Ohio Football Topic
Topic: Attention Brian Haines
Page: 5 of 5
JerseyArnie
General User
JA
Member Since: 12/6/2012
Post Count: 369
person
mail
JerseyArnie
mail
Posted: 8/21/2013 8:58 AM
http://www.athensohiotoday.com/blogs/bobcat_blog/ohio-foo...


— The punt segment surely drew some of Solich's ire. Ohio attempted four punts; the first two likely would have been blocked if the plays were run at game speed. Also during the segment, the Bobcats had two alignment penalties and returner Ian Dixon muffed a punt catch that would stand as the only 'turnover' of the day. Punter Grant Venham had three very good kicks in his four attempts.


This could get ugly, Louisville has great athletes, and a hostile environment.
OhioStunter
General User
Member Since: 2/18/2005
Location: Chicago
Post Count: 2,516
mail
OhioStunter
mail
Posted: 8/21/2013 10:31 AM
JerseyArnie wrote:expand_more
http://www.athensohiotoday.com/blogs/bobcat_blog/ohio-foo...


— The punt segment surely drew some of Solich's ire. Ohio attempted four punts; the first two likely would have been blocked if the plays were run at game speed. Also during the segment, the Bobcats had two alignment penalties and returner Ian Dixon muffed a punt catch that would stand as the only 'turnover' of the day. Punter Grant Venham had three very good kicks in his four attempts.


This could get ugly, Louisville has great athletes, and a hostile environment.


“We’re not a good football team right now, and we don’t have a lot of time to get ready to be a good football team.” -- Frank Solich after the last scrimmage before the opener.
Paul Graham
General User
Member Since: 1/18/2005
Location: The Plains, OH
Post Count: 1,424
mail
Paul Graham
mail
Posted: 8/21/2013 10:53 AM
JerseyArnie wrote:expand_more
http://www.athensohiotoday.com/blogs/bobcat_blog/ohio-foo...


— The punt segment surely drew some of Solich's ire. Ohio attempted four punts; the first two likely would have been blocked if the plays were run at game speed. Also during the segment, the Bobcats had two alignment penalties and returner Ian Dixon muffed a punt catch that would stand as the only 'turnover' of the day. Punter Grant Venham had three very good kicks in his four attempts.


This could get ugly, Louisville has great athletes, and a hostile environment.


Where have you gone Pete Germaaaano, Bobcat Nation turns its lonely eyes to you (woo woo woo)
A-townBound
General User
Member Since: 3/31/2012
Location: Georgetown, KY
Post Count: 672
mail
A-townBound
mail
Posted: 8/21/2013 10:56 AM
OhioStunter wrote:expand_more
http://www.athensohiotoday.com/blogs/bobcat_blog/ohio-foo...


— The punt segment surely drew some of Solich's ire. Ohio attempted four punts; the first two likely would have been blocked if the plays were run at game speed. Also during the segment, the Bobcats had two alignment penalties and returner Ian Dixon muffed a punt catch that would stand as the only 'turnover' of the day. Punter Grant Venham had three very good kicks in his four attempts.


This could get ugly, Louisville has great athletes, and a hostile environment.


“We’re not a good football team right now, and we don’t have a lot of time to get ready to be a good football team.” -- Frank Solich after the last scrimmage before the opener.


I remember him saying basically the same thing last year about this same time in camp...


Word via various twitter sources today seems to indicate that so far today has been a better day -

Via Jason Grooms - https://twitter.com/OhioBobcatOps/status/370197072823480320

          ~  “Last 2 a day for the Bobcats. Zeroing in on the Cards! Guys have had a great camp!”


Last Edited: 8/21/2013 12:17:59 PM by A-townBound
OhioStunter
General User
Member Since: 2/18/2005
Location: Chicago
Post Count: 2,516
mail
OhioStunter
mail
Posted: 10/13/2013 6:39 PM
Anyone else still feeling like our special teams coaching still needs improvement?
BillyTheCat
General User
BTC
Member Since: 10/6/2012
Post Count: 10,801
person
mail
BillyTheCat
mail
Posted: 10/13/2013 7:15 PM
We dropped a punt, how's that coaching?
bobcat695
General User
B695
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Parkersburg, WV
Post Count: 1,345
person
mail
bobcat695
mail
Posted: 10/13/2013 8:49 PM
That punt should have never been fielded. Who cares if it rolls to the 20? One first down and Tyler finishes the game in the Victory Formation. Absolutely, that is coaching.
BillyTheCat
General User
BTC
Member Since: 10/6/2012
Post Count: 10,801
person
mail
BillyTheCat
mail
Posted: 10/13/2013 9:31 PM
That punt rolls to the one foot line, we end up with a safety and they get the ball back, there would be a thread saying "catch the darn ball"!
bobcat695
General User
B695
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Parkersburg, WV
Post Count: 1,345
person
mail
bobcat695
mail
Posted: 10/13/2013 9:45 PM
Is that ball going to roll for 39 yards? It was a high kick and Carrie fumbled on the 39. At the worst OU would have the ball around the 20.

