menu
Logo
Ohio Football Topic
Topic: Off Topic Jersey Numbers.
Page: 1 of 2
Hawaiian Bobcat
General User
HB
Member Since: 2/1/2005
Location: Wailuku, HI
Post Count: 334
person
mail
Hawaiian Bobcat
mail
Posted: 9/7/2013 8:42 PM
During half I have switched over to ND vs Michigan.  Notre Dame's nose tackle is wearing #1 and Michigan's quarterback is wearing #98.  I don't know what drives me more crazy, duplicate numbers or ridiculous non traditional numbers for a position.  I think I am still leaning towards duplicate numbers.  
Brufus
General User
B
Member Since: 12/13/2011
Location: Wherever Miami and Michigan suck
Post Count: 439
person
mail
Brufus
mail
Posted: 9/7/2013 8:46 PM
Devin Gardner, Michigan's QB is wearing #98 to honor Tom Harmon, UM's first Heisman winner. He will wear that number for the rest of the year. Several other players will be wearing certain numbers to honor former players like Desmond Howard (#21) and Gerald Ford (#84)

As for Nix, I think it's his choice. Definitely not the first DL to choose single digits, but still unique...
Beat Michigan
General User
Member Since: 8/15/2013
Location: Almost Heaven
Post Count: 245
mail
Beat Michigan
mail
Posted: 9/8/2013 1:11 AM
Is there a rule about duplicate numbers? Marshall has a D player that wears #1 and an O player that wears #1.
BillyTheCat
General User
BTC
Member Since: 10/6/2012
Post Count: 10,802
person
mail
BillyTheCat
mail
Posted: 9/8/2013 1:49 AM
Chris_PHS89 wrote:expand_more
Is there a rule about duplicate numbers? Marshall has a D player that wears #1 and an O player that wears #1.

Can have as many people in a jersey number as you like. However, only one number can be on the field participating at one time.
anorris
General User
Member Since: 7/7/2010
Location: Bristol, CT
Post Count: 2,262
mail
anorris
mail
Posted: 9/8/2013 12:23 PM
BillyTheCat wrote:expand_more
Is there a rule about duplicate numbers? Marshall has a D player that wears #1 and an O player that wears #1.



Can have as many people in a jersey number as you like. However, only one number can be on the field participating at one time.
And with as many players as are on the teams, you'd be hard pressed not to have any duplicates.
Beat Michigan
General User
Member Since: 8/15/2013
Location: Almost Heaven
Post Count: 245
mail
Beat Michigan
mail
Posted: 9/8/2013 12:26 PM
Thats what I thought..  Only one can be on the field at  a time. 
Hawaiian Bobcat
General User
HB
Member Since: 2/1/2005
Location: Wailuku, HI
Post Count: 334
person
mail
Hawaiian Bobcat
mail
Posted: 9/8/2013 9:57 PM
anorris wrote:expand_more
Is there a rule about duplicate numbers? Marshall has a D player that wears #1 and an O player that wears #1.



Can have as many people in a jersey number as you like. However, only one number can be on the field participating at one time.
And with as many players as are on the teams, you'd be hard pressed not to have any duplicates.





Really?  85 scholarships and 14 walk-ons gives you 99 players.  I think only 60 can dress for a game.  Duplicate numbers should not be an issue.
BillyTheCat
General User
BTC
Member Since: 10/6/2012
Post Count: 10,802
person
mail
BillyTheCat
mail
Posted: 9/8/2013 10:23 PM
hawaiian bobcat wrote:expand_more
Is there a rule about duplicate numbers? Marshall has a D player that wears #1 and an O player that wears #1.



Can have as many people in a jersey number as you like. However, only one number can be on the field participating at one time.
And with as many players as are on the teams, you'd be hard pressed not to have any duplicates.





