menu
Logo
Ohio Football Topic
Topic: Indoor practice facility
Page: 2 of 2
OhioCatFan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 15,714
mail
OhioCatFan
mail
Posted: 9/19/2011 12:02 AM
Well, my two cents worth:  I agree with the general thrust of the remarks by Alan Swank, BBF and PF on this subject.  I think it was rather thin-skinned of the athletic department to ask for these drawings to be taken down.  It's their job to control leaks from their committee members.  It's not bobcatattack.com's job to be a instrument of the athletic department and to do its bidding.  I guess I tend to view this board as a place for an open discussion of ideas and opinions related to Ohio athletics and as an independent forum for these discussions.  This is not ohiobobcats.com, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Ohio University Department of Athletics.  The question here, in my mind, is not a matter of spine.  It's a matter of independence.  Is this an independent forum or is it just part of the company propaganda machine?  It pains me to say that today it feels more like the latter than the former. 

I think it would be wise for the guru's of this board to take into account that many of us who post here are graduates of the j-school.  We believe in a certain level of journalistic integrity, and we tend to look at things not from the corporate perspective but from the free flow of information perspective.  In the great scheme of things this one incident is not a very big deal; however, it is a disheartening one. 
bobcat695
General User
B695
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Parkersburg, WV
Post Count: 1,345
person
mail
bobcat695
mail
Posted: 9/19/2011 12:37 AM
I understand the legal side of the argument, but I am clearly on Ryan's side on this one.  This is starting to sound like a bunch of wacko conspiracy theorists.  We have a unique message board.  It is largely civil, the moderators actually set decency rules and stick to them and the posters generally behave themselves.  We enjoy a healthy relationship with the Athletic Department.  Heck, we even have a few Atheltics employees that are regular posters here.  I would also say we are in a small minority with regards to comradarie and personal relationships that have been fostered 100% as a result of this website.  I probably have 50 folks I  call casual friends that I would likely have never met if not for Ryan and Ted. 

I am thankful for the guys that build and run this site.  While we can argue which of us is more passionate about Ohio University athletics, I do not possess the  time or computer skills to replicate their efforts.  If I want the drawings, I'll file a Freedom of Information Act request.  Arguments like this do nothing to further the efforts of the actual facility being built.  The uniquenesss of this site is partly due to the good working relationship they have with the university.  This is no different than another member of the press being asked for something to be "off the record" until the deal can be finalized.  Until then, maybe Richard Vedder or Steve Hays can start a similar web venture for the full disclosure thread. 
JSF
General User
Member Since: 1/29/2005
Location: Houston, TX
Post Count: 6,580
mail
JSF
mail
Posted: 9/19/2011 12:40 AM
Everyone is welcome to start their own site if they're unhappy with this one. Why does everything have to be some sort of cause? The AD asked, not demanded (right?) the post be taken down- as they are well within their rights to do. Ryan chose to do so. He didn't have to. Maybe he doesn't want to needlessly foster ill will with The Convo. Maybe he's picking his battles.

Either way, this is silly and Putnam's post is flat out embarrassing.
PutnamField
General User
PF
Member Since: 9/20/2007
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 303
person
mail
PutnamField
mail
Posted: 9/19/2011 2:45 AM
bobcat695 wrote:expand_more
The uniquenesss of this site is partly due to the good working relationship they have with the university. This is no different than another member of the press being asked for something to be "off the record" until the deal can be finalized.


The indoor practice facility information had already been released and disseminated. 

I would submit that this site is popular because intelligent people who know and care a lot about Ohio Athletics are attracted to a freewheeling forum that goes beyond what official sources offer.

JSF wrote:expand_more
The AD asked, not demanded (right?) the post be taken down- as they are well within their rights to do. Ryan chose to do so. He didn't have to. Maybe he doesn't want to needlessly foster ill will with The Convo. Maybe he's picking his battles.

Either way, this is silly and Putnam's post is flat out embarrassing.


Why? And, why should any of this rise to the level of ill will? Do you realize how much marketing the Athletics Department gets from this site? Ted & Co. can do what they wish, but I believe they are in a suitable position to not have to "assume the position." 

OhioCatFan wrote:expand_more
The question here, in my mind, is not a matter of spine. It's a matter of independence. Is this an independent forum or is it just part of the company propaganda machine? It pains me to say that today it feels more like the latter than the former. 

