Ohio Basketball Topic
Topic: Two Varying Opinions
Page: 3 of 4
OUVan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Bethesda, MD
Post Count: 5,580
mail
OUVan
mail
Posted: 5/3/2013 8:18 AM
Lande71 wrote:expand_more
Wow!  My only point was that we do not need to blast Ivo on an athletic forum.  I prefer to read about Ohio athletics, not Ivo's tweet.  This discussion took a real turn. 


It took the only turn it could take.  Ivo is 100% allowed to have an opinion and 100% allowed to voice said opinion.  By the same token he is 100% allowed to get blasted for an ignorant, antiquated and bigoted view of the world.  A large chunk of the world's population is currently legally being discriminated against and it's flat out wrong.  Too many people want to force their religious beliefs and morals on an entire population.  This might shock some of you but the Bible is not what drives everyone and in the USA it should drive ZERO policies.  When this country was formed the world had a different view but our founding fathers were smart enough to separate church and state so that religious persecution couldn't drive our policies.  150 years ago slavery was seen as the natural order of things. 50 years ago separate but "equal" was seen as the natural order of things.  6 years ago having an African-American President was something that no one thought they would see in their lifetime.  Now the world is ready for another societal improvement and it's about time.   If any religious organization wants to keep gays from marrying in their church that's their business but that doesn't mean it should be forced on everyone else.   
Bobcat110alum
General User
Member Since: 7/7/2010
Location: Columbus, OH
Post Count: 470
mail
Bobcat110alum
mail
Posted: 5/3/2013 8:41 AM
Lande71 wrote:expand_more
I'm not sure that my views on any topic can be classified as outdated.  They are outdated to you because you don't happen to agree...I'm certainly proud!  I also had one of my best friends in HS turn out to be gay.  He also died at a young age (30) of aids.  I've seen, maybe closer than most people, both sides.  Why did he get aids? Because of the lifestyle he chose to participate in.


They are outdated because they suppress the rights of a group of people in our country. Someone suggested that Ivo wouldn't comment on African-American rights. Ivo probably wouldn't comment on African-American rights because our generation has grown up in a society where African-Americans aren't separated anymore and have legal rights the same as I do (Don't worry, I'm not naive enough to think we're at a point where there's not still discrimination, but I blame that on bigoted individuals who hold onto their outdated beliefs that certain people just aren't the same as everyone else and pass that along to their children, who know no better.)

You still think that AIDS is the "gay disease"? Is that your point? Magic Johnson. Slept around a lot and picked up HIV. Pretty sure he was straight. I don't think your problem should be with gay people, it should probably be with the entire 80's lifestyle that a lot of people participated in. 
Jeff McKinney
Moderator
JM
Member Since: 11/12/2004
Post Count: 6,163
person
mail
Jeff McKinney
mail
Posted: 5/3/2013 9:07 AM
Van...just a quick note that on the issues of homosexuality and also the relationship of church and state, there is certainly not a uniformity of thought in the Christian church.  There is a whole spectrum of thought on these issues and a lot of debate going on about the interpretive processes that lead to varying opinions.  Again, we have to be careful not to use too broad of a brush to paint a picture of any group.  This includes gay people, but also those who are involved in the church. 
OUVan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Bethesda, MD
Post Count: 5,580
mail
OUVan
mail
Posted: 5/3/2013 9:28 AM
Jeff McKinney wrote:expand_more
Van...just a quick note that on the issues of homosexuality and also the relationship of church and state, there is certainly not a uniformity of thought in the Christian church.  There is a whole spectrum of thought on these issues and a lot of debate going on about the interpretive processes that lead to varying opinions.  Again, we have to be careful not to use too broad of a brush to paint a picture of any group.  This includes gay people, but also those who are involved in the church. 


I'm aware of that but the vast majority of dissenting opinions on the subject point to the Bible as their guide on the issue.   I am by no means throwing all Christians (or Muslims, Jews, Hindus) into one bucket.  Religion isn't the problem.  Religious cherry picking is the problem.
100%Cat
General User
Member Since: 1/17/2013
Post Count: 2,728
mail
100%Cat
mail
Posted: 5/3/2013 9:34 AM
Tim Burke wrote:expand_more
Would rather focus on Reggie's pragmatic response.


