Ohio Basketball Topic
Topic: MVC conference read
Page: 2 of 3
nam1975
General User
N1975
Member Since: 3/25/2012
Post Count: 30
person
mail
nam1975
mail
Posted: 3/29/2013 9:07 AM
As far as MAC football goes, the chance that NIU or Kent had  a chance to play in a BCS game was basically completely ruined by one talking head and his stupid cray baby rant....Kirk Herbstreit.

Only 1 BCS game matters.....after that the Motor City Bowl or the Orange Bowl only really matter to 2 teams......
And who gives a sh*$ anyway...put all the names in a hat and have a bind draw....it would be more interesting?

But why have no MAC teams looked to move in the last few years and help non football sports? Are the invites not even out there?



 




mf279801
General User
M279801
Member Since: 8/6/2010
Location: Newark, DE
Post Count: 2,486
person
mail
mf279801
mail
Posted: 3/29/2013 10:19 AM
nam1975 wrote:expand_more
As far as MAC football goes, the chance that NIU or Kent had  a chance to play in a BCS game was basically completely ruined by one talking head and his stupid cray baby rant....Kirk Herbstreit.

Only 1 BCS game matters.....after that the Motor City Bowl or the Orange Bowl only really matter to 2 teams......
And who gives a sh*$ anyway...put all the names in a hat and have a bind draw....it would be more interesting?

But why have no MAC teams looked to move in the last few years and help non football sports? Are the invites not even out there?


Compared to football there isn't any money in non-football sports.
Athens
General User
A
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Post Count: 5,454
person
mail
Athens
mail
Posted: 3/30/2013 1:47 AM
mf279801 wrote:expand_more
As far as MAC football goes, the chance that NIU or Kent had  a chance to play in a BCS game was basically completely ruined by one talking head and his stupid cray baby rant....Kirk Herbstreit.

Only 1 BCS game matters.....after that the Motor City Bowl or the Orange Bowl only really matter to 2 teams......
And who gives a sh*$ anyway...put all the names in a hat and have a bind draw....it would be more interesting?

But why have no MAC teams looked to move in the last few years and help non football sports? Are the invites not even out there?


Compared to football there isn't any money in non-football sports.


We have a grand prize winner:) The new playoff money is 15 to 20 million for each non-BCS conference. Guaranteed. The A10 makes 7 million a year from men's basketball and that is with placing 3-5 schools a year in the NCAA tournament. The MAC as is makes 3 million from the NCAA tournament. At best the MAC places 2-3 schools a year in the NCAAs and 3 million becomes 5 million. Lack of basketball spending is not a league wide issue. Ohio is spending competitively with Jim Christian. Its more that schools that have historically been above average in MAC basketball like Miami aren't investing. Milllet Hall needs to be replaced with a smaller new facility like they have in Bowling Green. The finger shouldn't be pointed at Ohio and Kent St's football spending. It should be pointed at Miami and BG falling apart in men's basketball.
The Optimist
General User
Member Since: 3/16/2007
Location: CLE
Post Count: 5,611
mail
The Optimist
mail
Posted: 3/30/2013 10:34 AM
I agree, money is what is going to drive things...

Here is the thing I do not feel is being properly valued: EXPOSURE. We have all talked about the exposure provided by athletics when the anti-athletics bashers come in. Basketball is not a revenue sport to the extent of football, but I believe the exposure of a Final Four run could push basketball past football in terms of value. When I look at the investment we could make in hoops, I see much more value in our return than investing in football.. 

