menu
Logo
Ohio Football Topic
Topic: Yesterday Was A Reality Check For Our Fans
Page: 2 of 3
Your Name
General User
Member Since: 8/23/2010
Post Count: 150
mail
Your Name
mail
Posted: 9/19/2010 6:16 PM
Flomo, the Ohio State/SEC diss is stale. Can't come up with anything original? Or is it just easier to piggy back another conference? It is funny you bring up the SEC though. Something we both thoroughly enjoy, OU bball, had some problems with an SEC team/speed this past spring.
Pryor2Posey
General User
PP2
Member Since: 9/19/2010
Post Count: 8
person
mail
Pryor2Posey
mail
Posted: 9/19/2010 6:24 PM
Flomo-genized wrote:expand_more
If that is the standard for a rivalry then Ohio State shouldn't be considered Michigan's rival, because most Michigan fans care as much or more about beating Notre Dame and Michigan State than Ohio State, and really don't think about the school down south much except during the week they play.


No they don't


Flomo-genized wrote:expand_more
I also find it incredibly amusing that fans of a school that considers itself a legitimate national championship contender when its team would be lucky to finish 6-2 in the SEC, are calling us delusional. 


ROFL, this is the type of pathetic shit that drives people to be annoyed by your fan base.  You have 0 clue about football and turn around the minute you get your ass beat and talk about what OTHER teams that you don't even root for would supposidly do to ours. What the hell does the SEC have to do with this conversation?  Need I mention the fact that the Big Ten and SEC are dead even in bowl games the past decade?  There's quite a large difference between the fluctuating talent gaps in the Big Ten-SEC and the perennial gap between tOSU and other schools in the state of Ohio.




Doc Bobcat wrote:expand_more
The goods news is that you're off of the schedule and I'll root for Wisconsin when they beat your arse.


Read above


The Situation wrote:expand_more
The delusion on this board is staggering

No you aren't our rival, you aren't even close to being our rival.  How about giving a reason why we should be rivals other then the fact we happen to be in the same state?



Ohio vs. Ohio State isn't a rivalry, it's oppression. They've stolen OUr name with callus disregard. They quell OUr aspirations with condescension. (Oh well how many national championships do you have?,  Oh we'll you couldn't get in here if you tried)

I completely understand why some up north (and unfortunately  some of OUr own) look at the Bobcat faithful as peons. We've had virtually no national success on the football field over the over the last 200 years, small schools national championship aside. The only time you hear about OHIO is for drinking. From the outside it would be easy to look at OHIO in this way, "Well if all they do is drink, they probably don't study. If they don't study and they still graduate it must be a bad school. Why would I want to go to a bad school if they aren't even good at sports?"  

Ohio State stands in OUr way. They keep us from OUr pursuit of happiness. I look at this "rivalry" like the French Revolution. The aristocrats weren't threatened by the poor, you could hardly call it a rivalry. However the poor (with some outside help) worked for nothing less than the removal of the longstanding privileges of the upper class. I'm not promising an upheaval of football and academic order in the state off Ohio, I'm stating that this CAN be a one way rivalry for lack of a better word, depending on who you ask.

I hate Ohio State. I would venture to say that I hate Ohio State more than most Buckeye alumn's hate Michigan. My hate has a purpose. I want OUr name back. I want to get rid of Script Ohio. I dream of the day we are viewed as equals to Ohio State.

What does Ohio State stand to win in victories against Michigan in non-national championship years? Just one win for OU  over OSU in football can do so much. Ohio is so far down the totem poll right now that a win against Ohio State in women's field hockey would be a moral booster for the die-hards at OHIO. I know I'm on the extreme end but I look at competing with Ohio State as a 365 day battle. From the classroom to the field I want to be better.


