Ohio Football Topic
Topic: Monroe?
Page: 4 of 10
mail
person
L.C.
7/8/2017 9:33 AM
I'm going to have to disagree, on two points. My first point of disagreement is on whether we are "arguing". I don't think there is any arguing going on here. All we have is position statements. Some people expect maintenance of the status quo. Others expect the status quo but hope for better. Still others, myself included, expect continuing improvement.

By now we all recognize that we can't "win" an argument, and that we can't convince anyone to change their mind. The only thing that can change anyone's mind is the actual team performance. Where we are there is an intersection between the two perspectives as the team has risen from the low of 2014 back to winning the East again, but that won't last long. Either the team improves more from here, or it doesn't.

The second point of disagreement is that I don't think the discussion is the same as it has been in recent years. In this thread every post has been respectful, and no one has staked out the radical extreme position that there is nothing good at all about the program, and that anyone who disagrees is stupid.

I don't think most people are bothered by different opinions, so long as they are respectfully presented, and that's what has been lacking in recent years.
mail
person
bobcat695
7/8/2017 10:02 AM
While Monroe drove me nuts with the thread hijacking, I respected a few things about him. He was transparent the entire time, continues to give to both Ohio University and the Ohio Bobcat Club at commendable levels, and was consistent. By and large, the MAC stinks as a conference. It is crazy to not consider the lack of a title as a pretty big disappointment over the past decade or so.

I am personally growing very tired of hearing us refer to 40 years of history as a reason that we should be happy with 7-5 every year. Times change. 2017 Ohio Football is nothing like 1990 Ohio Football. The only people still around from that old regime are some of us. I agreed with the basis of Monroe's message, but hated his delivery.
mail
person
PA Bobcat Fan
7/8/2017 10:38 AM
^^+1000^^ Monroe wants greatness for Ohio what's wrong with that? He could be a real pain thread highjacking sometimes, but it was nice having someone else who wasn't satisfied with mediocrity.
mail
person
Bcat2
7/8/2017 12:16 PM
L.C. wrote:expand_more
I'm going to have to disagree, on two points. My first point of disagreement is on whether we are "arguing". I don't think there is any arguing going on here. All we have is position statements. Some people expect maintenance of the status quo. Others expect the status quo but hope for better. Still others, myself included, expect continuing improvement.

By now we all recognize that we can't "win" an argument, and that we can't convince anyone to change their mind. The only thing that can change anyone's mind is the actual team performance. Where we are there is an intersection between the two perspectives as the team has risen from the low of 2014 back to winning the East again, but that won't last long. Either the team improves more from here, or it doesn't.

The second point of disagreement is that I don't think the discussion is the same as it has been in recent years. In this thread every post has been respectful, and no one has staked out the radical extreme position that there is nothing good at all about the program, and that anyone who disagrees is stupid.

I don't think most people are bothered by different opinions, so long as they are respectfully presented, and that's what has been lacking in recent years.

BA has those who follow Ohio Football and those who closely follow Ohio Football. Following 8, 10 and 9 win seasons the record slipped to 6-6. Some folks had Ohio "circling the bowl" at that point. Others saw better seasons ahead. Teams have highs and lows Recently NIU and Bowling Green fans experienced what that means.

There are still those who believe "the MAC stinks as a conference" so winning the MACC should be easy. Well given the 2012 MACC went Orange Bowling and the 2016 MACC went Cotton Bowling the MAC is no longer your "uncle's" MAC.

Sorry, but, when I read "With the amount of student fees that we've spent since 2005, an occasional championship is expected" I detect that old "Enormous State University" vibe. Is Ohio even in the top half of the MAC in Football expenditures?
Last Edited: 7/8/2017 12:20:25 PM by Bcat2
mail
person
L.C.
7/8/2017 3:08 PM
bobcat695 wrote:expand_more
While Monroe drove me nuts with the thread hijacking...
I agreed with the basis of Monroe's message, but hated his delivery.

My hope is that Monroe will eventually recognize where he crossed the line, apologize for it, and return at some point to continue his message, but without the thread jacking and intolerance.
mail
person
Alan Swank
7/8/2017 3:25 PM
Bcat2 wrote:expand_more
I'm going to have to disagree, on two points. My first point of disagreement is on whether we are "arguing". I don't think there is any arguing going on here. All we have is position statements. Some people expect maintenance of the status quo. Others expect the status quo but hope for better. Still others, myself included, expect continuing improvement.

