menu
Logo
Ohio Football Topic
Topic: If Boo can't throw and Bates can't play, get Tettleton in
Page: 2 of 2
Bobcat36
General User
Member Since: 1/5/2005
Location: Delaware, OH
Post Count: 1,167
mail
Bobcat36
mail
Posted: 9/13/2010 11:38 AM
71 BOBCAT wrote:expand_more
My take on this game is the following;
1) We have tended to play down to our compition time and time again.
2) We obviously aren't that bad!
3) Was the team looking ahead?
We are all disappointed on many fronts. As we look forward after this weekend we tend to be negative. Was James Madison negative toward their chances on Saturday?
Let's take 1 game at a time.




GO BOBCATS


Thank you 71!

We are NOT that bad...O Line clearly needs work as does Kick Coverage...But yes for whatever reason we do seem to play down to our competition.  I think we believed a little too much of our own hype going into this game (the ass kicking that Arizona put on them at home didn't help matters either).

I trust the Staff to get things corrected moving forward (and lets remember Lavon's had VERY little practice time and Boo's seeing the field in live action for only the second time in a year).  One thing I think is critical for the remainder of the season in addition to O Line improvement is Boykin improving his pass pro skills.  The staff obviously isn't comfortable with them yet...If he does that and opposing D's can't identify an obvious run play when he's in, our running game improves drastically with his size behind the ball...

This was a conference loss yes...But a cross divisional one...We still hold our own fate in division and as I mentioned in another thread, Temple needed OT to beat CMU at home!

We're OK...We really are...
sargentfan
General User
S
Member Since: 3/17/2005
Post Count: 917
person
mail
sargentfan
mail
Posted: 9/13/2010 1:26 PM
As much as I hate Lavon's muffed punt I really can't hold it against him that much.  First off they had been punting to the sidelines all game so as not to give him a chance (good coaching/gameplan) and secondly the punt looked like it was gonna roll a long way so I can understand why he wanted to try to field it and at the very least stop its progress.  His main mistake was worrying more about picking the ball in such a way that he could return it, rather than just stopping its downfield progress. 
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 9/13/2010 5:10 PM
John C. Wanamaker wrote:expand_more
Monroe your problem is you are a grab bagger, you just want to keep pulling things out till you stumble upon one that works.  That does not work in the field of coaching, you must have a plan, you must prepare and you put the players in the position that you think gives them the best opportunities to win.  That being said, Ohio did have chances to win the game on Saturday, at some point in time players have to make plays.  How many times did we get Brazill on the corner with a quick pass and put him in a 1 on 1 situation?  Several, how many times did he make his man miss?  Zero.  How many times did we get the Running back on the edge, only for him not to break a tackle and make him miss?  few.  Coaches will make mistakes, players will make mistakes, however at the end of the day the coaches are doing what they feel is best for the team, to give the team the best chance at success.  Players have to make plays.


You think that coaching stops once the game begins.

I think that's when it's more important than ever.

Yes, have a game plan.  But adjust when it ain't working.

Gawd.  We lost to Toledo.  At home.
John C. Wanamaker
General User
Member Since: 1/2/2005
Post Count: 1,103
mail
John C. Wanamaker
mail
Posted: 9/13/2010 5:38 PM
Few coaches go grabbing players down the bench when things don't work, and even fewer draw plays in the dirt, this is not sandlot ball.
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 9/13/2010 7:52 PM
What are you talking about?  Seriously.

I merely suggest that the coaches should consider changing things up in some way if the game plan doesn't work.  What does that have to do with shaking players about or getting crazy with a stick. 

I guess that you don't think

(thought I'd stop there mid-sentence because that says so much)

that the coaches should come into the game with some alternative plays or players to insert in case the game plan isn't working.

Okay.  I get it.  You're just being an idiot to yank my chain.  Well, the first part is working.
Your Name
General User
Member Since: 8/23/2010
Post Count: 150
mail
Your Name
mail
Posted: 9/13/2010 8:14 PM
Monroe, what other changes should the offensive coaching staff make? You've diagrammed a few plays. A reverse with the WR/RB tossing the ball down the field, hurry up/run and shoot. Just to name a few. Based on what you watched on the webcast and listened to on the radio stream from Saturday's game, what else would you implement to encourage ball movement down the field?
Deciduous Forest Cat
General User
DFC
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: OH
Post Count: 4,560
person
mail
Deciduous Forest Cat
mail
Posted: 9/13/2010 10:19 PM
sargentfan wrote:expand_more
As much as I hate Lavon's muffed punt I really can't hold it against him that much.  First off they had been punting to the sidelines all game so as not to give him a chance (good coaching/gameplan) and secondly the punt looked like it was gonna roll a long way so I can understand why he wanted to try to field it and at the very least stop its progress.  His main mistake was worrying more about picking the ball in such a way that he could return it, rather than just stopping its downfield progress. 


