menu
Logo
Ohio Football Topic
Topic: Who will Boise State play in the BCS Championship Game?
Page: 2 of 5
Ozcat
General User
Member Since: 1/4/2005
Location: Gahanna, OH
Post Count: 820
mail
Ozcat
mail
Posted: 9/7/2010 4:25 PM
cc cat wrote:expand_more
Interesting that everyone agrees that the ACC is a joke.  Yet if FSU were to go undefeated this year along with only one other BCS Conference team, FSU would play in the Title Game over a 1 loss anyone.


If FSU went undefeated this year, they would collect wins @Oklahoma, @Miami, against North Carolina and Florida, and an ACC Championship win.  That would be fairly impressive.


Why can't people like Boise for what they are?  They have a great story.  Their players propose to cheerleaders after bowl wins.  They eat potatoes.  It's great.  They are a nice, quality football team that probably deserves to be ranked around 8-12.  That is pretty darn good.  But to think they are this now elite program is a joke.  They have 13 players on NFL rosters.  Florida had 9 drafted last year alone!  Let them play their BCS game each year they are worthy and move on from the whole 'they deserve a shot' argument.
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 9/7/2010 4:29 PM
John C. Wanamaker wrote:expand_more
Anyone who'd put an undefeated Boise behind a one-loss other school is thinkin' stinkin'.



No, this should not be the case, just winning all of your games should not be a guarantee to a title.  In my opinion the "national championships" of the 1984 BYU team who's biggest wins were against a #3 ranked Pitt team in the opener (Pitt one 3 games all year), and Michigan in the Holiday Bowl (Michigan finished the season 6-6), and the 1990 Title of Georgia Tech, Tech's marquee win was against a 7-4-1 Georgia team that finished 3rd in the SEC, are a great example of this.  No way either of those teams make it through the schedule in a major conference.  Six weeks into this season, this VT win may look tarnished as they could have 4 or 5 losses, then how good a win is that?  


Congratulations on achieving two:  your cantankerousnous is intact and you are wrong.

57-2 since 2006.  It's impossible to do that without being awfully good.  I don't care who you play.  Think about it.  You claim Boise ain't that good.  If they ain't that good, then how come only two have beaten 'em out of the last 59.  Because they are that good.  (Out of curiosity, who beat 'em and by what scores?)

Some of you could see it happen right in front of your eyes and you'd still deny it.

Seriously, it's really impressive that you'd argue that Boise is not a first rank team.  Really.  Hey, why let reality intrude on your preconceived notions.

I enjoy your (all you anti-Boises) exhibitions of dense.
Ozcat
General User
Member Since: 1/4/2005
Location: Gahanna, OH
Post Count: 820
mail
Ozcat
mail
Posted: 9/7/2010 4:49 PM
Monroe Slavin, CPA wrote:expand_more
57-2 since 2006.....  Because they are that good.  (Out of curiosity, who beat 'em and by what scores?)


2007:  Washington  24-10, Hawaii  39-27, the powerhouse that is ECU  41-38

2008:  TCU  17-16 in the always riveting Poinsettia bowl

Boise is so good that only perennial powers can beat 'em....  (That's also 4 losses, not 2 -- proficient research)
OhioCatFan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 15,716
mail
OhioCatFan
mail
Posted: 9/7/2010 4:52 PM
Brian Smith wrote to OzTheOSUCat:  

"You sound like a General Motors executive talking about Toyota in 1983."

Mr. Smith, thank you; I could not have said it better myself.
Last Edited: 9/7/2010 4:53:43 PM by OhioCatFan
Athens
General User
A
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Post Count: 5,454
person
mail
Athens
mail
Posted: 9/7/2010 5:02 PM
Looking purely at past results, when Louisville upgraded from CUSA to the Big East, Virginia Tech from the Big East to the ACC they pretty much continued their dominating ways for seasons to come. A top 15 team can pretty much top 15 in any conference. Its more the mid level bowl teams those that win 8 or 9 in a weaker conference that receive schedule shock by moving up to a stronger strength of schedule. Everyone thought VT was going to be over their head in the ACC and they won the conference in the first season. I love how the Big Ten strength is thrown about here as an impossibility for Boise when its been the weakest BCS conference over the past 5 years or so top to bottom.
TheRealMikeDrake
General User
TRMD
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Delaware, OH
Post Count: 300
person
mail
TheRealMikeDrake
mail
Posted: 9/7/2010 5:03 PM
Is there a more inane argument in sports than a College Football "Champions".  It's mind-numbingly bad.  Get over it.  You're not going to find any legitimacy.  Enjoy it for what it is...sports entertainment.  It's not WWE scripted, but you're not going to see what we determine a champion.  It's the two most familiar names at the beginning of the season who screw up the least throughout the year.  Then they'll play.  Then they'll split the money with the familiar names, rinse, repeat.