By now we all recognize that we can't "win" an argument, and that we can't convince anyone to change their mind. The only thing that can change anyone's mind is the actual team performance. Where we are there is an intersection between the two perspectives as the team has risen from the low of 2014 back to winning the East again, but that won't last long. Either the team improves more from here, or it doesn't.

The second point of disagreement is that I don't think the discussion is the same as it has been in recent years. In this thread every post has been respectful, and no one has staked out the radical extreme position that there is nothing good at all about the program, and that anyone who disagrees is stupid.

I don't think most people are bothered by different opinions, so long as they are respectfully presented, and that's what has been lacking in recent years.

BA has those who follow Ohio Football and those who closely follow Ohio Football. Following 8, 10 and 9 win seasons the record slipped to 6-6. Some folks had Ohio "circling the bowl" at that point. Others saw better seasons ahead. Teams have highs and lows Recently NIU and Bowling Green fans experienced what that means.

There are still those who believe "the MAC stinks as a conference" so winning the MACC should be easy. Well given the 2012 MACC went Orange Bowling and the 2016 MACC went Cotton Bowling the MAC is no longer your "uncle's" MAC.

Sorry, but, when I read "With the amount of student fees that we've spent since 2005, an occasional championship is expected" I detect that old "Enormous State University" vibe. Is Ohio even in the top half of the MAC in Football expenditures?
This is six years old but according to this article, in 2011 we spent the most. I can't find 2016 numbers anywhere.

http://businessofcollegesports.com/2011/04/29/how-does-th... /
mail
person
Bcat2
7/8/2017 3:58 PM
Alan Swank wrote:expand_more
I'm going to have to disagree, on two points. My first point of disagreement is on whether we are "arguing". I don't think there is any arguing going on here. All we have is position statements. Some people expect maintenance of the status quo. Others expect the status quo but hope for better. Still others, myself included, expect continuing improvement.

By now we all recognize that we can't "win" an argument, and that we can't convince anyone to change their mind. The only thing that can change anyone's mind is the actual team performance. Where we are there is an intersection between the two perspectives as the team has risen from the low of 2014 back to winning the East again, but that won't last long. Either the team improves more from here, or it doesn't.

The second point of disagreement is that I don't think the discussion is the same as it has been in recent years. In this thread every post has been respectful, and no one has staked out the radical extreme position that there is nothing good at all about the program, and that anyone who disagrees is stupid.

I don't think most people are bothered by different opinions, so long as they are respectfully presented, and that's what has been lacking in recent years.

BA has those who follow Ohio Football and those who closely follow Ohio Football. Following 8, 10 and 9 win seasons the record slipped to 6-6. Some folks had Ohio "circling the bowl" at that point. Others saw better seasons ahead. Teams have highs and lows Recently NIU and Bowling Green fans experienced what that means.

There are still those who believe "the MAC stinks as a conference" so winning the MACC should be easy. Well given the 2012 MACC went Orange Bowling and the 2016 MACC went Cotton Bowling the MAC is no longer your "uncle's" MAC.

Sorry, but, when I read "With the amount of student fees that we've spent since 2005, an occasional championship is expected" I detect that old "Enormous State University" vibe. Is Ohio even in the top half of the MAC in Football expenditures?
This is six years old but according to this article, in 2011 we spent the most. I can't find 2016 numbers anywhere.

http://businessofcollegesports.com/2011/04/29/how-does-th... /
Per the Hustle Belt link you provided earlier Ohio's reported expenses and subsidy % were both ninth of 12. ....?

Per your Business of College Sports link Ohio Football is one of the best revenue producers while still living within their means? I was not around Ohio athletics in 2005. Did coach Solich inherit best in MAC Football revinue?
Last Edited: 7/8/2017 4:16:16 PM by Bcat2
mail
person
Alan Swank
7/8/2017 4:09 PM
Bcat2 wrote:expand_more
I'm going to have to disagree, on two points. My first point of disagreement is on whether we are "arguing". I don't think there is any arguing going on here. All we have is position statements. Some people expect maintenance of the status quo. Others expect the status quo but hope for better. Still others, myself included, expect continuing improvement.