Really going to miss Reg.  I only wish he had progressed a little faster and cracked the starting lineup sooner than this past year because he was incredibly important to us last season.

As for Ivo...as if the topic of his PLAY were not enough to be disappointed in him, he tops that with using Twitter to show that he's basically a homophobic bigot.  I won't miss him.
JSF
General User
Member Since: 1/29/2005
Location: Houston, TX
Post Count: 6,580
mail
JSF
mail
Posted: 5/3/2013 9:40 AM
Lande71 wrote:expand_more
Why did he get aids? Because of the lifestyle he chose to participate in.


(jaw drops)
Mike Johnson
General User
Member Since: 11/11/2004
Location: North Canton, OH
Post Count: 1,756
mail
Mike Johnson
mail
Posted: 5/3/2013 9:46 AM
I hope all of you commenting in this thread are mindful of the pricelessness of our First Amendment rights.

A few years ago a Shanghai woman, Haiyan (used the name Katherine in her Western dealings) Chen,  was living and working here in the Canton area.  She was the age of our daughter, recently had become widowed, and we sort of "adopted" her.

During Katherine's last visit with us, I was grilling in our backyard.  She was standing with me and we were chatting about her soon-to-end year in the States.  I asked, "What will you miss most about America?"

Withoug a moment's hesitation, Katherine said, "Being able to say what I think without worrying that I will be arrested."
Mark Lembright '85
General User
ML85
Member Since: 8/22/2010
Location: Highland Heights, OH
Post Count: 2,460
person
mail
Mark Lembright '85
mail
Posted: 5/3/2013 9:52 AM
Mike Johnson wrote:expand_more
I hope all of you commenting in this thread are mindful of the pricelessness of our First Amendment rights.

A few years ago a Shanghai woman, Haiyan (used the name Katherine in her Western dealings) Chen,  was living and working here in the Canton area.  She was the age of our daughter, recently had become widowed, and we sort of "adopted" her.

During Katherine's last visit with us, I was grilling in our backyard.  She was standing with me and we were chatting about her soon-to-end year in the States.  I asked, "What will you miss most about America?"

Withoug a moment's hesitation, Katherine said, "Being able to say what I think without worrying that I will be arrested."


+1 and well said.
shabamon
General User
Member Since: 11/17/2006
Location: Cincinnati
Post Count: 7,316
mail
shabamon
mail
Posted: 5/3/2013 10:12 AM
I'm in favor of having the freedom to express opinions, but Ivo's statement that homosexuality is an activity for people with loose morals and ethics suggests that homosexuality is a choice, which IS incorrect. How many of you sympathisizing with Ivo have talked to gay people before? Why would anyone choose a lifestyle that is met with such hatred and bigotry?
BillyTheCat
General User
BTC
Member Since: 10/6/2012
Post Count: 10,802
person
mail
BillyTheCat
mail
Posted: 5/3/2013 10:45 AM
C Money wrote:expand_more
Proposal: eliminate state sanction of any marriage. Equal rights achieved, this debate ends with both sides getting what they want, and we can go back to arguing about what sucks more--an F5 tornado, or Fiami.


How are you going to limit the State sanctioning of marriage?  That is a reserved power protected by the 10th Amendment.  So unless you are going to change the Constitution, which will not happen.
C Money
General User
Member Since: 8/28/2010
Post Count: 3,420
mail
C Money
mail
Posted: 5/3/2013 11:22 AM
BillyTheCat wrote:expand_more
Proposal: eliminate state sanction of any marriage. Equal rights achieved, this debate ends with both sides getting what they want, and we can go back to arguing about what sucks more--an F5 tornado, or Fiami.


How are you going to limit the State sanctioning of marriage?  That is a reserved power protected by the 10th Amendment.  So unless you are going to change the Constitution, which will not happen.



Well, you could tackle it the same way SSM proponents tackled the SSM issue: at the state level. I would not be surprised, in the event a Supreme Court ruling is issued that mandates SSM legalization nationwide, if this is proposed in one or more states that have been consistently anti-SSM. And to be honest, the lawyer in me is kind of interested to see how it would play out, since "marraige" (however it is defined) impacts such a variety of issues. What if we just didn't have "marriage" anymore?