I do not see a ceiling for Ohio Basketball. The ceiling just seems lower for Ohio Football. That said, Frank Solich has pushed my optimism about Ohio football wayyyyyy up. We are doing things I did not think possible. I always viewed our recent basketball success as possible.
Athens
General User
A
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Post Count: 5,454
person
mail
Athens
mail
Posted: 3/30/2013 11:12 AM
This is where a  lot of the thinking goes astray on here. Ohio basketball does have a ceiling which is a 1 time dream run to the Final Four. Ohio can make a sweet 16 every 4-5 years and that in itself is great publicity but let's not kid ourselves here this is a Top 80 in the postseason every year program. Its not even a Top 40 level basketball school like Temple in the NCAA's every year and even they haven't made a final four. Gonzaga is a Top 20 basketball school for the past 15 years and no Final Four. VCU a peer comparison to Ohio has only made one Sweet 16 in its entire history and that was the year of its Final Four run. Ohio is not going to pull a UCLA and win 7 NCAA titles in a row. There is a limit. Similarly Ohio football's ceiling in the new playoff system is a one time appearance in the four team playoff. There is no way Ohio could win a four team football playoff just like there is no way Ohio is winning the final four. The ceiling has been raised from 8-10 years ago with Top 10 runs in football and basketball accomplished by mid major schools.
The Optimist
General User
Member Since: 3/16/2007
Location: CLE
Post Count: 5,611
mail
The Optimist
mail
Posted: 3/30/2013 1:34 PM
Uncle Wes wrote:expand_more
This is where a  lot of the thinking goes astray on here. Ohio basketball does have a ceiling which is a 1 time dream run to the Final Four. Ohio can make a sweet 16 every 4-5 years and that in itself is great publicity but let's not kid ourselves here this is a Top 80 in the postseason every year program. Its not even a Top 40 level basketball school like Temple in the NCAA's every year and even they haven't made a final four. Gonzaga is a Top 20 basketball school for the past 15 years and no Final Four. VCU a peer comparison to Ohio has only made one Sweet 16 in its entire history and that was the year of its Final Four run. Ohio is not going to pull a UCLA and win 7 NCAA titles in a row. There is a limit. Similarly Ohio football's ceiling in the new playoff system is a one time appearance in the four team playoff. There is no way Ohio could win a four team football playoff just like there is no way Ohio is winning the final four. The ceiling has been raised from 8-10 years ago with Top 10 runs in football and basketball accomplished by mid major schools.

I disagree strongly. I think your bias towards football is showing, and I believe what you are talking about is where the thinking goes astray on here. 

When I walk into the Convocation Center, I get a big-time feel. Its really that simple. I've talked about this with many Ohio fans. Fans who post here, fans who do not. We have something very special in the Convocation Center. That is an elite college basketball atmosphere. The size, the fans, the number of fans, the setup, everything... We have it really good. We are lucky. We should be thankful.. Other MAC schools would kill for what we've got going for us. 

We are not UCLA, one of the winningest programs of all-time. No one is saying we are.  You say we are not a Top 80 program? We SHOULD be. We should not have losing seasons as long as we are competing in the MAC. If we have a losing season, someone (coach or AD) did not do there job or we got really unlucky with players (transfers, injuries, suspensions). We have an arena 3x or 4x the size of other arenas in our league. We have an established fanbase that has shown up in bad years more than other teams in our conference draw in good years. There is ZERO reason a coach should not win here in basketball. I am sure this post comes across as cocky or arrogant. We are in a good run right now.. Would I still be saying these things when we are down? Any team can be beat. Kentucky didn't even make the Big Dance this year. Things happen. I don't expect us to have great seasons every year. However, I think that should be the expectation.

If Kent freaking State can have 20-win seasons for a decade, we can too. We SHOULD. Ohio is a superior program to Kent State in every way, except for what has happened on the court the last two decades.

VCU is not a peer comparison. We had 7 NCAA Tournament appearances before VCU ever made the Big Dance. We have 3x as many Sweet Sixteen appearances as VCU. Our arena seats almost 2x as many people as VCU does. VCU caught lightning in a bottle with their current coach, similar to what Ohio football did with Frank Solich. Plain and simple, I do not believe John Groce was lightning in a bottle. He was/is a good coach. There is a reason he turned down other jobs before coming to Ohio. He knew he could win here. Anyone who is good can win here in basketball.

When O'Shea left, I remember Dambrot making a comment along the lines of "there is no reason they shouldn't be winning big." That isn't exactly what he said, but it along those lines.. Dambrot could win here. Dambrot knows it.. He basically said anyone good could win here.