So what if BSU gets in?  They you'll hear how the system works.  Yes, sure..a team goes on a nearly decade long spree and finally gets a shot to play a team that underscheduled and avoided road games from a big conference.  There is a reason that non-BCS teams are 4-2 (3-1 if you count out last year's cannibalizing).

Just watch the games and enjoy them.  They are good games, for the most part.  If you want to watch a sport crown a champion, there are plenty of other options. Like FCS football. 
cc-cat
General User
C
Member Since: 4/5/2006
Location: matthews, NC
Post Count: 4,016
person
mail
cc-cat
mail
Posted: 9/7/2010 5:05 PM
57-2 regular season.  Point being they have earned the right this year IF they keep it rolling in the right direction.  Here is hoping that OSU loses a game and gets replaced by Boise in the title game.  Good for Boise.  Great to see as a Ohio grad and the bitching and moaning from Columbus may be just what we need to move to a playoff. 

The world is changing.  And with it folks are going to have to get past their historical "I don't mind those kind of people (I have friends that go to schools just like that), I just don't think they are worthy of fully associating with people like me."

Ah I remember the days when the PAC 10 and Big Ten said they would never give up the whole Rose Bowl thing.
Brian Smith (No, not that one)
General User
BSNNTO
Member Since: 2/4/2005
Post Count: 3,057
person
mail
Brian Smith (No, not that one)
mail
Posted: 9/7/2010 5:35 PM
Ozcat wrote:expand_more
How many freaking times does Ohio State have to go on the road to play in front of 75,000+ hostile fans this year? Camp Randall. That's it. Period.

They play FOUR games away from home. FOUR.


Ok, how about 70,000?  That will cover Kinnick as well.  So two games against top 10 programs on the road.  More than Boise can say, EVER.  I mean, I'm sure they have their rivalry game circled on their calendar.  What a barn burner that will be in the 16,000 seat Idaho-dome.

Every major program stays home.  When was the last time Florida played a non-conference road game IN ANOTHER STATE?
  

]Boise State's offensive and defensive lines are much more talented than Iowa's. Boise Statte's receivers are better than Iowa's. Moore is better than Stanzi. Yes, Boise State would be the second best team in the Big Ten.


And who's first?  Ohio State?  They are gonna have their hands full.  And you're kidding with the lines right?  Iowa may have the best D-line in the Big 10.  Wisconsin has the best O-line.  Boise's defense was cramping after one half against VTech (whose O-line was awful).  Their legs would fall off after one quarter against Wisconsion.  Both teams would destroy Boise.  At best, Boise would finish 4th in the Big 10 this year.  Michigan State, Penn State, and even Michigan could very well finish ahead of them.  They would go 5-3 at best.

I will, right now, take whoever Boise ends up playing in a BCS game, (must be a BCS opponent -- no TCU garbage) -13.5.


I just wanted to get the quote that Michigan State is better than Boise State in a quote box for the end of the season.
Piney
General User
P
Member Since: 2/3/2005
Location: Avon Lake, OH
Post Count: 135
person
mail
Piney
mail
Posted: 9/7/2010 5:41 PM
John C. Wanamaker wrote:expand_more
One thing everyone is forgetting in this rush to conspiracy is why wouldn't an Alabama, Texas, Oklahoma, Florida, or OSU want Boise State in the Title game?  They are looking at that as easy pickin's, and another trophy.  And to answer a line in the last post, BCS schools have been voted down in the past for struggling in games, happens every year, teams jump teams, that has always been a part of the polls (pre-BCS even). 

Let this play out and see what happens before we crown anyone.


Of course those school would LOVE to face Boise State in the championship game. But if Boise gets in over a perceived 'power' team the winner MAY get heat.

Here is the perfect scenario... Ohio State faces Boise St and wins by 10. But Boise got in over a 1-loss SEC team and that SEC team destroys whoever they face in the Sugar Bowl. How many people would be screaming 'Luckeyes' only can win when they don't play a SEC team in the championship... blah blah blah. That SEC team would have blown out Boise...

