menu
Logo
Ohio Football Topic
Topic: Home-and-homes with Kansas and Cincinnati
Page: 1 of 2
Tyler
General User
Member Since: 7/7/2010
Location: AZ
Post Count: 894
mail
Tyler
mail
Posted: 4/19/2012 9:43 AM
http://www.ohiobobcats.com/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/04191...

2016: @Kansas (Sept. 10)
2017: Kansas (Sept. 16)
2018: @Cincinnati (Sept. 22)
2020: Cincinnati (Sept. 12)

Who knows what state these programs will be in by then, but getting BCS teams into Peden is always a plus for me.
Last Edited: 4/19/2012 9:47:02 AM by Tyler
OUbobcat9092
General User
OU9092
Member Since: 12/28/2004
Location: Fairfax, VA
Post Count: 1,279
person
mail
OUbobcat9092
mail
Posted: 4/19/2012 9:47 AM
Great getting a home and home with two BCS Schools!
Ozcat
General User
Member Since: 1/4/2005
Location: Gahanna, OH
Post Count: 820
mail
Ozcat
mail
Posted: 4/19/2012 9:55 AM

Nice!  Some football scheduling news to actually be excited about.  I like it!

shabamon
General User
Member Since: 11/17/2006
Location: Cincinnati
Post Count: 7,318
mail
shabamon
mail
Posted: 4/19/2012 10:13 AM
Now let's follow through with them, unlike how we did with Northwestern and VA Tech. Miami has recently been burned by Boise State and Missouri trying to schedule home and homes.
bigtillyoopsupsideurhead
General User
Member Since: 12/1/2006
Location: Cincinnati
Post Count: 1,926
mail
bigtillyoopsupsideurhead
mail
Posted: 4/19/2012 10:19 AM
Yes, Ohio playing in my back yard. And I only have to wait 8 years for it. When do tickets go on sale?
mf279801
General User
M279801
Member Since: 8/6/2010
Location: Newark, DE
Post Count: 2,486
person
mail
mf279801
mail
Posted: 4/19/2012 10:36 AM

Very excited about this news (although that excitment will ebb and flow in the 4 years before the first of these games are played). Now lets just keep the team as good as or better than we are now.

Jeff Johnson
General User
JJ
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Post Count: 186
person
mail
Jeff Johnson
mail
Posted: 4/19/2012 11:16 AM
I noticed that the article incorrectly says that Ohio lost to Kansas in the 1967 game...actually the score was 30-15 in favor of Ohio (a win and a big upset at the time).
Last Edited: 4/19/2012 11:17:44 AM by Jeff Johnson
93Bobcat
General User
B93
Member Since: 9/1/2006
Location: Newark, OH
Post Count: 20
person
mail
93Bobcat
mail
Posted: 4/19/2012 11:22 AM
Youngstown Bobcat wrote:expand_more
http://www.ohiobobcats.com/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/04191...

2016: @Kansas (Sept. 10)
2017: Kansas (Sept. 16)
2018: @Cincinnati (Sept. 22)
2020: Cincinnati (Sept. 12)

Who knows what state these programs will be in by then, but getting BCS teams into Peden is always a plus for me.


Who knows what state our program will be in.  At Frank's age, I doubt he will be around to coach in some of these games.
anorris
General User
Member Since: 7/7/2010
Location: Bristol, CT
Post Count: 2,262
mail
anorris
mail
Posted: 4/19/2012 12:47 PM
shabamon wrote:expand_more
Now let's follow through with them, unlike how we did with Northwestern and VA Tech. Miami has recently been burned by Boise State and Missouri trying to schedule home and homes.
This.
OhioCatFan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 15,709
mail
OhioCatFan
mail
Posted: 4/19/2012 12:55 PM
Jeff Johnson wrote:expand_more
I noticed that the article incorrectly says that Ohio lost to Kansas in the 1967 game...actually the score was 30-15 in favor of Ohio (a win and a big upset at the time).


