menu
Logo
Ohio Football Topic
Topic: The Orlando Sentinel (OHIO #66) & USAT (OHIO #39) countdowns have begun
Page: 1 of 2
Pataskala
General User
P
Member Since: 7/8/2010
Location: At least six feet away from anybody else
Post Count: 9,465
person
mail
Pataskala
mail
Posted: 4/29/2013 10:54 PM
Must mean that football season is only four months away.  The Sentinel's full countdown is here; USAT's is here.   (8/19 Update: USAT has NIU at 21.)  So far, the MAC has:

UMass at 123 in the Sentinel (only Ga St and NMSU are worse) -- 124 USAT.
Akron at 121 in the Sentinel -- 120 USAT.
Eastern Michigan at 119 in the Sentinel -- 117 USAT.
Buffalo at 108 in the Sentinel (beat the likes of Colo, BC & Kansas) -- 74 USAT.
Western Michigan at 106 in the Sentinel -- 98 USAT.
Pubic Ivy at 94 in the Sentinel (ahead of UK, Syracuse and UConn) -- 103 USAT.
BGSUCKS is 85 in the Sentinel (ahead of Cal, TxTech, USF & Iowa St) -- 52 USAT.
CMU at 83 in the Sentinel -- 102 USAT.
OHIO AT 66 in the Sentinel (with a link to Bikini Basketball pix) -- 39 USAT (a nice shout-out to BA).
Kent at 64 in the Sentinel -- 85 USAT!
BSU at 62 in the Sentinel -- 46 USAT.
NIU at 59 in the Sentinel -- 21 USAT
Toledo at 49 in the Sentinel -- 44 USAT

And from our OOC schedule:

North Texas at 98 in the Sentinel -- 113 USAT.
Terd at 84 in the Sentinel -- 40 USAT.
L'ville at 13 in the Sentinel

And others of interest:

Grobe's Deacons are 93 in the Sentinel -- 72 USAT.
Temps at 91 in the Sentinel -- 88 USAT.
DeRuyter's Fresno St at 48 in the Sentinel -- 25 USAT
Cincy at 36 in the Sentinel -- 34 USAT
Last Edited: 8/19/2013 7:17:51 AM by Pataskala
MonroeClassmate
General User
MC
Member Since: 8/31/2010
Post Count: 2,325
person
mail
MonroeClassmate
mail
Posted: 5/15/2013 9:34 PM
Western Michigan:  what a ball buster schedule.  Spartans, Wildcats and Hawkeyes on the road first 3 of 4.  Than the MAC comes and you start with last season's east winner and end with the west winner and throw in Toledo and Ball State for good measure.
OhioCatFan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 15,699
mail
OhioCatFan
mail
Posted: 5/15/2013 10:45 PM
MonroeClassmate wrote:expand_more
Western Michigan:  what a ball buster schedule.  Spartans, Wildcats and Hawkeyes on the road first 3 of 4.  Than the MAC comes and you start with last season's east winner and end with the west winner and throw in Toledo and Ball State for good measure.


Now if they had to face OHIO, they'd have a real "murders row" schedule.  BTW, CMU beat Iowa twice in the last decade or so.  I remember the games, I'm not sure if they were in consecutive years or not.  And, last year the Hawks were 1-1 against the MAC beating NIU in game one by one and then losing a few games later to the Chips by 1. 
perimeterpost
General User
Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 3,165
mail
perimeterpost
mail
Posted: 5/15/2013 11:46 PM
NIU and Toledo start out tough too, both play 4 of first 5 on the road. Toledo has a home v FCS sandwiched between @Florida @Mizzou @CMU @Ball State. NIU not much better with home v FCS in the middle of @Iowa @Idaho @Purdue @Kent State.
ou1982
General User
O1982
Member Since: 3/5/2011
Post Count: 150
person
mail
ou1982
mail
Posted: 5/30/2013 6:28 PM
I haven't seen anyone guessing where OUr boys might end up in this countdown? Inside the top 60?? just wondered what the prognosticators out there are thinking?

a lot of questions around the 2013 version of the Cats.
Antonio Pierce
General User
AP
Member Since: 10/13/2012
Post Count: 243
person
mail
Antonio Pierce
mail
Posted: 5/31/2013 12:15 PM
I see more answers, not questions.  This year has as much potential as last.

colobobcat66
General User
C66
Member Since: 9/1/2006
Location: Watching the bobcats run outside my window., CO
Post Count: 4,744
person
mail
colobobcat66
mail
Posted: 5/31/2013 12:34 PM
Antonio Pierce wrote:expand_more
I see more answers, not questions. This year has as much potential as last.
going in - no way. Way too many questions about the defense this year, as well as kicking . And might as well mention all the injuries, surgeries, and recoveries from such that we saw in the spring. I have no idea how many of a large number of players that we will see at full strength going into the season.
Last Edited: 5/31/2013 4:13:57 PM by colobobcat66
Alan Swank
General User
AS
Member Since: 12/12/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 7,375
person
mail
Alan Swank
mail
Posted: 5/31/2013 6:23 PM
Antonio Pierce wrote:expand_more
I see more answers, not questions.  This year has as much potential as last.



