Ohio Football Topic
Topic: Official Game 2 Thread: Kentucky
Page: 2 of 6
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 9/2/2014 1:09 PM
I did see one alert Kentucky fan that noticed that while Ohio lost to Kent by 31 last year, they beat Kent by 3 this year, despite losing the turnover battle 4-0 this year, and wondered how that could be.  "Is Ohio really 34 points better than last year? Surely not. Or is Kent worse?" was about what he said.

Maybe its a little of both.  Kent is surely worse, without Archer and Nix, but Ohio playing as a team, and with Solich-like relentlessness makes a big difference.
The Optimist
General User
Member Since: 3/16/2007
Location: CLE
Post Count: 5,611
mail
The Optimist
mail
Posted: 9/2/2014 1:21 PM
L.C. wrote:expand_more
I did see one alert Kentucky fan that noticed that while Ohio lost to Kent by 31 last year, they beat Kent by 3 this year, despite losing the turnover battle 4-0 this year, and wondered how that could be.  "Is Ohio really 34 points better than last year? Surely not. Or is Kent worse?" was about what he said.

Maybe its a little of both.  Kent is surely worse, without Archer and Nix, but Ohio playing as a team, and with Solich-like relentlessness makes a big difference.

I think it is a lot of both.

It seemed pretty clear to me Kent lacked guys who could do anything with the ball in their hands. At the same time, Ohio actually had more of those guys on offense despite all of our graduations...

Beyond obviously hoping for a W, the thing I really am curious to see is how our defense looks against Kentucky. I think this could potentially be our best defense ever under Solich, but I want to see another great run D performance before I buy into the hype. Also, turnovers. Forced.

 
perimeterpost
General User
Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 3,165
mail
perimeterpost
mail
Posted: 9/2/2014 1:33 PM
I love all of the comments from UK fans about the "Cats" without an ounce of self awareness. I agree, the Cats will win!
Pataskala
General User
P
Member Since: 7/8/2010
Location: At least six feet away from anybody else
Post Count: 9,465
person
mail
Pataskala
mail
Posted: 9/2/2014 1:38 PM
The Optimist wrote:expand_more
I did see one alert Kentucky fan that noticed that while Ohio lost to Kent by 31 last year, they beat Kent by 3 this year, despite losing the turnover battle 4-0 this year, and wondered how that could be.  "Is Ohio really 34 points better than last year? Surely not. Or is Kent worse?" was about what he said.

Maybe its a little of both.  Kent is surely worse, without Archer and Nix, but Ohio playing as a team, and with Solich-like relentlessness makes a big difference.

I think it is a lot of both.

It seemed pretty clear to me Kent lacked guys who could do anything with the ball in their hands. At the same time, Ohio actually had more of those guys on offense despite all of our graduations...

Beyond obviously hoping for a W, the thing I really am curious to see is how our defense looks against Kentucky. I think this could potentially be our best defense ever under Solich, but I want to see another great run D performance before I buy into the hype. Also, turnovers. Forced.

 


Not having Durham also put them in a hole.

The whole team -- coaches included -- were up for Kent, mainly because of last year.  Hope they don't have a letdown this week.  Playing an SEC team should inspire them.
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 9/2/2014 7:14 PM
This comes from the benefit of hindsight, but I think that our performance against Louisville last year was very indicative of too much of our play last year:  We were there but we had no spark at all.  Nothing.

At the time, I thought 'Well, a loss is a loss so to get pounded by Louisville isn't particularly indicative..We just lost.'

Now, after seeing last season with it's preponderance of lackluster (to be generous) performance in our tough/key games (espec after stupd cow and 'kron), I think Louisville was who we were.

But it doesn't at all look like we're that kinda team this year.

GO OHIO!!!
C Money
General User
Member Since: 8/28/2010
Post Count: 3,420
mail
C Money
mail
Posted: 9/2/2014 9:01 PM
I wish it was Saturday now. That's partly b/c after a 6 day football binge I'm starting to have withdraw, but mostly because I'm ready to see what this team really has in it. Can we match up with "SEC talent"?

And more than that, what does the rest of the conference have in it? Has BG;s defense fallen that far? Are NIU and Toledo going to keep scoring that much? Do I need to start hating Akron in football too? GAH! It's like the end of a cliffhanger TV episode, and I want the plot points resolved NOW!
Brian Smith (No, not that one)
General User
BSNNTO
Member Since: 2/4/2005
Post Count: 3,057
person
mail
Brian Smith (No, not that one)
mail
Posted: 9/2/2014 9:08 PM
This could be the game where having a deep but not particularly athletic wide receiving corps could hurt. I like this year's group when it comes to taking on MAC defensive backs, but you need the group the Bobcats had when they went into Knoxville about five years ago to go up against faster, bigger DBs.

I sure hope Ohio can run the ball because I don't see these receivers being able to take the top off against an (albeit lower-tier) SEC program.