Seems like obvious inferority complex.  We don't stand in your way of doing anything..you have plenty of opportunities to be successful in sports without beating OSU, look at what Cincy was able to do under Kelly and really how far they have come in football recently (moving up to a BCS conference)

In terms of "stealing your name"  you guys are named after a state bro, it's not like it's some original or valuable name that you came up with.  If you want to be jerks about it you guys are OHIO UNIVERSITY, not OHIO, don't see where one school gets to claim the name of an entire state over another.  We were chosen and are recognized as the states flagship institution and we take pride in the state we are from, maybe if you spent a little bit more time supporting your fellow Ohio schools and teams and less time whining about your name you'd have a chance to be more accepted as the leading school in the state.
tbdbitl
General User
T
Member Since: 9/19/2010
Post Count: 20
person
mail
tbdbitl
mail
Posted: 9/19/2010 6:33 PM
Flomo-genized wrote:expand_more
I'm sorry, but you're wrong.


I guess we'll have to agree to disagree.  I have been to Ohio State m*ch*g*n games both home and away and a m*ch*g*n/nd game and the noise in *nn *rbor is not even close when nd is the opponent.  I was also friends with many m*ch*g*n alums in my frat and from being in The OSUMB and they all feel different than you.
Flomo-genized
General User
F
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 574
person
mail
Flomo-genized
mail
Posted: 9/19/2010 6:55 PM
Pryor2Posey wrote:expand_more
I also find it incredibly amusing that fans of a school that considers itself a legitimate national championship contender when its team would be lucky to finish 6-2 in the SEC, are calling us delusional. 


ROFL, this is the type of pathetic shit that drives people to be annoyed by your fan base.  You have 0 clue about football and turn around the minute you get your ass beat and talk about what OTHER teams that you don't even root for would supposidly do to ours. What the hell does the SEC have to do with this conversation?  Need I mention the fact that the Big Ten and SEC are dead even in bowl games the past decade?  There's quite a large difference between the fluctuating talent gaps in the Big Ten-SEC and the perennial gap between tOSU and other schools in the state of Ohio.


I realize that this will be a difficult concept for you to grasp, but one's choice of teams to root for has nothing to do with their knowledge of the game of football.  Just because I root for Ohio, and you Ohio A&M, doesn't mean that I have "0 clue" about football. 

Funny you didn't mention the Suckeyes' recent record against the SEC...
Flomo-genized
General User
F
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 574
person
mail
Flomo-genized
mail
Posted: 9/19/2010 7:03 PM
Your Name wrote:expand_more
Flomo, the Ohio State/SEC diss is stale. Can't come up with anything original? Or is it just easier to piggy back another conference? It is funny you bring up the SEC though. Something we both thoroughly enjoy, OU bball, had some problems with an SEC team/speed this past spring.


I can understand why OSU sheep don't want to hear about it, but facts are facts.  Ohio State cannot beat the SEC, and wouldn't be nearly as successful if it had to compete against SEC-level talent week in and week out.  I live in SEC country, and see the different in talent and speed week in and week out during the fall.  There is a reason the conference has won 4 straight BCS championships.  Football is simply a different beast in the SEC.
Flomo-genized
General User
F
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 574
person
mail
Flomo-genized
mail
Posted: 9/19/2010 7:12 PM
tbdbitl wrote:expand_more
I'm sorry, but you're wrong.


I guess we'll have to agree to disagree.  I have been to Ohio State m*ch*g*n games both home and away and a m*ch*g*n/nd game and the noise in *nn *rbor is not even close when nd is the opponent.  I was also friends with many m*ch*g*n alums in my frat and from being in The OSUMB and they all feel different than you.


A rivalry is more than just noise in a stadium.  The campus just has a different feel during ND week, or MSU week.  Sometimes it is the same during OSU week, but sometimes it isn't.  At the end of the day, Ohio State fans care much more about Michigan than Michigan cares about Ohio State.  That is simply a fact.  As snobby as it may sound, the only arena in which Ohio State can really compete with Michigan is athletics.  Academically, the two schools aren't in the same area code, so even when OSU wins, it doesn't bother Michigan fans nearly as much as a loss to the Wolverines eats at the Suckeyes.  ND is a different story.  Meanwhile, the in-state element of the MSU rivalry adds a different dynamic with split allegiences between families and friends. 