Special teams would be question number 1.  Not one mention on any of the first four teams on Steele's site.
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 5/31/2013 6:41 PM
Offense -
RB - more experience
QB - more experience, no injury
TE - a step down from Thompson
OL - probably a small step down. tackles and LG are more experienced. C/RG will be new, but probably solid.

Defense
CB - much improved - Carrie/Bass/Fisher/Wells/Shaw is a ton of experience
S - about the same - Moore gone, but he was hurt most of the year. Hughes/Kirstoff/Carpenter/Ingoll all return
LB - step down - Lewis and Woseley will be missed. Replacements have talent, but not the experience.
DE - probably about the same - scott is gone, but was hurt most of the year, and Hastings is also gone. There will be a ton of guys fighting for PT, and that should mean more depth. That should offset the losses.
DT - big step down - losing Huynh and Jones is hugh. There will be some new names, and some guys return like Crutcher, but overall it has to be a weaker position.

K- step down
P - more experience

Overall I expect the team to be similar to last year, or a small step down, especially early in the year. As the new faces gain experience, the team will improve and not doubt will be better than last year's team was in the last half of the schedule.
Deciduous Forest Cat
General User
DFC
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: OH
Post Count: 4,559
person
mail
Deciduous Forest Cat
mail
Posted: 5/31/2013 8:32 PM
As we learned last year, who the punter and kicker are means squat if the snap and protection are garbage.  That has to improve, and ten-fold, just for our special teams to become average. We had an all-American quality kicker and special teams could hardly be considered better than a catastrophe last year.
PhiTau74
General User
PT74
Member Since: 8/6/2010
Location: Columbia, SC
Post Count: 458
person
mail
PhiTau74
mail
Posted: 5/31/2013 9:46 PM
As we also learned last year the kicking won't matter because we will go for it when we should kick and get sacked.
Bcat2
General User
B2
Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 4,295
person
mail
Bcat2
mail
Posted: 6/1/2013 10:10 AM
L.C. wrote:expand_more
Offense -
RB - more experience
QB - more experience, no injury
TE - a step down from Thompson
OL - probably a small step down. tackles and LG are more experienced. C/RG will be new, but probably solid.

Defense
CB - much improved - Carrie/Bass/Fisher/Wells/Shaw is a ton of experience
S - about the same - Moore gone, but he was hurt most of the year. Hughes/Kirstoff/Carpenter/Ingoll all return
LB - step down - Lewis and Woseley will be missed. Replacements have talent, but not the experience.
DE - probably about the same - scott is gone, but was hurt most of the year, and Hastings is also gone. There will be a ton of guys fighting for PT, and that should mean more depth. That should offset the losses.
DT - big step down - losing Huynh and Jones is hugh. There will be some new names, and some guys return like Crutcher, but overall it has to be a weaker position.

K- step down
P - more experience

Overall I expect the team to be similar to last year, or a small step down, especially early in the year. As the new faces gain experience, the team will improve and not doubt will be better than last year's team was in the last half of the schedule.


With the experience returning at QB, RB, WR, TE, OL, CB and S, I expect a very good start. The roster depth means the new starters will likely be at least third year and probably fourth or fifth year players.  Louisville will have to respect both the run and the pass. I pray every day for the health of all of the wounded.  I do expect good thing from the DL as there are so many third and fourth year athletes available who must be ready by now. JMHO
Valley Cat
General User
Member Since: 12/28/2004
Location: Jackson Twp., OH
Post Count: 1,246
mail
Valley Cat
mail
Posted: 6/1/2013 11:12 AM
If McGrath and Prior are healthy and lined up at tackle week one. The Cats can compete with anybody on the schedule. To me that is the key to this season coming together.
Bcat2
General User
B2
Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 4,295
person
mail
Bcat2
mail
Posted: 6/1/2013 5:53 PM
Valley Cat wrote:expand_more
If McGrath and Prior are healthy and lined up at tackle week one. The Cats can compete with anybody on the schedule. To me that is the key to this season coming together.