By now we all recognize that we can't "win" an argument, and that we can't convince anyone to change their mind. The only thing that can change anyone's mind is the actual team performance. Where we are there is an intersection between the two perspectives as the team has risen from the low of 2014 back to winning the East again, but that won't last long. Either the team improves more from here, or it doesn't.

The second point of disagreement is that I don't think the discussion is the same as it has been in recent years. In this thread every post has been respectful, and no one has staked out the radical extreme position that there is nothing good at all about the program, and that anyone who disagrees is stupid.

I don't think most people are bothered by different opinions, so long as they are respectfully presented, and that's what has been lacking in recent years.

BA has those who follow Ohio Football and those who closely follow Ohio Football. Following 8, 10 and 9 win seasons the record slipped to 6-6. Some folks had Ohio "circling the bowl" at that point. Others saw better seasons ahead. Teams have highs and lows Recently NIU and Bowling Green fans experienced what that means.

There are still those who believe "the MAC stinks as a conference" so winning the MACC should be easy. Well given the 2012 MACC went Orange Bowling and the 2016 MACC went Cotton Bowling the MAC is no longer your "uncle's" MAC.

Sorry, but, when I read "With the amount of student fees that we've spent since 2005, an occasional championship is expected" I detect that old "Enormous State University" vibe. Is Ohio even in the top half of the MAC in Football expenditures?
This is six years old but according to this article, in 2011 we spent the most. I can't find 2016 numbers anywhere.

http://businessofcollegesports.com/2011/04/29/how-does-th... /
Per the Hustle Belt link you provided earlier Ohio's reported expenses and subsidy % were both ninth of 12. ....?
You said football expenses. That "report" was total expenses. Like I said, I can't find that anywhere for 2016 for MAC schools in football.
mail
person
Bcat2
7/8/2017 4:20 PM
Alan Swank wrote:expand_more
I'm going to have to disagree, on two points. My first point of disagreement is on whether we are "arguing". I don't think there is any arguing going on here. All we have is position statements. Some people expect maintenance of the status quo. Others expect the status quo but hope for better. Still others, myself included, expect continuing improvement.

By now we all recognize that we can't "win" an argument, and that we can't convince anyone to change their mind. The only thing that can change anyone's mind is the actual team performance. Where we are there is an intersection between the two perspectives as the team has risen from the low of 2014 back to winning the East again, but that won't last long. Either the team improves more from here, or it doesn't.

The second point of disagreement is that I don't think the discussion is the same as it has been in recent years. In this thread every post has been respectful, and no one has staked out the radical extreme position that there is nothing good at all about the program, and that anyone who disagrees is stupid.

I don't think most people are bothered by different opinions, so long as they are respectfully presented, and that's what has been lacking in recent years.

BA has those who follow Ohio Football and those who closely follow Ohio Football. Following 8, 10 and 9 win seasons the record slipped to 6-6. Some folks had Ohio "circling the bowl" at that point. Others saw better seasons ahead. Teams have highs and lows Recently NIU and Bowling Green fans experienced what that means.

There are still those who believe "the MAC stinks as a conference" so winning the MACC should be easy. Well given the 2012 MACC went Orange Bowling and the 2016 MACC went Cotton Bowling the MAC is no longer your "uncle's" MAC.

Sorry, but, when I read "With the amount of student fees that we've spent since 2005, an occasional championship is expected" I detect that old "Enormous State University" vibe. Is Ohio even in the top half of the MAC in Football expenditures?
This is six years old but according to this article, in 2011 we spent the most. I can't find 2016 numbers anywhere.