Gonzaga was a Cinderella 20 years ago. They may not have made a Final Four, but they are a Number 1 seed. I can only dream that we could do that. We are not in a major market like Temple... I get frustrated when people talk about the "little Athens media market." We are not Athens U. We are not Southeast Ohio U. We are Ohio. We can get this program to Top 40, and frankly, I think we should be distributing our spending to achieve that. Honestly, the way we are spending now, we can get there. I think we are on our way.

I do agree that the new playoff changes the ceiling argument for the better for football. However, its still not basketball where winning the conference tournament gets you in... Basketball is just a better deal for teams not "there" yet looking to rise up.

I don't like these arguments, because I am a big Ohio football fan. I love Ohio football. However, since day one, its always been basketball that feels like a true major program. We are a basketball school.
Last Edited: 3/30/2013 1:36:32 PM by The Optimist
Athens
General User
A
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Post Count: 5,454
person
mail
Athens
mail
Posted: 3/30/2013 4:56 PM
We are a high mid major school than wins by dominating a mid major conference. That is what we are. The Convo was a first tier basketball arena in 1968 but today its a second tier facility nationally. Its nothing compared to what Kentucky and Louisville have. If Ohio was in the ACC it would be no more than a .500 basketball and football school. That is just reality. The football and basketball programs are now quite solid and if I want to see resources placed elsewhere it would be better spent on more services for the students like a freshman fall camping trip. Athens can't rely exclusively on sports to bring people into the city. What I think would help is if they could bring outlet shopping to Athens County with the new bypass. The biggest drawback to Athens is it has no shopping outside of groceries and home improvement stores. I'm happy we are winning 25 games in basketball out of the MAC but it is what it is.
Columbus_Bobcat
General User
CB
Member Since: 11/23/2012
Post Count: 413
person
mail
Columbus_Bobcat
mail
Posted: 3/31/2013 2:55 AM
Uncle Wes wrote:expand_more
We are a high mid major school than wins by dominating a mid major conference. That is what we are. The Convo was a first tier basketball arena in 1968 but today its a second tier facility nationally. Its nothing compared to what Kentucky and Louisville have. If Ohio was in the ACC it would be no more than a .500 basketball and football school. That is just reality. The football and basketball programs are now quite solid and if I want to see resources placed elsewhere it would be better spent on more services for the students like a freshman fall camping trip. Athens can't rely exclusively on sports to bring people into the city. What I think would help is if they could bring outlet shopping to Athens County with the new bypass. The biggest drawback to Athens is it has no shopping outside of groceries and home improvement stores. I'm happy we are winning 25 games in basketball out of the MAC but it is what it is.


That's because Athens is all local. WHICH IS A DRAW. Ohio is also having the largest amount of applications EVER. Sports bring exposure to a school. Not to mention OHIO is breaking into the Columbus scene, believe it or not. Last time I went to Easton I kid you not I saw two or three women wearing Ohio University shirts. Even when I went to the Spring football game last year (OSU) I wore my OU hoodie and got some HEY I WENT THEIR GO BOBCATS!. It was I think President Alden's plan to bring OHIO into national competition with our basketball program. I hate to say this, but I think a major draw would be an indoor practice arena. Their already conflict with having to compete against women's volleyball and basketball, with the occasional wrestling match. I've heard rumors and people say a great spot would be to build just south of the Convo. Let's make s*(& happen. I hate the fact conferences wouldn't want to bring Ohio into their conference, because of small T.V. market, because look at WVU. They are in a city of 30,000 people that are in Big 12. 
Last Edited: 3/31/2013 2:25:38 PM by Jeff McKinney
The Optimist
General User
Member Since: 3/16/2007
Location: CLE
Post Count: 5,611
mail
The Optimist
mail
Posted: 3/31/2013 8:26 AM
Uncle Wes wrote:expand_more
We are a high mid major school than wins by dominating a mid major conference. That is what we are. The Convo was a first tier basketball arena in 1968 but today its a second tier facility nationally. Its nothing compared to what Kentucky and Louisville have. If Ohio was in the ACC it would be no more than a .500 basketball and football school. That is just reality. The football and basketball programs are now quite solid and if I want to see resources placed elsewhere it would be better spent on more services for the students like a freshman fall camping trip. Athens can't rely exclusively on sports to bring people into the city. What I think would help is if they could bring outlet shopping to Athens County with the new bypass. The biggest drawback to Athens is it has no shopping outside of groceries and home improvement stores. I'm happy we are winning 25 games in basketball out of the MAC but it is what it is.

