Ohio Football Topic
Topic: Construction Photos for Academic Center
Page: 5 of 6
Ted Thompson
Administrator
Member Since: 11/11/2004
Location: MAC Play
Post Count: 7,945
mail
Ted Thompson
mail
Posted: 8/17/2018 10:52 AM

 

Ted Thompson
Administrator
Member Since: 11/11/2004
Location: MAC Play
Post Count: 7,945
mail
Ted Thompson
mail
Posted: 8/29/2018 8:32 PM

 

Ted Thompson
Administrator
Member Since: 11/11/2004
Location: MAC Play
Post Count: 7,945
mail
Ted Thompson
mail
Posted: 8/29/2018 8:33 PM

 

Ted Thompson
Administrator
Member Since: 11/11/2004
Location: MAC Play
Post Count: 7,945
mail
Ted Thompson
mail
Posted: 9/2/2018 10:13 AM

Didn't get a chance to check out the inside but I think they nailed the fit of this center into Peden Stadium.

100%Cat
General User
Member Since: 1/17/2013
Post Count: 2,725
mail
100%Cat
mail
Posted: 9/5/2018 10:36 AM
Ted Thompson wrote:expand_more
Didn't get a chance to check out the inside but I think they nailed the fit of this center into Peden Stadium.
I agree that the fit is good, but I have to say I'm a bit disappointed in the aesthetics of the center when viewed from inside the stadium. There's such a focus on brick in construction of buildings on campus, and there's no visible brick on the Sook Center when viewed from the stands. It's a bland, off-white block-looking building. No character, in my opinion. I'm not an architecture buff or anything, but I just expected more from an aesthetic side.
Sam bobcat
General User
SB
Member Since: 7/14/2015
Post Count: 633
person
mail
Sam bobcat
mail
Posted: 9/5/2018 10:40 AM
100%Cat wrote:expand_more
Didn't get a chance to check out the inside but I think they nailed the fit of this center into Peden Stadium.
I agree that the fit is good, but I have to say I'm a bit disappointed in the aesthetics of the center when viewed from inside the stadium. There's such a focus on brick in construction of buildings on campus, and there's no visible brick on the Sook Center when viewed from the stands. It's a bland, off-white block-looking building. No character, in my opinion. I'm not an architecture buff or anything, but I just expected more from an aesthetic side.
I agree, the street side looks great. Field side not so much.
BillyTheCat
General User
BTC
Member Since: 10/6/2012
Post Count: 10,795
person
mail
BillyTheCat
mail
Posted: 9/5/2018 10:45 AM
Sam bobcat wrote:expand_more
Didn't get a chance to check out the inside but I think they nailed the fit of this center into Peden Stadium.
I agree that the fit is good, but I have to say I'm a bit disappointed in the aesthetics of the center when viewed from inside the stadium. There's such a focus on brick in construction of buildings on campus, and there's no visible brick on the Sook Center when viewed from the stands. It's a bland, off-white block-looking building. No character, in my opinion. I'm not an architecture buff or anything, but I just expected more from an aesthetic side.
I agree, the street side looks great. Field side not so much.
With the exception that the color scheme matches the front of the tower, but o.k..
rpbobcat
General User
R
Member Since: 4/28/2006
Location: Rochelle Park, NJ
Post Count: 3,661
person
mail
rpbobcat
mail
Posted: 9/5/2018 11:26 AM
Sam bobcat wrote:expand_more
I agree that the fit is good, but I have to say I'm a bit disappointed in the aesthetics of the center when viewed from inside the stadium. There's such a focus on brick in construction of buildings on campus, and there's no visible brick on the Sook Center when viewed from the stands. It's a bland, off-white block-looking building. No character, in my opinion. I'm not an architecture buff or anything, but I just expected more from an aesthetic side.

I agree, the street side looks great. Field side not so much.
The "street side" of the building fits in with O.U.'s focus on brick construction.
"Curb Appeal" as they say.

There really is no unifying finish or color scheme to the inside of the stadium.
As was pointed out,Sook does match the "Tower".

To me,using brick could have been too "dark" and look out of place,compared to the rest of the stadium.

