You know the students get these privileges. Why not act? With this inside information, you should immediately report.
Claiming we want to be you is another fallacy known as a red herring. I think it reflects more on your lack of proof of wrongdoing, rather than, your superior intelligence and academic superiority. Perhaps, we are defending our school against biased accusations based on illogical assumptions. If I wanted to attend Ohio, I would have.
Perhaps, but except for two fans, the sudden boom in the Marshall fanbase's interest in posting on this board didn't happen until after the game. Seems to me, then, that the majority of you derive some major sense of personal validation from a football team. You only get the courage to confront Ohio partisans to "defend your school" once your football team has defeated Ohio's team.
But dude, it's just football. If a winning football team is what you need to face the day and take a stand for what you feel is right, you need to re-examine your priorities in life.
Also, I think the logical fallacy you're looking for is argument from ignorance. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. And the fact remains, although you guys can throw out that 12-5 since whenever stat (which TOTALLY is the only timeframe that matters, because that's when Marshall was good and Ohio wasn't, so forget the prior 70 years or so), but there is a giant asterisk next to that 12.
Also also, logically prove to me that 44-14 > 44-7. I don't think you can. But that doesn't matter, does it? Because DA HERD IS BACK, BABY! WOOOOOOOO! ONE GAME WINNING STREAK VERSUS OHIO! THE WORLD IS NORMAL AGAIN!