menu
Logo
Ohio Football Topic
Topic: Temple leaving the dumpster fire.....
Page: 3 of 4
bobcat695
General User
B695
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Parkersburg, WV
Post Count: 1,345
person
mail
bobcat695
mail
Posted: 10/12/2011 12:20 PM

Hasn't OU beaten Miami 5 years in a row?  Maybe you guys should get new black jerseys for the game this year.
 

Pete Chouteau
General User
Member Since: 11/17/2004
Location: You Can't See Me
Post Count: 1,696
mail
Pete Chouteau
mail
Posted: 10/12/2011 12:32 PM
So anyway....

I don't see the point in doing anything to join a conference of mostly Catholic universities. There's no common discourse. We would never belong.
Ohio69
General User
O69
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 3,124
person
mail
Ohio69
mail
Posted: 10/12/2011 12:42 PM
JRIGGS wrote:expand_more
I'd love to see Ohio burn in a dumpster fire.....can we throw Rufus in there too? Wow, what a sight that would be!

REDHAWKS FOREVER!!!

Miami players don't need motivated by ugly black jerseys or the fact that they might win over half their games......Redhawks are motivated by themselves and always compete at "Harvard on the Hocking".........when's the next OU vs. Hocking College game.....that should be a close one.



I love this guy.  Please come back often.

Man, Uconn, WVU, and Louisville are getting screwed royally right now.  Top hoops programs and football teams that have played in BCS bowls.  Just getting screwed....  Oh well.  Sucks for them.
Last Edited: 10/12/2011 12:42:20 PM by Ohio69
Deciduous Forest Cat
General User
DFC
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: OH
Post Count: 4,560
person
mail
Deciduous Forest Cat
mail
Posted: 10/12/2011 12:51 PM
SBH wrote:expand_more
Love, just asking and don't mean it in a derogatory or mean-spirited way. Say we had a number of T Boone Pickens type of alums that would throw crazy money at the OHIO football program specifically and OHIO athletics in general what would you hope for the outcome to be? 


I know the question wasn't directed at me, but I'd tear Peden stadium down and start over. Not so we can build a 60k seat stadium, but so we could build a great 30k seat stadium. If we had the kind of funds you're talking about, we'd have a state of the art scoreboard, and we'd play on real grass, because we wouldn't need to use Peden for other stuff just for income. If we had a better stadium, with 30K good seats, I think we'd draw better. I think we'd recruit better and this would help advance the program. If we had those things, I'd like to see where that might lead. These, to me, are tangible uses for funds. Buying our way out of, then into a conference seems like flushing money down the toilet.

I'd also feel better knowing that athletics was more self-supporting so short-sighted faculty wouldn't rail against sports every week in the local fishwrap.


Wow, this is so off base, I don't know where to begin.  Tear down Peden (including a $20 million in upgrades over the past 15 years) to build a facility that's only a little bit larger?  Peden is a great place to watch a game.  Yes, the restrooms on the student side are old and the undersides of both stands need some work, but just throw the whole thing away?  You do know you can build a new scoreboard without trashing the whole complex, right?  And finally, the reason we play on turf is not to accommodate lots of other sports/activities but because grass won't grow there. The field is beneath the water table. Do you really believe that a few thousand Columbus area residents are going to wake up on Saturday mornings and say, "Gee, they've got that great new scoreboard and those updated restrooms down in Athens - let's go to today's game?"

Hey, let's tear down the Convo, too - I really hate the scoreboards in there.


SBH - you do have a knack for misinterpreting everything I say, so let me clarify some things...

1st off, Please note that I am talking about a world where we have a phil knight-type sugar daddy supporting the program...anything goes

2nd I didn't say tear down the stadium because of the scoreboard. I said start over with both of them. Two separate things. Peden is a "nice" place to watch a game, but it's not great by any stretch. Everything from how it looks with those godawful endzone sections to the tiny stands, to the walkways in front of the seats, to the high-school grade scoreboard, victory hill which isn't really a hill - rather a mound. Everything we've done in the last several years is a proverbial silk hat on a pig. I think the level of upgrades in the last 15 years amounts to about $5-6 million. Whatever actions have been taken inside the tower, sure we can keep that if at all possible. If we put in 20 million just into the stadium, then we got robbed. I think the major upgrade with the lowering of the field came to around 2.5 mil. Lights, plus field turf + restroom upgrades on the blue-hair side. That's hardly 20 million. Then let's talk the strength center. It's obviously a nice facility in and of itself, but it looks like an awkward appendage from inside the stadium, and the damn wall blocks half a section of people from seeing the main scoreboard. Whose idea was that?