But my point actually was: I'd rather debate subjects relavant to Ohio athletics than sexuality. Athlete twitter usage is a relevant issue. Whether a non-athlete is a bigot or repressive of free speech or religion doesn't seem to be. I am really looking forward to this debate ending, because I know too many friends/families who have been torn apart by this issue to the point that they are no longer on speaking terms.
Kevin Finnegan
General User
KF
Member Since: 2/4/2005
Location: Rockton, IL
Post Count: 1,214
person
mail
Kevin Finnegan
mail
Posted: 5/3/2013 11:49 AM
I can assume, based on the timing of Ivo's post, that his comment was in reaction to Jason Collins announcing he was gay. That's what makes this a basketball-related topic. Where Ivo is almost certainly wrong (despite your beliefs) is that Mr. Collins is asking for 'special rights' (as assumed by other posters) or 'gay rights' (as stated by Ivo) as opposed to 'equal rights'. Now, this entire discussion is a microcosm of debates going on politically across this country, but Mr. Collins did not come out and state any specific right he expects to be afforded, other than saying that he wants to be judged on his basketball talents.

He did not speak in his original announcement (I have not seen everything he has said since) about marriage equality. He did not state that NBA teams should have at least one gay player on the team or that players should take sensitivity training. Those would be 'special rights'. He did not ask for the right to have his partner be able to sit with player wives or to receive equal or enhanced benefits for his partner (not to say he doesn't believe these things, yet he did not ask for them). He actually asked for nearly nothing. He wanted to come out on his own terms, not to be 'outed' by sensational media outlets. He wanted to start a conversation.

Yet I wonder if Ivo read the testimonial. I don't see what he saw that would have him state, 'Gay rights and all that nonsense, I give two thumbs down'. What right? To be able to play basketball while admitting who you are? To be able to, in his words, now sleep better at night? Are those the rights that Ivo is challenging? Because, again, Mr. Collins did not ask for anything further.
Jeff McKinney
Moderator
JM
Member Since: 11/12/2004
Post Count: 6,163
person
mail
Jeff McKinney
mail
Posted: 5/3/2013 12:47 PM
Aren't tweets usually just off the cuff remarks, not well thought out statements?
bornacatfan
General User
Member Since: 8/3/2006
Post Count: 5,752
mail
bornacatfan
mail
Posted: 5/3/2013 12:50 PM
finnOhio wrote:expand_more
Yet I wonder if Ivo read the testimonial.


At this point,,,in a world of sound bites and media guiding the bleating sheep do you really think most folks actually read or pursue a story to figure out what they really think before they react and form an opinion with the limited information they have digested?

In 3 years of tweeting I have found him to be shallow and oft wondered if he did not have a  few "quote a day" and "inspirational" calendars he uses for his tweets. Those were fine and I found them pertinent. It is just recently since he actually started using his own thoughts that I found my jaw hitting the floor.

THe one thing that most folks are sure of...this conversation exists on a basketball board because we expect something better from the guys who represent us by wearing the uniform and become a face of the U. Maybe right, maybe wrong but sports personas are public figures associated with all who are part of the team they represent.
crackerbaby00
General User
C00
Member Since: 3/9/2007
Post Count: 442
person
mail
crackerbaby00
mail
Posted: 5/3/2013 2:15 PM
Mike Johnson wrote:expand_more
I hope all of you commenting in this thread are mindful of the pricelessness of our First Amendment rights.

A few years ago a Shanghai woman, Haiyan (used the name Katherine in her Western dealings) Chen,  was living and working here in the Canton area.  She was the age of our daughter, recently had become widowed, and we sort of "adopted" her.

During Katherine's last visit with us, I was grilling in our backyard.  She was standing with me and we were chatting about her soon-to-end year in the States.  I asked, "What will you miss most about America?"

Withoug a moment's hesitation, Katherine said, "Being able to say what I think without worrying that I will be arrested."


I do not believe that Ivo has been arrested for his comments. While everyone has the right to say what they want without such speech being interfered with by the government, that does not mean that you are free from feeling some backlash from private individuals or businesses.

