't fit their viewpoint. After all about the biggest blowhard liar ever was elected despite that most wouldn't let their child date him given his recorded statements.

I am impressed by those here who take one personal incident and generalize it as a universal truth and who tell us that we can't comment unless we've experienced it (so, if haven't coached or played football, then can't comment on it).

But, wait. Doesn't that mean that one can't comment on certain situations unless one is African-American or has protested the anthem at a football game?

Closed minds rule!
mail
person
Monroe Slavin
12/17/2016 2:27 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uftENCWhKrA

DeSean Jackson is the man.
mail
OhioCatFan
12/17/2016 5:04 PM
Monroe Slavin wrote:expand_more
. . . people who will forego the truth if it doesn't fit their viewpoint. . . .Closed minds rule!
Boy, for a minute I thought we were talking about a certain poster on BA who manufactures a new "truth mantra" every few months because the new facts don't fit his viewpoint. This same poster often gets confused between political matters and football and puts in his posts irrelevant comments about political figures that he doesn't like and then compares them with OHIO coaches or OHIO coaching philosophy. Sorry, I was mistaken, I must be on the wrong board. Sorry for the intrusion. Now, back to your regularly programmed mantra . . .
mail
person
Monroe Slavin
12/18/2016 3:56 AM
Be a dense load if you want...but the main theme is mediocrity and lack of MACC.

The rest--the crashing losses, bad playcalling and recruiting, etc--is just specific evidence.

Yeah, gotta be satisfied that we've not won a MAC or had one season of less than 4 losses from this staff in 12 years.

Tremendous improvement this year not to have had any 25 or 30 point losses.

Heck, that's really the same as winning the MAC, isn't it.


I'm sure every top football staff in the nation will be visiting Athens this summer in search of more perfect knowledge.
mail
person
Monroe Slavin
12/18/2016 12:00 PM
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/12/17/what-a-lot-of-people-get-w...

The truth and facts always seem a better way to go than other stuff that one wants to believe.
mail
OhioCatFan
12/18/2016 12:14 PM
Monroe Slavin wrote:expand_more
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/12/17/what-a-lot-of-people-get-w...

The truth and facts always seem a better way to go than other stuff that one wants to believe.
FWIW, I was always on the side of the lady bringing this suit. Part of the reason is that I have a mouth that is easily burned and I am constantly having to put a little ice in soup that is served at restaurants so hot that it would literally burn the flesh off the roof of my mouth.
mail
DelBobcat
12/19/2016 11:03 AM
Alan Swank wrote:expand_more
Alan, I will take a break from the game to answer your questions. No I don't view you as some sort of weak poster. We have all had a good give and take and perhaps this is a good way to wrap it up. No, I am currently not an on campus school administrator, though I have been and feel fortunate enough to have had some opportunities to do that on a wider more national scale which permits me to travel, speak, write etc. Alan, I really don't care to everyone's know business on this site. All I know is what they make available. I know you live in Athens and I have no idea if you are professor, research analyst or OU administrator. I wish you well in whatever endeavor you are involved. Perhaps we can continue to discuss issues when they arise, but it appears we have aired enough of our views--as far as I am concerned on this thread. Until the next time take care!
Fair enough and well stated. Let's adjourn to the City Tavern for an ale.

https://www.citytavern.com
I live about 10 blocks from the City Tavern. It's good for what it is, but it's a reproduction and not the actual City Tavern. For a true historic Philadelphia experience check out McGillin's, Cherry Street Tavern, or head up to Chestnut Hill for a Schmitter sandwich at McNally's.


http://mcgillins.com /

http://www.cherrysttavern.com/HOME.html

http://www.mcnallystavern.com /
Really, Mcgillins? It has televisions and karaoke. Hardly historic.
Do the televisions or karaoke change the fact that the bar has been in operation since 1860? Or that it is full of cool historic Philly artifacts? Or that they have every liquor license since 1860 proudly displayed behind the bar? Or that it has played host to Presidents, Kings, and all manner of historic figures?