Again, you are referencing Kentucky and Louisville.. No one is saying we should be like those programs. Kentucky is the best program in history! Most wins EVER. We aren't Kentucky.. We aren't Louisville.. They are a heck of a program in their own respect. Great arena. Great fanbase. Nice city. NCAA CHAMPIONSHIPS!

Just because we are not Kentucky or Louisville does not mean we do not have something special here, I am not talking about the amenities the Convo offers. It could definitely use some new pretzel stands. I personally think they should just paint the whole concourse green. That is not the point.. When you walk out of the concourse into a 13,000 seat arena with a student section and band right on the court and the entire lower bowl filled up, you do not get the feeling of a mid-major. We outdraw many high majors. With the proper care, it can get better. Being in a packed arena helps the program. Players want to play on the big stage.. The Convo feels like a big stage when you are in there.

If you threw us into the ACC, we would probably be .500 right off the bat. It would absolutely take an increased financial commitment for us to compete. It may not happen for a couple years, but we could compete after a couple years. You throw us in the ACC, and we bring in UNC and Duke, the Convo SELLS OUT. The program would be placed in a more visable scene, and it would go to the next level.
The point I was making is that I think our ability to compete in basketball (in the ACC, for instance) is better than it is in football. I like Peden, but that is not a high major stadium. We could find more fans for Peden with a jump to the ACC, but we would absolutely need a new/renovated stadium to compete. I am all for Peden being the "fenway" of college football stadiums. Still, we would need upgrades to get the atmosphere where I want it to be. That said, football has done things I never envisioned.. The blackout game against Temple on ESPN felt big-time. Pitt was awesome, but that felt like an upset. With the Temple game, the place was packed and people were into the game. Students were into the game. This year when we were undefeated, campus was awesome. There was a buzz. Freshman coming in were pumped they went to a sports school! These kids are Bobcat fans. They don't think of us as a program that runs the triple option and had a lot of loses. They wonder why OHIO isn't a bigger deal in Ohio. Solich has been amazing. He has built something here. My point remains that I think we have the ability to compete on the big level in hoops much easier than football. The next level in basketball is right there. We have a shot at it with the way we are spending now.. With more commitment, and some luck, I think it is bound to happen.

Outlet shopping may draw people to Athens, but Ohio University athletics doesn't need that to build something here. The pieces are in place to win and win big. Financing it is not easy. Simply put, I think it is worth it.

Funny story. They already offer a freshman fall camping trip. I went on a freshman fall camping trip in 2008. We went to the Boundary Waters in Minnesota. It was awesome. I highly recommend it to anyone coming into school at Ohio. Someone in the group I camped with on that trip ended up becoming one of my best friends over the next couple years at school. He is also a huge Ohio fan. I also received credit for a 200 level rec class via that trip.
http://www.ohio.edu/recreation/outdoorpursuits/newAdventures.cfm
SouthernCat
General User
SC
Member Since: 1/3/2005
Post Count: 166
person
mail
SouthernCat
mail
Posted: 3/31/2013 10:57 AM
If we want to improve conferences all of you need to start putting your money where your mouth is and donate the millions it takes to upgrade things and travel properly. We need to be able to fill our football stadium on a Tuesday and our basketball arena all the time if we think we are better than the MAC.
shabamon
General User
Member Since: 11/17/2006
Location: Cincinnati
Post Count: 7,316
mail
shabamon
mail
Posted: 3/31/2013 1:36 PM
I think the structure of Division I college football vs. college basketball plays a huge role in why people would want to emphasize basketball over football. Basketball is interesting because every game (besides those in the NIT, CBI, and the CIT) from November and onward plays a small part in determining the national champion. When you consider how RPI is structured and it's purpose, you can conclude that our game vs. Maryland Eastern Shore in front of 3,000 people was connected to next weekend's games.

