Ohio Football Topic
Topic: Fact.
Page: 5 of 5
mail
The Situation
2/18/2016 12:00 AM
The Situation wrote:expand_more
I started this thread to point out a fact. Something that no one can dispute.
http://giphy.com/gifs/danisnotonfire-dan-howell-mVI86tiHu...

dis·pute (verb): argue about (something); discuss heatedly.

no one (pronoun): no person; not a single person.

Let's start with baby steps Monroe. This is a test:

All I have to do to make the second quoted sentence invalid is argue about the fact you point out. I already argued with you about this fact. I am a person.

Can you even admit that you are WRONG about this sentence specifically? Someone can dispute the fact you pointed out.
Last Edited: 2/18/2016 12:03:55 AM by The Situation
mail
The Situation
2/18/2016 12:29 AM
10/8/2014

Monroe Slavin wrote:expand_more
Good to know that you are perfect, correct in all you think and that no other viewpoint will be allowed. [/QUOTE]----------------------------------

[QUOTE=Monroe Slavin]Good to know that you are perfect, correct in all you think and that no other viewpoint will be allowed.
Isn't that exactly how the brick wall responds?

Rather than state specifically where you think my response failed to invalidate your theory, you simply muddle back some emotional retort.

I would love to read your comments on the Dave Clawson example I put together for you in my last post. Or the Brady Hoke example I tabulated for you at the end of the 1st page.

Specifically I'm interested in how you think Dave Clawson was able to overcome his 4-14 record, between a conveniently selected period of time between the 2011 and 2012 seasons, and win a MAC Championship in 2013. I'd also be interested to read what coaching strategies you think led Brady Hoke to a 7-2 record against winning teams in 2011. Certainly I'd like to read your thoughts on why Brady Hoke only managed 2 and 1 wins against winning teams respectively the following two seasons.

The brick wall does not return the player's shot where the player stands. The brick wall only returns shots at the angle of reflection. In other words, my spat with you allows me to see where the most extreme angle of response to my objective conclusion will place the ball. Then I simply chase the ball down.

I'm wrong with great frequency. That's my secret. Through a trial and error process across the spectrum of my arguments I'm able to strengthen my conclusions. Iteration is my friend. And from time to time I'll square off with a brick wall like you Monroe to stay sharp, work on the fundamentals.

Overwhelmingly I value the contributions alums, students, and fans alike make to this message board. The posters I respect the most are the posters who demonstrate they are able to return the shot where the opponent stands (when conflict arises), because to me that signifies they are not a brick wall like you Monroe.
mail
person
cc-cat
2/18/2016 10:48 AM
allen wrote:expand_more
We got smoked by 3 MAC teams and we are in the MAC. We should not get smoked three games per year for the last three years. Accepting that is beyond being mediocre.
The post was simply to point out that unlike other teams in the MAC, we tend to have games decided by a wide margin. Case in point, 2013 when 7 of our 8 MAC games were decided by 17 or more (4 wins, 3 losses). Still waiting for insight as to why that would be…rather than the obvious yik-yak response that the losses mean Frank must go.

As I said in my original post “conclude what you wish.” My purpose was to simply provide information for thought, not try to convince someone from the SFB (a handful of 4-6 people) to migrate to the Yik-Yak side (Monroe/Allen and a few others) – or vis-versa. The rest of us RIBS (Rational and Intelligent Bobcat Supports) will continue to converse and exchange thoughts and information, while the extremes can remain obsessed with trying to convince others how “blind” they are about something non of us control – the fate of Ohio football and Frank Solich.


CC-Cat
Cory Hughes
Proud Member of RIBS since 1983 (I wasn’t real rational…or intelligent as a student)
Last Edited: 2/18/2016 10:50:02 AM by cc-cat
mail
person
allen
2/18/2016 12:04 PM
cc-cat wrote:expand_more
We got smoked by 3 MAC teams and we are in the MAC. We should not get smoked three games per year for the last three years. Accepting that is beyond being mediocre.
The post was simply to point out that unlike other teams in the MAC, we tend to have games decided by a wide margin. Case in point, 2013 when 7 of our 8 MAC games were decided by 17 or more (4 wins, 3 losses). Still waiting for insight as to why that would be…rather than the obvious yik-yak response that the losses mean Frank must go.