Now certainly some Michigan alums will feel differently, especially those that grew up or live in Ohio.  Speaking personally, I hate Ohio State much more than ND or MSU.  But on the whole, the three rivalries really are pretty even, much more so than you appreciate.
Your Name
General User
Member Since: 8/23/2010
Post Count: 150
mail
Your Name
mail
Posted: 9/19/2010 7:14 PM
Flomo-genized wrote:expand_more
I can understand why OSU sheep don't want to hear about it, but facts are facts.  Ohio State cannot beat the SEC, and wouldn't be nearly as successful if it had to compete against SEC-level talent week in and week out.  I live in SEC country, and see the different in talent and speed week in and week out during the fall.  There is a reason the conference has won 4 straight BCS championships.  Football is simply a different beast in the SEC.


Flomo, I finally caught that you went to Michigan. I now see why you hate Ohio State so much. I suppose I would carry just as much anger as you if the roles were reversed (ie my graduate school getting pummeled in football the past decade by your graduate school).

By the way, I don't think you'll find many people disagreeing with you regarding the SEC's dominance in BCS championship games. We'll see if that holds up this year and for the near future. I think the SEC is a little down this year and the Big Ten is a little up. Both conferences have distanced themselves from the rest of the pack.
Mr. Mo Jo Risin
General User
MMJR
Member Since: 6/23/2006
Post Count: 81
person
mail
Mr. Mo Jo Risin
mail
Posted: 9/19/2010 7:16 PM
Flomo-genized wrote:expand_more
Flomo, the Ohio State/SEC diss is stale. Can't come up with anything original? Or is it just easier to piggy back another conference? It is funny you bring up the SEC though. Something we both thoroughly enjoy, OU bball, had some problems with an SEC team/speed this past spring.


I can understand why OSU sheep don't want to hear about it, but facts are facts.  Ohio State cannot beat the SEC, and wouldn't be nearly as successful if it had to compete against SEC-level talent week in and week out.  I live in SEC country, and see the different in talent and speed week in and week out during the fall.  There is a reason the conference has won 4 straight BCS championships.  Football is simply a different beast in the SEC.


"Yawn." - signed Michigan, Penn State, and Wisconsin (Ohio State's yearly competitors) who have handled the SEC in bowl games. The Big Ten and SEC are tied in bowl games over the last 10 years. OSU has none of the wins, so the Big Ten wins have come from OSU's yearly competitors. Thus, OSU racks up those winning records against teams handling their own against the SEC equal.

OSU also puts out equal or better NFL talent compared to the elite SEC schools. (http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=cr-footballfactories031609)

Therefore, you have OSU's games with Florida and LSU since OSU has been good under Tressel. 2006 was a disaster for OSU, no doubt. Though, considering the B10's #3 Wisconsin beat Arkansas who played a shootout with Florida in the SEC Champ game, and Penn State (who OSU manhandled) beat Tennesse (who was the East's #2 and lost to UF by 1), it seems OSU just flat laid an egg. LSU was just older and better. It happens.

Anyway, glad you agree with Joe Bob down south.
tbdbitl
General User
T
Member Since: 9/19/2010
Post Count: 20
person
mail
tbdbitl
mail
Posted: 9/19/2010 7:19 PM
Flomo-genized wrote:expand_more
That is simply a fact.


No flomo...that is your OPINION.  With all you higher education, you should have at least learned that from the u of m.

I understand you are an Ohio State hater...that's cool brother, there are plenty out there.  I know there is nothing I can claim to make you feel differently...and to be honest, I don't really want you to change....I like the real estate that Ohio State occupies in your world.

I'm sure you will have an enlightened rebuttal.
Flomo-genized
General User
F
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 574
person
mail
Flomo-genized
mail
Posted: 9/19/2010 7:20 PM
Your Name wrote:expand_more
I can understand why OSU sheep don't want to hear about it, but facts are facts.  Ohio State cannot beat the SEC, and wouldn't be nearly as successful if it had to compete against SEC-level talent week in and week out.  I live in SEC country, and see the different in talent and speed week in and week out during the fall.  There is a reason the conference has won 4 straight BCS championships.  Football is simply a different beast in the SEC.


Flomo, I finally caught that you went to Michigan. I now see why you hate Ohio State so much. I suppose I would carry just as much anger as you if the roles were reversed (ie my graduate school getting pummeled in football the past decade by your graduate school).