City Tavern is a reproduction, carefully curated to look like it is historic. It's not the building that was there when the history happened. Mcgillin's a living and breathing pub that has evolved with the times while holding tightly to all the things that made it great in 1860, 1960, and will make it great in 2060.

...and to bring this back to the original topic, the televisions allow you to watch NFL games there :)
City Tavern burned down and they rebuilt it. So what - it's pretty darn close to being authentic. You cite Mcgillins as part of the "true historic Philadelphia experience." A place with televisions and karaoke doesn't really capture that. Essentially what we are comparing is a rebuilt 18th century tavern which is primarily a restaurant today with an intact 1860 Irish pub that is primarily a sports bar today. There is room for both.
I guess my point was that City Tavern isn't authentic at all. It burned down in the mid 19th Century and was rebuilt over a hundred years later and the reproduction is very different from the original in its atmosphere. Plus, none of the history they talk about actually happened in the extant building. McGillin's, on the other hand, has had a ton of Philadelphia history take place within its four walls--and that continues to this day. I'm not sure why you'd get hung up on them having TVs and a karaoke night. They also have tons of Philly artifacts and newspaper clippings on the walls from throughout their history. And those TVs aren't just used for sports. They're also for special events like the Mummer's parade, election returns, and the State of the Union. Calling McGillin's primarily a sports bar is a huge disservice. Sports bar is about number 100 on the list of things it is. It really is a fascinating place.

But yes, there is definitely room for all types of places :)


P.S.- Part of my beef with City Tavern is a general beef with the National Historic Park. They NPS tore down thousands of historic buildings to create Independence Mall and the pastoral setting to the south of Independence Hall around Independence Square. What you have there today is not historically accurate at all. It makes Philly look like it was a peaceful pastoral village. In reality it was a bustling metropolis and the second largest city in the British Empire. We wiped out tons of actual history in the surrounding blocks to create a fake version of 18th Century Philly.
Last Edited: 12/19/2016 11:10:24 AM by DelBobcat
mail
person
rpbobcat
12/19/2016 12:10 PM
As a history buff I always respected the Founders,but more so after being in Phillly in the summer.

Granted they didn't know any better,but being in Philly in July,I can't imagine what it was like, working on the Declaration of Independence.

Not exactly comfortable clothes,all the windows closed,plus the stress of worrying about getting caught.
mail
person
Bcat2
12/19/2016 6:00 PM
FYI 2015 & 2016. Make of this what you will.

Fatal Shootings 2016 vs 2015. White 435/495 (-12%), Black 223/258 (-14%), Hispanic 153/172 (-11%)

2016 CA 129, TX 79, FL 54, AZ 48, NC 32, CO 31, WA 26, Ohio 26, GA 26, IL 25, AL 21.

Monroe, CA 129, what the hell? Kaepernick QB for San Fran CA NFL team. I am getting why the left coast passion, though, it seems Kaepernick needs to be protesting the CA flag.

2016
https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/national/police-s... /

2015
https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/national/police-s... /

L.C.. One point on the protest's effectiveness. Were it not for this discussion, I would be doing a training lab on tax preparation. Yet, there is this.
Last Edited: 12/19/2016 6:37:59 PM by Bcat2
mail
person
BillyTheCat
12/19/2016 8:23 PM
Bcat2 wrote:expand_more
FYI 2015 & 2016. Make of this what you will.

Fatal Shootings 2016 vs 2015. White 435/495 (-12%), Black 223/258 (-14%), Hispanic 153/172 (-11%)

2016 CA 129, TX 79, FL 54, AZ 48, NC 32, CO 31, WA 26, Ohio 26, GA 26, IL 25, AL 21.

Monroe, CA 129, what the hell? Kaepernick QB for San Fran CA NFL team. I am getting why the left coast passion, though, it seems Kaepernick needs to be protesting the CA flag.

2016
https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/national/police-s... /

2015
https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/national/police-s... /

L.C.. One point on the protest's effectiveness. Were it not for this discussion, I would be doing a training lab on tax preparation. Yet, there is this.