As I said in my original post “conclude what you wish.” My purpose was to simply provide information for thought, not try to convince someone from the SFB (a handful of 4-6 people) to migrate to the Yik-Yak side (Monroe/Allen and a few others) – or vis-versa. The rest of us RIBS (Rational and Intelligent Bobcat Supports) will continue to converse and exchange thoughts and information, while the extremes can remain obsessed with trying to convince others how “blind” they are about something non of us control – the fate of Ohio football and Frank Solich.


CC-Cat
Cory Hughes
Proud Member of RIBS since 1983 (I wasn’t real rational…or intelligent as a student)

Solich needs to adjust or go, we can't get smoked by 3 MAC teams per year. I like Solich, I am glad he came to Ohio. It is time to go to the next level. We always end up in a debate, but I think most of us have respected positions.
mail
bshot44
2/18/2016 1:01 PM
L.C. wrote:expand_more
Experience could be relative age of the players, or it could also be experience with the system in place.

Maybe right - not sure. Need to look at prior playing time of the two deep (not just years on campus). I seem to recall LC outlining how we had a number of "newbies" last year - but my recall may be off....

bshot is just using a different measure than I am. He's looking at the total uppperclassmen on the roster, while I was primarily looking at the starters.
I dug a little further into the experience level of Ohio the last four seasons.

What I found was (to me, at least) is that we shouldn't have been in "rebuild" mode any of the last four years. We returned over 50% of our starters every year during that stretch and in 2015 we returned 20 starters and over 50 letterman....still there were inexplicable blowout losses in the MAC.

LET ME CLARIFY: THIS IS NOT A "FIRE FRANK SOLICH POST"

But even the most loyal Ohio supporter has to be left scratching their head trying to figure out why we can win 8 MAC games by 17+ and also lose 9 MAC games by 17+ the last four years? It's just something good programs don't do. Somewhere along the line the wheels have begun to wobble on Ohio as a program. I hope 2016 is the year they can steady things and return to being a consistent title contender like they were from 2009-2011. Or maybe that was just the best it will get. And that's fine. If those were the glory years of Ohio football and they've passed, I can live with that and just begin to enjoy 7-5, 8-4 bowl seasons for what they are and expect nothing more. Fine by me....I still get to drink beers in TailGreat Park and enjoy some fall weekends in Athens.

2012
15 starters returning
10 starters lost

48 letterman returning
19 letterman lost

2013
16 starters returning
10 starters lost

49 letterman returning
22 letterman lost

2014
15 starters returning
12 starters lost

45 letterman returning
20 letterman lost

2015
20 starters returning
6 starters lost

54 letterman returning
17 letterman lost

Final Tidbits:

Frank's Record vs. MAC
53-38 (47-37 if you take out Temple, UMass)

vs. current East: 34-21 (40-22 with Temple, UMass)
vs. current West: 13-16

Akron, Kent, EMU, Miami, UMass, UB
37-14 (35-14 if take out UMass)

BG, NIU, UT, WMU, CMU, Ball, Temple
16-24 (12-23 if you take out Temple)

During that 2009-2011 run
vs. MAC 19-7 (two MACC losses)
vs. East 15-3 (three wins vs. Temple)
vs. West 4-4 (two MACC losses)

Minus that 2009-2011 run
vs. MAC 34-31 (31-30 minus Temple, UMass)
vs. East 25-19 (22-18 minus Temple, UMass)
vs. West 9-12

We are a helluva lot better program now than we were pre-2005.....but I'm starting to think that 2009-11 was a flash-in-the-pan of sorts? It was a great run....but more of a blip than the norm. The norm appears to be we are an average to above-average MAC program. I'll take it over what we were before 2005 when we were a cellar-dweller. Might just need to temper my personal expectations of playing for league championships and accept what we've been the last few years as the norm.

As I said, I really hope 2016 blows all this up and begins another run to the top of the league (and one that has more staying power up there)

P.S. Only 197 days until I can have another beer at TailGreat Park in prep for Texas State
Last Edited: 2/18/2016 3:23:12 PM by bshot44
mail
person
Robert Fox
2/18/2016 1:51 PM
bshot44 wrote:expand_more
Or maybe that was just the best it will get. And that's fine. If those were the glory years of Ohio football and they've passed, I can live with that and just begin to enjoy 7-5, 8-4 bowl seasons for what they are and expect nothing more. Fine by me.
Hindsight being 20/20, you'll never know if that time has truly passed, or if we're on the cusp of getting very competitive or going into the tank.
mail
person
Casper71
2/18/2016 3:18 PM
Interesting factoids...I guess one can say thank god we are in the East. The West (and BG) pretty much own us! And, we are a nice middle of the pack to lower/upper level of the MAC team (some years). I'm with you, the way things are now 7-5 or 8-4 with an early December Bowl are what we are. It could be worse (Miami or EMU).

