What should we look at, then, if not the stat sheet?
The play on the field, the team's record?
Should we just assume that everything's perfect, as you seem to?
All he said was that his stats aren't the only indicator of the level of his play. If defenses give him all the attention, he might not accumulate numbers, but someone else will.
Maybe. But this person, who about 100% appears to be allied with or tied to Athletics but who refuses to answer re the nature of that relationship, NEVER posts anything but effusive praise for the program.
So, if the play on the field is poor and the record's lousy against mediocre competition then fill-in-the-blank-with-useless/irrelevant-stat or point to anything other than reality.
I get it. There's some potential here. We have to have hope.
But the post here was about last year's performance on the field.
Sheesh--if the guy was getting the attention of 2 or 3 O-linemen, then shouldn't that have freed up other guys to make lots of big plays--sacks, tackles for loss? But, of course, there was little notable of that.
Again, it's 2015. The most effective blitz is not a balanced blitz. It's a flood-one-side wave. Will OHIO ever realize that and employ it?
But, hey, that doesn't matter; the coaches and team are infallible.