No, that ball should have been avoided like the plague. Anyone watching that ball knew the outcome before it happened. Get the f*** away from that ball, and maybe out offense has one more chance at a fluke play for a score.
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 9/14/2010 12:21 AM
YN--Did we throw to the TE?  How many times did we even appear to throw mid-range to deep?  (So many comments here say that about all we did was throw short.)  Did we go two back set?  Did we go quick hitter run?  Or lead blocker run?  Or fake hand off and pitch out?  Or two back set and each guy goes off tackle but (obv) only one gets the ball or two back set and one chip blocks and goes for swing pass?  Some of this is foolishness, but some of this is spread the field and/or make 'em defend different things.  Sooo many comments here that what we did was bland and ineffective--but we kept on doing it.

This one's good for one long completion a year.  Qb hands to rb who heads into line--then pitches back to qb who hits receiver who's behind db downfield.

Did we quick punt on third down if we had bad field posn...to get a long/rolling punt, our d. stops 'em and we get their shorter punt for better field position.

Something.  Anything but a slow, gooey trudge to a boring loss to freakin' Toledo at home.
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 9/14/2010 12:21 AM
nomoreknorr.
Bcat2
General User
B2
Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 4,295
person
mail
Bcat2
mail
Posted: 9/14/2010 12:53 AM
Monroe Slavin, CPA wrote:expand_more
YN--Did we throw to the TE? How many times did we even appear to throw mid-range to deep? (So many comments here say that about all we did was throw short.) Did we go two back set? Did we go quick hitter run? Or lead blocker run? Or fake hand off and pitch out? Or two back set and each guy goes off tackle but (obv) only one gets the ball or two back set and one chip blocks and goes for swing pass? Some of this is foolishness, but some of this is spread the field and/or make 'em defend different things. Sooo many comments here that what we did was bland and ineffective--but we kept on doing it.

This one's good for one long completion a year. Qb hands to rb who heads into line--then pitches back to qb who hits receiver who's behind db downfield.

Did we quick punt on third down if we had bad field posn...to get a long/rolling punt, our d. stops 'em and we get their shorter punt for better field position.

Something. Anything but a slow, gooey trudge to a boring loss to freakin' Toledo at home.
Monroe, please take a breath. Boo did not just arrive on a hay wagon. Check the game notes. He is Ohio's top all-time passer for efficiency, completion percentage and yards per attempt. He is 4th all time with 21 passing TDs. If Toledo took away the deep ball and handled the short stuff too well congrats to them. You read like you lost the farm on this game. Have you no respect for Toledo? Time to look ahead. I am still hopefull for this year. Not sure what all the factors were vs Toledo, just a fan out here supporting the cats best I can. I do know things look better than in a loonnng time and should be better again next year. I still believe that. Congrats to Toledo. Not time to be telling these coaches how to coach, but for an idiot AD, they would still be in the Big 12 about to join the Big 10/11/12.
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 9/14/2010 2:13 AM
Huh?  I didn't say a word against Boo.  I haven't said a word against a single individual player.  By all accounts Franshaw is a GREAT guy.  Unfortunately, he and the offense weren't getting it done last week.

Sorry, but YN's question has me fired up.  I thouht a lot about this as I just drove home from work.

Let me grab on to that excellent post someone else put up today about leadership.  Saturday, we came back from down 7-0 after a bad interception to lead 10-7.  That shoulda been it.  We shoulda been fired up and thereon stormed to a big victory.  We desperately need it and a big start to a season for once.

Instead, we're headed to--I dont like saying it--1-3 start and no fan enthusiasm at all.

So, here's more, YN, of what I'd've done--things to could've gotten us going, could've put the leadership on the field.  The hurry up.  Gotta do it at points to literally get my players jumping and running.  Get the crowd excited.  There've been many, many posts here about how the crowd was lethargic bored.  And no posts at all about it being excited.

