Here is your exception, and note: "this excludes fouls that are not specifically reviewable".
Limitations on Reviewable Plays
ARTICLE 6. No other plays or officiating decisions are reviewable. However, the replay official may correct egregious errors, including those involving the game clock, whether or not a play is reviewable. This excludes fouls that are not specifically reviewable (Reviewable fouls: Rules 12-3-2-c and d, 12-3-4-b and 12-3-5-a).
You aren't reviewing the foul. No one disputes the foul (intentional grounding). The dispute is whether the foul results in a score. That isn't excluded and should be reviewable, because it is part of the play (not the foul), and is an egregious error.
I dispute the foul. Play started on the left side of the field and the penalty occurred on the right hash line, hence outside the tackle box. One of the receivers was within 15 yards of where the ball landed, but I'll give them the fact it was behind the line of scrimmage.
With that said, we were doing absolutely nothing on offense. It is time to play for the future since we wasted the MAC title opportunity away yet again.