I think it would be wise for the guru's of this board to take into account that many of us who post here are graduates of the j-school. We believe in a certain level of journalistic integrity, and we tend to look at things not from the corporate perspective but from the free flow of information perspective. In the great scheme of things this one incident is not a very big deal; however, it is a disheartening one.


Hey, when OCF's on, he's on.

Ryan Carey wrote:expand_more
OMG.  That response isn't real, right?  

I had a nice little sarcastic response typed up, even worked in a Dr. Claw reference to self destructing documents, but I'll just leave it with "wow" and let others decide for themselves as to the level of lunacy your post contains.


"An inside job? How dare you?" (Bill Clinton voice)

Lunacy, Mr. Carey? (Columbo voice) 

Hey, feel free to just answer the question. Asking somebody something is not the same as accusing somebody of something.  

It's an honest question. Do you double dog swear that the data loss had nothing whatsoever to do with cleansing the board of controversial content? 
Ryan Carey
Site Programmer
Member Since: 11/11/2004
Post Count: 993
mail
Ryan Carey
mail
Posted: 9/19/2011 4:25 AM
I assumed I already made the answer clear, but since you like to get people on the record, my official comment is, "get a life."
SBH
General User
SBH
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 4,681
person
mail
SBH
mail
Posted: 9/19/2011 7:01 AM
The fact that the AD asked for it to be taken down demonstrates how precarious this project is.  The faculty is just looking for the next reason to start launching media strikes. The facility is supposed to serve more than simply athletes, so Mr. Shaus (and presumably President McDavis) don't want to see it promoted (by us or anyone else) as a football-only structure.  What's the big deal - it's not like we're dealing with make-believe weapons of mass destruction being used as a justification for war. (Oops.)






Voice of Reason
General User
Member Since: 7/29/2010
Post Count: 249
mail
Voice of Reason
mail
Posted: 9/19/2011 8:03 AM
I hate that Alan Swank has stirred up the bee's nest again claiming inside sources on the committee.  I am with Ben on this.  Alan just likes to create controversy around football and anything Jim Schuas does because Schaus has the kahunas to not give a damn about Alan Swank and his precious Green and White Club.  Get over it already, Alan!  I am sure the renderings were taken down because they are just renderings, are very preliminary and they don't want morons like you seeing them and then raising a stink about certain features that were on the rendering that aren't on the final building.  We all know, and you know, that is something you would do in about two seconds!

Also, why is it on the Athletic Department to raise another $6 million to put an indoor track in.  That facility will serve the entire campus community regardless (intramurals, marching 110, Athens High School sports at times etc.).  If the committee believes it is better to have an indoor track to serve the campus community then the campus community that would benefit from it needs to pony up.  If Athletics is responsible for raising all the money they should be the only ones with access and should be able to charge rent to others on campus who want to use it.  I don't want to hear other areas on campus scream or cry about being able to use it, but aren't willing to chip in.  There is no such thing as a free lunch!
cc-cat
General User
C
Member Since: 4/5/2006
Location: matthews, NC
Post Count: 4,016
person
mail
cc-cat
mail
Posted: 9/19/2011 8:24 AM

I would bet that nearly everyone on this board wants the University to get an indoor practice facility.  We all know that it will help the football program in recruiting and preparation.  If keeping the information under wraps helps “sell” it and/or make sure we don’t get out in-front of it (thus make it happen), why would anyone be upset that the rendering was taken down?  Let’s look at the larger picture for the good of the football team.  Move on.

Ohio69
General User
O69
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 3,124
person
mail
Ohio69
mail
Posted: 9/19/2011 8:25 AM
Ryan Carey wrote:expand_more
Jesus, give it a rest.  Some of us don't make it a primary personal goal to piss off and challenge everything the Ohio University Athletic Department does.  

They asked us to take it down, they have their reasons. 

File the damn request to get the blurry mockups which showed absolutly no detail on what the building would even entail if it means so much to you people.  The thread had already made it to page 4 and hardly had any activity on it anyways. 

As always, some of you just love to stick your nose into something to make a mountain out of a mole hill.

Good Lord.


I love this post.  Kudos to Mr. Carey.  I'm moving on.....
Kinggeorge4
General User
Member Since: 12/22/2004
Location: Guysville, OH
Post Count: 1,087
mail
Kinggeorge4
mail
Posted: 9/19/2011 8:28 AM
Alan is speaking for himself, not the Green & White Club.
Bobcat Love
General User
BL
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Post Count: 1,193
person
mail
Bobcat Love
mail
Posted: 9/19/2011 8:45 AM
Ryan Carey wrote:expand_more
I assumed I already made the answer clear, but since you like to get people on the record, my official comment is, "get a life."


