Ohio Football Topic
Topic: Official Game 5 Thread: Kent St.
Page: 1 of 5
Ted Thompson
Administrator
Member Since: 11/11/2004
Location: MAC Play
Post Count: 7,945
mail
Ted Thompson
mail
Posted: 9/30/2018 11:04 PM

Use this thread to talk about anything game-related. For away games, we'll have a separate travel thread.

Date: October 6th, 2018 3:30 PM

Opponent: Kent St.  (1-4, 0-1 MAC)

Site: Dix Stadium

TV: None

Radio: Ohio Radio

Webcast: ESPN+

Ohio Game Notes

Kent St. Game Notes

Kent St. statisticsroster and media guide.

Kent St. Fan Site: Flash Fanatics 

Last Edited: 10/3/2018 1:59:35 PM by Ted Thompson
Brian Smith (No, not that one)
General User
BSNNTO
Member Since: 2/4/2005
Post Count: 3,057
person
mail
Brian Smith (No, not that one)
mail
Posted: 10/1/2018 3:03 PM
I'm not a sports gambler, but can you create a prop bet that Ohio's football team will score more points against Kent State than its basketball team against Kent State during the schools' basketball games this winter?

Because I'd think about that one.
GoCats105
General User
GC105
Member Since: 1/31/2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Post Count: 7,817
person
mail
GoCats105
mail
Posted: 10/1/2018 3:24 PM
Brian Smith wrote:expand_more
I'm not a sports gambler, but can you create a prop bet that Ohio's football team will score more points against Kent State than its basketball team against Kent State during the schools' basketball games this winter?

Because I'd think about that one.
Saul Phillips era Kent scores for Ohio men's basketball:

88
69
66
67
85
72
82
51
59

Average of 71. It's not out of the question...
Last Edited: 10/1/2018 3:24:14 PM by GoCats105
Maddog13
General User
M13
Member Since: 12/22/2004
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Post Count: 725
person
mail
Maddog13
mail
Posted: 10/1/2018 7:21 PM
I am glad that we are playing Kent State near the beginning of the MAC Schedule instead of near the end, when this team begins to gel. Still, it is the MAC and anything goes at this point. I feel that I know less about this Ohio team than we knew before the beginning of the season. I am a Bobcat fan till the day I die, so time to strap in and hope for the best. Go Bobcats!!!
MonroeClassmate
General User
MC
Member Since: 8/31/2010
Post Count: 2,325
person
mail
MonroeClassmate
mail
Posted: 10/1/2018 8:05 PM
Shucks, I was hoping the game would be early as I have an evening wedding to attend. I haven't missed a Bobcat game in Dix in a bunch of years.

I cannot imagine an odds maker having OHIO at better than -8 due to the schedule. Two of Kent's losses were vs teams similar to UVA and the Bearcats with Kent's coming against the Illini and Ole Miss. Kent had three straight road games the final being a romp by Ball State. 4 out of 5 on the road to start the season is a pretty crappy schedule and it would be hard to get up for Balls considering the scheduling. The other loss came at the hands of the Nittany Lions a far more powerful opponent than OHIO will face this season.

The common game was Howard both on the MAC home fields where the Flashes had a positive 40 point spread while the Bobcats won.

Kent trails OHIO's rushing and and total offense and trails in total defense as well but OHIO didn't face a Penn State classed team.

Therefore it may be tight unless Kent has already given up for the year and the Bobcats are fresh as their MAC season gets underway. Or Kent could be happy to be home and the Howard game proves to be indicative of the two team's abilities.

Go Bobcats--make it a statement game like the way Ball State thumped em. "Smoke Kent; knock the Flashes on their Ashes"
Ted Thompson
Administrator
Member Since: 11/11/2004
Location: MAC Play
Post Count: 7,945
mail
Ted Thompson
mail
Posted: 10/1/2018 11:56 PM

 

Buckeye to Bobcat
General User
BB
Member Since: 9/10/2013
Post Count: 1,873
person
mail
Buckeye to Bobcat
mail
Posted: 10/2/2018 9:09 AM
I see real estate agents on both sides of the field.

