menu
Logo
Ohio Football Topic
Topic: Ohio Beats OSU
Page: 3 of 3
JSF
General User
Member Since: 1/29/2005
Location: Houston, TX
Post Count: 6,581
mail
JSF
mail
Posted: 7/11/2011 8:55 PM
Given the massive size of the OSU athletic department, 375 violations over a decade plus is not a big number. If it's over a 10 year period, that's about one minor violation per team per year. That's not enough to raise even my eyebrows.
BattleCat
General User
BC
Member Since: 11/21/2007
Post Count: 312
person
mail
BattleCat
mail
Posted: 7/11/2011 9:34 PM
JSF wrote:expand_more
Given the massive size of the OSU athletic department, 375 violations over a decade plus is not a big number. If it's over a 10 year period, that's about one minor violation per team per year. That's not enough to raise even my eyebrows.
Applaud a common sense approach to this issue.

Question, how many self reports do we have? And per athlete we are under staffed with one full-time person for each 8 sports.
D.A.
General User
DA
Member Since: 8/6/2010
Location: Georgetown, ME
Post Count: 1,198
person
mail
D.A.
mail
Posted: 7/12/2011 9:04 AM
BattleCat wrote:expand_more
Given the massive size of the OSU athletic department, 375 violations over a decade plus is not a big number. If it's over a 10 year period, that's about one minor violation per team per year. That's not enough to raise even my eyebrows.


Applaud a common sense approach to this issue.

Question, how many self reports do we have? And per athlete we are under staffed with one full-time person for each 8 sports.


True, however if half of those occurred in hoops and FB, that would likely be perceived as a problem considering the probations.
Last Edited: 7/12/2011 9:04:50 AM by D.A.
BattleCat
General User
BC
Member Since: 11/21/2007
Post Count: 312
person
mail
BattleCat
mail
Posted: 7/12/2011 9:08 AM
D.A. wrote:expand_more
Given the massive size of the OSU athletic department, 375 violations over a decade plus is not a big number. If it's over a 10 year period, that's about one minor violation per team per year. That's not enough to raise even my eyebrows.


Applaud a common sense approach to this issue.

Question, how many self reports do we have? And per athlete we are under staffed with one full-time person for each 8 sports.


True, however if half of those occurred in hoops and FB, that would likely be perceived as a problem considering the probations.

We don't know where they occured, however, I have a good amount of money I would wager that they happened in the Olympic side of things.
cc-cat
General User
C
Member Since: 4/5/2006
Location: matthews, NC
Post Count: 4,016
person
mail
cc-cat
mail
Posted: 7/12/2011 9:16 AM
The minor violations in swimming are not a big deal.  The football cover-up is.
BattleCat
General User
BC
Member Since: 11/21/2007
Post Count: 312
person
mail
BattleCat
mail
Posted: 7/12/2011 9:48 AM
cc cat wrote:expand_more
The minor violations in swimming are not a big deal. The football cover-up is.
One person was involved in this cover up, there is at this time no documentation regarding any other official knew this was going on. If so please provide the documentation, I'd love to read it.
Last Edited: 7/12/2011 9:50:23 AM by BattleCat
Bobcat36
General User
Member Since: 1/5/2005
Location: Delaware, OH
Post Count: 1,167
mail
Bobcat36
mail
Posted: 7/12/2011 9:55 AM
BattleCat wrote:expand_more
The minor violations in swimming are not a big deal. The football cover-up is.


If you self report how are you covering up????


As I've said repeatedly, they self report when it's convenient and non damaging to do so.  When publicly confronted after the 3rd time Pryor was pulled over driving a loaner the Compliance Office's response was "we see no issue here".  When Smith was forced into holding a press conference to address the Tat 5 cover-up, he was quick to tell the world "we are fortunate that we don't have a systemic problem here".  Just 2 quick examples of a complete lack of accountability / ownership of the issues and in neither case did they intend to further investigate until the Media did it for them...
cc-cat
General User
C
Member Since: 4/5/2006
Location: matthews, NC
Post Count: 4,016
person
mail
cc-cat
mail
Posted: 7/12/2011 10:01 AM
You make the "one person" sound like he was a simple equipment manager, assistant trainer, admin - someone that has no real impact on a program. 

We are talking about the head coach of the program.  One of, if not the most powerful programs in the country.  Paying the head coach to resign is an honorable thing to do - lol, but if you think the NCAA is going to go, "well, he is now gone, so let's just put this whole thing behind us" I think you will be mistaken.  Your coach is your program.  Hell, your President basically said the coach is the most powerful person at the school "I hope he doesn't fire me."  Your program played star players knowing that they had broken NCAA rules.  The coach lied about it repeatedly.  This is not slap on the wrist time.