I don't know if there are any architects on BA.
If there are,they should be able to take one of the posted pictures and do a "photo-simulation" of what it would look like in brick.
Last Edited: 9/5/2018 11:27:49 AM by rpbobcat
OU_Country
General User
Member Since: 12/6/2005
Location: On the road between Athens and Madison County
Post Count: 8,401
mail
OU_Country
mail
Posted: 9/5/2018 11:45 AM
Ted Thompson wrote:expand_more
Didn't get a chance to check out the inside but I think they nailed the fit of this center into Peden Stadium.
I'm in agreement. I spent much of Q1 in the plaza area here. I think it is a definite upgrade on the stadium on the inside. I'd love to hear and see what the players have to say about the inside for it's affect on their class work.
ou79
General User
O79
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 671
person
mail
ou79
mail
Posted: 9/5/2018 1:24 PM
I loved the plaza and the view from the inside of Sook. My new favorite place to watch a game is at the rail of the plaza of Sook. What a view and it was an enjoyable experience. When it got too hot or I needed a break from the sun, I retreated into the shade offered by Sook.
GoCats105
General User
GC105
Member Since: 1/31/2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Post Count: 7,819
person
mail
GoCats105
mail
Posted: 9/5/2018 1:31 PM
I cant believe I'm asking this...does the extra building allow any noise to bounce off back toward the field?

LOL if we had fans that got loud on 3rd down that is.
100%Cat
General User
Member Since: 1/17/2013
Post Count: 2,725
mail
100%Cat
mail
Posted: 9/5/2018 3:11 PM
rpbobcat wrote:expand_more
I agree that the fit is good, but I have to say I'm a bit disappointed in the aesthetics of the center when viewed from inside the stadium. There's such a focus on brick in construction of buildings on campus, and there's no visible brick on the Sook Center when viewed from the stands. It's a bland, off-white block-looking building. No character, in my opinion. I'm not an architecture buff or anything, but I just expected more from an aesthetic side.

I agree, the street side looks great. Field side not so much.
The "street side" of the building fits in with O.U.'s focus on brick construction.
"Curb Appeal" as they say.

There really is no unifying finish or color scheme to the inside of the stadium.
As was pointed out,Sook does match the "Tower".

To me,using brick could have been too "dark" and look out of place,compared to the rest of the stadium.

I don't know if there are any architects on BA.
If there are,they should be able to take one of the posted pictures and do a "photo-simulation" of what it would look like in brick.
I don't think it needed to be all brick facing in towards the field, just some brick to add some contrast to a bland white building. They could have even had brick on the corners like they do on the outside and not "clashed" with the bland appearance of the tower. I'm sure the inside is great and the facility is functionally perfect, which is the most important thing. It's just bland and sterile to the eye, in my humble opinion.
rpbobcat
General User
R
Member Since: 4/28/2006
Location: Rochelle Park, NJ
Post Count: 3,661
person
mail
rpbobcat
mail
Posted: 9/5/2018 3:33 PM
100%Cat wrote:expand_more
I agree that the fit is good, but I have to say I'm a bit disappointed in the aesthetics of the center when viewed from inside the stadium. There's such a focus on brick in construction of buildings on campus, and there's no visible brick on the Sook Center when viewed from the stands. It's a bland, off-white block-looking building. No character, in my opinion. I'm not an architecture buff or anything, but I just expected more from an aesthetic side.

I agree, the street side looks great. Field side not so much.
The "street side" of the building fits in with O.U.'s focus on brick construction.
"Curb Appeal" as they say.

There really is no unifying finish or color scheme to the inside of the stadium.
As was pointed out,Sook does match the "Tower".

To me,using brick could have been too "dark" and look out of place,compared to the rest of the stadium.