Cant be true, Trump tells us that murder and violence has never been so bad.
mail
person
Bcat2
12/19/2016 9:28 PM
BillyTheCat wrote:expand_more
FYI 2015 & 2016. Make of this what you will.

Fatal Shootings 2016 vs 2015. White 435/495 (-12%), Black 223/258 (-14%), Hispanic 153/172 (-11%)

2016 CA 129, TX 79, FL 54, AZ 48, NC 32, CO 31, WA 26, Ohio 26, GA 26, IL 25, AL 21.

Monroe, CA 129, what the hell? Kaepernick QB for San Fran CA NFL team. I am getting why the left coast passion, though, it seems Kaepernick needs to be protesting the CA flag.

2016
https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/national/police-s... /

2015
https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/national/police-s... /

L.C.. One point on the protest's effectiveness. Were it not for this discussion, I would be doing a training lab on tax preparation. Yet, there is this.

Cant be true, Trump tells us that murder and violence has never been so bad.
Billy. The above reflects fatal shootings by police. 2016 down 12% from 2015.

Trump might be referring to actual murders in our cities. Those stats are trending up, not down. Chicago 600 homicides by November is on a pace to set a wrong record. Baltimore is over 300 for the second year in a row. So is there really evidence that Trump is wrong?
Last Edited: 12/19/2016 11:51:52 PM by Bcat2
mail
person
L.C.
12/20/2016 1:26 AM
Bcat2 wrote:expand_more
Billy. The above reflects fatal shootings by police. 2016 down 12% from 2015.

Trump might be referring to actual murders in our cities. Those stats are trending up, not down. Chicago 600 homicides by November is on a pace to set a wrong record. Baltimore is over 300 for the second year in a row. So is there really evidence that Trump is wrong?

That's not really surprising, a decline in deaths at the hands of police, combined with more homicides. I think that most people expected that result.
mail
person
Bcat2
12/20/2016 6:46 AM
L.C. wrote:expand_more
Billy. The above reflects fatal shootings by police. 2016 down 12% from 2015.

Trump might be referring to actual murders in our cities. Those stats are trending up, not down. Chicago 600 homicides by November is on a pace to set a wrong record. Baltimore is over 300 for the second year in a row. So is there really evidence that Trump is wrong?

That's not really surprising, a decline in deaths at the hands of police, combined with more homicides. I think that most people expected that result.
Actually the CA numbers caught me by surprise, what with all their safe zones and sanctuary cities, what with all the resident sage wisdom from all the actors who have played, presidents, politicians, lawyers, doctors, etc. in movies and on TV.

Note. Unpaid nonpolitical announcement. Tax season is upon us. There are many seniors and others who could use help with tax preparation. Most areas have no cost tax preparation through university extensions and the like. Volunteering and helping someone through this is rewarding. No one should have to pay for help with a simple return. Amazing what you can learn about the IRS, the tax code and even the Affordable Care Act.
Last Edited: 12/20/2016 7:30:33 AM by Bcat2
mail
person
Ohio69
12/20/2016 8:45 AM
Bcat2 wrote:expand_more
Trump might be referring to actual murders in our cities.
Putin's boy Trump says whatever he wants. And it works. PT Barnum would be proud.

By the way, crime and murder rates are way low historically. But, I don't know what the heck is going on in Chicago. That place is murder crazy.
Last Edited: 12/20/2016 8:48:37 AM by Ohio69
mail
person
Bcat2
12/20/2016 9:14 AM
Ohio69 wrote:expand_more
Trump might be referring to actual murders in our cities.
Putin's boy Trump says whatever he wants. And it works. PT Barnum would be proud.

By the way, crime and murder rates are way low historically. But, I don't know what the heck is going on in Chicago. That place is murder crazy.

"By the way, crime and murder rates are way low historically." Missourians have a saying, "Show Me."
mail
person
BillyTheCat
12/20/2016 10:18 AM
Ohio69 wrote:expand_more
Trump might be referring to actual murders in our cities.
Putin's boy Trump says whatever he wants. And it works. PT Barnum would be proud.