Travis is supposed to make the catch, but he didn't. If the coaches tell him to do the fake fair catch, then get out of the way, there is a 0% chance he muffs a punt he isn't anywhere close to. A fumble there is about the only way the Cats lose that game. The staff needed to eliminate the risk, yet didn't do it.
BillyTheCat
General User
BTC
Member Since: 10/6/2012
Post Count: 10,801
person
mail
BillyTheCat
mail
Posted: 10/13/2013 9:52 PM
My bad, I misread the play by play, the ball was kicked from the 21 and muffed at the 39. However he called for a fair catch and was under the ball. Water under the bridge.
yamaha45701
General User
Y45701
Member Since: 3/6/2005
Location: The plains, OH
Post Count: 173
person
mail
yamaha45701
mail
Posted: 10/14/2013 12:13 AM
That was a flood under that bridge.


 
Robert Fox
General User
RF
Member Since: 11/17/2004
Location: Knoxville, TN
Post Count: 2,039
person
mail
Robert Fox
mail
Posted: 10/14/2013 11:26 AM
What is the rule on giving the receiver room to catch the ball? is it one yard or two? Either way, it appeared the CMU guys (I think there were two) were within one yard of Carrie.
A-townBound
General User
Member Since: 3/31/2012
Location: Georgetown, KY
Post Count: 672
mail
A-townBound
mail
Posted: 10/14/2013 11:37 AM
Robert Fox wrote:expand_more
What is the rule on giving the receiver room to catch the ball? is it one yard or two? Either way, it appeared the CMU guys (I think there were two) were within one yard of Carrie.


I don't know if you want to watch it again or not, I also do not know if Carrie called for a Fair Catch, but you can watch it at the 30 second mark here -

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q_b8PNGCw8w
GoCats105
General User
GC105
Member Since: 1/31/2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Post Count: 7,821
person
mail
GoCats105
mail
Posted: 10/14/2013 12:14 PM

Robert Fox wrote:expand_more
What is the rule on giving the receiver room to catch the ball? is it one yard or two? Either way, it appeared the CMU guys (I think there were two) were within one yard of Carrie.


The two-yard "halo" rule is no longer in effect. Basically, all the kicking team has to do is not touch the guy and they are fine. They can get as close as they want, more or less.

BillyTheCat
General User
BTC
Member Since: 10/6/2012
Post Count: 10,801
person
mail
BillyTheCat
mail
Posted: 10/14/2013 12:15 PM
Watching that clip, even more reinforces my opinion that he simply has to make that catch, he was under the ball, just misplayed it.  It happens, move on.
Robert Fox
General User
RF
Member Since: 11/17/2004
Location: Knoxville, TN
Post Count: 2,039
person
mail
Robert Fox
mail
Posted: 10/14/2013 12:21 PM
GoCats105 wrote:expand_more

What is the rule on giving the receiver room to catch the ball? is it one yard or two? Either way, it appeared the CMU guys (I think there were two) were within one yard of Carrie.


The two-yard "halo" rule is no longer in effect. Basically, all the kicking team has to do is not touch the guy and they are fine. They can get as close as they want, more or less.



Thanks. I didn't know that. Given that rule change, I would think coaches would be less inclined to let the deep man fair catch in traffic. It's simply too dangerous when the opponent can stand in your grill under no penalty.
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 10/14/2013 9:08 PM
Still have to give room to catch it.  I'm quite sure that I've seen that penalty called this year without contact...I think.
GoCats105
General User
GC105
Member Since: 1/31/2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Post Count: 7,821
person
mail
GoCats105
mail
Posted: 10/15/2013 8:05 AM
Monroe Slavin wrote:expand_more
Still have to give room to catch it.  I'm quite sure that I've seen that penalty called this year without contact...I think.


It's probably a referee judgment call. The penalty is "kick catch interference" so technically, if someone got right in a guy's face without touching it could be called I guess.
OhioStunter
General User
Member Since: 2/18/2005
Location: Chicago
Post Count: 2,516
mail
OhioStunter
mail
Posted: 11/20/2013 12:34 AM
OhioStunter wrote:expand_more
http://www.athensohiotoday.com/blogs/bobcat_blog/ohio-foo...


— The punt segment surely drew some of Solich's ire. Ohio attempted four punts; the first two likely would have been blocked if the plays were run at game speed. Also during the segment, the Bobcats had two alignment penalties and returner Ian Dixon muffed a punt catch that would stand as the only 'turnover' of the day. Punter Grant Venham had three very good kicks in his four attempts.


This could get ugly, Louisville has great athletes, and a hostile environment.


“We’re not a good football team right now, and we don’t have a lot of time to get ready to be a good football team.” -- Frank Solich after the last scrimmage before the opener.


At least Frank knows it. Along with the rest of ESPN viewers.
Antonio Pierce
General User
AP
Member Since: 10/13/2012
Post Count: 243
person
mail
Antonio Pierce
mail
Posted: 1/28/2015 7:05 PM
A long snapper and kicker signing this year. I am glad Brian reads Bobcatattack!
Showing Messages: 101 - 120 of 120
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)