So while almost any team would love to play Boise in the title game, some teams would be perceived differently (like if the SEC team won and Boise got in over a 1-loss power team like Texas, Oklahoma or Ohio St) then all would be fine in the world.
Ozcat
General User
Member Since: 1/4/2005
Location: Gahanna, OH
Post Count: 820
mail
Ozcat
mail
Posted: 9/7/2010 5:55 PM
Brian Smith wrote:expand_more
Michigan State, Penn State, and even Michigan could very well finish ahead of them.


I just wanted to get the quote that Michigan State is better than Boise State in a quote box for the end of the season.


I just wanted to get the part where I said COULD, not IS.
Ozcat
General User
Member Since: 1/4/2005
Location: Gahanna, OH
Post Count: 820
mail
Ozcat
mail
Posted: 9/7/2010 6:00 PM
Piney is all over it.  All the OSU haters should be praying for an OSU/Boise matchup.

If Boise wins, you can have a ball with your OSU blows posts.  If OSU wins, the 'well they played Boise so it doesn't really count' rants could commence.

In my perfect world, Boise plays some interested party in any BCS game, gets waxed, and then we can go on with life without title talk for Boise, and just BCS matchups when they have excellent seasons.
cc-cat
General User
C
Member Since: 4/5/2006
Location: matthews, NC
Post Count: 4,016
person
mail
cc-cat
mail
Posted: 9/7/2010 6:23 PM
Andy Staples at SI nails it.

"Boise State's win against Virginia Tech on Monday night poured rocket fuel on a debate that raged all summer. One camp views Boise State as an excellent team capable of beating just about anyone in the country. The other believes the Broncos are merely a smurfed-out version of Ole Miss.

Camp No. 1 contends that if Boise State were a member of a power conference -- with the resources and the access to recruits that membership entails -- the Broncos would still be an elite team deserving of a spot in the national title game. Camp No. 2 contends that these Broncos would lose three or four games if they had to play an SEC schedule this season. Both of these scenarios are purely hypothetical. No power conference wants Boise State, and the Broncos' 2010 schedule is what it is. Here's the reality: All 15 teams that have faced Boise State since the 2009 season began have lost. That list includes last year's Pac-10 champ, another top 10 team from '09 and the team a lot of people picked to win the ACC this year.

If you have a problem with the quality of Boise State's schedule, write your favorite school's athletic director and tell him to schedule the Broncos so your team can prove its superiority. Boise State's Gene Bleymaier anxiously awaits your AD's call. If your school doesn't have the guts to schedule Boise State, kindly be quiet.

Remember, Boise State is only exploiting the idiotic system currently in place to choose the two teams that play for the national title. Boise State found the loophole in a system designed to keep the little guys out of the national title game. The loophole is this: If a team starts the season ranked high enough, that team stands an excellent chance of reaching the BCS title game as long as it goes undefeated -- regardless of the quality of its schedule -- and has at least one touchstone win.

There remains a simple, lucrative solution to this issue: Decide the national champion the same way the other NCAA divisions do -- with a 16-team playoff. Boise State would have to beat three elite opponents to reach the national title game, eliminating all concerns about the schedule. Until that happens, the debate will rage.

On to the rankings..."

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/writers/andy_staple...

Last Edited: 9/7/2010 6:24:17 PM by cc-cat
colobobcat66
General User
C66
Member Since: 9/1/2006
Location: Watching the bobcats run outside my window., CO
Post Count: 4,744
person
mail
colobobcat66
mail
Posted: 9/7/2010 6:30 PM
If the ACC is a joke it's only because Miami and FSU have been not so good lately.
OhioCatFan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 15,716
mail
OhioCatFan
mail
Posted: 9/7/2010 6:32 PM
Correctomento, ccCat.  That's the answer to the problem -- a 16 team playoff.  Each FBS conference champ gets a bid, with at-large berths going to rest of the field based on some type of computerized and/or human ranking.  I'd prefer computerized ranking because it eliminates to some extent the built-in biases of human voters.
John C. Wanamaker
General User
Member Since: 1/2/2005
Post Count: 1,103
mail
John C. Wanamaker
mail
Posted: 9/7/2010 6:35 PM
I love how 80% of people are using Ohio State as your argument, get over the Buckeyes there are a dozen other teams in the country that play majority home games, make millions of dollars and rarely go on the road.  Quit showing your penis envy of those guys.

