menu
Logo
99+
Bobcat Attack Menu
Logo
99+
Ohio Football Topic
Topic: OSU
Page: 2 of 2
BillyTheCat
General User
BTC
Member Since: 10/6/2012
Post Count: 10,793
person
mail
BillyTheCat
mail
Posted: 12/2/2024 12:13 PM
settings_applications edit_note
colobobcat66 wrote:expand_more
Same as TT's senior year here. Why do coaches run an offense where Read Option is featured but yet the QB doesn't run 5-6 times a game as in almost never. Defense doesn't even consider the keeper after a while.

I am still amazed that Nick Sabin pulls his starting QB in the national championship game for the back-up. With so many supposed studs going to O$U why wouldn't they have a capable running back up QB and just try smashing them for a series or two? Zero 2nd half first downs was not all because of great defense the QB play was terrible.
Maybe because their All-American LT was out for the season and their All-Big10 Center went down for the season. It all starts up front. What is our run game without our two best linemen?
As they say , injuries are part of the game. Folks are saying that Michigan played without their two best players. It goes both ways.
My comment was in regards to their lack of running game. I’m well aware that injuries are part of the game. Michigan was just flat out better up front on the defensive side of the ball, period.
colobobcat66
General User
C66
Member Since: 9/1/2006
Location: Watching the bobcats run outside my window., CO
Post Count: 4,744
person
mail
colobobcat66
mail
Posted: 12/2/2024 12:50 PM
settings_applications edit_note
BillyTheCat wrote:expand_more
Same as TT's senior year here. Why do coaches run an offense where Read Option is featured but yet the QB doesn't run 5-6 times a game as in almost never. Defense doesn't even consider the keeper after a while.

I am still amazed that Nick Sabin pulls his starting QB in the national championship game for the back-up. With so many supposed studs going to O$U why wouldn't they have a capable running back up QB and just try smashing them for a series or two? Zero 2nd half first downs was not all because of great defense the QB play was terrible.
Maybe because their All-American LT was out for the season and their All-Big10 Center went down for the season. It all starts up front. What is our run game without our two best linemen?
As they say , injuries are part of the game. Folks are saying that Michigan played without their two best players. It goes both ways.
My comment was in regards to their lack of running game. I’m well aware that injuries are part of the game. Michigan was just flat out better up front on the defensive side of the ball, period.

For a team that is full of 4 and 5 star guys, why don’t they have adequate backups? Lame excuse for losing and on he coaches to not have people to step in.
Victory
General User
V
Member Since: 3/11/2012
Post Count: 2,518
person
mail
Victory
mail
Posted: 12/2/2024 1:11 PM
settings_applications edit_note
JimLurker34 wrote:expand_more
What if PSU upsets Oregon? Does that help or hurt OSU's placement in the CFP?
Hurt. That would mean a close to 100% chance that Ohio State is behind both teams. Penn State would probably be the #1 or #2 seed and Oregon would probably be #5. If Oregon wins there is a very good chance that Ohio State would be ranked ahead of Penn State.
BillyTheCat
General User
BTC
Member Since: 10/6/2012
Post Count: 10,793
person
mail
BillyTheCat
mail
Posted: 12/2/2024 1:15 PM
settings_applications edit_note
colobobcat66 wrote:expand_more
Same as TT's senior year here. Why do coaches run an offense where Read Option is featured but yet the QB doesn't run 5-6 times a game as in almost never. Defense doesn't even consider the keeper after a while.

I am still amazed that Nick Sabin pulls his starting QB in the national championship game for the back-up. With so many supposed studs going to O$U why wouldn't they have a capable running back up QB and just try smashing them for a series or two? Zero 2nd half first downs was not all because of great defense the QB play was terrible.
Maybe because their All-American LT was out for the season and their All-Big10 Center went down for the season. It all starts up front. What is our run game without our two best linemen?
As they say , injuries are part of the game. Folks are saying that Michigan played without their two best players. It goes both ways.
My comment was in regards to their lack of running game. I’m well aware that injuries are part of the game. Michigan was just flat out better up front on the defensive side of the ball, period.

For a team that is full of 4 and 5 star guys, why don’t they have adequate backups? Lame excuse for losing and on he coaches to not have people to step in.
If it was that easy, everyone would be undefeated. It’s not like Michigan is a bunch of 3-stars or it’s not like they aren’t spending $20 million on their roster either. It’s a game, one that is played on the field, between the lines. Just like, why did Miami push us around so badly the first time? They were just better that day. It does happen.
colobobcat66
General User
C66
Member Since: 9/1/2006
Location: Watching the bobcats run outside my window., CO
Post Count: 4,744
person
mail
colobobcat66
mail
Posted: 12/2/2024 2:33 PM
settings_applications edit_note
BillyTheCat wrote:expand_more
Same as TT's senior year here. Why do coaches run an offense where Read Option is featured but yet the QB doesn't run 5-6 times a game as in almost never. Defense doesn't even consider the keeper after a while.

