Marshall ranks 86th in rushing defense (Ohio ranks 71)
Marshall ranks 107th in passing defense (Ohio ranks 10)
Marshall ranks 110th in total defense (Ohio ranks 30)
Marshall ranks 109th in scoring defense (Ohio ranks 75)
Marshall ranks 92nd in rushing offense (Ohio ranks 97)
Marshall ranks 86th in passing offense (Ohio ranks 117)
Marshall ranks 95th in total offense (Ohio ranks 119)
Marshall ranks 101st in scoring offense (Ohio ranks 105)
Marshall ranks 112th in turnover Margin (Ohio ranks 105)
Offensively it's basically a wash. Both offensives have been anemic (with Marshall having the slight edge)
Defensively, Ohio utterly destroys them at stopping the pass and overall defense..
Ohio is consistently ranked in the top half of their conference in almost every stat.
Marshall is in the bottom half. With Houston's QB injury double whammy, the MAC is by far a tougher conference than cUSA.
Take out the FCS option team and our pass numbers are not nearly as good. Toledo has an anemic pass offense as well. Our secondary is largely untested outside of OSU. I am interested in seeing how we fair in the remaining games.
I'm not so certain that the subtraction Keenum at Houston makes the MAC a "by far tougher conference than the CUSA. Houston, Tulane, Southern Miss, and ECU are good football teams. The jury is out on Marshall. I figure Marshall looks at the Ohio game as a must win game. We're going to get the Herd's best effort. Two losses vs. questionable MAC teams won't sit well with "Herd nation" down there.
We will find out a lot about the 2010 Ohio Bobcats this Saturday. We're still in the cold about this team.
Good teams can run the football when they need to. I don't think Ohio can do this.
Right now I'm not convinced we know how to win. The loss last weekend can't do much for the old confidence. Losing to the #2 team is rough, but we were out of that game in 10 minutes.
I do hope to admit my fallacy on Sunday morning, but I'm afraid we're in for a long season.
Last Edited: 9/22/2010 5:45:52 PM by medler