OSU has had a good run recently, but not much better than what Michigan did to the Suckeyes for the 10 or 15 years immediately prior.  And Michigan still owns comfortable margins over Ohio State when it comes to the overall rivalry, national championships, winning percentage, and total wins.

And in any event, that doesn't alter the fact that neither program would be competitive at the upper levels of the SEC at present.
Last Edited: 9/19/2010 7:27:32 PM by Flomo-genized
Flomo-genized
General User
F
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 574
person
mail
Flomo-genized
mail
Posted: 9/19/2010 7:23 PM
tbdbitl wrote:expand_more
That is simply a fact.


No flomo...that is your OPINION.  With all you higher education, you should have at least learned that from the u of m.


You really think that Michigan fans care as much about the OSU rivalry as Suckeye fans do?  Really?  I didn't even think that was up for debate.  Setting aside who is Michigan's biggest rival, I've literally never met an Ohio State fan who would say that the game means as much to Michigan fans as OSU fans.
Flomo-genized
General User
F
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 574
person
mail
Flomo-genized
mail
Posted: 9/19/2010 7:26 PM
Mr. Mo Jo Risin wrote:expand_more
"Yawn." - signed Michigan, Penn State, and Wisconsin (Ohio State's yearly competitors) who have handled the SEC in bowl games. The Big Ten and SEC are tied in bowl games over the last 10 years. OSU has none of the wins, so the Big Ten wins have come from OSU's yearly competitors. Thus, OSU racks up those winning records against teams handling their own against the SEC equal.


A couple points.  First of all, I'm talking about the last 4-5 years, not a decade ago.  I don't have time to pull the numbers, but I suspect the totals would be different if I did.  Second, you also have to consider whether like teams are being paired in the games.  The #2 Big Ten team beating the #4 SEC team, for instance, isn't quite as impressive as the second ranked teams in both conferences duking it out. 

I'd also be curious to see regular season results as well, such as Alabama-Penn State last week. 
Last Edited: 9/19/2010 7:31:08 PM by Flomo-genized
Your Name
General User
Member Since: 8/23/2010
Post Count: 150
mail
Your Name
mail
Posted: 9/19/2010 7:28 PM
Flomo-genized wrote:expand_more
OSU has had a good run recently, but not much better than what Michigan did to the Suckeyes for the 10 or 15 years immediately prior.  And Michigan still owns comfortable margins over Ohio State when it comes to the overall rivalry, national championships, winning percentage, and total wins.


It's cyclical. Maybe Michigan will have an upcoming run. Don't see it with Dick Rod at the helm though. Maybe the series will be competitive again when Jim Harbaugh comes on board.

Flomo-genized wrote:expand_more
And it any event, that doesn't alter the fact that neither program would be competitive at the upper levels of the SEC at present.


Speak for your (grad) school when it comes to this opinion. I think OSU would be very competitive in the upper level of the SEC this year as they have both an offense and defense to win. The SEC West would be a challenge as that side is solid with 'Bama and Arkansas. OSU would definitely challenge for the SEC East as the teams on that side are down, Florida included.

Michigan has a potent offense right now but have absolutely no defense so I agree with your opinion that Michigan would not be competitive in the upper levels of the SEC.
The Situation
General User
Member Since: 7/13/2010
Location: Columbus, OH
Post Count: 957
mail
The Situation
mail
Posted: 9/19/2010 7:32 PM
Pryor2Posey wrote:expand_more
Seems like obvious inferority complex.  We don't stand in your way of doing anything..

In terms of "stealing your name"  you guys are named after a state bro, it's not like it's some original or valuable name that you came up with.  If you want to be jerks about it you guys are OHIO UNIVERSITY, not OHIO, don't see where one school gets to claim the name of an entire state over another.


I'm not a psychiatrist, you're not a psychiatrist, but wouldn't it be a sensible agreement for you to stop cheering the name of which we have a legal trademark? And from a gentleman's perspective, respect your elders.

I've never met an Ohio State fan that can justify why Iowa State doesn't chant "IO-WA!"? Why doesn't Utah State follow suit.. "UT-AH"? Should BYU students start chanting go UTAH at their football games? Do students that attend BYU not have pride in their home state of UTAH? Why don't students at BGSU, Miami, Kent, Akron, and Toldeo cheer go OHIO at their football and basketball games? You're alleging no one can stake claim to the state moniker, but no one does it but Ohio State. I only listed 4 letter state examples for simplicity but the same scenario unfolds in every state in the union. The unwritten rule applies to everyone except apparently Ahia State.