Never said anything about the Convo - please don't put words in my mouth (another of your favorite tricks). While it has its quirks and it is, in fact, lacking in the scoreboard department, what a GREAT facility! The Convo is actually a perfect example of MY point. By itself it helps our program and we draw more fans just because it's a great arena. No one goes to Peden just because of Peden. Miami, Marshall, Toledo, WMU, and now Akron... all have stadiums that kick the crap out of ours. Akron's bad timing/coaching hire is costing them people, and Miami is just lame so no one goes to their games anyway despite the modicum of tradition they offer over the other MAC schools. Take Marshall before they expanded. They held about 30k in that place. Not much bigger than Peden's overflow 24 capacity. there is NO comparison between our facilities. Granted, they are handicapped because theirs is full of Marshall fans, but still, what a great stadium - that's what I envision for Ohio. Theirs looks like a smallish college stadium, where ours looks like an oversized highschool stadium. Peden Stadium never has been a selling point for our program.
bn9
General User
B9
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Post Count: 422
person
mail
bn9
mail
Posted: 10/12/2011 1:06 PM
MH55 wrote:expand_more
For those "cats interested, "]["emple's invitation for all sports is imminent

http://philly.sbnation.com/temple-owls/2011/7/1/2253768/temple-football-joining-the-big-east-in-2012



Congrats and good luck on becomming Rutgers. 

By the way, over the last five years your esteemed Men's Basketball program is 4-8 against Big East teams and just 7-5 against MAC East teams.

Just something to think about while celebrating.
 
Ryan Carey
Site Programmer
Member Since: 11/11/2004
Post Count: 993
mail
Ryan Carey
mail
Posted: 10/12/2011 1:31 PM
JRIGGS wrote:expand_more
I'd love to see Ohio burn in a dumpster fire.....can we throw Rufus in there too? Wow, what a sight that would be!

REDHAWKS FOREVER!!!

Miami players don't need motivated by ugly black jerseys or the fact that they might win over half their games......Redhawks are motivated by themselves and always compete at "Harvard on the Hocking".........when's the next OU vs. Hocking College game.....that should be a close one.



Bitter much?  What, didn't get the job when you tried out for Rufus?  With OU students like you, who needs enemies!
Hooligan
General User
H
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 223
person
mail
Hooligan
mail
Posted: 10/12/2011 6:46 PM
JRIGGS wrote:expand_more
I'd love to see Ohio burn in a dumpster fire.....can we throw Rufus in there too? Wow, what a sight that would be!

REDHAWKS FOREVER!!!

Miami players don't need motivated by ugly black jerseys or the fact that they might win over half their games......Redhawks are motivated by themselves and always compete at "Harvard on the Hocking".........when's the next OU vs. Hocking College game.....that should be a close one.



I like the way they have competed the last two times in town. I expect much the same this fall.  Thanks for showing up and reminding everyone why it's important to work hard while in high school.
Athens
General User
A
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Post Count: 5,454
person
mail
Athens
mail
Posted: 10/12/2011 8:01 PM
Deciduous Forest Cat wrote:expand_more
2nd I didn't say tear down the stadium because of the scoreboard. I said start over with both of them. Two separate things. Peden is a "nice" place to watch a game, but it's not great by any stretch. Everything from how it looks with those godawful endzone sections to the tiny stands, to the walkways in front of the seats, to the high-school grade scoreboard, victory hill which isn't really a hill - rather a mound. Everything we've done in the last several years is a proverbial silk hat on a pig. I think the level of upgrades in the last 15 years amounts to about $5-6 million. Whatever actions have been taken inside the tower, sure we can keep that if at all possible. If we put in 20 million just into the stadium, then we got robbed. I think the major upgrade with the lowering of the field came to around 2.5 mil. Lights, plus field turf + restroom upgrades on the blue-hair side. That's hardly 20 million. Then let's talk the strength center. It's obviously a nice facility in and of itself, but it looks like an awkward appendage from inside the stadium, and the damn wall blocks half a section of people from seeing the main scoreboard. Whose idea was that?