Really? 85 scholarships and 14 walk-ons gives you 99 players. I think only 60 can dress for a game. Duplicate numbers should not be an issue.
You had better check your facts, in August you bring 105 players, and you only have 99 numbers, and I believe OHIO only has 98 numbers. Then when school begins your roster expands even more. As for dressing, you have travel limits for league games only and can dress as many as you want at home
Brian Smith (No, not that one)
General User
BSNNTO
Member Since: 2/4/2005
Post Count: 3,057
person
mail
Brian Smith (No, not that one)
mail
Posted: 9/8/2013 10:43 PM
Unorthodox numbers are one of my favorite things in football. I covered a high school game with opposing quarterbacks with numbers 20 and 31 this week. sublime. I  love linebackers with single digits. Michigan's tradition of a No. 1 receiver is great. Oh, and kickers in the 90s are the best.
Pataskala
General User
P
Member Since: 7/8/2010
Location: At least six feet away from anybody else
Post Count: 9,465
person
mail
Pataskala
mail
Posted: 9/9/2013 6:49 AM
The NFL requires that each position have a number within a certain range.  OLs have to be in the 50-80 range; RBs and QBs under 50; receivers in the 80s or under 50.  Helps to keep track of eligible receivers.  The NCAA doesn't care, tho.

As for duplicate numbers, we benefited from the rule last year when one of our opponents had two players with the same number on a kickoff return.  They were penalized for illegal substitution (I think) and it nullified a pretty good return.
BillyTheCat
General User
BTC
Member Since: 10/6/2012
Post Count: 10,802
person
mail
BillyTheCat
mail
Posted: 9/9/2013 10:12 AM
Pataskala wrote:expand_more
The NFL requires that each position have a number within a certain range.  OLs have to be in the 50-80 range; RBs and QBs under 50; receivers in the 80s or under 50.  Helps to keep track of eligible receivers.  The NCAA doesn't care, tho.

As for duplicate numbers, we benefited from the rule last year when one of our opponents had two players with the same number on a kickoff return.  They were penalized for illegal substitution (I think) and it nullified a pretty good return.
\

Actually the NCAA also has number restrictions via position, however they are not as restrictive as the NFL due to the roster sizes. 
geekzer55
General User
G55
Member Since: 10/21/2012
Location: Mount Laurel, NJ
Post Count: 40
person
mail
geekzer55
mail
Posted: 9/9/2013 11:05 AM
Pataskala wrote:expand_more
The NFL requires that each position have a number within a certain range.  OLs have to be in the 50-80 range...


Remember Jim Otto of crossword puzzle fame?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Otto
Long Train Runnin'
General User
LTR
Member Since: 12/26/2004
Location: Cambridge, OH
Post Count: 118
person
mail
Long Train Runnin'
mail
Posted: 9/17/2013 11:37 AM
BillyTheCat wrote:expand_more
Is there a rule about duplicate numbers? Marshall has a D player that wears #1 and an O player that wears #1.



Can have as many people in a jersey number as you like. However, only one number can be on the field participating at one time.
And with as many players as are on the teams, you'd be hard pressed not to have any duplicates.





Really? 85 scholarships and 14 walk-ons gives you 99 players. I think only 60 can dress for a game. Duplicate numbers should not be an issue.


You had better check your facts, in August you bring 105 players, and you only have 99 numbers, and I believe OHIO only has 98 numbers. Then when school begins your roster expands even more. As for dressing, you have travel limits for league games only and can dress as many as you want at home


Is there a reason why Ohio never issues #1? I heard a rumor years ago that Coach Grobe didn't like handing it out because it "promotes individuality at the expense of team", but I don't think I buy into that. And besides, even if that were the reason, we are now two coaching administrations removed from that period.
BillyTheCat
General User
BTC
Member Since: 10/6/2012
Post Count: 10,802
person
mail
BillyTheCat
mail
Posted: 9/17/2013 12:32 PM
#1 is Rufus' number
Long Train Runnin'
General User
LTR
Member Since: 12/26/2004
Location: Cambridge, OH
Post Count: 118
person
mail
Long Train Runnin'
mail
Posted: 9/17/2013 12:35 PM
BillyTheCat wrote:expand_more
#1 is Rufus' number


#0 (as in "O" for Ohio) should be Rufus' number.
BillyTheCat
General User
BTC
Member Since: 10/6/2012
Post Count: 10,802
person
mail
BillyTheCat
mail
Posted: 9/17/2013 1:04 PM
Long Train Runnin' wrote:expand_more
#1 is Rufus' number


#0 (as in "O" for Ohio) should be Rufus' number.


