Borna: My question was an honest one because I simply don't know the answer. I'm not going to argue any points you make. You obviously are a greater student of the game than I am. I played in HS - that's it.
You have made the point several times that you believe we are a program that is on the verge of going to the next level. I hope that is true, but I just haven't seen it.
What are the key areas of the program that you feel put us in this position? What are we doing right that will help us break out this year or next?
Is our recruiting pipeline appreciably better than those of other MAC programs?
Yes, we have a great facility, but it really hasn't allowed us to be a "dominant" MAC program in some time - arguably since the Danny Nee years and then 15 years before that.
I look at what we have accomplished vs. Kent and Akron's resume over the past 5-6 years and it's really not even close. We got hot in one MAC tourney (after a frustrating regular season) thanks to the hot hand of a rather problematic transfer.
I'm not disputing the fact that we are "better" this year than last (IMO because Groce finally realized his defense and rebounding were killing him), but we've also shown that we have the capability of losing to anyone.
Our premier player is not nearly the competitive threat he was in his freshman year. Our "bigs" are average. We have a seven-footer who belongs at a D-2 school. We've got "athletic" wings whose games have gaping holes in them. And I'm not seeing any potentially dominant players in our pipeline - certainly not post players.
I assume (perhaps wrongly) that you subscribe to the theory that coaching staffs have "windows" of opportunity for step-change improvement in overall program competitiveness. Gary Waters at Kent. Dambrot. Groce's boss at OSU. We're at five years and I'm not seeing that type of dramatic elevation of our program. When does the window close? Six or seven years?
All very legitimate questions, I believe. I'd appreciate your thoughts.
Last Edited: 2/1/2012 9:29:23 AM by SBH