Ohio 49
Can't Read, Can't Write 35
Pataskala
General User
P
Member Since: 7/8/2010
Location: At least six feet away from anybody else
Post Count: 9,465
person
mail
Pataskala
mail
Posted: 10/2/2018 11:21 AM
Some key statistical matchups (granted, Kent had a tougher OOC schedule than we did):

Ohio scoring offense: 39.3 pts/game (26th)
Kent scoring defense: 39.6 pts/game (119th)

Ohio scoring defense: 38.3 pts/game (115th)
Kent scoring offense: 25.8 pts/game (92nd)

Ohio red zone offense: 95.7% [23 att; 15TD; 7FG] (13th)
Kent red zone defense: 69.2% [26 opp att; 16TD; 2FG] (12th)

Ohio red zone defense: 85.7% [14 opp att; 9TD; 3FG] (77th)
Kent red zone offense: 88.9% [18 att; 11TD; 5FG] (43rd)

Ohio passing offense: 242.8 yds/game (63rd)
Kent passing defense: 325.8 yds/game (125th)

Ohio passing defense: 386.8 yds/game (128th)
Kent passing offense: 232.4 yds/game (68th)

Ohio rushing offense: 223.0 yds/game (27th)
Kent rushing defense: 202.0 yds/game (105th)

Ohio rushing defense: 131.3 yds/game (47th)
Kent rushing offense: 174.8 yds/game (71st)

Ohio third-down conversion offense: 39.7% (69th)
Kent third-down conversion defense: 40.3% (83rd)

Ohio third-down conversion defense: 55.4% (129th)
Kent third-down conversion offense: 33.3% (112th)

Turnover margin: Ohio +4; Kent -2
OhioStunter
General User
Member Since: 2/18/2005
Location: Chicago
Post Count: 2,516
mail
OhioStunter
mail
Posted: 10/2/2018 1:06 PM
Pataskala wrote:expand_more
Ohio third-down conversion defense: 55.4% (129th)
Aren't there only 129 FBS teams?
mf279801
General User
M279801
Member Since: 8/6/2010
Location: Newark, DE
Post Count: 2,486
person
mail
mf279801
mail
Posted: 10/2/2018 1:31 PM
OhioStunter wrote:expand_more
Ohio third-down conversion defense: 55.4% (129th)
Aren't there only 129 FBS teams?
130th team is Liberty (transitioning to FBS)
allen
General User
A
Member Since: 1/24/2006
Post Count: 4,638
person
mail
allen
mail
Posted: 10/2/2018 3:12 PM
We need to come out of the gate tackling, last week, their running backs and wide receivers broke multiple tackles in the first half, there was a lot of grabbing as it it was a practice. We need to cover well and the offensive line need to assert themselves and Rourke, Papi, Odom, irons and AJ will do the rest. We also need to look for new ways to use our tight ends. Go Cats
SBH
General User
SBH
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 4,677
person
mail
SBH
mail
Posted: 10/2/2018 3:22 PM
If we lose this week, it's hard for me to see any promise for the rest of the season. Just a fact...in Year 14, you don't lose to an always-rebuilding Kent State program.
Deciduous Forest Cat
General User
DFC
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: OH
Post Count: 4,558
person
mail
Deciduous Forest Cat
mail
Posted: 10/2/2018 3:28 PM
SBH wrote:expand_more
If we lose this week, it's hard for me to see any promise for the rest of the season. Just a fact...in Year 14, you don't lose to an always-rebuilding Kent State program.
Can't say I disagree. This needs to be a pretty convincing win.

I know, I know, road game in conference, but we need to announce our presence with authority in this one.

That said, our division titles usually have a really inexplicable loss.
Last Edited: 10/2/2018 3:29:13 PM by Deciduous Forest Cat
bshot44
General User
Member Since: 2/12/2012
Post Count: 2,211
mail
bshot44
mail
Posted: 10/2/2018 3:31 PM
Deciduous Forest Cat wrote:expand_more
If we lose this week, it's hard for me to see any promise for the rest of the season. Just a fact...in Year 14, you don't lose to an always-rebuilding Kent State program.
Can't say I disagree. This needs to be a pretty convincing win.

I know, I know, road game in conference, but we need to announce our presence with authority in this one.

That said, our division titles usually have a really inexplicable loss.
Would be nice to hold a team to less than 30 points.

Yeah ... that sounds ridiculous ...

But they haven't done that in the last 6 regular season games ...

A 45-38 win over Kent doesn't exactly ooze with confidence.

This needs to be something more like a 31-13 win if they want us to take them serious as a MAC title contender.

But who here thinks this defense can hold Kent to 13? Not sure they could hold Glouster-Trimble to 13 points at this rate.
Bcat2
General User
B2
Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 4,295
person
mail
Bcat2
mail
Posted: 10/2/2018 7:41 PM
Deciduous Forest Cat wrote:expand_more
If we lose this week, it's hard for me to see any promise for the rest of the season. Just a fact...in Year 14, you don't lose to an always-rebuilding Kent State program.
Can't say I disagree. This needs to be a pretty convincing win.