Plus there is the little matter that when OSU self investigated last December they did not find/look at the checks Pryor had in his account from the booster.  Those checks (which the NCAA now has) alone are cause for major violations - and the lack of finding them (in plain site) leads others (NCAA) to feel OSU didn't look real hard.  But now I'm sure OSU will say, "we got rid of him too, so can we please just put this all behind us and move on?  We already said if we do anything else in the future we will really, really, punish ourselves."
Last Edited: 7/12/2011 10:16:25 AM by cc-cat
Bobcat36
General User
Member Since: 1/5/2005
Location: Delaware, OH
Post Count: 1,167
mail
Bobcat36
mail
Posted: 7/12/2011 10:02 AM
BattleCat wrote:expand_more
The minor violations in swimming are not a big deal. The football cover-up is.


One person was involved in this cover up, there is at this time no documentation regarding any other official knew this was going on. If so please provide the documentation, I'd love to read it.


Just watch the press conference again...If you can watch Smith cut Tressel off while responding that he had indeed forwarded those emails to other parties, and still tell me he was not aware then this is a pointless conversation...
Last Edited: 7/12/2011 10:13:42 AM by Bobcat36
SBH
General User
SBH
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 4,681
person
mail
SBH
mail
Posted: 7/12/2011 10:05 AM
This ESPN lawsuit for access to emails could end up getting ugly for Smith and Gee.  


Bobcat36
General User
Member Since: 1/5/2005
Location: Delaware, OH
Post Count: 1,167
mail
Bobcat36
mail
Posted: 7/12/2011 10:07 AM
SBH wrote:expand_more
This ESPN lawsuit for access to emails will end up getting ugly for Smith and Gee.  




Fixed that for you Hogie... 
BattleCat
General User
BC
Member Since: 11/21/2007
Post Count: 312
person
mail
BattleCat
mail
Posted: 7/12/2011 10:26 AM
SBH wrote:expand_more
This ESPN lawsuit for access to emails could end up getting ugly for Smith and Gee.
You are correct it could, however, will be interesting how the court rules on this, these cases of privacy of students has had some very interesting rulings.


I still stand by my assertion that as of yet there is not that smoking gun showing this as a department wide issue. Kind of like the Anthony prosecution right now, and we know how that worked for them.
Piney
General User
P
Member Since: 2/3/2005
Location: Avon Lake, OH
Post Count: 135
person
mail
Piney
mail
Posted: 7/12/2011 10:27 AM
cc cat wrote:expand_more
So playing ineligible players is #5 at best?  I don't think so.  I have no point of reference for your initial 4, but once a program and/or head coach knows of one of those four violations and then plays the player, the situation worsens - otherwise, the coach would always play the player in question and cover up the initial violation because there would be no worse penalty coming for the cover-up. 

Therefore, the cover-up must be at the top of your hierarchy.


Well, all those violations create ineligible players. So its a chicken and egg type of debate. But if put as a separate item, it would be #2. But, the root cause of those players being ineligible I would think would be the list I stated.
Piney
General User
P
Member Since: 2/3/2005
Location: Avon Lake, OH
Post Count: 135
person
mail
Piney
mail
Posted: 7/12/2011 10:47 AM
cc cat wrote:expand_more
You make the "one person" sound like he was a simple equipment manager, assistant trainer, admin - someone that has no real impact on a program. 

We are talking about the head coach of the program.  One of, if not the most powerful programs in the country.  Paying the head coach to resign is an honorable thing to do - lol, but if you think the NCAA is going to go, "well, he is now gone, so let's just put this whole thing behind us" I think you will be mistaken.  Your coach is your program.  Hell, your President basically said the coach is the most powerful person at the school "I hope he doesn't fire me."  Your program played star players knowing that they had broken NCAA rules.  The coach lied about it repeatedly.  This is not slap on the wrist time.


Yes the coach lied about it and that is a big deal. He lost his job and is looking at not being able to coach again for a long time (Show cause penalty) and at his age, probably will never coach again. And those star players are being punished. They all got suspended for 5 games, that isn't light, especially being star players. And while vacating wins might not seem like a big penalty, it is the normal penalty in these cases.


Quote:expand_more
Plus there is the little matter that when OSU self investigated last December they did not find/look at the checks Pryor had in his account from the booster.  Those checks (which the NCAA now has) alone are cause for major violations - and the lack of finding them (in plain site) leads others (NCAA) to feel OSU didn't look real hard.  But now I'm sure OSU will say, "we got rid of him too, so can we please just put this all behind us and move on?  We already said if we do anything else in the future we will really, really, punish ourselves."


The NCAA has the checks? Really??? Where did you hear that? Trust me, if the NCAA had those checks then there will be another Notice of Allegations and a different response from Ohio St. Remember... these self-imposed penalties are ONLY for the Tressel cover-up.