http://businessofcollegesports.com/2011/04/29/how-does-th... /
Per the Hustle Belt link you provided earlier Ohio's reported expenses and subsidy % were both ninth of 12. ....?
You said football expenses. That "report" was total expenses. Like I said, I can't find that anywhere for 2016 for MAC schools in football.
Per your Business of College Sports link Ohio Football is one of the best revenue producers while still living within their means? I was not around Ohio athletics in 2005. Did coach Solich inherit best in MAC Football revenue?
mail
person
Alan Swank
7/8/2017 5:23 PM
Man you sure know how to twist things in knots and argue your case in circles.
mail
person
Sam bobcat
7/8/2017 6:21 PM
Alan Swank wrote:expand_more
Man you sure know how to twist things in knots and argue your case in circles.
It seems like the article you posted actually bolsters his position. It looks like Ohio was at the top of the conference in getting their money's worth. And did those expenditures have anything to do with breaking ground on Walter Fieldhouse? If so then we are doing even better, right?
I can't tell if you think we spent too much with no MACC or we haven't spent enough to get a MACC.
mail
person
L.C.
7/8/2017 6:32 PM
That report shows that Ohio had a profit from football. Really? Then why do we get threads on whether or not football should be supported by fees? The $7 million in revenue, does that "revenue" include the fees? Perhaps, yes, since other schools manage to have revenues and expenses come out exactly equal. Also, I have a very hard time imagining that Ohio actually has >$7m in football revenue. This is about the max I can imagine:
$300k per home game in revenue ($1.8m)
$900k for a bought game
$700k for TV revenue
Licensing revenue $500k
Other revenue $500k
Bowl revenue $400k
The most I can imagine is maybe $4.8m

Also, per that report, Ohio spent nearly twice as much on football as BG that year (2009). I find that difficult to believe. Ohio traveled to North Texas and Tennessee out of Conference, neither really far, and went to Detroit for the Pizza, Pizza Bowl. BG had shorter in season trips, to Missouri and Marshall, but made a longer bowl trip, playing in the Spud Bowl. I think the differences are more apt to be caused by different ways of reporting things than actual expenses.

Another thing I find curious is the reported methods of financing. Ohio funded it all with fees. Meanwhile, WMU funded it 100% with "Direct Institutional Support", which is presumably built into the tuition. Is paying for it in the tuition any different than paying it in fees?

In the end, the more of these numbers I look at, the less I believe any of them. They really need to create a "GAAP" accounting system for athletic departments, and make all schools account for their revenues and expenses the same way.
mail
person
Alan Swank
7/8/2017 8:15 PM
L.C. wrote:expand_more
That report shows that Ohio had a profit from football. Really? Then why do we get threads on whether or not football should be supported by fees? The $7 million in revenue, does that "revenue" include the fees? Perhaps, yes, since other schools manage to have revenues and expenses come out exactly equal. Also, I have a very hard time imagining that Ohio actually has >$7m in football revenue. This is about the max I can imagine:
$300k per home game in revenue ($1.8m)
$900k for a bought game
$700k for TV revenue
Licensing revenue $500k
Other revenue $500k
Bowl revenue $400k
The most I can imagine is maybe $4.8m

Also, per that report, Ohio spent nearly twice as much on football as BG that year (2009). I find that difficult to believe. Ohio traveled to North Texas and Tennessee out of Conference, neither really far, and went to Detroit for the Pizza, Pizza Bowl. BG had shorter in season trips, to Missouri and Marshall, but made a longer bowl trip, playing in the Spud Bowl. I think the differences are more apt to be caused by different ways of reporting things than actual expenses.

Another thing I find curious is the reported methods of financing. Ohio funded it all with fees. Meanwhile, WMU funded it 100% with "Direct Institutional Support", which is presumably built into the tuition. Is paying for it in the tuition any different than paying it in fees?

In the end, the more of these numbers I look at, the less I believe any of them. They really need to create a "GAAP" accounting system for athletic departments, and make all schools account for their revenues and expenses the same way.
Amen LC. It's almost like a shell game on 42nd street. I'm a fan but for those who aren't, this sort of accounting gives them fuel for fire to attack and lobby for drastic reductions in athletic spending. It's hard to make a point with them when the athletic powers that be continue to play this shell game.
mail
person
Bobcat1996
7/8/2017 8:15 PM
This thread is titled Monroe. The people in charge of this website did what they needed to do. Move on! Some posters on this website pretend to be Bobcat football fans, but love to stir the pot. This is one of the reasons that some Ohio fans choose to ignore this website.
mail
person
Doc Bobcat
7/8/2017 9:20 PM
Bobcat1996 wrote:expand_more
This thread is titled Monroe. The people in charge of this website did what they needed to do. Move on! Some posters on this website pretend to be Bobcat football fans, but love to stir the pot. This is one of the reasons that some Ohio fans choose to ignore this website.
I guess it depends on how much you stir and what spoon you use.

