Oh, c'mon. This is not about stats....
Monroe, I just set out to prove or disprove the "claims" made by Billy the Cat about how things were soooo much harder in the "good old days" under Grobe. He was trying to make the case that Grobe>>Solich even though his winning record was lower, because Grobe played a harder schedule. A little research showed that his "facts" were wrong. The MAC of the late 90s was not that different from the MAC of today, though the MAC was indeed harder during the Knorr years.
When you look at it, on it's face, Solich's record and Grobe's are quite similar if you adjust for the difficulty of the schedule:
Solich Grobe
MAC games 43-31 58.1% 27-20-1 57.3%
BCS teams 3-12 20.0% 2- 9 18.1%
Other I-A teams 11- 6 64.7% 1- 3 25.0%
I-AA teams 8- 0 100.0% 3- 1 75.0%
Total 65-49 57.0% 33-33-1 50.0%
Another of Billy's claims is that Grobe played a harder schedule. That seems to be true, given that he played 11 BCS teams in 6 years, while Solich has only played 15 in 9 years. Yet, does it really matter who you play, if you don't beat them? So, let's have a look, and see who those OOC wins came against:
Grobe's OOC wins against I-A teams:
1996 Hawaii 2- 9
1997 Maryland 2- 9
2000 Minnesota 6- 6
Solich's OOC wins against I-A teams:
2005 Pitt 5- 6
2006 Illinois 2-10
2007 La-Lafayette 3- 9
2009 North Texas 2-10
2010 La-Lafayette 3- 9
2011 New Mexico State 4- 9
2011 Marshall 7- 6
2011 Utah State 7- 6
2012 Penn State 8- 4
2012 New Mexico St 1-11
2012 Marshall 5- 7
2012 La-Monroe 8- 5
2013 North Texas 7- 3
2013 Marshall 7- 3
Amazingingly, Solich's first 5-6 years look almost identical to Grobe's 5 years. But....something amazing happens in the last three years. For the first time, Ohio starts beating OOC teams with winning records, and not just once - six times in three years. These same Seniors that everyone is complaining about giving up? They are the ones who played in those games. Very, interesting.