I had a lot of fun during the football game against New Mexico State this past season. From pregaming at Jackie-O's, to seeing everyone in Athens wearing Ohio gear, the sold out crowd, the blowout win, it was all great fun. But then as I left Peden Stadium that night, part of me felt a bit bummed because I knew that game would have no connection to what eventually was Alabama vs. Notre Dame. I had a similar feeling when I went to the MAC championship game in 2009 against Lefevour and Chippewas. Once they won, and I saw their team and fans celebrating, I couldn't help but ask what it meant for them going forward.

I firmly believe we will say an all-inclusive playoff system in college football while all of us are still alive, especially with the four team playoff resolution that was passed this past year. Much like the gay rights movement, we are not where we should be yet, but we are making progress. Until then, we should accept Ohio football for what it is: a fun three and half hour opportunity show that our program is better than Akron, Bowling Green, Austin Peay, Idaho, etc.
Athens
General User
A
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Post Count: 5,454
person
mail
Athens
mail
Posted: 3/31/2013 3:16 PM
The Optimist wrote:expand_more
We are a high mid major school than wins by dominating a mid major conference. That is what we are. The Convo was a first tier basketball arena in 1968 but today its a second tier facility nationally. Its nothing compared to what Kentucky and Louisville have. If Ohio was in the ACC it would be no more than a .500 basketball and football school. That is just reality. The football and basketball programs are now quite solid and if I want to see resources placed elsewhere it would be better spent on more services for the students like a freshman fall camping trip. Athens can't rely exclusively on sports to bring people into the city. What I think would help is if they could bring outlet shopping to Athens County with the new bypass. The biggest drawback to Athens is it has no shopping outside of groceries and home improvement stores. I'm happy we are winning 25 games in basketball out of the MAC but it is what it is.


Outlet shopping may draw people to Athens, but Ohio University athletics doesn't need that to build something here. The pieces are in place to win and win big. Financing it is not easy. Simply put, I think it is worth it.

Funny story. They already offer a freshman fall camping trip. I went on a freshman fall camping trip in 2008. We went to the Boundary Waters in Minnesota. It was awesome. I highly recommend it to anyone coming into school at Ohio. Someone in the group I camped with on that trip ended up becoming one of my best friends over the next couple years at school. He is also a huge Ohio fan. I also received credit for a 200 level rec class via that trip.
http://www.ohio.edu/recreation/outdoorpursuits/newAdventures.cfm


Looking at the bigger picture for Athens County and tourism dollars flowing into the region 6 Bobcat football home dates and 18 Bobcat home basketball dates are big a shot in the arm for the local economy but having 30 premium outlet stores would bring dollars 365 days a year. There are plenty of cultural attractions in SE Ohio in Chillicothe, Hocking Hills, Marietta for example that students either don't have a car or don't know about it. The tourism marketing needs to be more integrated across county lines. All those class trips you've listed from that website cost a lot of additional money to participate in and are not mandatory for all students. At Dartmouth College it is mandatory. Having good FB and BB programs is great but if you want to attract the top students you've got work on more services and innovative academic programming.


Athens
General User
A
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Post Count: 5,454
person
mail
Athens
mail
Posted: 3/31/2013 3:34 PM
Bobcats_828 wrote:expand_more
We are a high mid major school than wins by dominating a mid major conference. That is what we are. The Convo was a first tier basketball arena in 1968 but today its a second tier facility nationally. Its nothing compared to what Kentucky and Louisville have. If Ohio was in the ACC it would be no more than a .500 basketball and football school. That is just reality. The football and basketball programs are now quite solid and if I want to see resources placed elsewhere it would be better spent on more services for the students like a freshman fall camping trip. Athens can't rely exclusively on sports to bring people into the city. What I think would help is if they could bring outlet shopping to Athens County with the new bypass. The biggest drawback to Athens is it has no shopping outside of groceries and home improvement stores. I'm happy we are winning 25 games in basketball out of the MAC but it is what it is.


