More later...but tell me about the number of games in which our guys gave a pretty good effort---many...
Now, tell me about the number of games in which in the last year's our coaching was notably the difference in our favor...probably not so many.
So for once in your life answer a DIRECT question ... Frank lost tonight's game? The more you post the less you seem to comprehend about the game of football. In the end it's played ON THE FIELD. Sprague's 2 INT's were a BIG reason we lost. In case you didn't watch the game Frank did NOT throw those 2 passes.
First off, overall tonight's game was very entertaining. Lots of drama.
mid70s--At some point, a tiger's stripes are evident. Solich and staff--most especially on offense--will never rise above itself and is very unlikely to win a MACC. We are so conservative and predictable. No two back sets, little use of TE, no quick hit passes, nothing to dictate the way the game is played, no particular ability to respond to pressure (must score or sustain possessions). Would be nice to play a guy who seems markedly better than any RB we've had for a while. Etc, etc.
You seem to be an OHIO fan. If you haven't seen that over the 11 years of Solich, then you are not very observant.
Sorry, but the FACTS are my way. The lack of MACC. The bowl game come from behind losses. The season after season in which--oh, injuries, once again!--we have jaw-dropping losses to opponents at the bottom of the MAC. Etc, etc.
Yes, our buys play with fine effort for the most part.
Now point me to facts and readily evident themes/trends which show that this staff is savvy.
The facts/evidence/reality do not support that. They don't.
I'm eminently willing to be shown otherwise. But when you come here supporting a theory which doesn't fit the facts, you will not convince me.