Never said anything about the Convo - please don't put words in my mouth (another of your favorite tricks). While it has its quirks and it is, in fact, lacking in the scoreboard department, what a GREAT facility! The Convo is actually a perfect example of MY point. By itself it helps our program and we draw more fans just because it's a great arena. No one goes to Peden just because of Peden. Miami, Marshall, Toledo, WMU, and now Akron... all have stadiums that kick the crap out of ours. Akron's bad timing/coaching hire is costing them people, and Miami is just lame so no one goes to their games anyway despite the modicum of tradition they offer over the other MAC schools. Take Marshall before they expanded. They held about 30k in that place. Not much bigger than Peden's overflow 24 capacity. there is NO comparison between our facilities. Granted, they are handicapped because theirs is full of Marshall fans, but still, what a great stadium - that's what I envision for Ohio. Theirs looks like a smallish college stadium, where ours looks like an oversized highschool stadium. Peden Stadium never has been a selling point for our program.


Excellent commentary. The price on the field lowering was 2.1 million. I believe the Carin weight center was another 2 million. I'll give about 1 million a piece for the Lights, Turf, Meeting Rooms. The scoreboard was paid for by the Pepsi Contract. I think 8 million dumped into the stadium would be a safe estimate since 1996 but that is nothing over that many years in the grand scheme of budgets. Miami doesn't have a very impressive stadium and the cradle statues are retarded. Imagine if Ohio put out statues out front for Jim Grobe and Tim Kish? Stupid. The only statue we need is that bronze bobcat outside the stadium gates.  Peden has some strengths. The feel inside the stadium is very open and bowl like with everything stretched out. It would make a lot of sense if they knocked out the back wall of the student section and moved about 30 feet directly back with a courtyard with more concessions and restrooms. Have the courtyard enclosed with a roof extending from the student stands. Have a much larger student gate so it doesn't take 30 minutes for the students to file into the stadium. Allow the Burrito Buggy and other vendors to be part of the courtyard. That would help encourage student attendance if they could get some decent food down at the stadium. Then also at the courtyard the could mill about while waiting for friends. Students are leaving early because there is nothing there to do at the stadium. The growth in attendance at Peden Stadium since the early 90's has correlated with the gradual growth of the student body. The stadium needs to cater more to the students and even give the entire away side to the students and not 75% as is the case now. On another renovation topic the south endzone are behind the mound looks unfinished with a cheap looking fence behind the scoreboard. What I think they should do is put in another section of seats between the student section and the mound to fill things out a little more and brick around the mound. Knock the capacity up to 27,000 in the stadium. It shouldn't cost that much to put into the stadium another small section. The school is getting 24,000 in the house to watch FCS competition as it is and with enrollment edging up its time for a few more seats. I think 27,000 is a good number for this program and ensures the house isn't too empty looking in bad weather.
Athens
General User
A
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Post Count: 5,454
person
mail
Athens
mail
Posted: 10/12/2011 10:04 PM
Bobcat Love wrote:expand_more
For those "cats interested, "]["emple's invitation for all sports is imminent

http://philly.sbnation.com/temple-owls/2011/7/1/2253768/temple-football-joining-the-big-east-in-2012


Congratulations. I for one am jealous. However, remember that your fan base and your programs have nothing to do with this move. Temple is moving up solely b/c of its location, location, and its location. Specifically, the geographic area and size of its location. Has nothing to do with the aesthetics (or lack thereof) of the location. 