Let's make s*(& happen. I hate the fact conferences wouldn't want to bring Ohio into their conference, because of small T.V. market, because look at WVU. They are in a city of 30,000 people that are in Big 12. 


West Virginia to the Big 12 is a perfect example of what happens when you get into a conference where the competition is over your head. WVU has gone from a Top 10 FB and BB program in the mid tier Big East (mid tier in FB at least) to .500 in FB and 13-19 in men's basketball in the course of 1 year. The same fate would apply to Ohio. We are what we are because the MAC is tailor made for our success. The MAC doesn't handicap Ohio in recruiting compared to playing in the Big 12 really at all anymore with the proliferation of TV exposure. I don't think Ohio Athletics is perfect but with the investment under Frank and JC the programs is finally where it should be. OU doesn't have an athletics problem anymore like it did in the late 80's. 


Athens
General User
A
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Post Count: 5,454
person
mail
Athens
mail
Posted: 3/31/2013 4:08 PM
shabamon wrote:expand_more
I think the structure of Division I college football vs. college basketball plays a huge role in why people would want to emphasize basketball over football. Basketball is interesting because every game (besides those in the NIT, CBI, and the CIT) from November and onward plays a small part in determining the national champion. When you consider how RPI is structured and it's purpose, you can conclude that our game vs. Maryland Eastern Shore in front of 3,000 people was connected to next weekend's games.


Computer rankings that include all 250 D1 football schools have been used to determine the BCS Standings for 15 years now. I think its more that posters on Bobcatattack are very passionate about basketball than the average gate goer to Ohio athletics weighing off RPI. Every huge win by OU football is viewed as a threat to basketball's omnipotence among a select group on here. The basic fact is OU can't get the players no matter how much money is thrown at it or conference we play in. The school would be average at best in anything bigger than the MAC. That is what you guys fail to realize is its not a money or conference thing. Its because we aren't a first tier historic name school like Notre Dame or Alabama. OU will never be considered among the elite in athletics not with Ohio State an elite program 75 miles up the road. That said OU can dominate the MAC with some Top 10 seasons and have a high quality D1 home game experience. The school is 90% of the way there already.
The Optimist
General User
Member Since: 3/16/2007
Location: CLE
Post Count: 5,611
mail
The Optimist
mail
Posted: 3/31/2013 4:20 PM
Uncle Wes wrote:expand_more
I think the structure of Division I college football vs. college basketball plays a huge role in why people would want to emphasize basketball over football. Basketball is interesting because every game (besides those in the NIT, CBI, and the CIT) from November and onward plays a small part in determining the national champion. When you consider how RPI is structured and it's purpose, you can conclude that our game vs. Maryland Eastern Shore in front of 3,000 people was connected to next weekend's games.


Computer rankings that include all 250 D1 football schools have been used to determine the BCS Standings for 15 years now. I think its more that posters on Bobcatattack are very passionate about basketball than the average gate goer to Ohio athletics weighing off RPI. Every huge win by OU football is viewed as a threat to basketball's omnipotence among a select group on here. The basic fact is OU can't get the players no matter how much money is thrown at it or conference we play in. The school would be average at best in anything bigger than the MAC. That is what you guys fail to realize is its not a money or conference thing. Its because we aren't a first tier historic name school like Notre Dame or Alabama. OU will never be considered among the elite in athletics not with Ohio State an elite program 75 miles up the road. That said OU can dominate the MAC with some Top 10 seasons and have a high quality D1 home game experience. The school is 90% of the way there already.