As far as confidence goes, it's an odd game. It's not like the Louisville game, where it was apparent within five minutes that Ohio was outclassed on the field and Frank Solich just wanted to get the arms and legs and head inside the turtle shell and get out of the Bluegrass State before Teddy Bridgewater stepped on us. But I'm not as confident as I was going into the Penn State game, where everything was ripe for the picking.

This one kind of feels like that Illinois game back early in the Solich era where it would certainly be an upset but it won't take a fluke to win it. Ohio can line up and play Kentucky and win three out of ten times, I believe. It's just a matter of taking care of the ball and getting a few bounces to go their way.
The Optimist
General User
Member Since: 3/16/2007
Location: CLE
Post Count: 5,611
mail
The Optimist
mail
Posted: 9/2/2014 9:36 PM
C Money wrote:expand_more
I wish it was Saturday now. That's partly b/c after a 6 day football binge I'm starting to have withdraw, but mostly because I'm ready to see what this team really has in it. Can we match up with "SEC talent"?

And more than that, what does the rest of the conference have in it? Has BG;s defense fallen that far? Are NIU and Toledo going to keep scoring that much? Do I need to start hating Akron in football too? GAH! It's like the end of a cliffhanger TV episode, and I want the plot points resolved NOW!
+1

I don't remember hating the middle of the week this much in years past. I probably did, I just don't have the self control/memory/intelligence to remember how much I always get excited about football.
MonroeClassmate
General User
MC
Member Since: 8/31/2010
Post Count: 2,325
person
mail
MonroeClassmate
mail
Posted: 9/2/2014 9:39 PM
After a stellar debut in Kent, it will be interesting to see the week to week development of OUr QB.  How will he perform when the OLine cannot give him the protection they provided on every single play of the 1st game?  Will hurried throws become less accurate; will a sack or two result in a composure change?  How will his decision making fair when plays get busted?


Moving your team up the field and managing the clock in the final drive was great.  Another performance at Kentucky like Kent and that will be evidence that OHIO has a real gem.  Thanks Mr. Vick, it was so very refreshing to watch you operate in the opener--keep it rolling!
The Situation
General User
Member Since: 7/13/2010
Location: Columbus, OH
Post Count: 957
mail
The Situation
mail
Posted: 9/2/2014 10:12 PM

The line for this game has moved to OHIO +12.5 (for the moment). The last time we played an SEC team was 2009. We lost to Tennessee by 11. The spread was +21. (Fun Fact: UT lost by 10 on the road to Tim Tebow's #1 ranked Florida Gators the previous week. Then UT lost to #1 Alabama by 2 points on the road later in the season. Regardless, the team finished 7-6.)

I know nothing about this Kentucky team. But I'm highly skeptical that the people who do know about this Kentucky team know anything about this OHIO team. Like the Tennessee game in 2009, there's a high probability of a spread mis-match*. I'm not advocating gambling, but if +12.5 holds, this will probably be the most favorable Bobcat line of the season.
 

*I attribute the mis-matches to be driven by the results of the previous season in which 2008 and 2013 Bobcat teams underachieved with respect to the actual talent on the roster, and these bad results were magnified by the "SEC" factor unassuming parties place on the match-up.

www.carbongaming.ag/sbk/sportsbook4/ncaa-football-ncaaf-game-lines-ncaaf-lines-sports.sbk

Last Edited: 9/2/2014 10:17:27 PM by The Situation
A-townBound
General User
Member Since: 3/31/2012
Location: Georgetown, KY
Post Count: 672
mail
A-townBound
mail
Posted: 9/3/2014 8:22 AM
With the current report saying thunder storms likely (60%), it could be a wet one on Saturday.
 
Last Edited: 9/3/2014 8:23:53 AM by A-townBound
Bobcatbob
General User
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Coolville, OH
Post Count: 1,351
mail
Bobcatbob
mail
Posted: 9/3/2014 8:29 AM
A-townBound wrote:expand_more
With the current report saying thunder storms likely (60%), it could be a wet one on Saturday.
 


Rain won't be a problem.  Now, lightning - that would be a problem.  These early season games always have that potential and I have yet to see that situation turn out well for anyone.
davepi2
General User
D2
Member Since: 7/9/2010
Location: columbus, OH
Post Count: 583
person
mail
davepi2
mail
Posted: 9/3/2014 10:51 AM
Bobcatbob wrote:expand_more
With the current report saying thunder storms likely (60%), it could be a wet one on Saturday.


Rain won't be a problem. Now, lightning - that would be a problem. These early season games always have that potential and I have yet to see that situation turn out well for anyone.

You don't remember Kent State 06? 25 mph winds, rain, sleet , snow, hail, and a 40 minute lightning delay. Most fun I ever had at a ballgame.
Pataskala
General User
P
Member Since: 7/8/2010
Location: At least six feet away from anybody else
Post Count: 9,465
person
mail
Pataskala
mail
Posted: 9/3/2014 1:31 PM
davepi2 wrote:expand_more
With the current report saying thunder storms likely (60%), it could be a wet one on Saturday.


Rain won't be a problem. Now, lightning - that would be a problem. These early season games always have that potential and I have yet to see that situation turn out well for anyone.