Location is big. Why are some of these non-BCS programs pretty good year after year? Think about out West, why have Utah and Boise had more success than Wyoming and Idaho over the last couple of decades? That is because Utah and Boise play in significant markets. It helps having a big community to support a program with donations and its also easier to  recruit. Frank has mentioned that many players in the state have no interest in playing in a small town. It doesn't matter if its a great university or not its a turnoff in recruiting. Fiami has an edge in this regard located in the backyard of highly talented SW Ohio. SE Ohio is almost devoid of HS talent. To make matters worse there are 6 other MAC programs recruiting against us in this state. We like to bring up Virginia Tech or Clemson as examples where small market teams can thrive but those schools didn't have Ohio State 60 minutes up the road when building their programs. Virginia Tech only gets the players because there is nowhere else for them to go instate. The ceiling for the football program is not high enough to demand entrance into a BCS conference. We should be happy in the MAC because it gives Ohio a regional conference at the FBS level. Its a conference Ohio can stay in the upper tier in with a good coach like Hess, Grobe, or Solich. The school is in the situation where you can install a nice offense like the option (Grobe) or pistol (Solich) and build some depth around it. Ohio is nothing more than an average MAC team trying to play with a conventional offense. With the easy schedules played it gives the Bobcats a chance to win 8 or 10 a year with the possibility of a few more wins in a big season. The cats would really struggle in the Big East trying to recruit against all those big city programs. Sure there would be a few more players interested in playing in Athens but at best we'd be like UConn only capable of winning the conference in a down season. That's a good example because Storrs is even smaller than Athens. We may as well just play in the MAC rather than move up into a BCS conference.
Doc Bobcat
General User
DB
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 4,421
person
mail
Doc Bobcat
mail
Posted: 10/12/2011 10:16 PM
Uncle Wes wrote:expand_more
2nd I didn't say tear down the stadium because of the scoreboard. I said start over with both of them. Two separate things. Peden is a "nice" place to watch a game, but it's not great by any stretch. Everything from how it looks with those godawful endzone sections to the tiny stands, to the walkways in front of the seats, to the high-school grade scoreboard, victory hill which isn't really a hill - rather a mound. Everything we've done in the last several years is a proverbial silk hat on a pig. I think the level of upgrades in the last 15 years amounts to about $5-6 million. Whatever actions have been taken inside the tower, sure we can keep that if at all possible. If we put in 20 million just into the stadium, then we got robbed. I think the major upgrade with the lowering of the field came to around 2.5 mil. Lights, plus field turf + restroom upgrades on the blue-hair side. That's hardly 20 million. Then let's talk the strength center. It's obviously a nice facility in and of itself, but it looks like an awkward appendage from inside the stadium, and the damn wall blocks half a section of people from seeing the main scoreboard. Whose idea was that?

Never said anything about the Convo - please don't put words in my mouth (another of your favorite tricks). While it has its quirks and it is, in fact, lacking in the scoreboard department, what a GREAT facility! The Convo is actually a perfect example of MY point. By itself it helps our program and we draw more fans just because it's a great arena. No one goes to Peden just because of Peden. Miami, Marshall, Toledo, WMU, and now Akron... all have stadiums that kick the crap out of ours. Akron's bad timing/coaching hire is costing them people, and Miami is just lame so no one goes to their games anyway despite the modicum of tradition they offer over the other MAC schools. Take Marshall before they expanded. They held about 30k in that place. Not much bigger than Peden's overflow 24 capacity. there is NO comparison between our facilities. Granted, they are handicapped because theirs is full of Marshall fans, but still, what a great stadium - that's what I envision for Ohio. Theirs looks like a smallish college stadium, where ours looks like an oversized highschool stadium. Peden Stadium never has been a selling point for our program.


Excellent commentary. The price on the field lowering was 2.1 million. I believe the Carin weight center was another 2 million. I'll give about 1 million a piece for the Lights, Turf, Meeting Rooms. The scoreboard was paid for by the Pepsi Contract. I think 8 million dumped into the stadium would be a safe estimate since 1996 but that is nothing over that many years in the grand scheme of budgets. Miami doesn't have a very impressive stadium and the cradle statues are retarded. Imagine if Ohio put out statues out front for Jim Grobe and Tim Kish? Stupid. The only statue we need is that bronze bobcat outside the stadium gates.  Peden has some strengths. The feel inside the stadium is very open and bowl like with everything stretched out. It would make a lot of sense if they knocked out the back wall of the student section and moved about 30 feet directly back with a courtyard with more concessions and restrooms. Have the courtyard enclosed with a roof extending from the student stands. Have a much larger student gate so it doesn't take 30 minutes for the students to file into the stadium. Allow the Burrito Buggy and other vendors to be part of the courtyard. That would help encourage student attendance if they could get some decent food down at the stadium. Then also at the courtyard the could mill about while waiting for friends. Students are leaving early because there is nothing there to do at the stadium. The growth in attendance at Peden Stadium since the early 90's has correlated with the gradual growth of the student body. The stadium needs to cater more to the students and even give the entire away side to the students and not 75% as is the case now. On another renovation topic the south endzone are behind the mound looks unfinished with a cheap looking fence behind the scoreboard. What I think they should do is put in another section of seats between the student section and the mound to fill things out a little more and brick around the mound. Knock the capacity up to 27,000 in the stadium. It shouldn't cost that much to put into the stadium another small section. The school is getting 24,000 in the house to watch FCS competition as it is and with enrollment edging up its time for a few more seats. I think 27,000 is a good number for this program and ensures the house isn't too empty looking in bad weather.


