You want the news coverage to reflect your reality, what you think is important.
We all do that to some extent.
But a good argument, a sensible argument, can be made that we get what people as a whole are really interested in.
And what's in the wind is no particular interest in Clinton's problems and great astonishment at the Repub nominee.
Deal with it.
#beentellinyaformonths
Of course there's no possibility of the media,including the Clinton News Network, wanting to do everything they can to try and influence another election by skewing what is reported and how ?
There didn't seem to be much coverage for Mrs.Clinton when she said she "short circuited" on the email scandal.
Same thing, haven't seen any coverage on the major networks about some of the physical problems Secret Service Agents have said she has.
There's also nothing to see in the emails that were released this week showing the cozy relationship between the Clinton Foundation and the State department she was heading.
Guess there was no media bias when Dan Rather used fabricated memos to try and bring down President Bush.
How many of the "Talking Heads" including George Stephanopoulos worked for Democratic Administrations in one way or another ? I'm sure they're objective.
Maybe you don't believe in media bias, but that doesn't mean it isn't there.
Last Edited: 8/13/2016 8:01:16 PM by rpbobcat