I never suggested turning it into a museum. I suggested mothballing it until it might be needed in the future. I also said that not too long ago one wing had been used as office space for the university public affairs office. I said that it could have been repurposed, and that in Europe they never would have torn down a building of this age that was that well built. You thought all of those ideas were stupid and showed a lack of understanding of modern financing and sound fiscal management. [/QUOTE]Please provide a quote in which I talked about modern financing and fiscal management. I'm truly not sure what you're talking about.
Our disagreement about Scott Quad was simple, little as you seem to understand it. I just don't think it was a particularly historic building worth preserving at all costs. As I said in that thread 8 times, it never felt to me like a building that was in the top 15 or so on campus.
I have no idea what your mumbo jumbo about “fixed costs” vs. “flexible costs” means.
This is pretty clear.
I just know that the University is very short-sighted in its decision making and has torn down many buildings over the last 50 years that it shouldn’t have and that could still serve useful purposes today.
The question about fixed/flexibile costs is a question about the short view vs. the long. We have more enrollees today then we expected, and thus need more beds. If you think that OU can maintain those enrollment levels, then a fixed cost -- i.e. mothballing Scott Quad, renovating, and utilizing as dorms -- makes sense. If you think the state of higher Ed makes it hard to project enrollment going forward and this might be a temporary spike, the current set up is a better financial one.
I know that I put a much greater value than you do on the role that historic buildings and an aesthetic physical plant play in helping people feel rooted and giving them a sense of place.
No, we just disagree about Scott Quad and whether it qualifies as historic.
[QUOTE=OhioCatFan]
At the rate we are going, we may very well destroy our historic campus with many older buildings that give it a sense of character and continuity and turn the place into something akin to Bowling Green, probably the ugliest most dysfunctional campus in the state.