Like Captain Kirk to the trekkies at the Convention....LOVE it.
Alan Swank
General User
AS
Member Since: 12/12/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 7,376
person
mail
Alan Swank
mail
Posted: 9/19/2011 8:48 AM
Kinggeorge4 (George Cheripko) wrote:expand_more
Alan is speaking for himself, not the Green & White Club.


As are OCF and you since we are all board members.
Last Edited: 9/19/2011 8:51:53 AM by Alan Swank
SBH
General User
SBH
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 4,681
person
mail
SBH
mail
Posted: 9/19/2011 8:55 AM
My feelings about the G&W Club are that it is/was made up of a bunch of locals who wanted to keep it local.  I once suggested that they sanction fundraising golf tourneys and other events in Central and Northeast Ohio so fans could connect with coaches, and was told it was a stupid idea.  So, Shaus and Co. come in and see it for what it is - an old boys club with very limited vision - and create their own program.  Kudos to them.

And Allan, it sure seems like you've got an agenda...perhaps dating back to the dismissal of your next-door neighbor the basketball coach?
Last Edited: 9/19/2011 8:57:51 AM by SBH
Ohio69
General User
O69
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 3,124
person
mail
Ohio69
mail
Posted: 9/19/2011 9:19 AM
SBH wrote:expand_more
My feelings about the G&W Club are that it is/was made up of a bunch of locals who wanted to keep it local.  I once suggested that they sanction fundraising golf tourneys and other events in Central and Northeast Ohio so fans could connect with coaches, and was told it was a stupid idea.  So, Shaus and Co. come in and see it for what it is - an old boys club with very limited vision - and create their own program.  Kudos to them.

And Allan, it sure seems like you've got an agenda...perhaps dating back to the dismissal of your next-door neighbor the basketball coach?


As a former GW Club board member, I can tell you that the idea you floated here would have been shot down by the current and last 2 ADs.  And, getting coaches to attend would be damn near impossible.  And, you are asking a lot of 8-10 volunteer board members.  And attendance would be about what it is at Bobcat Carvans if you are lucky, meaning very sparse, meaning you ain't gonna raise any money.

The GW Club continues to exist soley due to the dogged determination of continuing board members.  It will collapse when those volunteers get tired.  And, it will not be replaced by anything.
cc-cat
General User
C
Member Since: 4/5/2006
Location: matthews, NC
Post Count: 4,016
person
mail
cc-cat
mail
Posted: 9/19/2011 9:26 AM
Ohio69 wrote:expand_more
It will collapse ...And, it will not be replaced by anything.


Sounds like the concept of a practice facility if the current powers do not get it done.  If the least we can do is pull down the rendering so as not to appear to be ahead of the committee then I commend Ryan for doing so.  Way to put the need for a PF ahead of upsetting a few posters.  You did the right thing.  

And if they want to add an indoor track for the girl's team, they (the team, boosters, etc.) have a limited time to raise the money.  If not, forget that piece and build the PF for the football team.  If we don't have a PF because we couldn't add a track...that would be absurd, ridiculous, stupid, etc.
Last Edited: 9/19/2011 9:32:17 AM by cc-cat
bobcat695
General User
B695
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Parkersburg, WV
Post Count: 1,345
person
mail
bobcat695
mail
Posted: 9/19/2011 9:39 AM
G & W has already been replaced...by the Ohio Bobcat Club.  It will cease to exist within a year or two.  It is due to two factors.  First, as SBH mentioned, the interests of the G &W did not always go in line with the official athletic department stance.  It is just bad form when the board members of the booster organization are constantly arguing with the athletic department.  The members have figured this out over the past 10-15 years, which is why there has been a mass defection of paying G & W members (my entire family included).  Second (and probably more importantly), every member is considered a booster by the NCAA.  It is easier for the program to remain compliant if the main boosters club is run by, and monitored by university employees.
Alan Swank
General User
AS
Member Since: 12/12/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 7,376
person
mail
Alan Swank
mail
Posted: 9/19/2011 10:00 AM
bobcat695 wrote:expand_more
G & W has already been replaced...by the Ohio Bobcat Club.  It will cease to exist within a year or two.  It is due to two factors.  First, as SBH mentioned, the interests of the G &W did not always go in line with the official athletic department stance.  It is just bad form when the board members of the booster organization are constantly arguing with the athletic department.  The members have figured this out over the past 10-15 years, which is why there has been a mass defection of paying G & W members (my entire family included).  Second (and probably more importantly), every member is considered a booster by the NCAA.  It is easier for the program to remain compliant if the main boosters club is run by, and monitored by university employees.