To the person who says the Big 10 is the worse BCS Conference top to bottom, please do not drive at night as there are a lot of law enforcement officers and the are cracking down on impaired drivers.  The ACC and Big East are well below the Big 10 from top to bottom last year ESPN ranked the Big 10 2nd

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/columns/story?columnist=sch...

Sports Illustrated ranks the ACC as the worse in the last decade

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/magazine/specials/2...



Next
John C. Wanamaker
General User
Member Since: 1/2/2005
Post Count: 1,103
mail
John C. Wanamaker
mail
Posted: 9/7/2010 6:41 PM
Monroe Slavin, CPA wrote:expand_more
Anyone who'd put an undefeated Boise behind a one-loss other school is thinkin' stinkin'.



No, this should not be the case, just winning all of your games should not be a guarantee to a title.  In my opinion the "national championships" of the 1984 BYU team who's biggest wins were against a #3 ranked Pitt team in the opener (Pitt one 3 games all year), and Michigan in the Holiday Bowl (Michigan finished the season 6-6), and the 1990 Title of Georgia Tech, Tech's marquee win was against a 7-4-1 Georgia team that finished 3rd in the SEC, are a great example of this.  No way either of those teams make it through the schedule in a major conference.  Six weeks into this season, this VT win may look tarnished as they could have 4 or 5 losses, then how good a win is that?  


Congratulations on achieving two:  your cantankerousnous is intact and you are wrong.

57-2 since 2006.  It's impossible to do that without being awfully good.  I don't care who you play.  Think about it.  You claim Boise ain't that good.  If they ain't that good, then how come only two have beaten 'em out of the last 59.  Because they are that good.  (Out of curiosity, who beat 'em and by what scores?)

Some of you could see it happen right in front of your eyes and you'd still deny it.

Seriously, it's really impressive that you'd argue that Boise is not a first rank team.  Really.  Hey, why let reality intrude on your preconceived notions.

I enjoy your (all you anti-Boises) exhibitions of dense.


#1  Where did I say that Boise State is not good, or even awfully good?  Please point this out, because WOW, I missed where I said this!!!!

Did Bowling Green deserve a National Title when they went undefeated?  All I have stated is #1 it is early, let things play out.  #2  In 1984 BYU played creampuffs, and hung their hat on beating a 3 win Pitt team and a 6 win Michigan team, they had 0 wins against a ranked opponent at the end of the year.  That is a fact Mr. Certified Pigskin Anaylst  #3 Georgia Tech was not unblemished they had a tie, and had no real wins on their schedule either.  

Boise has done an outstanding job, but I am not ready to lay anything at their feet, or the feet of any other team in week one (which I have stated about a dozen times on this thread).  

So please tell me Mr. CPA where I am wrong?????
DelBobcat
General User
Member Since: 8/27/2010
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Post Count: 1,135
mail
DelBobcat
mail
Posted: 9/7/2010 6:47 PM
Brian Smith wrote:expand_more
A final thought for everyone.  It is 2010.  If Ohio does well this year and next (say win 9 or 10 and win bowl games), then goes undefeated in 2012 and 2014 and 2015 and 2016 and beats Oklahoma, Oregon, Oregon St. TCU, Va,. Tech S. Miss, Wyoming in that stretch and plays in a BCS bowl game, wins and returns basically everyone  and goes undefeated again, would you feel the same was as you do about Boise St?


Absolutely.  TCU, Boise, OU, Central Michigan, whoever.  If you're not going on the road in front of 75,000+ and collecting multiple victories in hostile environments each season, all while playing your home games against big boy teams week in and week out, then I have no interest in seeing you compete for the national title.

Here's my final thought for everyone:  If Boise competed in the Pac 10, SEC, Big 10, or ACC (ok, maybe take out the ACC) do you actually think they would finish top 2 (if even 3) in any of those conferences? 

It's easy to get up for one game a year, which is why OU can hang with OSU for 3 quarters, then lose 6 of their next 8 like back in '08.


How many freaking times does Ohio State have to go on the road to play in front of 75,000+ hostile fans this year? Camp Randall. That's it. Period. 

They play FOUR games away from home. FOUR.  And you talk about how hardened and battle-tested they are? They scheduled Marshall, Ohio and Eastern Michigan and they're so much more ready for a national title tilt than Boise State? What part of Ohio State crapping their shorts year after year on the biggest stages makes you think they are prepared for a national title game against Alabama?

 You sound like a General Motors executive talking about Toyota in 1983.

Just because things were one way for 60 years doesn't mean they will remain that way.