I have little concern playing the backups. Center is the only offensive position without significant snaps retuning and the new guy will not be wet behind the ears. My concern is at OLB as the position requires such athleticism, football smarts and instincts.
colobobcat66
General User
C66
Member Since: 9/1/2006
Location: Watching the bobcats run outside my window., CO
Post Count: 4,744
person
mail
colobobcat66
mail
Posted: 6/2/2013 7:59 AM
After looking over LC's list above, I must say that it is difficult to not be a little concerned about our defense and special teams. We must find a player or two from all the defensive ends to play defensive tackle or we are going to be very short on depth there. Same is true for OLB. We have no real depth at QB'S as far as game experience goes. And Daz Patterson's injury could hurt us at the RB and kick off returner positions. Do we have any TE that can catch the ball with any consistency ? So looking at his list we have one improved and a couple more experienced and 5 step downs of various degrees. The math indicates some room for concern.
Last Edited: 6/2/2013 8:02:41 AM by colobobcat66
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 6/2/2013 1:40 PM
L.C. wrote:expand_more
Offense -
RB - more experience
QB - more experience, no injury
TE - a step down from Thompson
OL - probably a small step down. tackles and LG are more experienced. C/RG will be new, but probably solid.

Defense
CB - much improved - Carrie/Bass/Fisher/Wells/Shaw is a ton of experience
S - about the same - Moore gone, but he was hurt most of the year. Hughes/Kirstoff/Carpenter/Ingoll all return
LB - step down - Lewis and Woseley will be missed. Replacements have talent, but not the experience.
DE - probably about the same - scott is gone, but was hurt most of the year, and Hastings is also gone. There will be a ton of guys fighting for PT, and that should mean more depth. That should offset the losses.
DT - big step down - losing Huynh and Jones is hugh. There will be some new names, and some guys return like Crutcher, but overall it has to be a weaker position.

K- step down
P - more experience

Overall I expect the team to be similar to last year, or a small step down, especially early in the year. As the new faces gain experience, the team will improve and not doubt will be better than last year's team was in the last half of the schedule.


This is probably true but I refuse to believe it.  Our d-line will surprise.  It's time for this to be OHIO's state, best team in the member of the union.
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 6/3/2013 4:27 PM
Come on you guys, I left off one rather important position, and no one noticed? I made no mention of WR. At WR, Futrell, Bussey, and Clark are gone, while Waters, Foster, and Cochran are the biggest name returnees, along with Landon Smith and Sebastian Smith. On paper WR loses a lot, but I think the Smiths are going to step up, and have great years. Contribution will also be needed from some of the Redshirt Freshmen, Reid and Rodriguez, or from one of the true Freshmen, Justin Wyatt, Cedric Brown, and Brendon Cope. Pulling a wild guess, I'll say Reid and Brown will round out the rotation.

In the end I think there is more talent at WR than last year, but less experience. Oh the whole it will be a step down early in the year, but probably a step up later in the year.
Last Edited: 6/4/2013 12:34:16 PM by L.C.
Rowdy Rufus
General User
Member Since: 1/11/2011
Post Count: 356
mail
Rowdy Rufus
mail
Posted: 6/4/2013 11:45 AM
L.C. wrote:expand_more
Come on you guys, I left off one rather important position, and no one noticed? I made no mention of WR. At WR, Futrell, Bussey, and Clark are gone, while Waters, Foster, and Cochran are the biggest name returnees, along with Landon Smith and Sebastian Smith. On paper WR loses a lot, but I think the Smiths are going to step up, and have great years. Contribution will also be needed from some of the Redshirt Freshmen, Reid and Rodriguez, or from one of the true Freshmen, Justin Wyatt, Cedric Brown, and Brendon Cope. Pulling a wild guess, I'll say Reid and Brown will round out the rotation.

In the end I think there is more talent at WR than last year, but lest experience. Oh the whole it will be a step down early in the year, but probably a step up later in the year.

I feel pretty good about this position.  I actually think there is more experience.  Clark was changed from DB to WR, Bussey was not used much his Jr year.   Unlike last year, I think we have some knowledge of their capabilities.  We return   2 of the top 3 in yardage.  The top 2 in TD's.  We definately have speed.    I also think we learned that we can now stretch the field (bowl game) with a healthy TT. 