Aaron, I'm not sure if your post or Drew's should get the award for posting the greatest amount of mis-information.  I'll do Drew first.  None of the current board members were officers when you suggested what you suggested.  69's post does a good job of describing the situation.  As for "my neighbor the basketball coach" James Jones is entering his 13th season as head coach at Yale and is the second winningest coach in the history of that program.  He was not fired at OU.

Now for Aaron.  The Green and White Club is currently the social committee for the OBC.  One thing that we can do that they can't is serve beer and wine.  They need the pregame experience for their members and we are currently providing that through a cooperative agreement for this year.  We have seen a decline in membership that is directly attributable to three things - the creation of tailgate park, the requirement that one must join the OBC if one wants to be a Green and White member and like so many old line churches in America, the aging of our membership.   I'm sure there are those who have quit over personality conflicts (Ben being one of those).  There are businesses that we all chose not to frequent for that very reason.  

This whole thread has morphed beyond the original question of what happened to the thread.  When my wife asked me why I get on that "stupid board" I told her that these boards have taken the place of the corner bar.  Now that you can take concealed weapons into bars I'm glad we have the safety of this forum.  
cc-cat
General User
C
Member Since: 4/5/2006
Location: matthews, NC
Post Count: 4,016
person
mail
cc-cat
mail
Posted: 9/19/2011 10:20 AM

You are right – way off track, so let’s bring it back based on what we know.

 

The thread was removed at the request of the athletic department.

The rendering posted was out “ahead of its time.” – seeing as members of the committee had not even seen it.

The project has gotten away from its original purpose to now include an indoor track for the women’s team.  Please - Honorable, but not intelligent when it adds 60% to the budget.

 

Raising an additional $6 million will be difficult in this economy.  So it makes perfect sense for the athletic department to ask Ryan to pull down the rendering - well done sir.  We need to make this facility happen – with or without the track, so the less the committee feels it is a “done deal” without their input (read indoor track) the better.

 

So here is the right thing to do:  Pull the rendering.  Let the indoor track idea die an appropriately quick, unfunded death.  Build the damn football facility.

SBH
General User
SBH
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 4,681
person
mail
SBH
mail
Posted: 9/19/2011 10:42 AM
Alan Swank wrote:expand_more
G & W has already been replaced...by the Ohio Bobcat Club.  It will cease to exist within a year or two.  It is due to two factors.  First, as SBH mentioned, the interests of the G &W did not always go in line with the official athletic department stance.  It is just bad form when the board members of the booster organization are constantly arguing with the athletic department.  The members have figured this out over the past 10-15 years, which is why there has been a mass defection of paying G & W members (my entire family included).  Second (and probably more importantly), every member is considered a booster by the NCAA.  It is easier for the program to remain compliant if the main boosters club is run by, and monitored by university employees.


Aaron, I'm not sure if your post or Drew's should get the award for posting the greatest amount of mis-information.  I'll do Drew first.  None of the current board members were officers when you suggested what you suggested.  69's post does a good job of describing the situation.  As for "my neighbor the basketball coach" James Jones is entering his 13th season as head coach at Yale and is the second winningest coach in the history of that program.  He was not fired at OU.

Now for Aaron.  The Green and White Club is currently the social committee for the OBC.  One thing that we can do that they can't is serve beer and wine.  They need the pregame experience for their members and we are currently providing that through a cooperative agreement for this year.  We have seen a decline in membership that is directly attributable to three things - the creation of tailgate park, the requirement that one must join the OBC if one wants to be a Green and White member and like so many old line churches in America, the aging of our membership.   I'm sure there are those who have quit over personality conflicts (Ben being one of those).  There are businesses that we all chose not to frequent for that very reason.  

This whole thread has morphed beyond the original question of what happened to the thread.  When my wife asked me why I get on that "stupid board" I told her that these boards have taken the place of the corner bar.  Now that you can take concealed weapons into bars I'm glad we have the safety of this forum.  




I was referring, of course, to your friend Billy Hahn.  And I wouldn't have expected any other response from 69, seeing as he (and virtually every other G&W Club board member in history) is an Athens area resident.