We are OHIO. We are literally OHIO. Deal with it!
tbdbitl
General User
T
Member Since: 9/19/2010
Post Count: 20
person
mail
tbdbitl
mail
Posted: 9/19/2010 7:39 PM
Flomo-genized wrote:expand_more
That is simply a fact.


No flomo...that is your OPINION.  With all you higher education, you should have at least learned that from the u of m.


You really think that Michigan fans care as much about the OSU rivalry as Suckeye fans do?  Really?  I didn't even think that was up for debate.  Setting aside who is Michigan's biggest rival, I've literally never met an Ohio State fan who would say that the game means as much to Michigan fans as OSU fans.


I guess you need to get out more.... It's a big world out there flomo, enjoy it while you can.  However, it still is your opinion.  I have meet loads of m*ch*g*n fans that view Ohio State the same way Ohio State views them.  They made an HBO documentary out of this game.  I don't remember seeing the HBO documentary on the msu game.  Maybe you could provide a link.

Your hatred even surprises me.  How about we find some common ground?  I don't really like marshall, I think their fans are obnoxious hillbillies.  I'm also not a big fan of raisin bran...they get soggy too fast...are we on the same page with any of those...anything???    
tbdbitl
General User
T
Member Since: 9/19/2010
Post Count: 20
person
mail
tbdbitl
mail
Posted: 9/19/2010 7:40 PM
Flomo-genized wrote:expand_more
I've literally never met an Ohio State fan who would say that the game means as much to Michigan fans as OSU fans.


Oh...one more thing....you can't say that anymore.  Nice to meet you :)
Ohio69
General User
O69
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 3,124
person
mail
Ohio69
mail
Posted: 9/19/2010 7:44 PM
Your Name wrote:expand_more
It's unfortunate that it takes a blowout to whom some of you call our "rival" to realize it. If people didn't know our role and place in the college football world before yesterdays massacre, you do today. We looked like a MAC bottom feeder instead of a MAC East contender. To think that some of you thought we were a top-25 football team this year. The next Boise or TCU? Keep bringing those laughs.


Wow.  Bitter much?  What the hell is your problem?  Go ahead and jump of the cliff and leave us Ohio Bobcat fans alone.


Pryor2Posey
General User
PP2
Member Since: 9/19/2010
Post Count: 8
person
mail
Pryor2Posey
mail
Posted: 9/19/2010 7:57 PM
Flomo-genized wrote:expand_more
"Yawn." - signed Michigan, Penn State, and Wisconsin (Ohio State's yearly competitors) who have handled the SEC in bowl games. The Big Ten and SEC are tied in bowl games over the last 10 years. OSU has none of the wins, so the Big Ten wins have come from OSU's yearly competitors. Thus, OSU racks up those winning records against teams handling their own against the SEC equal.


A couple points.  First of all, I'm talking about the last 4-5 years, not a decade ago.  I don't have time to pull the numbers, but I suspect the totals would be different if I did.  Second, you also have to consider whether like teams are being paired in the games.  The #2 Big Ten team beating the #4 SEC team, for instance, isn't quite as impressive as the second ranked teams in both conferences duking it out. 

I'd also be curious to see regular season results as well, such as Alabama-Penn State last week. 


What?  The Bowl games match up like teams, the Big Ten has had 2 teams in the BCS the past 5 years, so it's never "The 2nd team in the Big Ten vs the 4th team in the SEC"

The past 5 years the Big Ten is 4-1 in the Capital One Bowl,  2-3 in the Outback bowl and 0-2 in the 2 Championship games, which makes 6-6 a dead even record Big Ten vs SEC in bowls

Why would you look at Alabama-Penn State if your concerned with like teams?  Bama is likely the #1 team in the SEC, PSU is likely to finish 4th or 5th in the Big Ten this year (O-line is a mess, lost a lot on D, freshmen qb).  Bama won that game 24-3 at home,  We beat a better PSU team last year 24-7 at their place.   Regardless Northwestern beat Vandy..which I believe is the only 2 Big Ten-SEC games to take place so far.