By the way, crime and murder rates are way low historically. But, I don't know what the heck is going on in Chicago. That place is murder crazy.
http://www.factcheck.org/2016/10/trump-wrong-on-murder-rate /
mail
person
Robert Fox
12/20/2016 10:36 AM
BillyTheCat wrote:expand_more
Trump might be referring to actual murders in our cities.
Putin's boy Trump says whatever he wants. And it works. PT Barnum would be proud.

By the way, crime and murder rates are way low historically. But, I don't know what the heck is going on in Chicago. That place is murder crazy.
http://www.factcheck.org/2016/10/trump-wrong-on-murder-rate /
https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/fbi-rele...

A snippet: All of the offenses in the violent crime category—murder and non-negligent manslaughter, rape (revised definition), rape (legacy definition), aggravated assault, and robbery—showed increases when data from the first six months of 2015 were compared with data from the first six months of 2014. The number of rapes (legacy definition) increased 9.6 percent, the number of murders increased 6.2 percent, aggravated assaults increased 2.3 percent, the number of rapes (revised definition) rose 1.1 percent, and robbery offenses were up 0.3 percent.
mail
person
Ohio69
12/20/2016 10:51 AM
Folks, just google murder rate in America and you'll see that even with a one year jump in 2015 crime rates in America are at like 30 year lows. Maybe 50 year lows.

The violent crime rate peaked around 1992 and has plummeted. The murder rate had similar peaks in 1974, 1980, and 1992 and has plummeted since 1992.

America is safer than it has been in like 40-50 years.

But, that doesn't win elections. Or get TV news or talk radio ratings.

Or just go here:
http://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/2016/07/Violent-Cr...

http://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/2016/07/Murder-Rat...

My wild ass guess is that the pressure to change policing tactics has resulted in murders spiking in places like Chicago and Baltimore.
Last Edited: 12/20/2016 10:56:59 AM by Ohio69
mail
person
rpbobcat
12/20/2016 11:09 AM
Ohio69 wrote:expand_more
Folks, just google murder rate in America and you'll see that even with a one year jump in 2015 crime rates in America are at like 30 year lows. Maybe 50 year lows.

The violent crime rate peaked around 19992 and has plummeted. The murder rate had similar peaks in 1974, 1980, and 1992 and has plummeted since 1992.

America is safer than it has been in like 40-50 years.

But, that doesn't win elections.

Or just go here:
http://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/2016/07/Violent-Cr...

http://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/2016/07/Murder-Rat...

My wild ass guess is that the pressure to change policing tactics has resulted in murders spiking in places like Chicago and Baltimore.

Personally,I don't find much value in nationwide crime statistics.
If area "a" has a marked increase,while area "b" has a similar decrease,the overall number remains the same.
Not much comfort if you live in area "a".

I work with a number of law enforcement people and prosecutors.

Based on what they say,overall crime rates nationwide may be down.But crime rates in certain areas,like inner cities,especially violent,gang related crimes are way up.
One thing that has increased a lot in the "urban" areas around here,like Paterson and Passaic are driveby's.
mail
person
L.C.
12/20/2016 11:25 AM
Ohio69 wrote:expand_more
Folks, just google murder rate in America and you'll see that even with a one year jump in 2015 crime rates in America are at like 30 year lows. Maybe 50 year lows.

The violent crime rate peaked around 1992 and has plummeted. The murder rate had similar peaks in 1974, 1980, and 1992 and has plummeted since 1992.

America is safer than it has been in like 40-50 years.

But, that doesn't win elections. Or get TV news or talk radio ratings.

Or just go here:
http://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/2016/07/Violent-Cr...

http://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/2016/07/Murder-Rat...

My wild ass guess is that the pressure to change policing tactics has resulted in murders spiking in places like Chicago and Baltimore.