I strongly disagree.
OhioStunter
General User
Member Since: 2/18/2005
Location: Chicago
Post Count: 2,516
mail
OhioStunter
mail
Posted: 3/31/2013 10:42 PM
This thread appears to have a little bit of everything, including outlet malls. But let's take a look at Bobcat FB and MBB over the past few years:

-FB game vs. Big Ten on ABC Saturday afternoon? Check.
-Several ESPN FB games -- including those from Peden? Check.
-Opportunity for a MAC team to play in a BCS bowl game on primetime national TV? Check.
-Chance to play in a bowl game on national TV? Check.
-BB games on ESPN? Check.
-NCAA tournament upsets? Check, check and check.

Despite being in the MAC, we've enjoyed a heckuva last 5 years or so. And we've had the national stage several times. Sometimes we looked great (vs. Penn St., Michigan, Georgetown, etc.) and sometimes we looked awful (Akron, Belmont, etc.).

The point is, the MAC is not perfect. But we've had our chances to be up there with the big boys. 
Athens
General User
A
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Post Count: 5,454
person
mail
Athens
mail
Posted: 3/31/2013 11:11 PM
If you disagree answer this question then, if Ohio built another basketball arena would it be larger than 13,000 seats? The answer is obviously no. Most likely the basketball program is looking at a facility in the 8,000 to 10,000 seat range. Any school in the ACC or Big Ten would be shooting for around 20,000 seats for a new arena. The Convo is 45 years old and a few generations behind in modern stadium design. Ohio would build a modern mid tier sized facility. 12,000 seats in size on the very upper end and to keep the distinction as the MAC's largest arena. A second question is if Ohio built a new football stadium would it be larger than Peden? To justify a new stadium it would have to be at least 35,000-40,000 seats. Smaller on a new football stadium would be out of the question when overflow 2 or 3 games a year while having one of the smallest stadiums in FBS presently.
Last Edited: 3/31/2013 11:14:55 PM by Athens
Columbus_Bobcat
General User
CB
Member Since: 11/23/2012
Post Count: 413
person
mail
Columbus_Bobcat
mail
Posted: 3/31/2013 11:53 PM
If I could make improvements, I would make Peden 35,000 seats and Convo 12,000. We get low teen's, but not high enough. Anything lower than 11,000 wouldn't be acceptable. 
OhioCatFan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 15,699
mail
OhioCatFan
mail
Posted: 3/31/2013 11:57 PM
The Convo was not built exclusively for basketball.
OrlandoCat
General User
OC
Member Since: 3/15/2005
Post Count: 355
person
mail
OrlandoCat
mail
Posted: 4/1/2013 10:09 AM
Uncle Wes wrote:expand_more
The basic fact is OU can't get the players no matter how much money is thrown at it or conference we play in. The school would be average at best in anything bigger than the MAC. That is what you guys fail to realize is its not a money or conference thing.


What you fail to realize is being 'average' in big 6 in both football and basketball gets you better ball games then being the 'best' in the MAC.

We could compete in the MVC almost right away in basketball...and being just above agerage gets you into the tournament.

Being great in the MAC means nothing unless you win in Cleveland, or at best, the Motor City bowl.
OhioStunter
General User
Member Since: 2/18/2005
Location: Chicago
Post Count: 2,516
mail
OhioStunter
mail
Posted: 4/1/2013 11:28 AM
OrlandoCat wrote:expand_more
The basic fact is OU can't get the players no matter how much money is thrown at it or conference we play in. The school would be average at best in anything bigger than the MAC. That is what you guys fail to realize is its not a money or conference thing.


What you fail to realize is being 'average' in big 6 in both football and basketball gets you better ball games then being the 'best' in the MAC.


Define "better". More national games? Better home opponents to drive attendance?

OrlandoCat wrote:expand_more
We could compete in the MVC almost right away in basketball...and being just above agerage gets you into the tournament.


You really think so? Think we'd be above Wichita St. and Creighton? The MVC bids don't typically go more than two-deep. I also don't like how the MAC is a one-bid conference, but I really think it's up to the MAC teams winning their big OOC games to be considered. 