Tbh the SEC doesn't look ALL that hot this year, they have Bama at the top, Florida however has been a mess, Tennessee is down,  Auburn didn't set the world on fire against Clemson although they pulled it out.  Georgia not looking good, The Les Miles era at LSU is probably coming to an end.   The doors basically being opened for teams like South Carolina and Arkansas.  There's no way your going to convince me Ohio State couldn't win in that league when South Carolina has a legit chance at making the SEC title game.






Last Edited: 9/19/2010 8:09:51 PM by Pryor2Posey
Pryor2Posey
General User
PP2
Member Since: 9/19/2010
Post Count: 8
person
mail
Pryor2Posey
mail
Posted: 9/19/2010 8:01 PM
Flomo-genized wrote:expand_more
A rivalry is more than just noise in a stadium.  The campus just has a different feel during ND week, or MSU week.  Sometimes it is the same during OSU week, but sometimes it isn't.


When were you there?  Might this have anything to do with the fact that Michigan actually had a chance against ND/MSU and against OSU they knew they !#%^#&? :)



Your Name wrote:expand_more
Michigan has a potent offense right now but have absolutely no defense so I agree with your opinion that Michigan would not be competitive in the upper levels of the SEC.


Right now Michigan isn't competitive in the Big Ten, they won 1 game last year in conference...so wouldn't expect them to do much in the SEC now either.  Of course they did beat up on the Gators the last time they had a competent team
Last Edited: 9/19/2010 8:03:52 PM by Pryor2Posey
Your Name
General User
Member Since: 8/23/2010
Post Count: 150
mail
Your Name
mail
Posted: 9/19/2010 8:04 PM
Ohio69 wrote:expand_more
Wow.  Bitter much?  What the hell is your problem?  Go ahead and jump of the cliff and leave us Ohio Bobcat fans alone.


Wishing death upon others? Yeah, no more reason to comment.
Tim Burke
General User
Member Since: 11/23/2004
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Post Count: 607
mail
Tim Burke
mail
Posted: 9/19/2010 8:07 PM
"Rival" is just too loaded a word to use anymore. Stick with nemesis vs archenemy.

Miami is our nemesis. Ohio State is our archenemy.

(Akron is our in-conference archenemy.)

If you are unaware of the difference,

http://www.grendel.org/tsc/klosterman-enemies.htm
Mr. Mo Jo Risin
General User
MMJR
Member Since: 6/23/2006
Post Count: 81
person
mail
Mr. Mo Jo Risin
mail
Posted: 9/19/2010 8:14 PM
Flomo-genized wrote:expand_more
"Yawn." - signed Michigan, Penn State, and Wisconsin (Ohio State's yearly competitors) who have handled the SEC in bowl games. The Big Ten and SEC are tied in bowl games over the last 10 years. OSU has none of the wins, so the Big Ten wins have come from OSU's yearly competitors. Thus, OSU racks up those winning records against teams handling their own against the SEC equal.


A couple points.  First of all, I'm talking about the last 4-5 years, not a decade ago.  I don't have time to pull the numbers, but I suspect the totals would be different if I did.  Second, you also have to consider whether like teams are being paired in the games.  The #2 Big Ten team beating the #4 SEC team, for instance, isn't quite as impressive as the second ranked teams in both conferences duking it out. 

I'd also be curious to see regular season results as well, such as Alabama-Penn State last week. 


The numbers would not be different. In 2006, for instance, the Big Ten was 2-1 against the SEC. Oddly enough, that's when the "SEC is so awlesome and the Big Ten is so bad" stuff started to really gain momentum. That year, the Big Ten #3 beat the SEC West Champion. The Big Ten #4 beat the SEC East runner-up. That was the year OSU lost to Florida.

In 2007, the SEC was 2-1 against the Big Ten. The SEC #1 beat the Big Ten #1. The SEC East #1 beat the Big Ten #3 21-17. The Big Ten #4 beat the SEC East #3 (Florida) 41-35.