Another excellent commentary as well.

The courtyard idea is excellent.  It would be nice to get closer to a 30,000 stadium....Victory Hill could be used...sacred however to some of you.....sacred to me cause those were the bleachers I always sat in as a student.


Athens
General User
A
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Post Count: 5,454
person
mail
Athens
mail
Posted: 10/12/2011 10:38 PM
Ryan Carey wrote:expand_more
[QUOTE=Bobcat Love]
RU is going to be considered one of the BE powerhouses now.  I think Ohio would be .500 against them over the course of 10 games.  That's why I really don't think it matters what league Ohio really plays in.  Put us in the MAC, CUSA, water down BE, all really the same in my mind.


Good points because take a look at Boise State. They've been in top 10 for 3-4 consecutive years as a WAC now MWC school. They played in MAC level conferences and have had more sustained success at the top than West Virginia ever had, the very best program left in the Big East. The Bobcats have the opportunities out of the MAC they just haven't stepped up enough in the post season and against the BCS. Rutgers, Penn State are games the program has to be able to win if it wants to be taken seriously. We had Tennessee on the ropes two years ago but let them off the hook with stupid penalties. Boise State has gone out an won games like that every time for a 4-5 year period. Of course winning that Fiesta Bowl back in 2006 forever changed recruiting at that school.
Ohio0710
General User
O0710
Member Since: 7/8/2010
Post Count: 13
person
mail
Ohio0710
mail
Posted: 10/13/2011 9:21 AM
It's my opinion that Temple is leaving for a slightly larger, perhaps more raging, commercial sized dumpster fire.
JSF
General User
Member Since: 1/29/2005
Location: Houston, TX
Post Count: 6,580
mail
JSF
mail
Posted: 10/13/2011 3:08 PM
As has been pointed out, real turf is simply not an option for the site Peden currently occupies. And the trend has been moving toward artificial turf for a variety of reasons.
Jeff McKinney
Moderator
JM
Member Since: 11/12/2004
Post Count: 6,163
person
mail
Jeff McKinney
mail
Posted: 10/13/2011 5:51 PM
Uncle Wes wrote:expand_more
[QUOTE=Bobcat Love]
RU is going to be considered one of the BE powerhouses now.  I think Ohio would be .500 against them over the course of 10 games.  That's why I really don't think it matters what league Ohio really plays in.  Put us in the MAC, CUSA, water down BE, all really the same in my mind.


Good points because take a look at Boise State. They've been in top 10 for 3-4 consecutive years as a WAC now MWC school. They played in MAC level conferences and have had more sustained success at the top than West Virginia ever had, the very best program left in the Big East. The Bobcats have the opportunities out of the MAC they just haven't stepped up enough in the post season and against the BCS. Rutgers, Penn State are games the program has to be able to win if it wants to be taken seriously. We had Tennessee on the ropes two years ago but let them off the hook with stupid penalties. Boise State has gone out an won games like that every time for a 4-5 year period. Of course winning that Fiesta Bowl back in 2006 forever changed recruiting at that school.


I don't think Ohio can become the "next Boise."  For one thing, the Boise metro area is larger than you think.  It is also affluent and has a significant corporate presence.  Also, Boise State has established a recruiting pipeline into the most populous state in the nation, California, which by western standards isn't very far away. 
anorris
General User
Member Since: 7/7/2010
Location: Bristol, CT
Post Count: 2,262
mail
anorris
mail
Posted: 10/13/2011 5:56 PM
JSF wrote:expand_more
As has been pointed out, real turf is simply not an option for the site Peden currently occupies. And the trend has been moving toward artificial turf for a variety of reasons.
Was curious, because my experience has led me to believe that turf was becoming pretty standard, so I looked at the FBS stadiums (on Wikipedia, so perhaps not 100% reliable, but close enough for my purposes).  Turf is more common than grass, with FieldTurf being the overwhelming favorite among brands of artificial playing surfaces.  I also noticed a distinct regional trend, with grass being far more common in the south and west than in the northern parts of the country.  Hardly surprising, but it was interesting how evident that was.  It also seemed that grass was far more common in BCS conference stadiums than in smaller conferences.  I would have to guess that FieldTurf, particularly in the north, is cheaper to maintain, as well.