I do not know what the chances are that Ivo will play professionally somewhere, but it is possible that he may have lost a potential employer with his comments (even if it is not in the basketball world).  I am not saying that he will not get a job, but who knows if he may have limited his opportunities with his comments.
JSF
General User
Member Since: 1/29/2005
Location: Houston, TX
Post Count: 6,580
mail
JSF
mail
Posted: 5/3/2013 7:05 PM
finnOhio wrote:expand_more
I can assume, based on the timing of Ivo's post, that his comment was in reaction to Jason Collins announcing he was gay. That's what makes this a basketball-related topic. Where Ivo is almost certainly wrong (despite your beliefs) is that Mr. Collins is asking for 'special rights' (as assumed by other posters) or 'gay rights' (as stated by Ivo) as opposed to 'equal rights'. Now, this entire discussion is a microcosm of debates going on politically across this country, but Mr. Collins did not come out and state any specific right he expects to be afforded, other than saying that he wants to be judged on his basketball talents.

He did not speak in his original announcement (I have not seen everything he has said since) about marriage equality. He did not state that NBA teams should have at least one gay player on the team or that players should take sensitivity training. Those would be 'special rights'. He did not ask for the right to have his partner be able to sit with player wives or to receive equal or enhanced benefits for his partner (not to say he doesn't believe these things, yet he did not ask for them). He actually asked for nearly nothing. He wanted to come out on his own terms, not to be 'outed' by sensational media outlets. He wanted to start a conversation.

Yet I wonder if Ivo read the testimonial. I don't see what he saw that would have him state, 'Gay rights and all that nonsense, I give two thumbs down'. What right? To be able to play basketball while admitting who you are? To be able to, in his words, now sleep better at night? Are those the rights that Ivo is challenging? Because, again, Mr. Collins did not ask for anything further.


This such an excellent post. Well freaking done.
bobcat28
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 817
mail
bobcat28
mail
Posted: 5/4/2013 2:22 PM

"Congrats to everybody who graduated! Love you all! #2013"

Love you all....except the gays of course!

PhiTau74
General User
PT74
Member Since: 8/6/2010
Location: Columbia, SC
Post Count: 458
person
mail
PhiTau74
mail
Posted: 5/4/2013 4:43 PM
Being gay is a choice being black is God given so big difference.
giacomo
General User
G
Member Since: 11/20/2007
Post Count: 2,763
person
mail
giacomo
mail
Posted: 5/4/2013 6:13 PM
The ridiculous thing to me is that anyone would care about the opinion of a 22 year old college student.
Suga Fries
General User
SF
Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 148
person
mail
Suga Fries
mail
Posted: 5/4/2013 6:22 PM
PhiTau74 wrote:expand_more
Being gay is a choice being black is God given so big difference.
you are joking right?
cc-cat
General User
C
Member Since: 4/5/2006
Location: matthews, NC
Post Count: 4,016
person
mail
cc-cat
mail
Posted: 5/4/2013 6:24 PM
Being uneducated is choice, being dumb is God given so big difference
Last Edited: 5/4/2013 6:31:43 PM by cc-cat
Hypnotoad
General User
H
Member Since: 10/2/2012
Post Count: 9
person
mail
Hypnotoad
mail
Posted: 5/4/2013 8:51 PM
Suga Fries wrote:expand_more
Being gay is a choice being black is God given so big difference.
you are joking right?


No kidding. So much straight up ignorance on display. This has been a very disappointing thread to churn through.
OUVan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Bethesda, MD
Post Count: 5,580
mail
OUVan
mail
Posted: 5/4/2013 9:19 PM
Having allergies is a choice.   Being tall is a choice.  Blood type is a choice. Male pattern baldness is a choice. 

Did he really go there?
JSF
General User
Member Since: 1/29/2005
Location: Houston, TX
Post Count: 6,580
mail
JSF
mail
Posted: 5/5/2013 3:20 AM
This is one of the more illuminating threads in recent Bobcat Attack history.
Pataskala
General User
P
Member Since: 7/8/2010
Location: At least six feet away from anybody else
Post Count: 9,465
person
mail
Pataskala
mail
Posted: 5/5/2013 9:34 AM
Homosexuality may be a choice, but so is religion.  Yet religion is protected under the Constitution, and nobody questions that, so long as you're not harming others (human sacrifice, bilking people out of their money or property, etc.).  So are lots of other things that aren't specifically mentioned in the Constitution.  For the most part, the gay rights movement isn't about preferential treatment; it's about being treated equally as straights.  I feel sorry for anyone who has a problem with that.
Showing Messages: 51 - 75 of 98
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)