I don't know if there are any architects on BA.
If there are,they should be able to take one of the posted pictures and do a "photo-simulation" of what it would look like in brick.
I don't think it needed to be all brick facing in towards the field, just some brick to add some contrast to a bland white building. They could have even had brick on the corners like they do on the outside and not "clashed" with the bland appearance of the tower. I'm sure the inside is great and the facility is functionally perfect, which is the most important thing. It's just bland and sterile to the eye, in my humble opinion.
Looking at the pictures,I agree,some contrast would have been nice.
I also think that the white columns should have been brick.
rpbobcat
General User
R
Member Since: 4/28/2006
Location: Rochelle Park, NJ
Post Count: 3,661
person
mail
rpbobcat
mail
Posted: 9/5/2018 3:36 PM
OU_Country wrote:expand_more
I'd love to hear and see what the players have to say about the inside for it's affect on their class work.
Classes only started a week or so ago.
When I was at O.U.,students would still be buying their books and considering when to open them. :-)
SBH
General User
SBH
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 4,677
person
mail
SBH
mail
Posted: 9/5/2018 4:03 PM
If you look at the original drawings of the building, including the illustrations used in soliciting donations, there is a LOT less brickwork in the finished product. I think the building looks very bland from inside the stadium.
Last Edited: 9/5/2018 4:19:12 PM by SBH
jayboy
General User
J
Member Since: 1/29/2007
Post Count: 46
person
mail
jayboy
mail
Posted: 9/5/2018 4:44 PM
SBH wrote:expand_more
If you look at the original drawings of the building, including the illustrations used in soliciting donations, there is a LOT less brickwork in the finished product. I think the building looks very bland from inside the stadium.

This. Simply came down to one thing, $$$.
100%Cat
General User
Member Since: 1/17/2013
Post Count: 2,725
mail
100%Cat
mail
Posted: 9/5/2018 5:02 PM
jayboy wrote:expand_more
If you look at the original drawings of the building, including the illustrations used in soliciting donations, there is a LOT less brickwork in the finished product. I think the building looks very bland from inside the stadium.

This. Simply came down to one thing, $$$.
It usually does.
Alan Swank
General User
AS
Member Since: 12/12/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 7,375
SBH
General User
SBH
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 4,677
Mark Lembright '85
General User
ML85
Member Since: 8/22/2010
Location: Highland Heights, OH
Post Count: 2,460
person
mail
Mark Lembright '85
mail
Posted: 9/5/2018 8:24 PM
I am FOR SURE in the minority on this one. I love the field view of Sook. Finally, FINALLY there’s one building on campus that isn’t covered head-to-toe with brick! I know it’s a mortal sin not to have every single University structure in Georgian-styled architecture but so be it. I think Sook has a more modern and sleek look to it.

I mean, I understand the overall Georgian theme to architecture at Ohio University and like same, but does that mean everything has to covered from top to bottom in brick? Can’t there be one structure just a little bit different? Sook needs more brick????? OMG save me!
ou79
General User
O79
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 671
person
mail
ou79
mail
Posted: 9/5/2018 9:45 PM
Sorry everyone, but Sook does not distract from what is an otherwise dump of a stadium. As I stated elsewhere, the student section of Peden is an absolute disaster that should have been demolished a long time ago. I appreciate all of your comments but if you think Sook takes away from the looks of the rest of Peden, I would suggest that perhaps you need to put down the crack bowl and back away from the liquor cabinet.
OUcats82
General User
Member Since: 1/9/2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Post Count: 1,912
mail
OUcats82
mail
Posted: 9/6/2018 12:39 AM
What looks kind of odd to me at the bare concrete pillars on the lower level for the upper deck support. They look unfinished and raw. Maybe put up some brick veneer on those! = )
GoCats105
General User
GC105
Member Since: 1/31/2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Post Count: 7,819
person
mail
GoCats105
mail
Posted: 9/6/2018 7:56 AM
ou79 wrote:expand_more
Sorry everyone, but Sook does not distract from what is an otherwise dump of a stadium. As I stated elsewhere, the student section of Peden is an absolute disaster that should have been demolished a long time ago. I appreciate all of your comments but if you think Sook takes away from the looks of the rest of Peden, I would suggest that perhaps you need to put down the crack bowl and back away from the liquor cabinet.
You mean putting a crown on a turd doesn't make it less poopy?
Sam bobcat
General User
SB
Member Since: 7/14/2015
Post Count: 633
person
mail
Sam bobcat
mail
Posted: 9/6/2018 8:03 AM
Mark Lembright '85 wrote:expand_more
but does that mean everything has to covered from top to bottom in brick?
I don’t think anyone else said anything that dramatic.
SBH
General User
SBH
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 4,677
person
mail
SBH
mail
Posted: 9/6/2018 8:31 AM
It's similar to when they built Peden's "tower" in the late 1980s. Harold McElhaney once told me in great detail about all of the "de-contenting" they had to do to finish that project. The most obvious to men, of course, are the metal urinal troughs...but they cheapened up the windows, exterior finish and much, much more.
Showing Messages: 101 - 125 of 141
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)