Experience could be relative age of the players, or it could also be experience with the system in place.
Maybe right - not sure. Need to look at prior playing time of the two deep (not just years on campus). I seem to recall LC outlining how we had a number of "newbies" last year - but my recall may be off....
bshot is just using a different measure than I am. He's looking at the total uppperclassmen on the roster, while I was primarily looking at the starters.
I dug a little further into the experience level of Ohio the last four seasons.
What I found was (to me, at least) is that we shouldn't have been in "rebuild" mode any of the last four years. We returned over 50% of our starters every year during that stretch and in 2015 we returned 20 starters and over 50 letterman....still there were inexplicable blowout losses in the MAC.
LET ME CLARIFY: THIS IS NOT A "FIRE FRANK SOLICH POST"
But even the most loyal Ohio supporter has to be left scratching their head trying to figure out why we can win 8 MAC games by 17+ and also lose 9 MAC games by 17+ the last four years? It's just something good programs don't do. Somewhere along the line the wheels have begun to wobble on Ohio as a program. I hope 2016 is the year they can steady things and return to being a consistent title contender like they were from 2009-2011. Or maybe that was just the best it will get. And that's fine. If those were the glory years of Ohio football and they've passed, I can live with that and just begin to enjoy 7-5, 8-4 bowl seasons for what they are and expect nothing more. Fine by me....I still get to drink beers in TailGreat Park and enjoy some fall weekends in Athens.
2012
15 starters returning
10 starters lost
48 letterman returning
19 letterman lost
2013
16 starters returning
10 starters lost
49 letterman returning
22 letterman lost
2014
15 starters returning
12 starters lost
45 letterman returning
20 letterman lost
2015
20 starters returning
6 starters lost
54 letterman returning
17 letterman lost
Final Tidbits:
Frank's Record vs. MAC
53-38 (47-37 if you take out Temple, UMass)
vs. current East: 34-21 (40-22 with Temple, UMass)
vs. current West: 13-16
Akron, Kent, EMU, Miami, UMass, UB
37-14 (35-14 if take out UMass)
BG, NIU, UT, WMU, CMU, Ball, Temple
16-24 (12-23 if you take out Temple)
During that 2009-2011 run
vs. MAC 19-7 (two MACC losses)
vs. East 15-3 (three wins vs. Temple)
vs. West 4-4 (two MACC losses)
Minus that 2009-2011 run
vs. MAC 34-31 (31-30 minus Temple, UMass)
vs. East 25-19 (22-18 minus Temple, UMass)
vs. West 9-12
We are a helluva lot better program now than we were pre-2005.....but I'm starting to think that 2009-11 was a flash-in-the-pan of sorts? It was a great run....but more of a blip than the norm. The norm appears to be we are an average to above-average MAC program. I'll take it over what we were before 2005 when we were a cellar-dweller. Might just need to temper my personal expectations of playing for league championships and accept what we've been the last few years as the norm.
As I said, I really hope 2016 blows all this up and begins another run to the top of the league (and one that has more staying power up there)
P.S. Only 197 days until I can have another beer at TailGreat Park in prep for Texas State
Last Edited: 2/18/2016 3:23:12 PM by bshot44