You are absolutely right, Jeff, OHIO won that game.   Mr. Snyder and Mr. Bryant had themselves a stellar afternoon.  It's shame the the AD's minions can't get it right.  I looked for somewhere on the site to send a correction to the webmaster, or other appropriate person, but could find none.  I think I'll just email Schaus directly.


KyleWvr13
General User
Member Since: 11/10/2010
Location: Pottstown, PA
Post Count: 503
mail
KyleWvr13
mail
Posted: 4/19/2012 1:28 PM
The scheduling gods have answered our prayers!
shabamon
General User
Member Since: 11/17/2006
Location: Cincinnati
Post Count: 7,318
mail
shabamon
mail
Posted: 4/19/2012 1:32 PM
UC's scout board seems approving of the deal, too. There are some posters who would prefer it to be a 2-1, but still wanted to play us for a long time. Interesting because a lot of their fans would like to abandon the Miami series.
Scott Woods
General User
SW
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: On the banks of the Ohio, OH
Post Count: 243
person
mail
Scott Woods
mail
Posted: 4/19/2012 1:38 PM
OhioCatFan wrote:expand_more
I noticed that the article incorrectly says that Ohio lost to Kansas in the 1967 game...actually the score was 30-15 in favor of Ohio (a win and a big upset at the time).


You are absolutely right, Jeff, OHIO won that game.   Mr. Snyder and Mr. Bryant had themselves a stellar afternoon.  It's shame the the AD's minions can't get it right.  I looked for somewhere on the site to send a correction to the webmaster, or other appropriate person, but could find none.  I think I'll just email Schaus directly.



grfx.cstv.com/photos/schools/ohio/sports/m-footbl/auto_pdf/2011-12/misc_non_event/Ohio_Football_History_and_Reco.pdf
Last Edited: 4/19/2012 1:40:07 PM by Scott Woods
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 4/19/2012 1:43 PM
The important thing is that these are 1-1, not the horrible 2-1 deals of the past. It has been fascinating to watch Ohio ever so slowly but steadily building a brand name, and now these deals are a confirmation of the progress that has been made. How much can be credited to the winning 5 of 6 on National TV last fall? How much to a dramatic bowl game win? How much to the coach's or AD's reputation? How much to the steady increases in attendance and fan support? How much to less directly applicable things, like the run to the Sweet 16, or the publicity related to the black uniforms? It's hard to know, but its good to see that Ohio has sufficient credibility to ask for, and get, 1-1 deals with the likes of Cincy and Kansas instead of NMSU and the Ragin Cajuns. Note also that when another team asks for a 2-1, Ohio can point to these deals and say "Why would we agree to that?".
Last Edited: 4/19/2012 1:44:39 PM by L.C.
The Optimist
General User
Member Since: 3/16/2007
Location: CLE
Post Count: 5,611
mail
The Optimist
mail
Posted: 4/19/2012 2:16 PM
I think we will point to 2012 as the year we made it.
Nash'Cat
General User
Member Since: 3/29/2012
Location: Nashville, TN
Post Count: 156
mail
Nash'Cat
mail
Posted: 4/19/2012 2:37 PM
The Optimist wrote:expand_more
I think we will point to 2012 as the year we made it.


+1
Turney13
General User
T13
Member Since: 7/28/2010
Post Count: 364
person
mail
Turney13
mail
Posted: 4/19/2012 3:43 PM
L.C. wrote:expand_more
The important thing is that these are 1-1, not the horrible 2-1 deals of the past. It has been fascinating to watch Ohio ever so slowly but steadily building a brand name, and now these deals are a confirmation of the progress that has been made. How much can be credited to the winning 5 of 6 on National TV last fall? How much to a dramatic bowl game win? How much to the coach's or AD's reputation? How much to the steady increases in attendance and fan support? How much to less directly applicable things, like the run to the Sweet 16, or the publicity related to the black uniforms? It's hard to know, but its good to see that Ohio has sufficient credibility to ask for, and get, 1-1 deals with the likes of Cincy and Kansas instead of NMSU and the Ragin Cajuns. Note also that when another team asks for a 2-1, Ohio can point to these deals and say "Why would we agree to that?".


