This is total bs. The candidate gets a call indicating he or she isn't going to be chosen, then they remove their name from consideration. So the fourth guy gets the job by default? No wonder there is such disdain and disrespect for so many of the decisions of the board. Total bs. Just be hones with the taxpayers.
I saw the the University was set to announce the new president on 2/22.
I presume that means the board made a decision and let the candidates know.
If the a candidate(s) knows they weren't getting the job,and dropped out to save face,how is that a problem with the board ?
Save face? Really? Everyone knows why they dropped out. Three candidates just don't suddenly get better offers or have a change of heart. It's the process that's bs and any intelligent person can see right through it.
Another angle is that if they did really have a change of heart, we'll never know if the new guy was really the board's first choice or fourth choice. How would you like to be coming into a job with that uncertainty.
Point is you can't have it both ways.
To be honest,I really wouldn't care if I was the first choice or fourth choice.
I got the job.
That's all that counts.
You might not but the people reporting to you would and that's not a good way to start a job. You want buy in from as many of those folks who report to you and for whom you are responsible as possible. You never want to take a job where the belief can be "well, he was the only one left."
Sorry,but I disagree.
A number of people submitted "applications".
The board then came up with a list of 4 finalists.
To me,that means that the board felt that any of the 4 were capable of being the next president.
Academics is a different animal then the private sector.
In the real world,the new guy is,for whatever reason,the boss.You have to,deal with it.
I do work with a number of Municipalities.
A few years ago one of them got a new Administrator who was,to say the least,tough to work with.
Her response "You don't like it,leave.I'll find someone else ".