Let's not pretend it is just the right or just the left that make emotional pleas based on crime. Both do it. For example, if you listen to the news services, every time there is a large scale violent crime, you hear calls for gun control (even when the violent crime was committed with knives and a car, as happened at Ohio State), yet the data above includes large-scale crimes, and on the whole it is falling. And, as above, Trump certainly misquotes data, though I personally consider him to be a populist or would-be fascist, and not "right wing".

What is particularly interesting here, is the spike in murder rates in Chicago and Baltimore in particular, given that those two specific locations come to mind when when things about protests against police. Is there a similar spike in and around Ferguson, Missouri? Is there a relationship? For example, did police back on enforcement in violent neighborhoods? Did criminals get bolder, expecting that their would be less enforcement? Further study to understand this trend is certainly justified.

As a side question, are the mullahs all on holiday? I've been hearing the icy whistles of Siberia calling for quite awhile, and yet there is no sign we are heading there.
Last Edited: 12/20/2016 11:29:22 AM by L.C.
mail
person
Ohio69
12/20/2016 11:38 AM
Hmmmm. Well, can't find 2015 data for those places. But, through 2014 Passaic's crime rate has plummeted since 2002. Never more than 6 murders there in that time period. And 2014 there were 2. Patterson NJ does have more murders (24) in 2014 after having 18 to 21 the previous years. All other crime in Patterson seems to be down.
mail
person
Alan Swank
12/20/2016 1:06 PM
L.C. wrote:expand_more
Folks, just google murder rate in America and you'll see that even with a one year jump in 2015 crime rates in America are at like 30 year lows. Maybe 50 year lows.

The violent crime rate peaked around 1992 and has plummeted. The murder rate had similar peaks in 1974, 1980, and 1992 and has plummeted since 1992.

America is safer than it has been in like 40-50 years.

But, that doesn't win elections. Or get TV news or talk radio ratings.

Or just go here:
http://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/2016/07/Violent-Cr...

http://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/2016/07/Murder-Rat...

My wild ass guess is that the pressure to change policing tactics has resulted in murders spiking in places like Chicago and Baltimore.

Let's not pretend it is just the right or just the left that make emotional pleas based on crime. Both do it. For example, if you listen to the news services, every time there is a large scale violent crime, you hear calls for gun control (even when the violent crime was committed with knives and a car, as happened at Ohio State), yet the data above includes large-scale crimes, and on the whole it is falling. And, as above, Trump certainly misquotes data, though I personally consider him to be a populist or would-be fascist, and not "right wing".

What is particularly interesting here, is the spike in murder rates in Chicago and Baltimore in particular, given that those two specific locations come to mind when when things about protests against police. Is there a similar spike in and around Ferguson, Missouri? Is there a relationship? For example, did police back on enforcement in violent neighborhoods? Did criminals get bolder, expecting that their would be less enforcement? Further study to understand this trend is certainly justified.

As a side question, are the mullahs all on holiday? I've been hearing the icy whistles of Siberia calling for quite awhile, and yet there is no sign we are heading there.
The reason we haven't been sent to Siberia is that by and large these "discussions" have been fairly respectful save for the personal attacks on Monroe. This is the only message board that I'm registered on but in looking at some others, they are by and large shallow one sentence smart ass replies to shallow one sentence smart ass replies. I think that as a group we have proved that you can have intelligent discourse on a wide range of topics on a "sports" message board. The other thing is that for the most part, the vast majority of posters actually have skin in the game as graduates of Ohio University as opposed to those who bought their tosu tee shirt at Walmart.
mail
DelBobcat
12/20/2016 1:09 PM
rpbobcat wrote:expand_more
Folks, just google murder rate in America and you'll see that even with a one year jump in 2015 crime rates in America are at like 30 year lows. Maybe 50 year lows.

The violent crime rate peaked around 19992 and has plummeted. The murder rate had similar peaks in 1974, 1980, and 1992 and has plummeted since 1992.

America is safer than it has been in like 40-50 years.

But, that doesn't win elections.

Or just go here:
http://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/2016/07/Violent-Cr...

http://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/2016/07/Murder-Rat...

