why would we want to be in the BCS, really?
Money and a chance to get into a meaningful (and lucrative) bowl game.
I understand the envy we have of the big schools with all their media hype and all their bandwagon fans in your office talking about the big game, but is it really worth it?
I would believe so. Increased visibility leads to an increase in support to Athletics ($$$) as well as an increase in the national reputation of the University and leads to a rise in applications.
Even if we could find a way to get 50K SEO residents to come to a football game 6 times a year are we really going to be able to invest in the facilities to accomidate them?
Like I said earlier, Peden would have to be expanded to roughly 40 k. I dont know if this is feasible, but if it is, and we were in a larger conference, why wouldnt we want this? More attendance=more money.
I like the MAC. Let me rephrase that- I like the idea of the MAC. I like the similarity and the proximity of the schools, I just wish our bad teams weren't so dreadful. To use Marshall as an example- I'd rather be like Marshall was in the MAC then like Marshall is now. They're trying to be bigger than what they really are and it isn't working.
I like that the schools are close to each other, but I dont like the lack of respect and prestige that the conference has sometimes. I dont want to be satisfied with being one of the same. I want Ohio to be
better than the Kent States and directional schools of the world. I want Ohio to strive to be one of the best Athletic departments in the country, not just the part of the midwest not occupied by major conference schools. We can join the Boise States and TCUs of the world.