Last Edited: 9/19/2011 10:46:50 AM by SBH
sargentfan
General User
S
Member Since: 3/17/2005
Post Count: 917
person
mail
sargentfan
mail
Posted: 9/19/2011 11:00 AM
I am kind of dismayed at the vitriol coming from so many about his.  I understand the need for openness and the possible precedent some might see this as setting.  But would everyone here be willing to risk delaying the building of this facility due to anything negative that could have come out of the original post?  We already have a faculty that loves to jump on Athletics for the tiniest things, why even give them an opening on something as stupid as some possible first draft drawings and conjecture.
Ohio69
General User
O69
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 3,124
person
mail
Ohio69
mail
Posted: 9/19/2011 11:47 AM
bobcat695 wrote:expand_more
G & W has already been replaced...by the Ohio Bobcat Club.  It will cease to exist within a year or two.  It is due to two factors.  First, as SBH mentioned, the interests of the G &W did not always go in line with the official athletic department stance.  It is just bad form when the board members of the booster organization are constantly arguing with the athletic department.  The members have figured this out over the past 10-15 years, which is why there has been a mass defection of paying G & W members (my entire family included).  Second (and probably more importantly), every member is considered a booster by the NCAA.  It is easier for the program to remain compliant if the main boosters club is run by, and monitored by university employees.


Basically the GW Club is now a tailgate club within the Ohio Bobcat Club.  And, I think a tailgate club is really needed in Athens/OU.  So, I hope it doesn't go away. 
bobcat695
General User
B695
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Parkersburg, WV
Post Count: 1,345
person
mail
bobcat695
mail
Posted: 9/19/2011 11:54 AM
But you and your family always have an open invitation to tailgate with me 69.  Plus, I never charge anything. 
PutnamField
General User
PF
Member Since: 9/20/2007
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 303
person
mail
PutnamField
mail
Posted: 9/19/2011 3:01 PM
To anyone interested, and especially Ryan:

Let me be frank (small f).

I don't know the inner machinations of the organized fan/booster atmosphere at Ohio University, but I'm learning. I'm a diehard fan of Bobcat basketball and football, a double alumnus, a local "townie" and a reporter/researcher. Figuring out who is who and what is what takes time if you're not Rasputin and you're not getting paid.

Believe it or not, I don't have any personal grudges toward anybody in this environment. I do enjoy moving the needle, and I want any expanded success the sports teams enjoy to never come at the expense of ethics and good sporting behavior. So, I freely report "negative" things that I can access, while also going to games, following the teams and encouraging friends, family and even strangers to join me in being a fan.

I was a diehard fan for a quarter-century before I was a journalist, OK? There have been ethical lapses among people within the OU sports universe (was Cleve Bryant a "super nice guy" before he became "Ol' Freaky Nasty"?). You never hear as much as you should about all the awesome, hard-working, regular people, and that sucks. If I ever control a media operation, maybe I can help change that.   

Sometimes I post things in a half-kidding manner, while inadvertently being insensitive to the fact that the some of the site managers, moderators, posters and lurkers devote great amounts of their personal resources to the site or to Ohio Athletics. At the same time, I'm also at least half-serious about transparency being important and about not accepting a corporate/government model for communications.

Having said this, let me say that I do not believe that Ryan would do something like delete major content at the Department's request. Reading his thoughtful and I believe sincere PM tells me that that would be unlikely. However, I know a few things about how spin control was carried out under previous ADs, so I wouldn't put it past the department or the administration of this university to make indecent overtures to media organizations.

For the record, I don't hang out with or carry any water for restive faculty types. I want the sports teams to remain intact and to thrive. Some professors might relish the thought of uncovering athletics scandals, but I'd like there to be no more of them and for the teams to kick ass.     

Ryan, I'll try to be more considerate, because it must have been a bad day for you when that data loss occurred.
Ryan Carey
Site Programmer
Member Since: 11/11/2004
Post Count: 993
mail
Ryan Carey
mail
Posted: 9/19/2011 3:36 PM
Thank you Putnam, I really do appreciate your response!
MedinaCat
General User
MC
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Lakewood, OH
Post Count: 750
person
mail
MedinaCat
mail
Posted: 9/19/2011 4:36 PM
Thank you everyone for your responses.  Quite entertaining and a few lol's.  We all need those, eh?
Showing Messages: 26 - 50 of 50



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)