I know, I know, road game in conference, but we need to announce our presence with authority in this one.

That said, our division titles usually have a really inexplicable loss.
Riiight! Need to win BIG!!!. Style points matter in Ohio/Solich football. Really, since when?
Pataskala
General User
P
Member Since: 7/8/2010
Location: At least six feet away from anybody else
Post Count: 9,465
person
mail
Pataskala
mail
Posted: 10/2/2018 7:41 PM
bshot44 wrote:expand_more
If we lose this week, it's hard for me to see any promise for the rest of the season. Just a fact...in Year 14, you don't lose to an always-rebuilding Kent State program.
Can't say I disagree. This needs to be a pretty convincing win.

I know, I know, road game in conference, but we need to announce our presence with authority in this one.

That said, our division titles usually have a really inexplicable loss.
Would be nice to hold a team to less than 30 points.

Yeah ... that sounds ridiculous ...

But they haven't done that in the last 6 regular season games ...

A 45-38 win over Kent doesn't exactly ooze with confidence.

This needs to be something more like a 31-13 win if they want us to take them serious as a MAC title contender.

But who here thinks this defense can hold Kent to 13? Not sure they could hold Glouster-Trimble to 13 points at this rate.
They maybe won't hold Kent to 13, but could do under 25. Except for Howard, Kent hasn't scored more than 24 pts this season. (Yeah, I know, they did better vs Howard than we did.) I think the score will be more like their BSU score. I'm thinking something like 48-20.
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 10/2/2018 7:42 PM
bshot44 wrote:expand_more
Would be nice to hold a team to less than 30 points.

Yeah ... that sounds ridiculous ...
...

Nah, that's not a ridiculous goal. I honestly they they have a shot of doing it. I think Ohio will win, 42-28.

Vegas has Ohio winning by 13.5 and the over/under at 70. Solve for O and K:
O-K=13.5
O+K=70
so, O=K+13.5, meaning (K+13.5)+K=70, or 2K=56.5
So, K=28.25
meaning O=41.75

Ha! That's hilarious. That's exactly on my prediction, which I did before I looked up the spread and over/under.

Yes, Ohio has an excellent chance of holding Kent under 30.
Last Edited: 10/2/2018 7:42:46 PM by L.C.
Bcat2
General User
B2
Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 4,295
person
mail
Bcat2
mail
Posted: 10/2/2018 7:59 PM
L.C. wrote:expand_more
Would be nice to hold a team to less than 30 points.

Yeah ... that sounds ridiculous ...
...

Nah, that's not a ridiculous goal. I honestly they they have a shot of doing it. I think Ohio will win, 42-28.

Vegas has Ohio winning by 13.5 and the over/under at 70. Solve for O and K:
O-K=13.5
O+K=70
so, O=K+13.5, meaning (K+13.5)+K=70, or 2K=56.5
So, K=28.25
meaning O=41.75

Ha! That's hilarious. That's exactly on my prediction, which I did before I looked up the spread and over/under.

Yes, Ohio has an excellent chance of holding Kent under 30.
L.C. Let bshot44 have his fun. Shaming a team/players is a time honored method of motivation by fans. When things get better we can remember these threads.
Sam bobcat
General User
SB
Member Since: 7/14/2015
Post Count: 633
person
mail
Sam bobcat
mail
Posted: 10/2/2018 8:06 PM
bshot44 wrote:expand_more
But who here thinks this defense can hold Kent to 13? Not sure they could hold Glouster-Trimble to 13 points at this rate.

Fine...that was really funny because I had to google Glouster Trimble....congratulations.
bshot44
General User
Member Since: 2/12/2012
Post Count: 2,211
mail
bshot44
mail
Posted: 10/2/2018 11:42 PM
Sam bobcat wrote:expand_more
But who here thinks this defense can hold Kent to 13? Not sure they could hold Glouster-Trimble to 13 points at this rate.

Fine...that was really funny because I had to google Glouster Trimble....congratulations.
Thanks bud! If only bcat2 had any sense of humor .... or sense of reality 😉
bshot44
General User
Member Since: 2/12/2012
Post Count: 2,211
mail
bshot44
mail
Posted: 10/2/2018 11:48 PM
Bcat2 wrote:expand_more
Would be nice to hold a team to less than 30 points.

Yeah ... that sounds ridiculous ...
...

Nah, that's not a ridiculous goal. I honestly they they have a shot of doing it. I think Ohio will win, 42-28.