FieldTurf: 55
Grass: 45
Other Turf: 21
Last Edited: 10/13/2011 5:57:13 PM by anorris
rpbobcat
General User
R
Member Since: 4/28/2006
Location: Rochelle Park, NJ
Post Count: 3,664
person
mail
rpbobcat
mail
Posted: 10/13/2011 6:55 PM
anorris wrote:expand_more
As has been pointed out, real turf is simply not an option for the site Peden currently occupies. And the trend has been moving toward artificial turf for a variety of reasons.
Was curious, because my experience has led me to believe that turf was becoming pretty standard, so I looked at the FBS stadiums (on Wikipedia, so perhaps not 100% reliable, but close enough for my purposes).  Turf is more common than grass, with FieldTurf being the overwhelming favorite among brands of artificial playing surfaces.  I also noticed a distinct regional trend, with grass being far more common in the south and west than in the northern parts of the country.  Hardly surprising, but it was interesting how evident that was.  It also seemed that grass was far more common in BCS conference stadiums than in smaller conferences.  I would have to guess that FieldTurf, particularly in the north, is cheaper to maintain, as well.

FieldTurf: 55
Grass: 45
Other Turf: 21

I have designed a number of synthetic turf fields,primarily Field Turf.

From a cost effective stand point, today's synthetic turf has a number of advantages over natural turf.
Synthetic Turf  has a high installation cost,but other then "grooming" every few weeks,its virtually maintaince free.

Synthetic Turf can also be played on during/after rain or in subfreezing temperatures with out any damage.

You can also "customize" the turf based on the sport and the strenth of your teams.

Only real "downside",even today's synthetic best turf  systems hold heat.In fact,in some areas the synthetic turf fields have irrigation system to cool them off.
Athens
General User
A
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Post Count: 5,454
person
mail
Athens
mail
Posted: 10/13/2011 7:05 PM
Jeff McKinney wrote:expand_more
[QUOTE=Bobcat Love]
RU is going to be considered one of the BE powerhouses now.  I think Ohio would be .500 against them over the course of 10 games.  That's why I really don't think it matters what league Ohio really plays in.  Put us in the MAC, CUSA, water down BE, all really the same in my mind.


Good points because take a look at Boise State. They've been in top 10 for 3-4 consecutive years as a WAC now MWC school. They played in MAC level conferences and have had more sustained success at the top than West Virginia ever had, the very best program left in the Big East. The Bobcats have the opportunities out of the MAC they just haven't stepped up enough in the post season and against the BCS. Rutgers, Penn State are games the program has to be able to win if it wants to be taken seriously. We had Tennessee on the ropes two years ago but let them off the hook with stupid penalties. Boise State has gone out an won games like that every time for a 4-5 year period. Of course winning that Fiesta Bowl back in 2006 forever changed recruiting at that school.


I don't think Ohio can become the "next Boise."  For one thing, the Boise metro area is larger than you think.  It is also affluent and has a significant corporate presence.  Also, Boise State has established a recruiting pipeline into the most populous state in the nation, California, which by western standards isn't very far away. 


Going back to an earlier post in the thread I said having the metro market was a major advantage. Boise State won all the recruiting battles in the WAC because they played in a metro area and Idaho is an underrated football state.  That is the general trend with all the successful schools in the non-BCS is a metro area or some other significant recruiting advantage. This kind of ties Ohio's hands to picking up the occassional Noah Keller or Lavon Brazil breakthrough player. Boise has been able to stock a roster with 3 and 4 star recruits and get them to execute in a high octane system. I do like where Boise is going with scheduling, play one top 20 BCS program on the road to earn poll credibility. Ohio is capable of running the table and making a BCS bowl, I just don't think due to recruiting they could become a defacto BCS program like Boise State, killing everyone in the MAC by 40-50 points. I think some of our fans expect the 40 to 50 point victories regardless of where the program statcks up nationally just because it is the MAC and that is ludicrous.
anorris
General User
Member Since: 7/7/2010
Location: Bristol, CT
Post Count: 2,262
mail
anorris
mail
Posted: 10/13/2011 9:29 PM
rpbobcat wrote:expand_more
I have designed a number of synthetic turf fields,primarily Field Turf.