But several have posted that it was quite a good crowd, espec from the underclassmen.  This was a game which we had to win, to TAKE, to git the program going.  I woulda done that hurry up to shake up Toledo.  To get 'em worn out as my guys fired in and out of the lineup KNOWING THAT THEY WERE COMING WITH AN EDGE, that we had too much for 'em, that this is OUr time..  Only one running back carried for us the other day?  No way when I get our offense running at warp speed--gonna need at least two guys 'cause this is gonna be energy.  Get the crowd fired up.

Run four wideouts, no running back sets.  Leaves ya six linemen spots to protect our qb.

Four wideouts all on one side  If Boo couldn't wing it long, try another qb.  Quick hitter runs.  Not all of the hurry up offense needs to be run at warp speed.  Get to the line quickly doens't necessarily mean get the play off quickly.

Does our qb ever pump fake to freeze db's or make them commit?

Maybe two wideouts and a TE one one side and one running back.

I want my offense coming out knowing that they got a whole package of stuff they can put on ya and no way you gonna stop it all...and the house 'bOUt to blow up...'cause you had you're 7-0 lead, but now it's 10-7 O- H-I-O in the house and it is OVER for you.

Fade back to pass and shovel pass it forward to a running back.


I don't have all of the answers.  But there's something that'll work.

But, instead, we blew it.  Last Saturday was a bellwether for the program.  It was a chance to announce, to take a step up.  Instead, we goinked it.  That's what so many of us know and feel.  That was a BAD loss.


And, I still say Snyder.
Last Edited: 9/14/2010 2:22:00 AM by Monroe Slavin
John C. Wanamaker
General User
Member Since: 1/2/2005
Post Count: 1,103
mail
John C. Wanamaker
mail
Posted: 9/14/2010 8:25 AM
Monroe :"Run four wideouts, no running back sets.  Leaves ya six linemen spots to protect our qb."


We have done this a few times, and one major problem is our QB is running for his life with the defense rushing a hard to manage 3 and dropping 8.  You want to know why there were few deep balls and our TE had trouble getting open.  It is simple, 3 down linemen were able to harass our QB and 8 guys were in pass coverage, that is 8 v. 3-4-5, those are not good numbers.  We have to get better up front, and we have to be able to establish the run.  Until we do that the offense will struggle.  Even your basic trick plays will struggle against a Defense who is controlling the front with only committing 3 or 4 guys to the LOS.
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 9/14/2010 1:17 PM
John C. Wanamaker wrote:expand_more
Monroe :"Run four wideouts, no running back sets.  Leaves ya six linemen spots to protect our qb."

We have done this a few times, and one major problem is our QB is running for his life with the defense rushing a hard to manage 3 and dropping 8.  You want to know why there were few deep balls and our TE had trouble getting open.  It is simple, 3 down linemen were able to harass our QB and 8 guys were in pass coverage, that is 8 v. 3-4-5, those are not good numbers.  We have to get better up front, and we have to be able to establish the run.  Until we do that the offense will struggle.  Even your basic trick plays will struggle against a Defense who is controlling the front with only committing 3 or 4 guys to the LOS

I agree with what you are saying here, but I would add one thing. When they are only rushing 3, there have to be gaps between them. Ohio's running plays, unfortunately, take too long to develop, and Toledo's defense was able to adjust and stop them. Do you think quicker-hitting running plays would have been any more effective?
John C. Wanamaker
General User
Member Since: 1/2/2005
Post Count: 1,103
mail
John C. Wanamaker
mail
Posted: 9/14/2010 1:56 PM
No, because I believe it we lined up in a formation that would have given us a quick hit option that you would see an adjustment in the Toledo front, simple math is they are always going to try and have more person in the box than you give them.  One of the draw backs of a spread running attack is a deep back, and a largely sideways running game that has very little down hill capability due to the lack of a lead blocker.  Seeing how we still lack a fullback, I do not see lining up in an "I" much of an option.
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 9/14/2010 2:44 PM
OK, thanks, JCW. Do you have any other suggestions or ideas how to get the offense moving, given the players they have?
The Optimist
General User
Member Since: 3/16/2007
Location: CLE
Post Count: 5,611
mail
The Optimist
mail
Posted: 9/14/2010 2:58 PM
The beauty of playing Kyle Snyder is that he is used to getting no protection from his offensive line from his HS days at Barberton.
Showing Messages: 26 - 41 of 41
MAC News Links
Wednesday, May 13, 2026



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)