Also, the MVC devotes at large chunk of its budget to basketball. The football conference is FCS. Want to drop down there? Where would our FB team play? 


OrlandoCat wrote:expand_more
Being great in the MAC means nothing unless you win in Cleveland, or at best, the Motor City bowl.


What bowl did NIU play in last season?
 

OrlandoCat
General User
OC
Member Since: 3/15/2005
Post Count: 355
person
mail
OrlandoCat
mail
Posted: 4/1/2013 11:50 AM
I was going to do the whole quote/response thing, but dont' feel like messing with /quotes, so I'll number them:

1)  Both.  Which do you think ESPN rather pick up; Ohio v Directional Mich or Big 6 vs Big 6.  Our fan base has shown time and time again that it will pack any venue when you give us an oppnent that the most casual fan can recognize as 'big name.'

2a)  Being competitive =/= winning it every year.  At least in the MVC we would have a legit reason to be on the bubble most years, and not watching our RPI go down because we beat EMU.  Do I think we go in and dominate?  No....Do I think we'd be in the top 4?  Yes.

2b)  Maybe the new Big East, or whatever it will be called allows football only.  Maybe the MAC would allow us football only. Maybe CUSA.  It not like what I'm proposing is unheard of.

3)  In psy 221 we call what NIU did an 'outlier.'  A LOT had to go right last season for NIU to get where it got, and after the way they got pasted, a lot MORE will have to go right for a MAC school to do it again.
OhioCatFan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 15,699
mail
OhioCatFan
mail
Posted: 4/1/2013 1:12 PM
I agree with all of OC's points, except #3, but I don't have time to argue that one right now.
mf279801
General User
M279801
Member Since: 8/6/2010
Location: Newark, DE
Post Count: 2,486
person
mail
mf279801
mail
Posted: 4/1/2013 1:42 PM
OrlandoCat wrote:expand_more
3)  In psy 221 we call what NIU did an 'outlier.'  A LOT had to go right last season for NIU to get where it got, and after the way they got pasted, a lot MORE will have to go right for a MAC school to do it again.


Under the BCS bowl format that is going along with the 4-team playoff model starting in 2014-15, the top ranked "other" conference champion (that is the champions of the leagues not named SEC, Pac12, Big12, Big10) WILL go to one of the big name access bowls. IIRC it will be the Orange Bowl. In other words, under the future system, rather than this year's BCS system, NIU would have played in the Orange Bowl. In years going forward, the top ranked non-BCS conference champion will go big-time bowling (though likely not in the 4-team playoff). All that need happen for a MAC school to "do it again" in the future is being ranked higher than the winners of the CUSA, the MWC, and the SunBelt (the WAC being defunct)
OrlandoCat
General User
OC
Member Since: 3/15/2005
Post Count: 355
person
mail
OrlandoCat
mail
Posted: 4/1/2013 1:47 PM
mf279801 wrote:expand_more
3)  In psy 221 we call what NIU did an 'outlier.'  A LOT had to go right last season for NIU to get where it got, and after the way they got pasted, a lot MORE will have to go right for a MAC school to do it again.


Under the BCS bowl format that is going along with the 4-team playoff model starting in 2014-15, the top ranked "other" conference champion (that is the champions of the leagues not named SEC, Pac12, Big12, Big10) WILL go to one of the big name access bowls. IIRC it will be the Orange Bowl. In other words, under the future system, rather than this year's BCS system, NIU would have played in the Orange Bowl. In years going forward, the top ranked non-BCS conference champion will go big-time bowling (though likely not in the 4-team playoff). All that need happen for a MAC school to "do it again" in the future is being ranked higher than the winners of the CUSA, the MWC, and the SunBelt (the WAC being defunct)


So now we're going to a different bowl that nobody outside of us will care about.  Throwing BCS in the bowl name somewhere doesn't matter if there is a play-off, we're still on the outside looking in.  We just have a better window to look through.
Showing Messages: 26 - 50 of 57
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)