Me thinks The Situation thinks the MAC is in a much more powerful position with ESPN than reality. Reality is they can live without us no problemo.
And, the MAC is lucky to have Temple and Umass as football only members. I know we don't like to hear it, but Temple and Umass bring more to the MAC than any other school in terms of potential exposure and ratings, and credibility. A 10-3 UMass or Temple team will get way more publicity than any other MAC team.
My issue is the "well represented" line. The MAC is not well represented on TV.
You'd never make it in marketing/advertising.
I'm fairly sure you didn't mean it as such, but your post sounds like a compliment.
It was more a joke than anything.
2) Akron is not "leaps and bounds" the best program. Maybe in the last 2-3 years. Do you think they are THAT much better than OU or Kent over the last five years? If so, why?
- Akron has played in 5 straight MAC tournament championship games.
- Akron has been in the NCAA tournament 2 of the last 3 years.
- It appears Akron's coach ain't going anywhere soon. The other 11 head coaches take off for middling places like Bradley and TCU.
- See bornacatfan's post on Akron recruiting and etc.
- Wins the last 6 years: 23, 26, 24, 23, 24, 23
- MAC wins the last 6 years: 14, 13, 11, 10, 12, 9
- Akron post season the last 6 years: 2 NIT, 2 NCAA, 1 CBI
They are now the dominant program. (Replacing Kent State)
Last Edited: 1/31/2012 5:12:14 PM by Ohio69