Those talking about how Ohio doesn't have the "athletes" to compete with Kent State and Akron: are you forgetting Ohio beat those two teams earlier in the season, and beat Buffalo 74-53 at Buffalo?
This is a good point, though we do not seem to be the same team I’m terms of overall intensity that we were then. The only time we showed much intensity was in the last seven minutes when we were hopelessly behind. Also, BRod is not in total collapse — only his three point shot. I’ve watched him closely and he is still giving his all in other aspects of the game. His defense is generally sound. He rebounds well. He is one of our better foul shooters. He’s making contested layups at a much higher percentage than earlier in the season.
No, no and no. BRod sat the final 15 min. last night because he's providing little toward our team's chances of winning. One of better foul shooters? At 64%? Mismatch defensively in most matchups. Does play hard, but contributing little. And yes, I've "watched him closely" too.
cc-cat came up from Charlotte for his first game in the Convo in years, joining me, SBH and others from the early 1980s Crazy Cats, the predecessor to the OZone. cc-cat was wondering if Ohio has tired legs. I told him that it's an issue of athletes going up against non-athletes, which are relative terms. You put our players on the court at Ping and they're the most athletics players on the floor. You put them on the court v. an NBA team and they're the least athletic. I believe our players, compared with the better teams in the league, are less athletic. And it showed last night.
A couple of nights in Cleveland will determine what prevails. A team with quality basketball players good enough to beat UB and split with Akron and Kent? Or the teams with superior athletes that have exposed OUr team the last couple of Fridays?
Last Edited: 2/26/2022 1:14:53 PM by bobcatsquared