Vegas has Ohio winning by 13.5 and the over/under at 70. Solve for O and K:
O-K=13.5
O+K=70
so, O=K+13.5, meaning (K+13.5)+K=70, or 2K=56.5
So, K=28.25
meaning O=41.75

Ha! That's hilarious. That's exactly on my prediction, which I did before I looked up the spread and over/under.

Yes, Ohio has an excellent chance of holding Kent under 30.
L.C. Let bshot44 have his fun. Shaming a team/players is a time honored method of motivation by fans. When things get better we can remember these threads.
Oh ... let's be sure to pull out all of your gems!

Loved your disappearing act after that loss to Akron last year.

Sorry if facts get in the way of your cheerleading practice.

I can't help it that Ohio has let up 30+ 6 straight regular season games.

But you keep taking that high road. Leave us lesser fans down here to play in the reality mud.
bshot44
General User
Member Since: 2/12/2012
Post Count: 2,211
mail
bshot44
mail
Posted: 10/2/2018 11:54 PM
Pataskala wrote:expand_more
If we lose this week, it's hard for me to see any promise for the rest of the season. Just a fact...in Year 14, you don't lose to an always-rebuilding Kent State program.
Can't say I disagree. This needs to be a pretty convincing win.

I know, I know, road game in conference, but we need to announce our presence with authority in this one.

That said, our division titles usually have a really inexplicable loss.
Would be nice to hold a team to less than 30 points.

Yeah ... that sounds ridiculous ...

But they haven't done that in the last 6 regular season games ...

A 45-38 win over Kent doesn't exactly ooze with confidence.

This needs to be something more like a 31-13 win if they want us to take them serious as a MAC title contender.

But who here thinks this defense can hold Kent to 13? Not sure they could hold Glouster-Trimble to 13 points at this rate.
They maybe won't hold Kent to 13, but could do under 25. Except for Howard, Kent hasn't scored more than 24 pts this season. (Yeah, I know, they did better vs Howard than we did.) I think the score will be more like their BSU score. I'm thinking something like 48-20.
48-20 would be nice!

But I'm not holding my breath on that kind of output for Ohio.

For whatever reason, in Frank's 13 games against them... his offense has only broken 30 points once (last season)

Sorry bcat2 ... just more facts. Chirp away.

Four straight over Flashes allowing only 27 total points.

We'll see if trend continues
GoCats105
General User
GC105
Member Since: 1/31/2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Post Count: 7,817
person
mail
GoCats105
mail
Posted: 10/3/2018 7:38 AM
Bcat2 wrote:expand_more
If we lose this week, it's hard for me to see any promise for the rest of the season. Just a fact...in Year 14, you don't lose to an always-rebuilding Kent State program.
Can't say I disagree. This needs to be a pretty convincing win.

I know, I know, road game in conference, but we need to announce our presence with authority in this one.

That said, our division titles usually have a really inexplicable loss.
Riiight! Need to win BIG!!!. Style points matter in Ohio/Solich football. Really, since when?
Style points have nothing to do with it. It's showing that you're actually the MAC Champ favorite against a perpetual cellar dweller which seemingly always upsets Ohio somehow when they shouldn't. Please stop this charade. We need to win big for once against a team that is steps below us.
71 BOBCAT
General User
71B
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Post Count: 1,954
person
mail
71 BOBCAT
mail
Posted: 10/3/2018 7:58 AM
I was surprised with the 13.5 pt. spread for this game.
I compare it to last weeks spread which was the same and we were at home.
This week we are on the road.
I originally thought 6-9 points would be the spread.
My final take from this is that the odds makers feel that Kent is not as good a team as UMASS.




GO BOBCATS
Bcat2
General User
B2
Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 4,295
person
mail
Bcat2
mail
Posted: 10/3/2018 8:07 AM
GoCats105 wrote:expand_more
If we lose this week, it's hard for me to see any promise for the rest of the season. Just a fact...in Year 14, you don't lose to an always-rebuilding Kent State program.
Can't say I disagree. This needs to be a pretty convincing win.

I know, I know, road game in conference, but we need to announce our presence with authority in this one.

That said, our division titles usually have a really inexplicable loss.
Riiight! Need to win BIG!!!. Style points matter in Ohio/Solich football. Really, since when?
Style points have nothing to do with it. It's showing that you're actually the MAC Champ favorite against a perpetual cellar dweller which seemingly always upsets Ohio somehow when they shouldn't. Please stop this charade. We need to win big for once against a team that is steps below us.
"We need to win big for once ...." Well last season , for one, was 48-3. Does that count?
Showing Messages: 1 - 25 of 115
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)