Attacking players has never been a proper way in my book to stir the pot. Even though I bleed green I see no problem in questioning schemes or time management or whatever. That doesn't make a fan
less of a fan.

I think most who post are fans...even Monroe.
mail
person
Sam bobcat
7/8/2017 10:58 PM
Doc Bobcat wrote:expand_more
This thread is titled Monroe. The people in charge of this website did what they needed to do. Move on! Some posters on this website pretend to be Bobcat football fans, but love to stir the pot. This is one of the reasons that some Ohio fans choose to ignore this website.
I guess it depends on how much you stir and what spoon you use.

Attacking players has never been a proper way in my book to stir the pot. Even though I bleed green I see no problem in questioning schemes or time management or whatever. That doesn't make a fan
less of a fan.

I think most who post are fans...even Monroe.
Why would you join a thread titled Monroe, read the posts, and then complain that people are discussing the Monroe situation on this thread titled "Monroe"?
mail
person
Alan Swank
7/8/2017 11:18 PM
What amazes me is that this thread has even been allowed to exist per the posting policy. There have been countless posts attacking a former poster. Kind of like the guy in charge in Washington - the rules don't apply when you're in charge. Sad.

Flames ("you suck!"), personal attacks, and profanity.
mail
TWT
7/8/2017 11:51 PM
There is a backstory to all of this. Monroe is one of the most hardcore Bobcat fans there is. We know about his contributions to the program. The athletic department gives you nothing but the run-around when you press them on moving the program significantly forward and FS status as coach is part of the run-around. I talked to him privately about why he pounds the pavement over the MACC. What he said was he would continue until everyone agreed to his point of view. He became jaded and hardened over the issue. I told him I'm watching what is going on Rich Rod over at Arizona because if he washes out there he could look at an Ohio if the job is open. A guy that understands offense and older could be another Solich for us. He said honestly all follows is Ohio and that he couldn't answer to what was happening in other programs. This is lot different than say bornacat who knows college basketball scene and can compare and contrast to what is going on at Ohio. Monroe is what he is a hard core athletic supporter like you'd find at a P5 program. But the bottom line is he was hijacking and drowning people out. There are demanding for success posters on this site. Monroe didn't have to be the self proclaimed messiah. A lot of people agreed with him. Some didn't. That doesn't give him the right to bully.
mail
TWT
7/8/2017 11:56 PM
For kicks I counted through this thread and about 40 different posters have weighted in about no more Monroe. Probably the most in any football thread in years.
mail
person
Sam bobcat
7/9/2017 7:47 AM
Alan Swank wrote:expand_more
What amazes me is that this thread has even been allowed to exist per the posting policy. There have been countless posts attacking a former poster. Kind of like the guy in charge in Washington - the rules don't apply when you're in charge. Sad.

Flames ("you suck!"), personal attacks, and profanity.
I didn't see countless attacks but there were a couple. Unnecessary. I admire Monroe's passion and respect his position and opinion on the matter. I don't agree with him but would have enjoyed discussing it in a thread of his naming. But his crusade to not allow positive comments on the program or coaches to go unchallenged, was counterproductive for a fan website I think.
mail
person
mf279801
7/9/2017 7:48 AM
Sam bobcat wrote:expand_more
What amazes me is that this thread has even been allowed to exist per the posting policy. There have been countless posts attacking a former poster. Kind of like the guy in charge in Washington - the rules don't apply when you're in charge. Sad.

Flames ("you suck!"), personal attacks, and profanity.
I didn't see countless attacks but there were a couple. Unnecessary. I admire Monroe's passion and respect his position and opinion on the matter. I don't agree with him but would have enjoyed discussing it in a thread of his naming. But his crusade to not allow positive comments on the program or coaches to go unchallenged, was counterproductive for a fan website I think.
His constant ad hominem attacks got old pretty quick
mail
person
LynxRufus6
7/9/2017 11:02 AM
If he added any substance to whatever thread he posted on, I would be more sympathetic to the fact that he's gone. However, riding in on the same float every parade demanding Solich be fired and the lack of a MACC makes Ohio mediocre was getting extremely tiresome very, very quickly and I've been on BA for a year or so now.