On a side note... IF there are checks... then throw the book at Ohio St, I have no problems there. BUT people are just throwing wild accusations to the wall to see what sticks and alot of that stuff has fallen to the ground with no backup information other than disgruntled former players who have no proof and aren't willing to go on record with the NCAA.
Piney
General User
P
Member Since: 2/3/2005
Location: Avon Lake, OH
Post Count: 135
person
mail
Piney
mail
Posted: 7/12/2011 10:52 AM
BattleCat wrote:expand_more
This ESPN lawsuit for access to emails could end up getting ugly for Smith and Gee.


You are correct it could, however, will be interesting how the court rules on this, these cases of privacy of students has had some very interesting rulings.


I still stand by my assertion that as of yet there is not that smoking gun showing this as a department wide issue. Kind of like the Anthony prosecution right now, and we know how that worked for them.


But the Ohio Supreme Court will rule for ESPN and release the records they are asking (But it might take a while to go through the courts). And most likely the NCAA has already SEEN those emails. An Ohio State insider I listen to says he is surprised it hasn't happened sooner, but he says he doubts there is anything in there that the NCAA doesn't know about already.
OhioCatFan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 15,714
mail
OhioCatFan
mail
Posted: 7/12/2011 11:07 AM
Deep Pigskin, the ultimate O$U insider, says "USC level penalties."

Edit: FERPA is the most abused law by colleges and universities.  They use it to hide almost everything.  I certainly hope the Ohio Supreme Court believes Ohio's FOI Act trumps FERPA in this case.  I suppose they could order the release of the information with student names redacted but that would be a real cop out.  Undoubtedly, A&M will appeal any ruling impinging on FERPA to the Federal Court system.  This could be a long-drawn out mess, but ultimately, I'm hoping the Federal courts might reign in FERPA a little bit and issue some guidelines as to its appropriate and inappropriate uses.

Edit: corrected stupid typo due to Jeff's quickly spotting my bonehead typing . . . sometimes the fingers don't type what the mind wants them to.
Last Edited: 7/12/2011 6:37:51 PM by OhioCatFan
Mike Johnson
General User
Member Since: 11/11/2004
Location: North Canton, OH
Post Count: 1,759
mail
Mike Johnson
mail
Posted: 7/12/2011 5:47 PM
This morning I saw the headline telling us that Fickel had hired Vrabel.  My first thought: That's nice.  Hire as your replacement as LB coach an OSU grad and accomplished NFL veteran. 

Then about midway through the story I read that Vrabel once had been found guilty of a relatively minor crime.  Okay, second chance.  Then the story went on to report that last spring Vrabel was arrested for theft and can avoid an indictment only by avoiding another crime during the ensuing 6 months.

As I type this I'm shaking my head in disbelief.  OSU, under the gun for scandals, is hiring as a new coach one with a criminal record.  Smith and Gee said okay to this? 

Or am I alone in reacting this way? 
Jeff McKinney
Moderator
JM
Member Since: 11/12/2004
Post Count: 6,163
person
mail
Jeff McKinney
mail
Posted: 7/12/2011 6:06 PM
OhioCatFan wrote:expand_more
Deep Pigskin, the ultimate O$U insider, says "UCLA level penalties."

Edit: FERPA is the most abused law by colleges and universities.  They use it to hide almost everything.  I certainly hope the Ohio Supreme Court believes Ohio's FOI Act trumps FERPA in this case.  I suppose they could order the release of the information with student names redacted but that would be a real cop out.  Undoubtedly, A&M will appeal any ruling impinging on FERPA to the Federal Court system.  This could be a long-drawn out mess, but ultimately, I'm hoping the Federal courts might reign in FERPA a little bit and issue some guidelines as to its appropriate and inappropriate uses.



What does UCLA have to do with this?  Do you mean USC? 
OhioCatFan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 15,714
mail
OhioCatFan
mail
Posted: 7/12/2011 6:36 PM
Yes, I mean't USC.  Don't know why I typed UCLA.  I'll go and correct my error, though you've immortalized it in your quote box! :-)
BattleCat
General User
BC
Member Since: 11/21/2007
Post Count: 312
person
mail
BattleCat
mail
Posted: 7/12/2011 8:41 PM
Vrable was accused of stealing 6 beers (maybe less) from an Indiana Casino, have not heard the outcome of the case yet, but I do believe there will be no criminal record of the offense.
Last Edited: 7/12/2011 8:42:53 PM by BattleCat
cc-cat
General User
C
Member Since: 4/5/2006
Location: matthews, NC
Post Count: 4,016
person
mail
cc-cat
mail
Posted: 7/12/2011 9:59 PM
Beers, tattoos, its all kids stuff.  Let's just put all this stuff behind us -
Showing Messages: 51 - 71 of 71



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)