Boise State's offensive and defensive lines are much more talented than Iowa's. Boise Statte's receivers are better than Iowa's. Moore is better than Stanzi. Yes, Boise State would be the second best team in the Big Ten.

The only thing left for the Boise State deniers are empty platitudes conjured up in 2002 and old war stories about the good ol' boys of college football.

Iowa is not better than Boise State because Hayden Frye used to coach there or because their stadium is bigger or they are in the Big Ten. They just aren't.

I agree that a team more battle-tested should get into the title game over a team that isn't battle tested. But dragging the empty suits of the Big Ten and ACC out isn't the right way to go about that argument. The SEC is the only complete gauntlet of a conference in the country. The rest rely on reputation and money. The SEC teams deserve special consideration over Boise State when it comes time to play the title game.

But to pick Iowa or Oregon or Pitt or Texas over Boise State because they played one more quality game than Boise? Nah. I don't buy the mystique of the Big Ten, ACC, Pac 10 or Big East. They are inflated dinosaurs. Only the SEC carries any weight in my mind.


Thank you for typing out what I was thinking so I didn't have to. Four away games, what a joke. My impatience for this scheduling extends to other teams as well, not just OSU. With that being said, boy I hate OSU.
John C. Wanamaker
General User
Member Since: 1/2/2005
Post Count: 1,103
mail
John C. Wanamaker
mail
Posted: 9/7/2010 6:57 PM
We may not like the 4 game road slates some of these schools play, but it is simple economics, they make WAY more money at home than they will on the road, and it today's world of budgets and expenditures schools need as much money as they can get.
OhioCatFan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 15,716
mail
OhioCatFan
mail
Posted: 9/7/2010 7:07 PM

I'm not a socialist; I'm a died-in-the-wool capitalists, but let me say this: Ohio Agricultural and Mechanical School has way too much money.  It's time for a little Teddy Roosevelt type trust busting, IMHO!
 

Last Edited: 9/7/2010 9:00:40 PM by OhioCatFan
anorris
General User
Member Since: 7/7/2010
Location: Bristol, CT
Post Count: 2,262
mail
anorris
mail
Posted: 9/7/2010 8:08 PM
John C. Wanamaker wrote:expand_more
This whole conversation is everything wrong with college football in a nutshell.
This is no different that trying to talk about who will win the National Title in Basketball in December.  There is a system in place and it will play out.

Conversing about who might make the title game in September (or basketball in December) is fine -- heck, I enjoy it.  The "12-0 Boise State vs. 11-1 OSU/Texas/Bama/etc." debate is what is wrong.  The debates are ridiculous, nobody can sway another, and nothing will change.

Championships should be decided on the playing surface.  In any sport.  Period.

Let's take 2008.  Florida 12-1, Oklahoma 12-1, Utah 12-0.

Florida:

Wins over teams at the time ranked #1, #3, #8, #23, #24.

Loss to unranked, 4-loss team.

Oklahoma:

Wins over teams at the time ranked #2, #12, #16, #17, #23.

Loss to #5, 1-loss team.

Utah: 

Wins over teams at the time ranked #11, #14, #24.

No losses.

I think they're all more than deserving.

So, Utah waxes Alabama by a field goal more than did Florida, who eventually won the title.  I'm not arguing law of transitive properties, but it creates ambiguity and a situation where the championship is being awarded in a board room, not a stadium.

Basketball's system may not be perfect, but at least I know Duke earned last year's national championship.
GoCats105
General User
GC105
Member Since: 1/31/2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Post Count: 7,826
person
mail
GoCats105
mail
Posted: 9/7/2010 8:34 PM
I agree with a lot of things said here, but have to agree more with Ozcat saying there is no way Boise State goes undefeated or even close to that in a week-to-week BCS conference. I just dont see it happening. What happens after they get through Virginia Tech and Oregon State? Oh yeah, they have to play the football powers of San Jose State, Idaho, Lousiana Tech, and Wyoming. Just plug them into a team's schedule in a BCS conference (other than the Big East unfortunately) and try to see how many games they win, honestly. Let's take Alabama's for an example just as a hypothetical...