I hope some year real soon they prove me wrong...but after 11 fun filled years I am still waiting!
mail
person
Robert Fox
2/18/2016 3:33 PM
Casper71 wrote:expand_more
I'm with you, the way things are now 7-5 or 8-4 with an early December Bowl are what we are. It could be worse (Miami or EMU).
And with that realization, you can now enjoy the season! The clouds are parting! Their is no sorrow, only joy!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lX5tfRdkoY0
mail
The Situation
2/18/2016 4:29 PM
I'm just going to take this moment to apologize to any and all posters (except Monroe Slavin) for being overly-critical of their numbers and their opinions. It was never my intent to suppress opinions or make anyone feel like I think my opinions are somehow better than another (unless explictly stated). FWIW my genuine intent through these repeating threads has been to critique approach.

At the end of the day we come here for enjoyment and it hasn't been that enjoyable lately. I'm partly to blame.

Roll d.mn Bobcats!
Last Edited: 2/18/2016 4:36:34 PM by The Situation
mail
The Situation
2/18/2016 5:04 PM
In other words, this is my pledge to police myself from contributing to or aggrivating the great dead horse debate.
mail
person
mid70sbobcat
2/18/2016 5:11 PM
allen wrote:expand_more
Solich needs to adjust or go, we can't get smoked by 3 MAC teams per year. I like Solich, I am glad he came to Ohio. It is time to go to the next level. We always end up in a debate, but I think most of us have respected positions.
And what makes you think we can, or will, go to the next level? We're in the MAC and we'll have ups and downs from now until the end of time. I'll bet money we do not go to some 'next level', whether it be under Frank or any other coach. More likely is that we'll continue to have a decent team after Frank is gone due to him building the program up to what it is today.
mail
person
Monroe Slavin
2/18/2016 8:45 PM
The Situation wrote:expand_more
I'm just going to take this moment to apologize to any and all posters (except Monroe Slavin) for being overly-critical of their numbers and their opinions. It was never my intent to suppress opinions or make anyone feel like I think my opinions are somehow better than another (unless explictly stated). FWIW my genuine intent through these repeating threads has been to critique approach.

At the end of the day we come here for enjoyment and it hasn't been that enjoyable lately. I'm partly to blame.

Roll d.mn Bobcats!


Situation--I want you to write my autobiography, please.

That would be very interesting. You can write whatever you want! Your version and wording certainly would be more interesting than the pure truth!

The only thing we have to negotiate is how much you'll pay me to write it.



#heywherearetheemoticons?!
mail
person
cc-cat
2/18/2016 9:52 PM
bshot44 wrote:expand_more
But even the most loyal Ohio supporter has to be left scratching their head trying to figure out why we can win 8 MAC games by 17+ and also lose 9 MAC games by 17+ the last four years? It's just something good programs don't do.
Good info, thanks for doing the digging. It (losing 9 MAC games by 17+) is not something good programs do. Nor is it (winning 8 MAC games by 17+) something bad programs do. I'm with you - its a head scratcher. Love to hear from ExCat and others that played the game how teams can be so Jekyll and Hyde.
mail
person
allen
2/19/2016 7:02 AM
cc-cat wrote:expand_more
But even the most loyal Ohio supporter has to be left scratching their head trying to figure out why we can win 8 MAC games by 17+ and also lose 9 MAC games by 17+ the last four years? It's just something good programs don't do.
Good info, thanks for doing the digging. It (losing 9 MAC games by 17+) is not something good programs do. Nor is it (winning 8 MAC games by 17+) something bad programs do. I'm with you - its a head scratcher. Love to hear from ExCat and others that played the game how teams can be so Jekyll and Hyde.
+1
mail
The Situation
2/19/2016 7:30 AM
Monroe Slavin wrote:expand_more
Situation--I want you to write my autobiography, please.

That would be very interesting. You can write whatever you want! Your version and wording certainly would be more interesting than the pure truth!
Every question I ask you is answered with (at best) a question of your own.

I'm sorry I can't read minds. I'd just be guessing at places where you grew up, the dynamics of your childhood, how travel dog bags you've sold...
Showing Messages: 101 - 115 of 115
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)