From a cost effective stand point, today's synthetic turf has a number of advantages over natural turf.
Synthetic Turf  has a high installation cost,but other then "grooming" every few weeks,its virtually maintaince free.

Synthetic Turf can also be played on during/after rain or in subfreezing temperatures with out any damage.

You can also "customize" the turf based on the sport and the strenth of your teams.

Only real "downside",even today's synthetic best turf  systems hold heat.In fact,in some areas the synthetic turf fields have irrigation system to cool them off.
Makes sense, and pretty much what I'd guessed, in that the higher upfront costs are likely offset by both labor and product costs of watering, fertilizing, cutting, painting, etc. long term.  Great to have your confirmation of my suspicions, thanks for chiming in!
JSF
General User
Member Since: 1/29/2005
Location: Houston, TX
Post Count: 6,580
mail
JSF
mail
Posted: 10/13/2011 10:31 PM
It would not surprise me to see professional teams move in the FieldTurf direction in the near future.
RSBobcat
General User
Member Since: 8/23/2010
Location: Columbus, OH
Post Count: 4,505
mail
RSBobcat
mail
Posted: 10/13/2011 11:57 PM
Turf? Metro area? Heated spa's, toilet seats?

How about just "winning"?
OhioCatFan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 15,714
mail
OhioCatFan
mail
Posted: 10/14/2011 12:10 AM
anorris
General User
Member Since: 7/7/2010
Location: Bristol, CT
Post Count: 2,262
mail
anorris
mail
Posted: 10/14/2011 1:19 AM
JSF wrote:expand_more
It would not surprise me to see professional teams move in the FieldTurf direction in the near future.
I was actually surprised to find that of 31 NFL stadiums, only 18 at present have grass playing surfaces.
davepi2
General User
D2
Member Since: 7/9/2010
Location: columbus, OH
Post Count: 583
person
mail
davepi2
mail
Posted: 10/14/2011 10:22 AM
I was just in Philly this summer and I think it is a great city. Only one section I saw(where Temple is at) was bad. We were on the north side of town near valley forge and it was great. Downtown is alive and great to see also. I believe anyone who doesn't think philly is a great city has never been there. Columbus is a great town but we have our bad spots also. Wouldn't move from here though.
davepi2
General User
D2
Member Since: 7/9/2010
Location: columbus, OH
Post Count: 583
person
mail
davepi2
mail
Posted: 10/14/2011 10:36 AM
As a fan who didn't attend ohio the topic of private donors is one I would like to address. When the bobcat club gives you a parking pass and then you arrive at the game more then an hour early to find their are no spots for you in your assigned lot it makes it tough to continue supporting the program. This has happened to me twice now. Both times I have had to park a long way away and walk. Shuttles were advertised but never appeared. The last time I was told I had one of the last 6 spots left in the lot I parked in. If I had been ten minutes later I would have had too have parked who knows how far away. Giving away promised spots is not acceptable. Want to get more donations, then fulfill your promises.
Deciduous Forest Cat
General User
DFC
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: OH
Post Count: 4,560
person
mail
Deciduous Forest Cat
mail
Posted: 10/14/2011 11:18 AM
davepi2 wrote:expand_more
As a fan who didn't attend ohio the topic of private donors is one I would like to address. When the bobcat club gives you a parking pass and then you arrive at the game more then an hour early to find their are no spots for you in your assigned lot it makes it tough to continue supporting the program. This has happened to me twice now. Both times I have had to park a long way away and walk. Shuttles were advertised but never appeared. The last time I was told I had one of the last 6 spots left in the lot I parked in. If I had been ten minutes later I would have had too have parked who knows how far away. Giving away promised spots is not acceptable. Want to get more donations, then fulfill your promises.


The parking pass is not a guarantee of availability - it's only a guarantee that you get in for free if spots are available.
Showing Messages: 51 - 75 of 82



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)