I am still amazed that Nick Sabin pulls his starting QB in the national championship game for the back-up. With so many supposed studs going to O$U why wouldn't they have a capable running back up QB and just try smashing them for a series or two? Zero 2nd half first downs was not all because of great defense the QB play was terrible.
Maybe because their All-American LT was out for the season and their All-Big10 Center went down for the season. It all starts up front. What is our run game without our two best linemen?
As they say , injuries are part of the game. Folks are saying that Michigan played without their two best players. It goes both ways.
My comment was in regards to their lack of running game. I’m well aware that injuries are part of the game. Michigan was just flat out better up front on the defensive side of the ball, period.

For a team that is full of 4 and 5 star guys, why don’t they have adequate backups? Lame excuse for losing and on he coaches to not have people to step in.
If it was that easy, everyone would be undefeated. It’s not like Michigan is a bunch of 3-stars or it’s not like they aren’t spending $20 million on their roster either. It’s a game, one that is played on the field, between the lines. Just like, why did Miami push us around so badly the first time? They were just better that day. It does happen.

Of course everybody wouldn’t be undefeated , everybody doesn’t have OSU money. Michigan may, but blaming the loss on injuries is as old as the earth. I’m just happy to see the nuts get it handed to them since it’s so important to them.
BillyTheCat
General User
BTC
Member Since: 10/6/2012
Post Count: 10,793
person
mail
BillyTheCat
mail
Posted: 12/2/2024 2:40 PM
settings_applications edit_note
colobobcat66 wrote:expand_more
Same as TT's senior year here. Why do coaches run an offense where Read Option is featured but yet the QB doesn't run 5-6 times a game as in almost never. Defense doesn't even consider the keeper after a while.

I am still amazed that Nick Sabin pulls his starting QB in the national championship game for the back-up. With so many supposed studs going to O$U why wouldn't they have a capable running back up QB and just try smashing them for a series or two? Zero 2nd half first downs was not all because of great defense the QB play was terrible.
Maybe because their All-American LT was out for the season and their All-Big10 Center went down for the season. It all starts up front. What is our run game without our two best linemen?
As they say , injuries are part of the game. Folks are saying that Michigan played without their two best players. It goes both ways.
My comment was in regards to their lack of running game. I’m well aware that injuries are part of the game. Michigan was just flat out better up front on the defensive side of the ball, period.

For a team that is full of 4 and 5 star guys, why don’t they have adequate backups? Lame excuse for losing and on he coaches to not have people to step in.
If it was that easy, everyone would be undefeated. It’s not like Michigan is a bunch of 3-stars or it’s not like they aren’t spending $20 million on their roster either. It’s a game, one that is played on the field, between the lines. Just like, why did Miami push us around so badly the first time? They were just better that day. It does happen.

Of course everybody wouldn’t be undefeated , everybody doesn’t have OSU money. Michigan may, but blaming the loss on injuries is as old as the earth. I’m just happy to see the nuts get it handed to them since it’s so important to them.
I never blamed a loss on injury. I simply answered a question about the running game. Geese! It’s not that hard to understand. If I’d blame the loss on anything, it’s called poor execution! Two InT’s, missed FG. It’s really a simple game.
greencat
General User
Member Since: 3/13/2005
Post Count: 2,835
mail
greencat
mail
Posted: 12/2/2024 3:11 PM
settings_applications edit_note
colobobcat66 wrote:expand_more
Same as TT's senior year here. Why do coaches run an offense where Read Option is featured but yet the QB doesn't run 5-6 times a game as in almost never. Defense doesn't even consider the keeper after a while.

I am still amazed that Nick Sabin pulls his starting QB in the national championship game for the back-up. With so many supposed studs going to O$U why wouldn't they have a capable running back up QB and just try smashing them for a series or two? Zero 2nd half first downs was not all because of great defense the QB play was terrible.
Maybe because their All-American LT was out for the season and their All-Big10 Center went down for the season. It all starts up front. What is our run game without our two best linemen?
As they say , injuries are part of the game. Folks are saying that Michigan played without their two best players. It goes both ways.
My comment was in regards to their lack of running game. I’m well aware that injuries are part of the game. Michigan was just flat out better up front on the defensive side of the ball, period.

For a team that is full of 4 and 5 star guys, why don’t they have adequate backups? Lame excuse for losing and on he coaches to not have people to step in.
If it was that easy, everyone would be undefeated. It’s not like Michigan is a bunch of 3-stars or it’s not like they aren’t spending $20 million on their roster either. It’s a game, one that is played on the field, between the lines. Just like, why did Miami push us around so badly the first time? They were just better that day. It does happen.

Of course everybody wouldn’t be undefeated , everybody doesn’t have OSU money. Michigan may, but blaming the loss on injuries is as old as the earth. I’m just happy to see the nuts get it handed to them since it’s so important to them.
As if Michigan is all that much different?

You don't think EMU fans cringe when they hear "Hail to the Victors" --??
Showing Messages: 26 - 32 of 32
reply
vertical_align_top
vertical_align_center
vertical_align_bottom
add_comment
chevron_backward
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)