My wild ass guess is that the pressure to change policing tactics has resulted in murders spiking in places like Chicago and Baltimore.

Personally,I don't find much value in nationwide crime statistics.
If area "a" has a marked increase,while area "b" has a similar decrease,the overall number remains the same.
Not much comfort if you live in area "a".

I work with a number of law enforcement people and prosecutors.

Based on what they say,overall crime rates nationwide may be down.But crime rates in certain areas,like inner cities,especially violent,gang related crimes are way up.
One thing that has increased a lot in the "urban" areas around here,like Paterson and Passaic are driveby's.
That's absolutely not true. Crime rates are down in inner cities big time. The 1980s were a peak for inner city violence. I work with this data on a regular basis. Cities like Chicago and Baltimore, where the rate is trending up, are the anomalies--not the rule. And let's be clear, those are very short term trends. Even those cities are safer now than they were a generation ago. As someone said before, it is not useful to compare the change in violent crime from one year to the next. You really do need to look at the longer trend. Our cities are the safest they've been in generations.
mail
OhioStunter
12/20/2016 1:28 PM
Summary of topics/personalities making cameos in this thread (in order of appearance):

NFL Ratings
Art Modell
Mark Cuban
1994 MLB Strike
Steve Jobs
Erector Sets
Colin Kaepernick
NASCAR
Sen. Lindsey Graham
Fidel Castro
Malcolm X
Led Zeppelin
City Tavern
Trump Supporters
DeSean Jackson
Siberia
mail
person
rpbobcat
12/20/2016 1:54 PM
DelBobcat wrote:expand_more
Folks, just google murder rate in America and you'll see that even with a one year jump in 2015 crime rates in America are at like 30 year lows. Maybe 50 year lows.

The violent crime rate peaked around 19992 and has plummeted. The murder rate had similar peaks in 1974, 1980, and 1992 and has plummeted since 1992.

America is safer than it has been in like 40-50 years.

But, that doesn't win elections.

Or just go here:
http://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/2016/07/Violent-Cr...

http://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/2016/07/Murder-Rat...

My wild ass guess is that the pressure to change policing tactics has resulted in murders spiking in places like Chicago and Baltimore.

Personally,I don't find much value in nationwide crime statistics.
If area "a" has a marked increase,while area "b" has a similar decrease,the overall number remains the same.
Not much comfort if you live in area "a".

I work with a number of law enforcement people and prosecutors.

Based on what they say,overall crime rates nationwide may be down.But crime rates in certain areas,like inner cities,especially violent,gang related crimes are way up.
One thing that has increased a lot in the "urban" areas around here,like Paterson and Passaic are driveby's.
That's absolutely not true. Crime rates are down in inner cities big time. The 1980s were a peak for inner city violence. I work with this data on a regular basis. Cities like Chicago and Baltimore, where the rate is trending up, are the anomalies--not the rule. And let's be clear, those are very short term trends. Even those cities are safer now than they were a generation ago. As someone said before, it is not useful to compare the change in violent crime from one year to the next. You really do need to look at the longer trend. Our cities are the safest they've been in generations.
You use the phrase "inner city violence".
That's a broad term,that covers a multitude of offenses.

There was big "expose" about how,under Mayor DiBlasio of NYC certain crimes were "reclassified" as "non-violent".
Also,if a person was charged with several offenses,the non-violent charge,if there as one,was used on their statistical breakdown.
He also wanted,don't know if its in place yet,certain "quality of life" offenses,like urinating in public decriminalized.

These types of actions show that statistically overall and violent crime rates are lower,which is just "smoke and mirrors".

One thing that can't be "fudged' are the number of shooting and/or murders.
In northern New Jersey,Paterson is on track to have the most murders in its history.
New York also has seen big spikes in this.

From talking to the law enforcement people I deal with,shootings are much more common then they used to be, due in large part to gangs.
They also say that criminals no longer have any fear of shooting at law enforcement.
Last Edited: 12/20/2016 1:55:35 PM by rpbobcat
Showing Messages: 176 - 200 of 255
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)