Just think OSU against Florida with Troy Smith and the gang. Probably only 5 guys on either of the two Ohio teams (OSU against FL and us aginst Troy) could have started for the other team. Talent alone would keep a game close especially when you are not making foolish turnovers. Both of those big games for each of the Ohio teams resulted in total domination at every position by the opponent.
I don't know what you'd be angry about seeing how they were displaying the most awesome vitals on the TV--go get some--more and enjoy the experience.
Merry Christmas!
I disagree somewhat, and I think the NFL rosters would back up my disagreement. I also think people are exaggerating the talent differential between Ohio and Troy.
People overreact to bowl games. They are a different animal and produce a lot of strange outcomes.
Teams lose the season's momentum. Some teams lose focus. It doesn't take a huge loss of focus to get punched early and never recover from the momentum swing.
For instance: OSU v. Michigan '06. Check the Michigan D from that year and the NFL defensive rosters. It looks better than the UF D.
OSU was totally in-sync in the passing game, and much of it was timing routes. Michigan hit Smith a lot and many of his completions were thrown just before a hit.
OSU v. Florida. Ginn goes down. Deep threat gone. Coverage sits on the WRs. Timing in the passing game not in mid-season form anyway. Smith pass attempts go from the near-sack completions to sacks. Offense does nothing but put D in short-field situations. Will is crushed. No further effort. Game over.
Yet, the UT team that lost to UF by 1 was handled by PSU. The Arkansas team that played UF closely in the SEC Championship game handled by Wisconsin.
People get all hyperbole inside and make waaaay too much out of bowl games. Ohio will be fine, and if the game had been played during the season, would have played just fine with Troy.