What it "should be" and what it actually is are two different things.
Long Train Runnin'
General User
LTR
Member Since: 12/26/2004
Location: Cambridge, OH
Post Count: 118
person
mail
Long Train Runnin'
mail
Posted: 9/17/2013 1:09 PM
BillyTheCat wrote:expand_more
#1 is Rufus' number


#0 (as in "O" for Ohio) should be Rufus' number.


What it "should be" and what it actually is are two different things.


Really? I was unaware of that. Thank you very much for your snarky response!

I'll keep my opinions to myself from now on.
Robert Fox
General User
RF
Member Since: 11/17/2004
Location: Knoxville, TN
Post Count: 2,039
person
mail
Robert Fox
mail
Posted: 9/17/2013 2:00 PM
No need. Someone apparently pisses in his wheaties on a daily basis.
Long Train Runnin'
General User
LTR
Member Since: 12/26/2004
Location: Cambridge, OH
Post Count: 118
person
mail
Long Train Runnin'
mail
Posted: 9/17/2013 2:37 PM
Robert Fox wrote:expand_more
No need. Someone apparently pisses in his wheaties on a daily basis.


Thanks. My point was that #0 is not a valid number for players, so it would be the perfect number to give to a mascot. (As though a mascot needs a number at all!) So there has to be another reason why #1 is not issued to players.
Robert Fox
General User
RF
Member Since: 11/17/2004
Location: Knoxville, TN
Post Count: 2,039
person
mail
Robert Fox
mail
Posted: 9/17/2013 6:00 PM
There probably is a reason. I would guess it's considered too self-centered. But that's just a guess.
BillyTheCat
General User
BTC
Member Since: 10/6/2012
Post Count: 10,802
person
mail
BillyTheCat
mail
Posted: 9/17/2013 9:17 PM
Some I wonder how many recruits we loose because we do not let them wear #1
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 9/17/2013 10:15 PM

Long Train Runnin' wrote:expand_more
Is there a reason why Ohio never issues #1? I heard a rumor years ago that Coach Grobe didn't like handing it out because it "promotes individuality at the expense of team", but I don't think I buy into that. And besides, even if that were the reason, we are now two coaching administrations removed from that period.

I would say that this is probably correct. It's an Ohio tradition, not a Solich one. They did use #1 at Nebraska, so obviously Solich picked up on the Ohio tradition, and adopted it.

Hawaiian Bobcat
General User
HB
Member Since: 2/1/2005
Location: Wailuku, HI
Post Count: 334
person
mail
Hawaiian Bobcat
mail
Posted: 9/18/2013 1:36 AM
Does Ohio dress 105 for all home games?  If so, walk-ons and redshirts can wear the 7 duplicate numbers, again duplicate numbers should not be an issue.  If Ohio loses a recruit over a jersey number, I really don't think I want that individual to be part of Ohio football.
BillyTheCat
General User
BTC
Member Since: 10/6/2012
Post Count: 10,802
person
mail
BillyTheCat
mail
Posted: 9/18/2013 10:23 AM
hawaiian bobcat wrote:expand_more
Does Ohio dress 105 for all home games?  If so, walk-ons and redshirts can wear the 7 duplicate numbers, again duplicate numbers should not be an issue.  If Ohio loses a recruit over a jersey number, I really don't think I want that individual to be part of Ohio football.


What if two scholarship kids "WANT" to wear number 7?  Do you tell a young man you recurited that they cannot have the number they wanted?  And I believe we have close to 115 players on the roster, and they seem to dress everyone eligible, even those who do not dress wear jersey's on the sideline.  Either way you are dealing with more than 7 duplicates, and with the history that Coach Solich has had with his walk-on program, giving walk-ons duplicate numbers is not as easy as it sounds, because a lot of walk-ons earn playing time in this program.
Hawaiian Bobcat
General User
HB
Member Since: 2/1/2005
Location: Wailuku, HI
Post Count: 334
person
mail
Hawaiian Bobcat
mail
Posted: 9/18/2013 12:24 PM
I thought you check the facts and said 105 now it is 115?  Strange.  Yes I do tell a recruit 7 is taken and he can wait for it.  The fact he is part of Ohio football is privilege enough.  If you want number 7 earn it through hard work.  The purpose of numbers is to distinguish players from one another.  Having a number 7 on both offense and defense can be confusing for an observer not close to the team.  
Showing Messages: 1 - 25 of 40
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)