Personally, I would love to be able to redshirt those true freshman  unless they can show they are absolutely head and shoulders above any of those returning.  Don't forget we also have Dovell coming back as well.  A projected starter last year.  Went out in Game one with broken leg allowing Cochran more time.  

I could see 2 groups in rotation
Waters, Foster, Dovell/ Smith (sebastian)   and Cochran, Smith (landen), (a Redshirt Freshman).  

L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 6/4/2013 12:33 PM
Good point regarding Dovell, who I left off. Factor him in, and you have at least as much experience, and probably more athleticism than last year. I'll call WR up, not down. That means offense should be improved at QB, RB, and WR, off a little on the line and TE.  On paper the offense will be comparable, but when you factor in all the injuries last year, the offense will be much improved, especially by late season games.

On defense the key will be how fast the experience develops. There is more total talent on the line than ever before, and far more depth, but most of it doesn't have experience yet. Players on the line like Basham, Laseak, Tautaiuki, and McLeod, plus linebackers Blair Brown, and Jake Schany, all of whom will probably play important roles this year, have yet to play a down for Ohio. I would expect that the defense will improve as the year goes on, and be a significant force by the key MAC games.
Last Edited: 6/4/2013 12:46:28 PM by L.C.
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 6/5/2013 12:04 AM
I am getting ...I am...fired up for some ball.

Really hope that injuries are not a significant factor this year.  If they are not, possibs are fun to contemplate.




MAC CHAMPIONSHIP
C Money
General User
Member Since: 8/28/2010
Post Count: 3,420
mail
C Money
mail
Posted: 6/6/2013 10:02 AM
L.C. wrote:expand_more
S - about the same - Moore gone, but he was hurt most of the year. Hughes/Kirstoff/Carpenter/Ingoll all return


I'm worried about safety, particularly pass coverage from our safeties. Corner, no worries. D-Line will surprise I think. Plenty of athletes to play LB effectively. But our safeties are much better run stoppers than pass stoppers. Moving Carpenter helps, but....I don't know that it's enough. I love his energy, his instincts, and effort. And I think our defense is better when he's on the field. But a 5-9 safety is going to have a really tough time making a play on a 6-3 WR on a deep over-the-shoulder catch. I get the sense we're going to get beat down the deep middle more frequently than I am willing to accept.

Somebody talk me off the cliff.
Robert Fox
General User
RF
Member Since: 11/17/2004
Location: Knoxville, TN
Post Count: 2,039
person
mail
Robert Fox
mail
Posted: 6/6/2013 11:11 AM
May have much to do with the success of our pass rush. Deep passes require a lot of protection. If we can force early/bad decisions, the pass coverage will be helped.
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 6/6/2013 12:16 PM
C Money wrote:expand_more
...
Somebody talk me off the cliff.

Let's compare to last year. Last year Moore and Hughes were supposed to be the starters. Hughes barely played, between an early suspension and then an injury. Moore did play, but was hampered by an injury most of the season. A significant portion of the snaps last year were taken by Kristoff and Ingoll. Both will return, and add back Hughes and Carpenter, I can't see that this will be worse than last year.  If they coaches are worried about it, there is so much depth at corner, they could move one of them to Safety as well, say Carrie or Bass.

Besides the upperclassmen, there are Sophomore, redshirt freshmen and true freshmen safeties that could play.  (Toran Davis, Aaron Macer, Corey Quallen, and possibly James Alexander). Additionally there are walkon Safeties like James Ray, Casey Schappacher, Devin Jones, Calvin Holloway, and Greg Burlovich. Ray and Jones both played some last year.
Last Edited: 6/6/2013 12:54:48 PM by L.C.
C Money
General User
Member Since: 8/28/2010
Post Count: 3,420
mail
C Money
mail
Posted: 6/6/2013 12:43 PM
L.C. wrote:expand_more
If they coaches are worried about it, there is so much depth at corner, they could move one of them to Safety as well, say Carrie or Bass.


I think I would feel better if we moved a corner to safety. Not Carrie (too good at corner) or Bass (too small for safety) though. Maybe Shaw or Wells.

Also, I think I would feel better if our offense decided to score more than 35 points every game. Yeah, we ought to just go ahead and decide to do that. Makes a lot of things simpler, really.
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 6/6/2013 12:47 PM
C Money wrote:expand_more
..Also, I think I would feel better if our offense decided to score more than 35 points every game. Yeah, we ought to just go ahead and decide to do that. Makes a lot of things simpler, really.

Sounds like a good plan to me.
Showing Messages: 1 - 25 of 50
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)