.. a MAC that is having a down year....
For some reason, people have a natural instinct to diminish achievements. Let's look at some data, and see if the MAC is actually having a down year. I looked at Sagarin ratings, not because they are perfect, but because they are readily available. Here is the average rating for the MAC since 2016, skipping the Covid year when there was not enough data:
MAC Average:
2016 59.14
2017 57.72
2018 59.89
2019 57.84
2021 61.41
2022 60.81
2022 was the second strongest MAC overall.
What about the MAC East?
2016 53.95
2017 56.11
2018 59.47
2019 56.11
2021 56.27
2022 60.16
This was by far the strongest MAC East in many years.
So, no, this was not an unusually weak MAC. In fact it was an unusually strong MAC, overall. So, if "weak" is an incorrect adjective, what adjective accurately describes this year's MAC. Let's look at the standard deviation:
2016 10.14
2017 10.4
2018 8.2
2019 9.77
2021 7.87
2022 5.02
Let's also look at the range, the difference between the highest ranked team and the lowest:
2016 37.38
2017 36.63
2018 23.47
2019 33.94
2021 26.04
2022 19.88
This was the most BALANCED MAC in a very long time. With the exception of Akron, all teams were between 57.25 (BG) and 68.49 (Ohio). That is close enough that any team could have beaten any other team on any given week, which is precisely why every other MAC team other than Ohio has at least 2 MAC losses, and when it all over, it is not impossible that they will all have at least 3 losses, which would happen if Buffalo loses to Kent and Toledo loses to WMU.
Rather than diminishing the achievement, for Ohio to dominate a balance conference shows what a great achievement it was. Ohio kept their focus each and every game, and they had a will to win. That is precisely what ExCat21 pointed out about them when he compared them to the 2006 team.
Congratulations, Bobcats, on a job well done. Beat Toledo.