Ohio Football Topic
Topic: Official Game 5 Thread: Miami (OH)
Page: 5 of 5
catfan28
General User
C28
Member Since: 6/11/2011
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 1,503
person
mail
catfan28
mail
Posted: 10/1/2016 10:47 PM
shabamon wrote:expand_more
Nice to go to an away game and see a win, but holy God is the gameday production in Yager Stadium annoying. The finish of EVERY play is met with canned pop or dubstep music. They must have played 60 different songs and their band may have played 10 times from the stands.
Not sure if you were there at the start...but worse than that was the music still playing underneath a moment of silence AND the national anthem (yes, the national anthem!). Our Ohio section was going crazy...so disrespectful and bush league.
shabamon
General User
Member Since: 11/17/2006
Location: Cincinnati
Post Count: 7,312
mail
shabamon
mail
Posted: 10/1/2016 10:56 PM
YES! I did notice that.
OhioCatFan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 15,683
mail
OhioCatFan
mail
Posted: 10/1/2016 11:30 PM
At little perspective from my observations in Oxford, Ohio, today. I'm actually writing this from my brother-in-law's house in this most forsaken of all Ohio cities. Miami's football team was really psyched up for this game today. It was clear to me that they really want to both end their losing streak this year and OHIO's streak against them. Miami played with a great deal of intensity on both sides of the ball throughout the game. They really left everything on the field. Mark my words, Miami will make some noise in the MAC this year, and could very well play the role of spoiler down the road. OHIO was certainly a little hobbled due to injuries, especially at the RB position, but Irons and Hardy really played well in spots but not with the consistency that they will have when they have more experience. Windham's passing is also inconsistent; he can look like all world on one play and then be incredibly out of sync on the next. It seems to me that he's usually best on downfield passes and tends to overthrow slants and screens. I think he'll get better as the season progresses. I'm still confident that this team will be in contention for the MAC East and could surprise folks in the MACC. I also noted today that a number of true freshman had contributed and made exceptional plays. This team is only going to get better.
colobobcat66
General User
C66
Member Since: 9/1/2006
Location: Watching the bobcats run outside my window., CO
Post Count: 4,744
person
mail
colobobcat66
mail
Posted: 10/2/2016 9:21 AM
OhioCatFan wrote:expand_more
At little perspective from my observations in Oxford, Ohio, today. I'm actually writing this from my brother-in-law's house in this most forsaken of all Ohio cities. Miami's football team was really psyched up for this game today. It was clear to me that they really want to both end their losing streak this year and OHIO's streak against them. Miami played with a great deal of intensity on both sides of the ball throughout the game. They really left everything on the field. Mark my words, Miami will make some noise in the MAC this year, and could very well play the role of spoiler down the road. OHIO was certainly a little hobbled due to injuries, especially at the RB position, but Irons and Hardy really played well in spots but not with the consistency that they will have when they have more experience. Windham's passing is also inconsistent; he can look like all world on one play and then be incredibly out of sync on the next. It seems to me that he's usually best on downfield passes and tends to overthrow slants and screens. I think he'll get better as the season progresses. I'm still confident that this team will be in contention for the MAC East and could surprise folks in the MACC. I also noted today that a number of true freshman had contributed and made exceptional plays. This team is only going to get better.
Miami looks better, but I'm doubting that they can get up for many future games like they did in this one. They might surprise someone, but with their QB woes, they're not likely to win many games. They are a very young team, they're be much better in the future years though.
Bcat2
General User
B2
Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 4,295
person
mail
Bcat2
mail
Posted: 10/2/2016 9:32 AM
colobobcat66 wrote:expand_more
At little perspective from my observations in Oxford, Ohio, today. I'm actually writing this from my brother-in-law's house in this most forsaken of all Ohio cities. Miami's football team was really psyched up for this game today. It was clear to me that they really want to both end their losing streak this year and OHIO's streak against them. Miami played with a great deal of intensity on both sides of the ball throughout the game. They really left everything on the field. Mark my words, Miami will make some noise in the MAC this year, and could very well play the role of spoiler down the road. OHIO was certainly a little hobbled due to injuries, especially at the RB position, but Irons and Hardy really played well in spots but not with the consistency that they will have when they have more experience. Windham's passing is also inconsistent; he can look like all world on one play and then be incredibly out of sync on the next. It seems to me that he's usually best on downfield passes and tends to overthrow slants and screens. I think he'll get better as the season progresses. I'm still confident that this team will be in contention for the MAC East and could surprise folks in the MACC. I also noted today that a number of true freshman had contributed and made exceptional plays. This team is only going to get better.
Miami looks better, but I'm doubting that they can get up for many future games like they did in this one. They might surprise someone, but with their QB woes, they're not likely to win many games. They are a very young team, they're be much better in the future years though.
My hope is they will get hot over these losses and fire this staff and start over again.
Bcat2
General User
B2
Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 4,295
person
mail
Bcat2
mail
Posted: 10/2/2016 9:40 AM
I could not watch the game. My perception was they wanted to take away Sebastian Smith on offense and handle/avoid Poling on defense. Any merit to that perception?
AlumDadDad
General User
Member Since: 10/18/2015
Post Count: 621
mail
AlumDadDad
mail
Posted: 10/2/2016 10:40 AM
Bcat2 wrote:expand_more
I could not watch the game. My perception was they wanted to take away Sebastian Smith on offense and handle/avoid Poling on defense. Any merit to that perception?
I would say that they were successful in limiting Smith (1 catch for 12 yards). Harding, probably their best player, did a good job on him in man coverage. Windham didn't have his best day, so that contributed. I don't think anyone can be completely successful in avoiding Poling.
Pataskala
General User
P
Member Since: 7/8/2010
Location: At least six feet away from anybody else
Post Count: 9,465
person
mail
Pataskala
mail
Posted: 10/2/2016 10:48 AM
I caught the end of the EMU-BG game and the announcers were talking about where EMU was a year ago. Losing lots of close games and their coach harping on how they needed to find a way to win. Fiami's in the same boat. Give them a year and they might be where EMU is today.
Athens
General User
A
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Post Count: 5,454
person
mail
Athens
mail
Posted: 10/2/2016 10:57 AM
Pataskala wrote:expand_more
I caught the end of the EMU-BG game and the announcers were talking about where EMU was a year ago. Losing lots of close games and their coach harping on how they needed to find a way to win. Fiami's in the same boat. Give them a year and they might be where EMU is today.
EMU has taken a cue from Ohio's non-conference scheduling with easy games. Miami is playing at Marshall, hosting Cincinnati and at Notre Dame in 2017. An extra loss or two a year makes a difference when it keeps a program from finishing .500 and making bowl games.
Ted Thompson
Administrator
Member Since: 11/11/2004
Location: MAC Play
Post Count: 7,946
mail
Ted Thompson
mail
Posted: 10/3/2016 9:56 AM

 

Showing Messages: 101 - 110 of 110
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)