In 2008, the conferences went 1-1 against each other. The Big Ten #5 beat the SEC East #3 31-10. The SEC East #2 beat the Big Ten #3 24-12.

In 2009, the conferences went 1-1 against each other. The SEC West #4 beat the Big Ten #5 in OT. The Big Ten #3 beat the SEC West #2 19-17.

For the most part, the matchups have been fairly equal according to standings. Also, 2008 and 2009 happened with Michigan totally on the mat.

As for regular season, there have not been many matchups but I have no clue. The Bama/PSU game is a poor example though, as it was at Bama, PSU started a true frosh QB in his first road game, and PSU is not likely a Big Ten top 3.

Note: I do not think the Big Ten is as good as the SEC in most recent years. My point is that once you get past hyperbole and sensationalism, the margin is slim. Essentially, lately the SEC's best team is better than the Big Ten's best team. Though, it is all cyclical. There have been years in my young lifetime that the Big Ten has run right through the SEC.

Also, Doc Holliday (UF assistant in 2006) said that this OSU team is much fast and better than what he saw in 2006. That may not matter, because luck is always involved in a full season.
Last Edited: 9/19/2010 8:18:57 PM by Mr. Mo Jo Risin
Flomo-genized
General User
F
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 574
person
mail
Flomo-genized
mail
Posted: 9/19/2010 8:44 PM
Thanks Mo Jo, I stand corrected about the recent history.  I do believe that there is a difference between playing a single bowl game 6 weeks after the season, and playing an 8-game conference schedule on a weekly basis.  The depth of a conference shows through much more in the latter than the former.  For instance, this week the SEC has 4 of the top 14, and 6 of the top 17 teams in the coaches' poll.  Not a perfect measure to be sure, but the Big 10 only has 2 in the top 17 (with Iowa 18th).  So while the top of the Big 10 and SEC may match up, I think that the SEC is quite a bit deeper most seasons, which makes it a more difficult conference in a way that head-to-head bowl wins doesn't account for.  
Pryor2Posey
General User
PP2
Member Since: 9/19/2010
Post Count: 8
person
mail
Pryor2Posey
mail
Posted: 9/19/2010 8:53 PM
Flomo-genized wrote:expand_more
Thanks Mo Jo, I stand corrected about the recent history.  I do believe that there is a difference between playing a single bowl game 6 weeks after the season, and playing an 8-game conference schedule on a weekly basis.  The depth of a conference shows through much more in the latter than the former.  For instance, this week the SEC has 4 of the top 14, and 6 of the top 17 teams in the coaches' poll.  Not a perfect measure to be sure, but the Big 10 only has 2 in the top 17 (with Iowa 18th).  So while the top of the Big 10 and SEC may match up, I think that the SEC is quite a bit deeper most seasons, which makes it a more difficult conference in a way that head-to-head bowl wins doesn't account for.  


So what your saying is...polls>>results on the field?  Sorry but I do believe you are talking out of your ass at this point.

There is some legitimacy to the idea that bowl games can be a bit shaky given how long they are after the end of the regular season..but isn't it the Big Ten that's has the longer layoff?  Not to mention both of the 2 bowls that regularly match the SEC and Big Ten are in SEC country, the title game vs LSU right there in New Orleans.  The Florida-OSU game was the only real "neutral" site

 I don't see any real difference between the SEC and Big Ten in terms of team strength other then the perception.  The only reason that it might be a little more difficult to go through the SEC probably has more to do with their fans, the Big Ten has a few hostile environments (like OSU, PSU) whereas the SEC is loaded with them.  The truth of the matter is if the SEC was so ridiculously good, you wouldn't have had a team come out of there with a chance for the NC under the BCS system because those great teams would beat up on each other.
Your Name
General User
Member Since: 8/23/2010
Post Count: 150
mail
Your Name
mail
Posted: 9/19/2010 9:07 PM
Flomo, what is your reasoning for going w/ the top 17? Seems like an odd place to stop, although I do see Auburn at 17 in the AP. If you actually go with the traditional top 25, the SEC and Big Ten both end up with SIX teams in the rankings. No other SEC team received votes, Northwestern received other votes in both major polls.
Showing Messages: 26 - 50 of 74
MAC News Links
Wednesday, May 13, 2026



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)