No. Absolutely not. First of all, you don't discount the fact a team was missing their most important player after they had him for the first 35 or so games. Those still count. Second of all, Ohio was not a better team than North Carolina and in no way would have deserved a higher ranking if Walt's free throw goes in. That's nonsense.
No, I don't think it's nonsense. You want to get into all sorts of hypotheticals about what might have happened if player X hadn't been injured, or if player Y hadn't fouled out, etc.
The only hypothetical here is Ohio winning. Yeah, I think it's nonsense that you can to throw out things like "winning the ACC" because of the results of one game.
Third of all, because we almost beat them, does that mean we should be right next to them in the rankings
No . . . we lost. Almost only counts
That's not true, either. A one-point loss and a 30-point loss are very different.
Again: Are we better than Creighton even though they were clearly a superior team over the course of the season just because they had a harder draw than we did?
We deserve to be ranked higher, because we finished higher in the NCAA Tournament!
OK, now I'll get hypothetical: Flip it. We have a better season, get a higher seed, and lose to UNC in the second round while Creighton has a worse season, gets a worse seed, and loses to UNC the round after that. Are they better than us? Do you see what I'm getting at here?
Right now, you and Monroe are basically saying, "I want to think about this as little as possible and refuse to consider any nuance."
Not really. We are saying that there is a standard -- called the NCAA tournament -- and it determines how good you are at the end of the season. Doesn't mean that other teams aren't better at some other given point in time, but results on the court are all that matters when it comes to tourney time.
That's fine, except the polls are supposed to take into consideration
the entire season. That's what you're refusing to acknowledge. If you ask me, "Was Louisville one of the four best teams in the country this season," I'm going to say no even though they made it to the Final Four. Great accomplishment, nice run. But there were better teams.
By the way: What if Ohio rolls into next year's tournament ranked, loses in the second round, but still maintains, say, a #15 ranking? Are you going to protest that? I doubt it.
I'd still think it was wrong, but I would probably bite my tongue and enjoy the injustice.

Thank you, please pull through.
At least with Monroe, he just thinks Ohio should be ranked higher. And I think he'd say that if we had lost to USF. I respect that, even if I don't agree.
Last Edited: 4/6/2012 2:02:26 AM by JSF