OHIO makes everything seem so damn hard. There are rarely any easy plays other than the slants. BG on the other hand made some things look pretty simple.
I have tried to remain as constructive as possible over the last couple of years, and I have to say on your point above, I would be in violent agreement. However I have a nuanced difference of opinion with our resident pet goods entrepreneur. He wants us to run hurry up as the solution to our offensive woes, whereas I want us to be decisive, not necessarily fast.
Point of emphasis: look at both BG and the New England Patriots. BG just runs fast regardless of the scenario. The Patriots can run either fast or deliberate.
However, they both contrast from OHIO's O in that they are both decisive, allowing the QB to make play calls and not always relying on the call to come in from the tower. Additionally, they are making their play calls very quickly, regardless of how much clock they are using prior to the snap, and seem to know exactly what they want to do in advance of getting to the line.
We always seem to be waiting for the call to come from the booth to the signal crew to the QB, and it gets in the way of the flow of the O. And in that delay, we are allowing the D to react, which limits our effectiveness.
Now we may not have the skill set in our QB's to rapid fire play calls and/or they cannot make their own reads, but in TT's heyday, he seemed to have been empowered to audible without the replacement call coming from the tower.
Not sure why it is the way it is now, but it drives me effing crazy, and we need a solution to our delay in decisiveness.