My honest opinion, nothing more.

vs. San Jose St. W
vs. Penn State W (freshman QB and you got the blue field)
@ Duke W
@ Arkansas L
vs. Florida L
@ South Carolina TOSS UP, but I'll say W
vs. Ole Miss W
@ Tennessee W
@ LSU L
vs. Miss St. W
vs. Georgia State W
vs. Auburn L

That's 8-4 or 7-5 depending on how the South Carolina game turns out. The grind of the SEC season would begin to take its toll, maybe even after that so losing to an erratic Ole Miss team isn't out of the question the following week. Let's do another for fun...let's take...oh I dont know...Minnesota

@ Middle Tennessee W
vs. South Dakota W
vs. USC L
vs. Northern Illinois W
vs. Northwestern W
@ Wisconsin L
@ Purdue W
vs. Penn State W, only because its at home, but it will be tough
vs. Ohio State L
@ Michigan State I would go W, but it could be an L after playing two tough games
@ Illinois W
vs. Iowa L

Once again, 8-4 possibly 7-5. Late October and early November games in the Big Ten are no joke.


Their players would not hold up in a 12-game schedule like Alabama, Florida, Oregon, Wisconsin, etc. They are a finesse team, and when it comes down to the trenches they get dominated. Sure, they beat TCU last year, but it wasn't pretty by all means. Plus, they had to use a fake punt to put themselves in a position to win. And guess what, they probably will go undefeated and then win their BCS game because they are rested. Seriosly, how good do you think Alabama would be after they played the likes of a WAC schedule? They'd win their BCS game by 20+.

I like Boise, and I hope they run the table because I root for the little guy all the time, but honestly, I was kinda rooting for Virginia Tech last night just so I wouldnt have to hear about this stuff for the next three months.
Last Edited: 9/7/2010 8:57:24 PM by GoCats105
Your Name
General User
Member Since: 8/23/2010
Post Count: 150
mail
Your Name
mail
Posted: 9/7/2010 8:54 PM
It's a shame how threads like this inevitably but predictably turn into OSU/Big Ten hate fests. If only a majority of you could remove emotion from your posts. When analysts and fans want an example of irrational non-BCS/mid-major mentalists, just click on this thread.
OhioCatFan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 15,716
mail
OhioCatFan
mail
Posted: 9/7/2010 8:57 PM
Your Name wrote:expand_more
It's a shame how threads like this inevitably but predictably turn into OSU/Big Ten hate fests. If only a majority of you could remove emotion from your posts. When analysts and fans want an example of irrational non-BCS/mid-major mentalists, just click on this thread.
  And, if they want OSU apologists pretending to be Bobcat fans they can PM you and OzCat. 
Last Edited: 9/7/2010 8:58:23 PM by OhioCatFan
Your Name
General User
Member Since: 8/23/2010
Post Count: 150
mail
Your Name
mail
Posted: 9/7/2010 9:00 PM
I don't have to explain my situation to you or anyone else again. Nor should it matter, considering how I will be rooting for OU next Saturday.
cc-cat
General User
C
Member Since: 4/5/2006
Location: matthews, NC
Post Count: 4,016
person
mail
cc-cat
mail
Posted: 9/7/2010 9:49 PM
The whole debate over how would they do in the SEC or Big Ten is irrelevant.  That is not their responsibility.  As the SI article points out, if they start the season near the top and win out they put themselves in a position to win it all.  That is the angle they have to play and they are doing it well.  The argument about how they would do in the SEC is as relevant as Red Sox fans arguing that they should be in the playoffs because they are a better team than the Rangers and if the Sox played in the West division they would be in first place.  Doesn't matter. 

I have no doubt that given the opportunity to play in th Big 12 or Big Ten or PAC 10 year over year, Boise and Petersen would recruit a deeper team and continually compete for conference and national titles.  I also have no doubt that if for some unbelievable reason Ohio State was dropped out of the Big Ten and had to compete in the MAC, overtime, their recruiting would suffer and they would lose to the Purdues in their money game.

The system is in place.  They have their way in and they are in a position to pull it off.  What is so horrifying about them getting in to a title game?  They have yet to embarrass themselves in anyway in a game.  OSU, ALA , Texas know what they have to do to get to the title game - win all their games and win their conference.  Do it and you are in.  Lose a game and you lose control of your destiny.  That is one of the main reasons the BCS conference teams limit their risk in OOC.  Boise has now put themselves in the same position.  It took 3 to 4 years of stumble free ball, but they are there for now.  In doing so, they are a threat to OSU, ALA, etc. only if those teams lose and therefore lose control of their own destiny. 
Last Edited: 9/7/2010 10:03:55 PM by cc-cat
Showing Messages: 26 - 50 of 123
MAC News Links
Wednesday, May 13, 2026



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)