As far as the coaching staff and the team in general, I think this year they have an excellent shot at winning the East and pulling off the W in Detroit if everyone stays healthy.

I also noticed a few arguments earlier regarding excitement around the program and so forth, and I think if Ohio had more to offer offensively than the "3 yards and a cloud of dust" offensive scheme there would be more excitement. We are in the golden age of offensive football and Ohio runs a very old style scheme, one that is nowhere near as fun to watch as the old "Blur" offense, or the Air Raid system.

My history on this site shows I am no fan of Tim Albin. I think if anyone were to replaced or let go, that's the guy. And I don't think expecting consistency and being fine with a MACC appearance is a bad thing either. Of course I would love to see them eventually win it, I am glad I don't have to see monroes nonsense about firing Solich when the topic is about the best craft beer at JackieO's, or whatever the topic may be.
mail
person
Maddog13
7/9/2017 12:20 PM
What does the obsessed fan in all of us do when what we love becomes an addiction that can never be satisfied? Can it ever be enough? I always love the idea that we are entitled to one thing in this world, and that is absolutely nothing. That there is no frustration or anger if one did not already believe that they had something coming to them that may not be realistic to expect or even deserved. How many of us would have what it takes to reach the levels of these young student players and their coaches? Why football? Why not something else? For them at least, they don't just talk the talk, but walk the walk. They have turned their love and obsession into something hands on and very real. Like much that is real, the fantasy is quite often much better than the reality.

How close this group of people, both past and present, have come to achieving their ultimate goals and dreams. I don't think anyone expects Ohio to win a National Championship, and so the MAC title seems like the closest we might get. Whether the Bobcats reach this goal or not, I will still remain a fan, and that is regardless of who the players are and who the coach is. Coach Solich and his staff have far achieved expectations and thus turned this program into a nationally recognized one at the same time that MAC games can even be found being played in bars and gyms all across the West Coast. Who would have thought?

Jim Grobe almost took the Bobcats to Ohio State and beat them on their home turf. They were in that game for three quarters. Now that is a fantasy I would certainly like to see come true, though watching Rufus attack Brutus at a later date was a nice consolation prize.

I hope that my obsession for the Bobcats does not turn into an unwanted addiction. Being a Bobcat means that I have learned to be successful in other areas of my life, including jobs, family, and friends. Being a Bobcat means that I love Athens, Ohio, where I was born and raised. While it is fun to have a board like this where everyone can express their own opinion, it is not a lot of fun when those with common interests turn bitterly against one another and forget how we are much more alike than we are all different. Go 'Cats!!!
mail
person
Casper71
7/9/2017 9:19 PM
Wow, been a while since I have been on BA! So, what do I see upon my return? Monroe has been kicked off. Well, I get that he hi-jacked a lot of threads. And, I get that his opinions, taken as a whole, were in the minority. I must admit though, I agree with him on the "no MACC" thing. It is not that OHIO is entitled to one. But, we spend like everyone else in the MAC, have one of the better coaching staffs in the MAC (I think), and have had some really good MAC players over the Solich years. Yet we have watched lots of others win a MACC in those 13 years. Given all that, I will continue to echo Monroe...it is time this staff wins a MACC.

And, I think a really good discussion would be: Why do you think this staff/players has/have not been able to win a MACC in 13 years? Schemes, personnel/recruiting, facilities, location, bad luck, other, ???. Have at it...
mail
person
Jeff McKinney
7/9/2017 10:53 PM
Alan Swank wrote:expand_more
What amazes me is that this thread has even been allowed to exist per the posting policy. There have been countless posts attacking a former poster. Kind of like the guy in charge in Washington - the rules don't apply when you're in charge. Sad.

Flames ("you suck!"), personal attacks, and profanity.
I'm not sure that one or two posts on this thread constitutes "countless". One post called Monroe a "jerk". That's probably flaming, but it kinda got lost among the preponderence of posts on this thread which are decent and thoughtful toward Monroe.

What is being lost in all this is that the Admins didn't exercise a quick trigger. This action came after years of striving with Monroe to rein himself in. The Admins are fine with opinions critical of the athletic department or of coaches. This action was taken due to persistent rudeness through thread jacking.
Showing Messages: 76 - 100 of 234
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)