You don't remember Kent State 06? 25 mph winds, rain, sleet , snow, hail, and a 40 minute lightning delay. Most fun I ever had at a ballgame.


Sometimes lightning can actually help a team.  In 1991 we had CMU at home over Labor Day.  It was Lichtenberg's second season, so 'nuff said.  We had two or three lightning delays that benefited our team by giving them more breaks so they weren't getting worn down so much.  We had the lead, but CMU scored late and we wound up with a 17-all tie.
ZIPsCAT
General User
ZIPCAT
Member Since: 9/3/2014
Post Count: 36
person
mail
ZIPsCAT
mail
Posted: 9/3/2014 1:56 PM
Hello Bobcat faithful!  I've been reading the forum for sometime...can't get enough MACtion.  Always like the insight. Now I know I'm an Akron fan (don't beat up on me too much!) but I wanted to wish all Ohio fans luck this Saturday with Kentucky!  The MAC needs some good wins, and an SEC win would look nice on the resume.

Great-job knocking off Can't, knock off CAN'Tucky too while you're at it (please)!


 
Last Edited: 9/3/2014 1:56:56 PM by ZIPsCAT
JerseyArnie
General User
JA
Member Since: 12/6/2012
Post Count: 369
davepi2
General User
D2
Member Since: 7/9/2010
Location: columbus, OH
Post Count: 583
person
mail
davepi2
mail
Posted: 9/3/2014 2:30 PM
ZIPS_Balszy wrote:expand_more
Hello Bobcat faithful! I've been reading the forum for sometime...can't get enough MACtion. Always like the insight. Now I know I'm an Akron fan (don't beat up on me too much!) but I wanted to wish all Ohio fans luck this Saturday with Kentucky! The MAC needs some good wins, and an SEC win would look nice on the resume.


Great-job knocking off Can't, knock off CAN'Tucky too while you're at it (please)!
good luck to you over at Penn State also.
Last Edited: 9/3/2014 2:32:04 PM by davepi2
colobobcat66
General User
C66
Member Since: 9/1/2006
Location: Watching the bobcats run outside my window., CO
Post Count: 4,744
person
mail
colobobcat66
mail
Posted: 9/3/2014 2:35 PM


Two really bad errors in the facts, we have not won 5 straight bowl games and our win over them was not the first time we played them. Where do these writers come from?
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 9/3/2014 2:55 PM
Ohio is 4-2-2 all time against Kentucky.

Stoops quote in that article kind of rubs me the wrong way.
Stoops wrote:expand_more
We definitely can't take anybody for granted.

The implication in what he said is that Ohio is "anybody". Thus the logical way to complete the thought is "...not even Ohio".
A-townBound
General User
Member Since: 3/31/2012
Location: Georgetown, KY
Post Count: 672
mail
A-townBound
mail
Posted: 9/3/2014 3:05 PM
 
perimeterpost
General User
Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 3,165
mail
perimeterpost
mail
Posted: 9/3/2014 4:59 PM
A UK fan is doing some video analysis of our defense- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCCRUc_PFJ7gTMFyM-_ex0UA/...

LC, time to up your game!
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 9/3/2014 5:38 PM
perimeterpost wrote:expand_more
A UK fan is doing some video analysis of our defense- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCCRUc_PFJ7gTMFyM-_ex0UA/...

LC, time to up your game!

Interesting analysis. Thanks for the link. The front 7 looked pretty solid but he's right, there were some gaps in the secondary on the plays he highlights. Let's hope the defense makes more improvements this week.
Bobcats1991
General User
B1991
Member Since: 9/22/2011
Location: Lancaster, OH
Post Count: 59
person
mail
Bobcats1991
mail
Posted: 9/3/2014 5:46 PM
The ESPN message board for the game is laughable at best. So many UK fans really believe it is going to be a repeat of last week for them. Without their explosive RB, and now competing against a FBS foe, I hope OUr Cats come in and shock the world.., AGAIN!
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 9/3/2014 5:55 PM
A-townBound wrote:expand_more
 

Scott Mayle caught TD passes of 44 and 89 yards against Kentucky in 2004. He had 5 catches for 157 yards in the game, and also had 52 yards rushing on 5 carries, all on end-around plays.
Pataskala
General User
P
Member Since: 7/8/2010
Location: At least six feet away from anybody else
Post Count: 9,465
person
mail
Pataskala
mail
Posted: 9/3/2014 8:20 PM
ZIPS_Balszy wrote:expand_more
Hello Bobcat faithful!  I've been reading the forum for sometime...can't get enough MACtion.  Always like the insight. Now I know I'm an Akron fan (don't beat up on me too much!) but I wanted to wish all Ohio fans luck this Saturday with Kentucky!  The MAC needs some good wins, and an SEC win would look nice on the resume.

Great-job knocking off Can't, knock off CAN'Tucky too while you're at it (please)!


 


Another MAC win at Happy Valley would look great also.  I always pull for the MAC in OOC games.  You might have an edge given PSU's long flight back from Ireland last weekend.  Good luck.
Showing Messages: 26 - 50 of 126
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)