i thought it was because of the 4 person walk out against Louisiana Lafayette game in 2010... silly me
Jeff Johnson
General User
JJ
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Post Count: 186
person
mail
Jeff Johnson
mail
Posted: 4/19/2012 5:10 PM
OhioCatFan wrote:expand_more
I noticed that the article incorrectly says that Ohio lost to Kansas in the 1967 game...actually the score was 30-15 in favor of Ohio (a win and a big upset at the time).


You are absolutely right, Jeff, OHIO won that game.   Mr. Snyder and Mr. Bryant had themselves a stellar afternoon.  It's shame the the AD's minions can't get it right.  I looked for somewhere on the site to send a correction to the webmaster, or other appropriate person, but could find none.  I think I'll just email Schaus directly.


Guess they got the word because the article has been corrected to reflect an Ohio win.
MonroeClassmate
General User
MC
Member Since: 8/31/2010
Post Count: 2,325
person
mail
MonroeClassmate
mail
Posted: 4/19/2012 8:19 PM
Notice both are away first then home.  Or perhaps away then Ohio is dropped.  But I doubt it since Cincinnati regularly travels to Oxford and it isn't basketball for Kansas.  

Very nice job to secure these games AD.
Athens
General User
A
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Post Count: 5,454
person
mail
Athens
mail
Posted: 4/19/2012 11:18 PM
While its great to get Kansas and Cincinnati at home we don't know yet if these 1 for 1's are to replace the Sun Belt and WAC games or if they're scheduled with the purpose of supplanting the annual BCS money game. It could be we're doing both; going away from the money game and focusing in on scheduling in mid level programs on a 1 for 1 basis.
Athens
General User
A
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Post Count: 5,454
person
mail
Athens
mail
Posted: 4/19/2012 11:23 PM
MonroeClassmate wrote:expand_more
Notice both are away first then home.  Or perhaps away then Ohio is dropped.  But I doubt it since Cincinnati regularly travels to Oxford and it isn't basketball for Kansas.  


But is it basketball for Kansas? To get these home games did the Bobcats offer to go on the road 1 and done at KU and CU in basketball? These games are a good start but i would like to see the remainder of the football schedule before I draw any conclusions from it.
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 4/20/2012 12:35 AM
Again, it did not hurt that Lavon caught that last moment ball at the goal line.

I do not know about Love, The but I think that I can confidently say that Mrs. Love, The is very excited about this news.
Bobcat Love
General User
BL
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Post Count: 1,193
person
mail
Bobcat Love
mail
Posted: 4/20/2012 9:59 AM
I am absolutely over the moon and feel like the fruits of my labor have been rewarded!

Great work by Frank and Jim on getting these games done!
bobcat695
General User
B695
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Parkersburg, WV
Post Count: 1,345
person
mail
bobcat695
mail
Posted: 4/20/2012 10:04 AM
First person I thought of when that particular school was scheduled.  The Kansas series has already been labeled the Love Bowl. 
Scott Woods
General User
SW
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: On the banks of the Ohio, OH
Post Count: 243
person
mail
Scott Woods
mail
Posted: 4/20/2012 1:18 PM
Uncle Wes wrote:expand_more
While its great to get Kansas and Cincinnati at home we don't know yet if these 1 for 1's are to replace the Sun Belt and WAC games or if they're scheduled with the purpose of supplanting the annual BCS money game. It could be we're doing both; going away from the money game and focusing in on scheduling in mid level programs on a 1 for 1 basis.


I'm certainly hopeful that the "money game" is still there every year.  If so, I'm pretty excited about it!

I'd like to see these type of BCS 1 for 1's, the BCS money game, Marshall, and a Sun Belt/WAC/Army/Navy/FCS game.
Showing Messages: 1 - 25 of 30



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)