The only parallel I see between Solich and Snyder is their age. Snyder has accomplished so much more.
Lol.
Situation, you might not like Monroe, but you're dead wrong on your almost apologetic view of the football program. I am tired of hearing people on this board lambast those of us that expect more than finishing 2nd in the MAC East.
I've seen my argument treated as if, somehow, I have nothing to gain by OU becoming the next TCU tomorrow.
It's as if I don't have the emotional investment in OU that others somehow have?
It's as if I didn't sit through that NIU game in person two weeks ago. It's as if I didn't drive down to Kentucky and Marshall this year only to come home empty handed.
I literally failed a structural theory midterm my Junior year because I drove to Philly with good friends to see Tuesday night MACtion against Temple.
I've got a big 1804 tattooed on my bicep.
I'm emotionally invested folks.
I don't want a MAC Championship next week. I wanted a MAC Championship five (5) years ago.
Have I not demonstrated a willingness to confront a person I believe to be a problem?
Would it really be more difficult to indirectly berate Frank Solich rather than directly berate Monroe Slavin?
What I want from this program cannot happen overnight, or really within a decade considering the initial state of the program. What I want can only be found at the end of a long hard road. My mind says Frank Solich puts OHIO in the best position to weather that long hard road. My heart gets no say in business decisions. I can be ruthless when it comes to evaluating matters of fact. Have I not made that clear???
Who can we hope to be like?
Boise State: They're not Cinderella. According to a stat L.C. posted recently, Boise had nearly a dozen consecutive seasons at or above 0.500 before making their claim to fame against Oklahoma in that now famous bowl game.
And TCU: Before TCU was in the Fiesta bowl in 2010 and the Rose Bowl in 2011, TCU played in ten (10) bowl games between 1998 and 2009. TCU won seven of those ten bowl games over that period. They beat USC. They beat Iowa State. They beat NIU and Boise in those bowl games. And after a decade of winning more bowl games than they lost, TCU finally broke through and won that Rose Bowl.
Monroe does what few on this board do. He opens up his checkbook and supports the university, as well as the athletic department, at a very high level. There is nothing wrong with having a high expectation of success. The truly successful people in this world are always looking for a way to get better. I grow weary of the constant justification of mediocrity, as well as the sales job put on us about how things will be "really good next year".
I grow weary of the justification of financial mediocrity. As I've stated earlier, I don't recall seeing plans for the to-be-constructed Monroe Slavin Running Backs Facility.
If Frank Solich is mediocrity, then Monroe Slavin's financial contributions to OHIO University don't even register on the graph.
The only tangible effect an alumni can have on this program is money $$$, more money than the long distance cost of ownership of a Bobcat Black seat.
For a number of reasons alumni cannot or choose not to make and/or invest the type of money required to make a tangible impact on the football program. That's fine by me. But that doesn't change what's required to succeed.
And why should anything but money separate football programs?
If I have a dream for OHIO football at age 24, and some other 24 year old has a dream for their university at age 24, why shouldn't the tie breaker come down to the guy with the money to get shit done? Should it really be some other way?
Like I said in another thread, reading complaints on a regular basis about the state of the program from 50+ year old alumni is like listening to a father complain to his kids about the size of their house. It's like dad, you had your chance to make hay while the sun shined. The small house is on you.
What is a university but the people?